nach oben

International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering

Erschienen in:

01.03.2016 | Technical Note

Experimental Investigation of Interface Behaviour of Different Types of Granular Soil/Geosynthetics

verfasst von: Awdhesh Kumar Choudhary, A. Murali Krishna

Erschienen in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this paper, influence of different types of soils and geosynthetics on soil/geosynthetics interface behaviouris investigated by direct shear and pullout tests. Three different types of cohesionless soils and three different types of geosynthetics materials are adopted for experimental investigation. A series of large direct shear tests and pullout tests were conducted to investigate the interface behaviour of soil/geosynthetics. The test equipment, soils, and geosynthetics properties are described. The influence of soil particle size (D ₅₀) and geosynthetic structure are discussed by analysing tests results. Results are presented and discussed in terms of peak shear resistance, peak pullout resistance, interface friction angle, efficiency factors and interaction coefficient for different soils and geosynthetics. It could be seen that the interface friction angle from both direct shear and pullout tests linearly increases with increase in (D ₅₀) of soil. The pullout interaction coefficients (C_i) are found to be in the range of 0.62–1.72 for different tests conditions.

Vorheriger Artikel A Laboratory Study on the Geotechnical Characteristics of Sand–Bentonite Mixtures and the Role of Particle Size of Sand

Nächster Artikel Control of the Local Scouring Around the Cylindrical Bridge Pier Using Armed Soil by Geotextile

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Shukla SK (2002) Geosynthetics and their applications. Thomas Telford Publishing, London

Shukla SK, Yin JH (2006) Fundamentals of geosynthetic Engineering. Taylor and Francis, London

Shukla SK (2012) Handbook of geosynthetic Engineering, 2nd edn. ICE Publishing, London

Liu CN, Gilbert RB (2003) Simplified method for estimating geosynthetic loads in landfill liner side slopes during filling. Geosynth Int 10(1):24–33CrossRef

Palmeira EM, Viana HNL (2003) Effectiveness of geogrids as inclusions in cover soils of slopes of waste disposal areas. Geotext Geomembr 21(5):317–337CrossRef

Elias V, Christopher BR (1996) Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes—design and construction guidelines. FHWA Demonstration Project 82. Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA, USA

ASTM D5321 (2002) Standard test method for determining the coefficient of soil and geosynthetic or geosynthetic and geosynthetic friction by the Direct Shear Method. ASTM Designation: D5321-02, ASTM, USA

Lopes PC, Lopes MJ, Lopes ML (2001) Shear behaviour of geosynthetics in the inclined plane test influence of soil particle size and geosynthetic structure. Geosynth Int 8:327–342CrossRef

Wu W, Wick H, Ferstl F, Aschauer F (2008) A tilt table device for testing geosynthetic interfaces in centrifuge. Geotext Geomembr 26(1):31–38CrossRef

10.

Richards EA, Scott JD (1985) Soil geotextile frictional properties. Second Canadian symposium on geotextiles and geomembranes, Edmonton, 13–24

11.

Lee KM, Manjunath VR (2000) Soil-geotextile interface friction by direct shear tests. Can Geotech J 37:238–252CrossRef

12.

Mahmood A, Zakaria N, Ahmad F (2000) Studies on geotextile/soil interface shear behaviour. Electron J Geotech Eng, 5

13.

Bergado DT, Ramana GV, Sia HI, Varun HI (2006) Evaluation of interface shear strength of composite liner system and stability analysis for a landfill lining system in Thailand. Geotext Geomembr 24:371–393CrossRef

14.

ASTM D6706 (2001) Standard test method for measuring geosynthetic pullout resistance in soil. ASTM Designation: D6706-01, ASTM, USA

15.

Giroud JP (1986) From geotextiles to geosynthetics: a revolution in geotechnical engineering. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on geotextiles, Vienna, Austria, Vol 1: 1–18

16.

Bergado DT, Sampaco, CL, Shivashankar R, Alfaro MC, Anderson LR, Balasubramaniam AS (1991) Performance of a welded wire wall with poor quality backfills on soft clay. ASCE Geotechnical, 908–922. Special Publication No. 27

17.

Touahamia M, Sivakumar V, McKelvey D (2002) Shear strength of reinforced-recycled material. Constr Build Mater 16:331–339CrossRef

18.

Jewell RA, Milligan GWE, Sarsby RW, Dubois D (1984) Interaction between soil and geogrids, polymer grid reinforcement, Thomas Telford Ltd., In: Proceedings of a conference held in London, United Kingdom, March 1984, pp 18–30

19.

Goodhue MJ, Edil TB, Benson CH (2001) Interaction of foundry sands with geosynthetics. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 124(4):353–362CrossRef

20.

Sugimoto M, Alagiyawanna AMN (2003) Pullout behaviour of geogrid by test and numerical analysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 129(4):361–371CrossRef

21.

Desai FCS, El-Hoseiny KE (2005) Prediction of field behaviour of reinforced soil wall using advanced constitutive model. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 131(6):729–739CrossRef

22.

Moraci N, Gioffre D (2006) A simple method to evaluate the pullout resistance of extruded geogrids embedded in a compacted granular soil. Geotext Geomembr 24(3):198–199CrossRef

23.

Palmeira EM, Milligan GWE (1989) Scale and other factors affecting the results of pull-out tests of grid buried in sand. Géotechnique 11(3):511–524CrossRef

24.

Moraci N, Recalcati PG (2006) Factors affecting the pullout behaviour of extruded geogrids embedded in compacted granular soil. Geotext Geomembr 24(22):220–242CrossRef

25.

Palmeira EM (2009) Soil-geosynthetic interaction: modelling and analysis. Geotext Geomembr 27(5):368–390CrossRef

26.

Toufigh V, Saeid F, Toufigh V, Ouria A, Desai CS, Saadatmanesh H (2013) Laboratory study of soil-CFRP interaction using pull-out test. Geomech Geoeng 9(3):208–214CrossRef

27.

Cazzuffi D, Moraci N, Calvarano LS, Cardile G, Gioffre D, Recalcati P (2014) European experience in pullout tests: Part 2-The influence of vertical effective stress and of geogrid length on interface behaviour under pullout conditions. Geosynthetics 32(2):40–50

28.

Moraci N, Cardile G, Gioffre D, Mandaglio MC, Calvarano LS, Carbone L (2014) Soil geosynthetic interaction: design parameters from experimental and theoretical analysis. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol 1(2):165–227CrossRef

29.

Hsieh CW, Chen GH, Jeng-Han W (2011) The shear behaviour obtained from the direct shear and pullout tests for different poor graded Soil-geosynthetic systems. J Geoeng 6:15–26

30.

ASTM D3080 (2011) Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

31.

Lopes ML, Silvano R (2010) Soil/geotextile interface behaviour in direct shear and pullout movements. GeotechGeol Eng 28:791–804CrossRef

32.

Prashanth V, Krishna AM (2016) Pullout tests using modified Direct Shear Test Setup for measuring soil-geosynthetic interaction parameters, International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering. (submitted)

33.

ASTM D6913-04(2009) Standard Test Methods for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis.American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA

34.

ASTM D4253 (2006) Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2006, Vol. 04. 08

35.

ASTM D4254 (2006) Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2006, Vol. 04. 08

36.

ASTM standard D0854 (2006) Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM international, West Conshohocken, PA, 2006, vol. 04.09

37.

ASTM D 2487 (2006) Standard practices for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2006, Vol. 04. 08

38.

ASTM D4595 (2009) standard test method for tensile properties of geotextiles by the wide-width strip method. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA

39.

ASTM D5261 (1996) Standard test method for measuring mass per unit area of geotextiles. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA

Titel: Experimental Investigation of Interface Behaviour of Different Types of Granular Soil/Geosynthetics
verfasst von: Awdhesh Kumar Choudhary
A. Murali Krishna
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2016
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 2199-9260
Elektronische ISSN: 2199-9279
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-016-0044-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Correlation Between Shear Wave Velocity (Vs) and SPT Resistance (N) for Roorkee Region

Control of the Local Scouring Around the Cylindrical Bridge Pier Using Armed Soil by Geotextile

Contribution to the Long-Term Shear Strength of a Needle Punched GCL

Seismic Response of Geocell Retaining Walls Through Shaking Table Tests

Assessing the Influence of Soil-Reinforcement Interaction Parameters on the Performance of a Low Fill on Compressible Subgrade. Part II: Influence of Surface Maintenance

A Laboratory Study on the Geotechnical Characteristics of Sand–Bentonite Mixtures and the Role of Particle Size of Sand