nach oben

International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering

Erschienen in:

01.09.2020 | State of the Art/Practice Paper

Coupled Flow Modelling in Geotechnical and Ground Engineering: An Overview

verfasst von: Ahmed Ibrahim, Mohamed A. Meguid

Erschienen in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Particulate flows of combined granular media and fluids are relevant to several natural phenomena as well as industrial applications. In geotechnical engineering, the existing modelling approaches mainly adopt a macroscopic-based continuum analysis which does not provide access to important information on the fluid flow interaction with granular media at the particle scale. Alternatively, particulate modelling can be a powerful tool in understanding the complex micro-mechanics of different phenomena such as landslide, debris flow and internal erosion. However, it is challenging to employ the existing particulate flow models on a scale that practically serves the design and risk assessment for earth structures. With rapid advances in computational power, particulate flow modelling can provide valuable insights on both the micro as well as the macro-scale levels. This paper reviews the different approaches of particulate flow modelling from a multidisciplinary perspective with emphasis on geotechnical applications. In addition, this study presents a summary of the available techniques for reducing the computational cost and highlights the outstanding challenges of particulate flow modelling in geotechnical engineering. This work should provide guidance to geotechnical engineers and researches to determine the appropriate modelling tool to approach particulate flow modelling and identify the major challenges associated with each approach.

Vorheriger Artikel Studies on the Properties of Fly Ash–Rice Husk Ash-Based Geopolymer for Use in Black Cotton Soils

Nächster Artikel Evaluation of the Durability of PE-HD Geosynthetic Barriers Using High-Pressure Autoclave Tests

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Wachs A (2019) Particle-scale computational approaches to model dry and saturated granular flows of non-Brownian, non-cohesive, and non-spherical rigid bodies. Acta Mech 230(6):1919–1980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-019-02389-9MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Zhao T (2017) Coupled DEM-CFD analyses of landslide-induced debris flows, 1st edn. Science Press, BeijingCrossRef

van der Hoef MA, Ye M, van Sint Annaland M, Andrews AT, Sundaresan S, Kuipers JAM (2006) Multiscale modeling of gas-fluidized beds. In: Computational fluid dynamics. advances in chemical engineering, pp 65–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2377(06)31002-2

Sakai M, Koshizuka S (2009) Large-scale discrete element modeling in pneumatic conveying. Chem Eng Sci 64(3):533–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2008.10.003CrossRef

Zhu HP, Zhou ZY, Yang RY, Yu AB (2007) Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: theoretical developments. Chem Eng Sci 62(13):3378–3396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.12.089CrossRef

Zhu HP, Zhou ZY, Yang RY, Yu AB (2008) Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: a review of major applications and findings. Chem Eng Sci 63(23):5728–5770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2008.08.006CrossRef

Yang J, Yin Z-Y, Laouafa F, Hicher P-Y (2020) Hydromechanical modeling of granular soils considering internal erosion. Can Geotech J 57(2):157–172. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0653CrossRef

Schaufler A, Becker C, Steeb H (2013) Infiltration processes in cohesionless soils. Zamm-Z Angew Math Me 93(2–3):138–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.201200047MathSciNetCrossRef

Vardoulakis I, Stavropoulou M, Papanastasiou P (1996) Hydro-mechanical aspects of the sand production problem. Transp Porous Med 22(2):225–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf01143517CrossRef

10.

Shamy UE, Zeghal M (2005) Coupled continuum-discrete model for saturated granular soils. J Eng Mech 131(4):413–426. https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCE0733-93992005131:4413CrossRef

11.

Zeghal M, El Shamy U (2004) A continuum-discrete hydromechanical analysis of granular deposit liquefaction. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 28(14):1361–1383. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.390CrossRefMATH

12.

Shi Z-M, Zheng H-C, Yu S-B, Peng M, Jiang T (2018) Application of CFD-DEM to investigate seepage characteristics of landslide dam materials. Comput Geotech 101:23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.04.020CrossRef

13.

Guo Y, Yu X (2017) Comparison of the implementation of three common types of coupled CFD-DEM model for simulating soil surface erosion. Int J Multiph Flow 91:89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.01.006MathSciNetCrossRef

14.

Harada E, Ikari H, Shimizu Y, Khayyer A, Gotoh H (2018) Numerical investigation of the morphological dynamics of a step-and-pool riverbed using DEM-MPS. J Hydraul Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(Asce)Hy.1943-7900.0001392CrossRef

15.

Harada E, Gotoh H, Ikari H, Khayyer A (2019) Numerical simulation for sediment transport using MPS-DEM coupling model. Adv Water Resour 129:354–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.08.007CrossRef

16.

Hu D, Tang W, Sun L, Li F, Ji X, Duan Z (2019) Numerical simulation of local scour around two pipelines in tandem using CFD–DEM method. Appl Ocean Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.101968CrossRef

17.

Shan T, Zhao J (2014) A coupled CFD-DEM analysis of granular flow impacting on a water reservoir. Acta Mech 225(8):2449–2470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-014-1119-zMathSciNetCrossRefMATH

18.

Jing L, Kwok CY, Leung YF, Sobral YD (2016) Extended CFD-DEM for free-surface flow with multi-size granules. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 40(1):62–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2387CrossRef

19.

Deen NG, Van Sint Annaland M, Van der Hoef MA, Kuipers JAM (2007) Review of discrete particle modeling of fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci 62(1–2):28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.08.014CrossRef

20.

Peters B, Baniasadi M, Baniasadi M, Besseron X, Donoso AE, Mohseni M, Pozzetti G (2019) XDEM multi-physics and multi-scale simulation technology: review of DEM–CFD coupling, methodology and engineering applications. Particuology 44:176–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2018.04.005CrossRef

21.

Zhou ZY, Kuang SB, Chu KW, Yu AB (2010) Discrete particle simulation of particle–fluid flow: model formulations and their applicability. J Fluid Mech 661:482–510. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002211201000306xMathSciNetCrossRefMATH

22.

Zhong W, Yu A, Zhou G, Xie J, Zhang H (2016) CFD simulation of dense particulate reaction system: approaches, recent advances and applications. Chem Eng Sci 140:16–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2015.09.035CrossRef

23.

Ariyaratne WKH, Manjula EVPJ, Ratnayake C, Melaaen MC (2018) CFD approaches for modeling gas-solids multiphase flows—a review. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 9th EUROSIM congress on modelling and simulation, EUROSIM 2016, the 57th SIMS conference on simulation and modelling SIMS 2016

24.

Ergun S (1952) Fluid flow through packed columns. Chem Eng Prog 48(2):89–94

25.

Jackson R (2000) The dynamics of fluidized particles. Cambridge monographs on mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

26.

Wen CY, Yu YH (1966) Mechanics of fluidization. Chem Eng Progress Symp Ser 62(62):100–111

27.

Kafui KD, Thornton C, Adams MJ (2002) Discrete particle-continuum fluid modelling of gas-solid fluidised beds. Chem Eng Sci 57(13):2395–2410. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(02)00140-9CrossRef

28.

Di Felice R (1994) The voidage function for fluid particle interaction systems. Int J Multiph Flow 20(1):153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(94)90011-6CrossRefMATH

29.

Stokes GG (1901) Mathematical and physical papers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 416

30.

Schiller L, Naumann A (1935) A drag coefficient correlation. Z Ver Dtsch Ing 77:318–320

31.

DallaValle JM (1948) Micromeritics: the technology of fine particles, 2nd edn. Pitman Pub. Corp, Toronto

32.

Brown PP, Lawler DF (2003) Sphere drag and settling velocity revisited. J Environ Eng-Asce 129(3):222–231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(Asce)0733-9372(2003)129:3(222)CrossRef

33.

Elghobashi S (1994) On predicting particle-laden turbulent flows. Appl Sci Res 52(4):309–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf00936835CrossRef

34.

Crowe CT, Schwarzkopf JD, Sommerfeld M, Tsuji Y (2012) Multiphase flow with droplets and particles, 2nd edn. CRC, Oxford

35.

Cheng Z, Hsu T-J, Chauchat J (2018) An Eulerian two-phase model for steady sheet flow using large-eddy simulation methodology. Adv Water Resour 111:205–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.11.016CrossRef

36.

Harada E, Gotoh H, Tsuruta N (2015) Vertical sorting process under oscillatory sheet flow condition by resolved discrete particle model. J Hydraul Res 53(3):332–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2014.994139CrossRef

37.

Chauchat J, Guillou S (2008) On turbulence closures for two-phase sediment-laden flow models. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jc004708CrossRef

38.

Ti-J Hsu, Jenkins JT, Liu PL-F (2003) On two-phase sediment transport: sheet flow of massive particles. J Geophys Res 108(14):2223–2250. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004708CrossRefMATH

39.

Bakhtyar R, Yeganeh-Bakhtiary A, Barry DA, Ghaheri A (2009) Two-phase hydrodynamic and sediment transport modeling of wave-generated sheet flow. Adv Water Resour 32(8):1267–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.05.002CrossRef

40.

Amoudry LO (2014) Extension of ω turbulence closure to two-phase sediment transport modelling: application to oscillatory sheet flows. Adv Water Resour 72:110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.07.006CrossRef

41.

Jha SK, Bombardelli FA (2010) Toward two-phase flow modeling of nondilute sediment transport in open channels. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jf001347CrossRef

42.

Jha SK, Bombardelli FA (2009) Two-phase modeling of turbulence in dilute sediment-laden, open-channel flows. Environ Fluid Mech 9(2):237–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-008-9118-zCrossRef

43.

Van Deemter JJ, Van der Laan ET (1961) Momentum and Energy balances for dispersed two-phase flow. Appl Sci Res 10:102–108CrossRef

44.

Marble FE (1963) Dynamics of a gas containing small solid particles. Paper presented at the 5th AGRAD symp., Braunschwig, GE

45.

Anderson TB, Jackson R (1967) A fluid mechanical description of fluidized bed. Equations of motion. Ind Eng Ind Fundam 6:527–539CrossRef

46.

Tsuo YP, Gidaspow D (1990) Computation of flow patterns in circulating fluidized beds. AIChE J 36(6):885–896CrossRef

47.

Kuipers JAM, Duin KJV, Beckum V, Swaaij WPMV (1992) A numerical model of gas-fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci 47(8):1913–1924CrossRef

48.

van der Hoef MA, van Sint Annaland M, Deen NG, Kuipers JAM (2008) Numerical simulation of dense gas-solid fluidized beds: a multiscale modeling strategy. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 40(1):47–70. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102130MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

49.

Jenkins JT, Savage SB (1983) A theory for the rapid flow of identical, smooth, nearly elastic, spherical particles. J Fluid Mech. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112083001044CrossRefMATH

50.

Lun CKK, Savage SB, Jeffrey DJ, Chepurniy N (1984) Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flowfield. J Fluid Mech 140:223–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112084000586CrossRefMATH

51.

Ding J, Cidaspow D (1990) A bubbling fluidization model using kinetic theory of granular flow. AIChE J 36(4):523–538CrossRef

52.

Gidaspow D (1994) Multiphase flow and fluidization: continuum and kinetic theory descriptions. Academic, BostonMATH

53.

Dickenson JA, Sansalone JJ (2009) Discrete phase model representation of particulate matter (PM) for simulating PM separation by hydrodynamic unit operations. Environ Sci Technol 43(21):8220–8226. https://doi.org/10.1021/es901527rCrossRef

54.

Zahari NM, Zawawi MH, Sidek LM, Mohamad D, Itam Z, Ramli MZ, Syamsir A, Abas A, Rashid M (2018) Introduction of discrete phase model (DPM) in fluid flow: a review. AIP Conf Proc 2030:020234. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5066875CrossRef

55.

Vakhrushev A, Wu M (2013) Verification of a discrete phase model with water-particle flow experiments in a Tundish. Paper presented at the The 5th international conference STEELSIM, VŠB—Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic

56.

Marchelli F, Bove D, Moliner C, Bosio B, Arato E (2017) Discrete element method for the prediction of the onset velocity in a spouted bed. Powder Technol 321:119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.08.032CrossRef

57.

Adamczyk WP, Klimanek A, Białecki RA, Węcel G, Kozołub P, Czakiert T (2014) Comparison of the standard Euler–Euler and hybrid Euler–Lagrange approaches for modeling particle transport in a pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed. Particuology 15:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2013.06.008CrossRef

58.

Cloete S, Amini S (2017) Implementing the kinetic theory of granular flows into the lagrangian dense discrete phase model. Paper presented at the 12th international conference on CFD in oil & gas, metallurgical and process industries, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway

59.

Andrews MJ, ORourke PJ (1996) The multiphase particle-in-cell (MP-PIC) method for dense particulate flows. Int J Multiph Flow 22(2):379–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(95)00072-0CrossRefMATH

60.

Snider DM (2001) An incompressible three-dimensional multiphase particle-in-cell model for dense particle flows. J Comput Phys 170(2):523–549. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2001.6747CrossRefMATH

61.

Zeng J, Li H, Zhang D (2019) Numerical simulation of proppant transport in propagating fractures with the multi-phase particle-in-cell method. Fuel 245:316–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.02.056CrossRef

62.

Patankar NA, Joseph DD (2001) Modeling and numerical simulation of particulate flows by the Eulerian-Lagrangian approach. Int J Multiph Flow 27(10):1659–1684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9322(01)00021-0CrossRefMATH

63.

Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29(1):47–65CrossRef

64.

Attard P, Gillies G (2001) Deformation and adhesion of viscoelastic particles: theory and experiment. Aust J Chem 54(8):477–485. https://doi.org/10.1071/Ch01117CrossRef

65.

Gellespie T, Settineri WJ (1968) The effect of capillary liquid on the force of adhesion between spherical solid particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 26:199–202

66.

Lian G, Thornton C, Adams MJ (1993) A theoretical study of the liquid bridge forces between two rigid spherical bodies. J Colloid Interface Sci 161:138–147CrossRef

67.

Hamaker HC (1937) The london–van der waals attraction between spherical particlesf. Physica 10:1058–1072CrossRef

68.

Israelachvili JN (2011) Intermolecular and surface forces, 3rd edn. Elsevier Academic Press Inc, San Diego

69.

Tsuji Y, Kawaguchi T, Tanaka T (1993) Discrete particle simulation of two-dimensional fluidized bed. Powder Technol 77:79–87CrossRef

70.

Xu BH, Yu AB (1997) Numerical simulation of the gas-solid flow in a fluidized bed by combining discrete particle method with computational fluid dynamics. Chem Eng Sci 52(16):2785–2809CrossRef

71.

Hoomans BPB, Kuipers JAM, Briels WJ, Swaaij WPM (1996) Discrete particle simulation of bubble and slug formation in a two-dimensional gas-fluidised bed: a hard-sphere approach. Chem Eng Sci 51(1):99–118CrossRef

72.

Kawaguchi T, Tanaka T, Tsuji Y (1998) Numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluidized beds using the discrete element method (comparison between the two- and three-dimensional models). Powder Technol 96(2):129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(97)03366-4CrossRef

73.

Zhou F, Hu S, Liu Y, Liu C, Xia T (2014) CFD–DEM simulation of the pneumatic conveying of fine particles through a horizontal slit. Particuology 16:196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2014.03.015CrossRef

74.

Zhou J-w, Du C-l, Liu S-y, Liu Y (2016) Comparison of three types of swirling generators in coarse particle pneumatic conveying using CFD-DEM simulation. Powder Technol 301:1309–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.07.047CrossRef

75.

Zhang Y, Lim EWC, Wang CH (2007) Pneumatic transport of granular materials in an inclined conveying pipe: comparison of computational fluid dynamics-discrete element method (CFD-DEM), electrical capacitance tomography (ECT), and particle image Velocimetry (PIV) results. Ind Eng Chem Res 46(19):6066–6083. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie061304iCrossRef

76.

Azmir J, Hou Q, Yu A (2019) CFD-DEM simulation of drying of food grains with particle shrinkage. Powder Technol 343:792–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.11.097CrossRef

77.

Hilton JE, Ying DY, Cleary PW (2013) Modelling spray coating using a combined CFD–DEM and spherical harmonic formulation. Chem Eng Sci 99:141–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.05.051CrossRef

78.

Suzuki K, Bardet JP, Oda M, Iwashita K, Tsuji Y, Tanaka T, Kawaguchi T (2007) Simulation of upward seepage flow in a single column of spheres using discrete-element method with fluid-particle interaction. J Geotech Geoenviron 133(1):104–109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(Asce)1090-0241(2007)133:1(104)CrossRef

79.

Zou Y, Chen C, Zhang L (2020) Simulating progression of internal erosion in gap-graded sandy gravels using coupled CFD-DEM. Int J Geomech. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001520CrossRef

80.

Tsuji Y, Tanaka T, Ishida T (1992) Lagrangian numerical-simulation of plug flow of cohesionless particles in a horizontal pipe. Powder Technol 71(3):239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(92)88030-LCrossRef

81.

Courant R, Friedrichs K, Lewy H (1928) On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics. IBM J Res Dev 11(2):215–234MathSciNetCrossRef

82.

Hirche D, Birkholz F, Hinrichsen O (2019) A hybrid Eulerian–Eulerian–Lagrangian model for gas-solid simulations. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.129CrossRef

83.

Kloss C, Goniva C, Hager A, Amberger S, Pirker S (2012) Models, algorithms and validation for opensource DEM and CFD-DEM. Progress Comput Fluid Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1504/pcfd.2012.047457MathSciNetCrossRef

84.

Goniva C, Kloss C, Deen NG, Kuipers JAM, Pirker S (2012) Influence of rolling friction on single spout fluidized bed simulation. Particuology 10(5):582–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2012.05.002CrossRef

85.

Pan TW, Joseph DD, Bai R, Glowinski R, Sarin V (2002) Fluidization of 1204 spheres: simulation and experiment. J Fluid Mech 451:169–191. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112001006474MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

86.

Hu HH (1996) Direct simulation of flows of solid-liquid mixtures. Int J Multiph Flow 22(2):335–352CrossRef

87.

Catalano E, Chareyre B, Barthelemy E (2014) Pore-scale modeling of fluid-particles interaction and emerging poromechanical effects. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 38(1):51–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2198CrossRef

88.

Wachs A, Hormozi S, Hrenya C, Pannala S (2018) New frontiers in multiphase CFD for the 21st century energy mix. Workshop final report. https://www.birs.ca/events/2018/5-day-workshops/18w5139. Accessed 12 Aug 2020

89.

Cook BK, Noble DR, Williams JR (2004) A direct simulation method for particle-fluid systems. Eng Comput 21(2/3/4):151–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644400410519721CrossRefMATH

90.

Kruggel-Emden H, Kravets B, Suryanarayana MK, Jasevicius R (2016) Direct numerical simulation of coupled fluid flow and heat transfer for single particles and particle packings by a LBM-approach. Powder Technol 294:236–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.02.038CrossRef

91.

Cui X, Li J, Chan A, Chapman D (2014) Coupled DEM–LBM simulation of internal fluidisation induced by a leaking pipe. Powder Technol 254:299–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.01.048CrossRef

92.

Hardy J, Depazzis O, Pomeau Y (1976) Molecular-dynamics of a classical lattice gas—transport properties and time correlation-functions. Phys Rev A 13(5):1949–1961. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.13.1949CrossRef

93.

Chen S, Doolen GD (1998) Lattice Boltzmann method for fluid flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 30:329–364. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.329MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

94.

Qian YH, Dhumieres D, Lallemand P (1992) Lattice Bgk models for Navier-Stokes equation. Europhys Lett 17(6):479–484. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/17/6/001CrossRefMATH

95.

Satofuka N, Nishioka T (1999) Parallelization of lattice Boltzmann method for incompressible flow computations. Comput Mech 23(2):164–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004660050397CrossRefMATH

96.

Third JR, Chen Y, Müller CR (2015) Comparison between finite volume and lattice-Boltzmann method simulations of gas-fluidised beds: bed expansion and particle–fluid interaction force. Comput Particle Mech 3(3):373–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-015-0086-zCrossRef

97.

Han Y, Cundall P (2017) Verification of two-dimensional LBM-DEM coupling approach and its application in modeling episodic sand production in borehole. Petroleum 3(2):179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2016.07.001CrossRef

98.

Tang Y, Chan DH, Zhu DZ (2017) A coupled discrete element model for the simulation of soil and water flow through an orifice. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 41(14):1477–1493. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2677CrossRef

99.

Tang Y, Chan DH, Zhu DZ (2017) Numerical investigation of sand-bed erosion by an upward water Jet. J Eng Mech. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001319CrossRef

100.

Lucy LB (1977) Numerical approach to testing of fission hypothesis. Astron J 82(12):1013–1024. https://doi.org/10.1086/112164CrossRef

101.

Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ (1977) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics—theory and application to non-spherical stars. Mon Not R Astron Soc 181(2):375–389. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/181.3.375CrossRefMATH

102.

Koshizuka S, Oka Y (1996) Moving-particle semi-implicit method for fragmentation of incompressible fluid. Nucl Sci Eng 123(3):421–434. https://doi.org/10.13182/nse96-a24205CrossRef

103.

Sulsky D, Zhou SJ, Schreyer HL (1995) Application of a particle-in-cell method to solid mechanics. Comput Phys Commun 87(1–2):236–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(94)00170-7CrossRefMATH

104.

Sulsky D, Brackbill JU (1991) A numerical-method for suspension flow. J Comput Phys 96(2):339–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(91)90240-LCrossRefMATH

105.

Bui HH, Fukagawa R (2013) An improved SPH method for saturated soils and its application to investigate the mechanisms of embankment failure: case of hydrostatic pore-water pressure. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 37(1):31–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1084CrossRef

106.

Cleary PW, Monaghan JJ (1999) Conduction modelling using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Comput Phys 148(1):227–264. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1998.6118MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

107.

Gotoh H, Okayasu A, Watanabe Y (2013) Computational wave dynamics. Advanced series on ocean engineering, vol 37. World Scientific, HackensackCrossRef

108.

Shao SD, Lo EYM (2003) Incompressible SPH method for simulating Newtonian and non-Newtonian flows with a free surface. Adv Water Resour 26(7):787–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(03)00030-7CrossRef

109.

Khayyer A, Gotoh H (2010) A higher order Laplacian model for enhancement and stabilization of pressure calculation by the MPS method. Appl Ocean Res 32(1):124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2010.01.001CrossRef

110.

Khayyer A, Gotoh H (2009) Wave impact pressure calculations by improved SPH methods. Int J Offshore Polar 19(4):300–307

111.

Khayyer A, Gotoh H, Shimizu Y (2017) Comparative study on accuracy and conservation properties of two particle regularization schemes and proposal of an optimized particle shifting scheme in ISPH context. J Comput Phys 332:236–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.12.005MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

112.

Khayyer A, Gotoh H, Shao S (2009) Enhanced predictions of wave impact pressure by improved incompressible SPH methods. Appl Ocean Res 31(2):111–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2009.06.003CrossRef

113.

Wang Z, Zhang J, Shirazi SA, Dou Y (2019) Experimental and numerical study of erosion in a non-Newtonian hydraulic fracturing fluid. Wear 422–423:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2018.12.080CrossRef

114.

Khayyer A, Gotoh H, Falahaty H, Shimizu Y (2018) An enhanced ISPH–SPH coupled method for simulation of incompressible fluid–elastic structure interactions. Comput Phys Commun 232:139–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2018.05.012MathSciNetCrossRef

115.

Marrone S, Antuono M, Colagrossi A, Colicchio G, Le Touzé D, Graziani G (2011) δ-SPH model for simulating violent impact flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(13–16):1526–1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.12.016MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

116.

Potapov AV, Hunt ML, Campbell CS (2001) Liquid–solid flows using smoothed particle hydrodynamics and the discrete element method. Powder Technol 116:204–213CrossRef

117.

Sakai H, Maeda K (2006) Seepage failure of granular ground accounting for soil-water-gas interaction. In: Geomechanics and geotechnics of particulate media, proceedings of the international symposium on geomechanics and geotechnics of particulate media, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan, pp 273–279

118.

Biot MA (1941) General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys 12(2):155–164. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712886CrossRefMATH

119.

Robinson M, Ramaioli M, Luding S (2014) Fluid–particle flow simulations using two-way-coupled mesoscale SPH–DEM and validation. Int J Multiph Flow 59:121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.11.003CrossRef

120.

Kwon J, Cho H (2016) Simulation of solid-liquid flows using a two-way coupled smoothed particle hydrodynamics-discrete element method model. Korean J Chem Eng 33(10):2830–2841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0193-4CrossRef

121.

Wu K, Yang D, Wright N (2016) A coupled SPH–DEM model for fluid-structure interaction problems with free-surface flow and structural failure. Comput Struct 177:141–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.08.012CrossRef

122.

Tang Y, Jiang Q, Zhou C (2018) A Lagrangian-based SPH–DEM model for fluid–solid interaction with free surface flow in two dimensions. Appl Math Model 62:436–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.06.013MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

123.

He Y, Bayly AE, Hassanpour A, Muller F, Wu K, Yang D (2018) A GPU-based coupled SPH–DEM method for particle-fluid flow with free surfaces. Powder Technol 338:548–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.07.043CrossRef

124.

Xu W-J, Dong X-Y, Ding W-T (2019) Analysis of fluid-particle interaction in granular materials using coupled SPH–DEM method. Powder Technol 353:459–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.05.052CrossRef

125.

Gholami Korzani M, Galindo-Torres SA, Scheuermann A, Williams DJ (2017) SPH approach for simulating hydro-mechanical processes with large deformations and variable permeabilities. Acta Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-017-0610-9CrossRef

126.

Wang C, Wang Y, Peng C, Meng X (2016) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulation of water-soil mixture flows. J Hydraul Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0001163CrossRef

127.

Khayyer A, Gotoh H, Shimizu Y, Gotoh K, Falahaty H, Shao S (2018) Development of a projection-based SPH method for numerical wave flume with porous media of variable porosity. Coast Eng 140:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.05.003CrossRef

128.

Akbari H, Pooyarad A (2020) Wave force on protected submarine pipelines over porous and impermeable beds using SPH numerical model. Appl Ocean Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2020.102118CrossRef

129.

Naili M, Matsushima T, Yamada Y (2005) A 2D smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for liquefaction induced lateral spreading analysis. J Appl Mech 8:591–599. https://doi.org/10.2208/journalam.8.591CrossRef

130.

Zhang W, Maeda K, Saito H, Li Z, Huang Y (2016) Numerical analysis on seepage failures of dike due to water level-up and rainfall using a water–soil-coupled smoothed particle hydrodynamics model. Acta Geotech 11(6):1401–1418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0488-yCrossRef

131.

Huang Y, Zhang W, Mao W, Jin C (2011) Flow analysis of liquefied soils based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Nat Hazards 59(3):1547–1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9851-3CrossRef

132.

Ariyaratne WKH, Manjula EVPJ, Ratnayake C, Melaaen MC (2016) CFD Approaches for modeling gas-solids multiphase flows—a review. Paper presented at the Proceedings of The 9th EUROSIM congress on modelling and simulation, EUROSIM 2016, The 57th SIMS conference on simulation and modelling SIMS 2016

133.

Zhou H, Wang G, Jia C, Li C (2019) A Novel, coupled CFD-DEM model for the flow characteristics of particles inside a pipe. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112381CrossRef

134.

Norouzi HR, Zarghami R, Sotudeh-Gharebagh R, Mostoufi N (2016) Coupled CFD-DEM modeling: formulation, implementation, and application to multiphase flows, 1st edn. Wiley, OxfordCrossRef

135.

Konrad K, Davidson JF (1984) The gas-liquid analogy in horizontal dense-phase pneumatic conveying. Powder Technol 39(2):191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(84)85036-6CrossRef

136.

Link JM, Deen NG, Kuipers JAM, Fan X, Ingram A, Parker DJ, Wood J, Seville JPK (2008) PEPT and discrete particle simulation study of spout-fluid bed regimes. AIChE J 54(5):1189–1202. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11456CrossRef

137.

MFiX MFiX hybrid Eulerian–Lagrangian–Eulerian. https://mfix.netl.doe.gov/doc/mfix/19.1.4/about.html

138.

Zhao T, Dai F, Xu NW (2017) Coupled DEM-CFD investigation on the formation of landslide dams in narrow rivers. Landslides 14(1):189–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0675-1CrossRef

139.

Khayyer A, Tsuruta N, Shimizu Y, Gotoh H (2019) Multi-resolution MPS for incompressible fluid-elastic structure interactions in ocean engineering. Appl Ocean Res 82:397–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2018.10.020CrossRef

140.

Auton TR, Hunt JCR, Prudhomme M (1988) The force exerted on a body in inviscid unsteady non-uniform rotational flow. J Fluid Mech 197:241–257. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112088003246MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

141.

Reeks MW, Mckee S (1984) The dispersive effects of basset history forces on particle motion in a turbulent-flow. Phys Fluids 27(7):1573–1582. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.864812CrossRefMATH

142.

Saffman PG (1968) Correction. J Fluid Mech 31:624. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112068999990CrossRef

143.

Saffman PG (1965) Lift on a small sphere in a slow shear flow. J Fluid Mech 22:385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112065000824CrossRefMATH

144.

Rubinow SI, Keller JB (1961) The transverse force on a spinning sphere moving in a viscous fluid. J Fluid Mech 11(3):447–459. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112061000640MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

145.

Sakai M, Shigeto Y, Sun X, Aoki T, Saito T, Xiong J, Koshizuka S (2012) Lagrangian-Lagrangian modeling for a solid–liquid flow in a cylindrical tank. Chem Eng J 200–202:663–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.080CrossRef

146.

Idelsohn SR, Oñate E, Pin FD (2004) The particle finite element method: a powerful tool to solve incompressible flows with free-surfaces and breaking waves. Int J Numer Meth Eng 61(7):964–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1096MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

147.

Fullmer WD, Hrenya CM (2018) Continuum prediction of scale-dependent, anisotropic fluctuating kinetic energy in gas-solid flows. Chem Eng Sci 186:84–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2018.04.035CrossRef

148.

Passalacqua A, Fox RO (2011) Implementation of an iterative solution procedure for multi-fluid gas–particle flow models on unstructured grids. Powder Technol 213(1–3):174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2011.07.030CrossRef

149.

Sousani M, Hobbs AM, Anderson A, Wood R (2019) Accelerated heat transfer simulations using coupled DEM and CFD. Powder Technol 357:367–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.08.095CrossRef

150.

Bakshi A, Shahnam M, Gel A, Li T, Altantzis C, Rogers W, Ghoniem AF (2018) Comprehensive multivariate sensitivity analysis of CFD-DEM simulations: critical model parameters and their impact on fluidization hydrodynamics. Powder Technol 338:519–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.06.049CrossRef

151.

Fernandes C, Semyonov D, Ferrás LL, Nóbrega JM (2018) Validation of the CFD-DPM solver DPMFoam in OpenFOAM^® through analytical, numerical and experimental comparisons. Granul Matter. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-018-0834-xCrossRef

152.

Chen F, Drumm EC, Guiochon G (2011) Coupled discrete element and finite volume solution of two classical soil mechanics problems. Comput Geotech 38(5):638–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.03.009CrossRef

153.

Peng C, Wang S, Wu W, Yu H-s, Wang C, Chen J-y (2019) LOQUAT: an open-source GPU-accelerated SPH solver for geotechnical modeling. Acta Geotech 14(5):1269–1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00839-1CrossRef

Titel: Coupled Flow Modelling in Geotechnical and Ground Engineering: An Overview
verfasst von: Ahmed Ibrahim
Mohamed A. Meguid
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2020
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 2199-9260
Elektronische ISSN: 2199-9279
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-020-00223-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Numerical Analyses of the Optimum Length for Stone Column Reinforced Foundation

Effect of the Geotextile Arrangement on the Bearing Capacity of a Strip Footing

Evaluation of the Durability of PE-HD Geosynthetic Barriers Using High-Pressure Autoclave Tests

Deformation and Stability Analyses of Hybrid Earth Retaining Structures

Amplification of Vibrations in High-Speed Railway Embankments by Passive Ground Vibration Barriers

Studies on the Properties of Fly Ash–Rice Husk Ash-Based Geopolymer for Use in Black Cotton Soils