nach oben

Innovative Infrastructure Solutions

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2016 | Technical Note

Modified correlations to predict the shear wave velocity using piezocone penetration test data and geotechnical parameters: a case study in the southwest of Sweden

verfasst von: Abbas Abbaszadeh Shahri, Shima Naderi

Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Shear wave velocity (V _S) is an important geotechnical characteristic for determining dynamic soil properties. When no direct measurements are available, V _S can be estimated based on correlations with common in situ tests, such as the piezocone penetration test (CPTu). In the current paper, three modified equations to predict the V _S of soft clays based on a comprehensive provided CPTu database and related geotechnical parameters for southwest of Sweden were presented. The performance of the obtained relations were examined and investigated by several statistical criteria as well as graph analyses. The best performance was observed by implementing of corrected cone tip resistance (q _t) and pore pressure ratio (B _q) which directly can be found from CPTu data. The introduced modifications were developed and validated for available soft clays of the studied area in southwest of Sweden, and thus, their applicability for proper prediction in other areas with different characteristics should be controlled. However, the used method as a suitable tool can be employed to investigate.

Vorheriger Artikel Evaluation of external FRP-concrete bond in repaired concrete bridge girders and columns

Nächster Artikel A review on soil–structure interaction analysis of laterally loaded piles

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abbaszadeh Shahri A, Behzadafshar K, Rajablou R (2013) Verification of a new method for evaluation of liquefaction potential analysis. Arab J Geosci. 6:881–892CrossRef

Abbaszadeh Shahri A, Larsson S and Johansson F (2015a) CPT-SPT correlations using artificial neural network approach- A case study in Sweden. Electron J Geotech Eng 20, Bund. 28, 13439–13460

Abbaszadeh Shahri A, Malehmir A, Juhlin C (2015) Soil classification analysis based on piezocone penetration test data—a case study from a quick clay landslide site in south western Sweden. Eng Geol 189:32–47CrossRef

Andrus RD, Stokoe KH, Juang CH (2004) Guide for shear-wave based liquefaction potential evaluation. Earthq Spectra 20(2):285–308CrossRef

Andrus RD, Mohanan NP, Piratheepan P, Ellis BP, Holzer TL (2007) Predicting shear-wave velocity from cone penetration resistance. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, paper no. 1454, Thessaloniki, Greece

Bartlett SF, Sok Lee H (2004) Estimation of compression properties of clayey soils Salt Lake Valley, Utah. Report for the Utah Department of Transportation Research Division, Utah, USA

Cai G, Puppalab AJ, Liau S (2014) Characterization on the correlation between shear wave velocity and piezocone tip resistance of Jiangsu clays. Eng Geol. 171:96–103CrossRef

Campanella RG, Stewart WP (1992) Seismic cone analysis using digital signal processing for dynamic site characterization. Can Geotech J 29(3):477–486CrossRef

Campanella RG, Robertson PK, Gillespie D (1986) Seismic cone penetration test. In: Proceedings of In-Situ’86. GSP 6, ASCE, Reston, VA, pp 116–130

10.

Cha M, Cho GC (2007) Shear strength estimation of sandy soils using shear wave velocity. Geotech Test J 30(6):484–495

11.

Cunning JC, Robertson PK, Sego DC (1995) Shear wave velocity to evaluate in situ sate of cohesionless soils. Can Geotech J 32:848–858CrossRef

12.

Fear CE, Robertson PK (1995) Estimating the undrained strength of sand: a theoretical framework. Can Geotech J 32(5):859–870CrossRef

13.

Hardin BO (1978) The nature of stress–strain behaviour for soils. In: Proceedings of the ASCE specialty conference on earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, Pasadena, CA, vol 1, pp 3–90

14.

Hegazy YA, Mayne PW (2006) A global statistical correlation between shear wave velocity and cone penetration data. Site and geomaterial characterization (ASCE GSP 149), Proceedings of GeoShanghai 2006, pp 243–248

15.

Hegazy YA, Mayne PW (1995) Statistical correlations between VS and cone penetration data for different soil types. In: Proceedings of international symposium on cone penetration testing, CPT’95, Linkoping, Sweden, vol 2, pp 173–178

16.

Hussien MN, Karray M (2015) Shear wave velocity as a geotechnical parameter: an overview. Can Geotech J. doi:10.1139/cgj-2014-0524

17.

Jamie A, Romo MP (1988) The Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985 correlations between dynamic and static properties of Mexico City clay. Earthq Spectra 4(4):787–804CrossRef

18.

Karry M, Lefebvre G, Ethier Y, Bigras A (2011) Influence of particle size on the correlation between shear wave velocity and cone tip resistance. Can Geotech J 48(4):599–615CrossRef

19.

Klingberg F, Påsse T, Levander J (2006) K43: Bottenförhållanden och geologisk utveckling i Göta älv. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Göteborg

20.

Klingberg F (2010) Bottenförhållanden i Göta Älv: SGU-rapport 2010: 7. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Göteborg

21.

Ku T, Mayne PW, Cargill E (2013) Continuous-interval shear wave velocity profiling by auto-source and seismic piezocone tests. Can Geotech J 50(4):382–390CrossRef

22.

Lindskog G (1983) Brief report of the investigation of the slope stability along the river in Göta River valley. Statens Geotekniska Institut, Linköping

23.

Long M, Donohue S (2010) Characterization of Norwegian marine clays with combined shear wave velocity and piezocone cone penetration test (CPTu) data. Can Geotech J 47(7):709–718CrossRef

24.

Lunne T, Robertson PK, Powell JJM (1997) Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. Blackie Academic, EF Spon/Routledge Publ, New York, p 312

25.

Malehmir A, Saleem UM, Bastani M (2013) High-resolution reflection seismic investigations of quick-clay and associated formations at a landslide scar in southwest Sweden. J Appl Geophys 92:84–102CrossRef

26.

Mayne PW (2007a) Cone penetration testing. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 368. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC

27.

Mayne PW (2007b) Cone penetration testing state-of-practice. NCHRP Project 20-05 Topic 37-14

28.

Mayne PW (2006) In situ test calibrations for evaluating soil parameters. In: Proceedings of characterization and engineering properties of natural soils II, Singapore

29.

Mayne PW (2000) Enhanced geotechnical site characterization by seismic piezocone penetration tests. In: Proceedings of the 4th international geotechnical conference, Cairo, Egypt, pp 95–120

30.

Mayne PW, Rix GJ (1995) Correlations between shear wave velocity and cone tip resistance in natural clays. Soils Found 35(2):107–110CrossRef

31.

Mayne PW, Rix GJ (1993) G_max- q_c relationships for clays. Geotech Test J 16(1):54–60CrossRef

32.

Millet D (2011) River erosion, landslides and slope development in Göta River, a study based on bathymetric data and general limit equilibrium slope stability analysis, M.Sc Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Division of GeoEngineering, Geotechnical Engineering Research Group, Chalmers university of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden

33.

Powell JJM, Lunne T (2005) Use of CPTu data in clays/fine grained soils. Stud Geotech Mech 27(3–4):29–65

34.

Robertson PK (2012) Discussion of influence of particle size on the correlation between shear wave velocity and cone tip resistance. Can Geotech J 49(1):121–123CrossRef

35.

Robertson PK, Woeller DJ, Kokan M, Hunter J, Luternaur J (1992) Seismic techniques to evaluate liquefaction potential. In: Proceedings of the 45th Canadian geotechnical conference, Toronto, ON, 26–28 October 1992, pp 51–59

36.

Robertson PK, Campanella RG, Gillespie D, Rice A (1986) Seismic CPT to measure in situ shear wave velocity. J Geotech Eng 112(8):791–803CrossRef

37.

Robertson PK, Cabal KL (2010) Guide to cone penetration testing for geotechnical engineering, 4th edn. Gregg Drilling and Testing Inc, Signal Hill

38.

Robertson PK (2009) Interpretation of cone penetration tests—a unified approach. Can Geotech J 46:1337–1355CrossRef

39.

Schneider JA, McGillivray AV, Mayne PW (2004) Evaluation of SCPTu intra-correlations at sand sites in the lower Mississippi River valley, USA. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on site characterization, ISC’2, geotechnical and geophysical site characterization, Porto, Portugal, pp 1003–1010

40.

Schnaid F (2009) In situ testing in geomechanics. Taylor and Francis, London and New York

41.

Simonini P, Cola S (2000) Use of piezocone to predict maximum stiffness of Venetian soils. J Geotech Geoenviron 126(4):378–382CrossRef

42.

Sykora DE, Stokoe KH (1983) Correlations of in situ measurements in sands of shear wave velocity. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20:125–136

43.

Tumay MT, Boggess RL, Acar Y (1981) Subsurface investigation with piezocone penetrometer. ASCE GSP on cone penetration testing and experience, St Louis, MO, pp 325–342

44.

Wair BR, DeJong JT, Shantz T (2012) Guidelines for estimation of shear wave velocity profiles. PEER Report 2012/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Headquarters at the University of California

45.

Wride CE, Robertson PK, Biggar KW, Campanella RG, Hofmann BA, Hughes JMO, Kupper A, Woeller DJ (2000) Interpretation of in situ test results from the CANLEX sites. Can Geotech J 37(3):505–529CrossRef

Titel: Modified correlations to predict the shear wave velocity using piezocone penetration test data and geotechnical parameters: a case study in the southwest of Sweden
verfasst von: Abbas Abbaszadeh Shahri
Shima Naderi
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2016
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 2364-4176
Elektronische ISSN: 2364-4184
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-016-0014-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Seismic rotational displacement of retaining walls: a pseudo-dynamic approach

Facility-based planning methodology for rural roads using spatial techniques

Rational design of foundations on soil reinforced by columns

Structural performance of impact damaged and repaired concrete bridge girder using GFRP rebars

Unsaturated shear strength properties of a compacted expansive soil from Regina, Canada

Innovative techniques used to plumb two 57 m height concrete buildings leaning 3.8 and 3.1 %