nach oben

Innovative Infrastructure Solutions

Erschienen in:

01.09.2023 | Review

A state-of-the-art review on geopolymer foam concrete with solid waste materials: components, characteristics, and microstructure

verfasst von: Mohamed Abdellatief, Mohamed Abd Elrahman, Hani Alanazi, Aref A. Abadel, Ahmed Tahwia

Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions | Ausgabe 9/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Globally, several million tons of various wastes are produced each year, and these quantities are projected to rise. Environmental issues arise from the landfilling or burning of many of these wastes. These wastes can gradually be used as replacement construction materials to reduce their harmful impacts on the environment. In this context, geopolymer foam concrete (GFC) could be used to incorporate these wastes in high volumes owing to its low strength requirement. GFC is a material developed by combing of foam concrete with geopolymer technologies. It helps reduce the consumption of natural resources, carbon dioxide, and energy used in buildings. GFCs have also emerged as one of the most intriguing composites in recent years thanks to their extraordinary benefits, low cost, and eco-friendly synthesis techniques. Recent developments in this area have led to the production of GFC, which combines performance advantages and operational energy savings with cradle-to-gate emissions reductions acquired using a geopolymer binder. This review discusses the sustainability of GFC with different wastes and major parameters affecting its stability, performance, and microstructure to provide a better understanding of the characteristics of GFC and its large-scale advantages. Limitations, challenges, and potential GFC futures for the various uses are outlined and extensively addressed. This review also presents the extraordinary potential of geopolymer foams in high-value applications as a PC-based foam alternative, which could encourage their broad technological utilization.

Graphical abstracts

Vorheriger Artikel Prediction of water quality parameters using support vector regression

Nächster Artikel Seismic evaluation of traditional timber framed masonry systems using shake table tests and finite element modelling

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Gong C, Wang Y, Huo L, Dai J (2023) Phosphorus removal from sewage by flocculated foamed lightweight aggregate: performance optimisation, adsorption kinetics and mechanisms. Sep Purif Technol 305:122458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122458CrossRef

Song Y, Lange D (2021) Influence of fine inclusions on the morphology and mechanical performance of lightweight foam concrete. Cem Concr Compos 124:104264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104264CrossRef

Abd-Elaty MA, Ghazy MF, Khalifa OH (2022) Mechanical and thermal properties of fibrous rubberized geopolymer mortar. Constr Build Mater 7(354):129192CrossRef

Gilka-Bötzow A, Folino P, Maier A, Koenders EAB, Caggiano A (2021) Triaxial failure behavior of highly porous cementitious foams used as heat insulation. Processes. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9081373CrossRef

Pasupathy K, Ramakrishnan S, Sanjayan J (2021) Formulating eco-friendly geopolymer foam concrete by alkali-activation of ground brick waste. J Clean Prod 325:129180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129180CrossRef

Wasim M, Duc Ngo T, Law D (2021) Durability performance of reinforced waste-based geopolymer foam concrete under exposure to various corrosive environments. Case Stud Constr Mater 15:e00703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00703CrossRef

Alnahhal AM, Alengaram UJ, Ibrahim MSI, Yusoff S, Metselaar HSC, Gabriela Johnson P (2022) Synthesis of ternary binders and sand-binder ratio on the mechanical and microstructural properties of geopolymer foamed concrete. Constr Build Mater 349:128682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128682CrossRef

Ghazy MF, Abd Elaty MA, Taman MH, Mehriz AM (2023) A comprehensive review on the performance of geopolymer concrete subjected to elevated temperature. Innov Infrastruct Solut 8(7):194CrossRef

Gopalakrishna B, Dinakar P (2023) Mix design development of fly ash-GGBS based recycled aggregate geopolymer concrete. J Build Eng 63:105551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105551CrossRef

10.

Abbas R, Khereby MA, Ghorab HY, Elkhoshkhany N (2020) Preparation of geopolymer concrete using Egyptian kaolin clay and the study of its environmental effects and economic cost. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22(3):669–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01811-4CrossRef

11.

Davidovits J (2020) Geopolymer chemistry and applications, 5th edn. J. Davidovits.–Saint-Quentin, France, p 5

12.

Alawi Al-Sodani KA (2022) Mix design, mechanical properties and durability of the rubberized geopolymer concrete: a review. Case Stud Constr Mater 17:e01480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01480CrossRef

13.

Li N, Shi C, Zhang Z, Wang H, Liu Y (2019) A review on mixture design methods for geopolymer concrete. Compos B Eng 178:107490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107490CrossRef

14.

Zhang H et al (2022) Mechanical and physical properties of silt-based foamed concrete with different silt types. Arab J Sci Eng 47(10):12803–12815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06551-1CrossRef

15.

Hajimohammadi A, Ngo T, Mendis P, Nguyen T, Kashani A, van Deventer JSJ (2017) Pore characteristics in one-part mix geopolymers foamed by H2O2: the impact of mix design. Mater Des 130:381–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.084CrossRef

16.

Wu Y et al (2022) Preparation and properties of metakaolin based porous geopolymer modified by potassium titanate whisker. Constr Build Mater 314:125580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125580CrossRef

17.

Gao H et al (2020) A bifunctional hierarchical porous kaolinite geopolymer with good performance in thermal and sound insulation. Constr Build Mater 251:118888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118888CrossRef

18.

Leiva C, Luna-Galiano Y, Arenas C, Alonso-Fariñas B, Fernández-Pereira C (2019) A porous geopolymer based on aluminum-waste with acoustic properties. Waste Manage 95:504–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.042CrossRef

19.

Zhang Z, Provis JL, Reid A, Wang H (2015) Mechanical, thermal insulation, thermal resistance and acoustic absorption properties of geopolymer foam concrete. Cem Concr Compos 62:97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.03.013CrossRef

20.

Yan S, Zhang F, Feng X, Kong J, Wang B, Yang J (2021) Effect of high temperature on the mechanical properties of hierarchical porous cenosphere/geopolymer composite foams. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 18(3):817–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.13681CrossRef

21.

Ghazy MF, Abd Elaty MA, Abd El Hameed MF (2022) Multi-response optimization of geopolymer mortar at elevated temperatures. Revista Romana de Materiale 52(2):134–44

22.

Ghazy MF, Abd Elaty MA, Taman M, Eissa ME. Durability performance of geopolymer ferrocement panels prepared by different alkaline activators. InStructures 2022 Apr 1 (Vol. 38, pp. 168-183). Elsevier

23.

Zhang Z, Provis JL, Reid A, Wang H (2014) Geopolymer foam concrete: an emerging material for sustainable construction. Constr Build Mater 56:113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.081CrossRef

24.

Singh B, Ishwarya G, Gupta M, Bhattacharyya SK (2015) Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments. Constr Build Mater 85:78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.036CrossRef

25.

Sasson A et al (2021) How to read, write, and review the imaging literature. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 50(2):109–114. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.01.002CrossRef

26.

Van Wee B, Banister D (2016) How to write a literature review paper? Transp Rev 36(2):278–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456CrossRef

27.

Abdellatief M, Alanazi H, Radwan MKH, Tahwia AM (2022) Multiscale characterization at early ages of ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete. Polymers. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14245504CrossRef

28.

Matalkah F, Ababneh A, Aqel R (2022) Synthesis of calcined kaolin-based geopolymer foam: Assessment of mechanical properties, thermal insulation, and elevated temperature stability. Ceram Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.11.174CrossRef

29.

Zawrah MF, Sadek HEH, Ngida REA, Sawan SEA, El-Kheshen AA (2022) Effect of low-rate firing on physico-mechanical properties of unfoamed and foamed geopolymers prepared from waste clays. Ceram Int 48(8):11330–11337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.356CrossRef

30.

Su L, Fu G, Liang B, Sun Q, Zhang X (2022) Mechanical properties and microstructure evaluation of fly ash–Slag geopolymer foaming materials. Ceram Int 48(13):18224–18237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.081CrossRef

31.

Shi J et al (2022) Physico-mechanical, thermal properties and durability of foamed geopolymer concrete containing cenospheres. Constr Build Mater 325:126841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126841CrossRef

32.

Shi J, Liu Y, Xu H, Peng Y, Yuan Q, Gao J (2022) The roles of cenosphere in ultra-lightweight foamed geopolymer concrete (UFGC). Ceram Int 48(9):12884–12896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.161CrossRef

33.

Bai C, Li H, Bernardo E, Colombo P (2019) Waste-to-resource preparation of glass-containing foams from geopolymers. Ceram Int 45(6):7196–7202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.227CrossRef

34.

Petlitckaia S, Poulesquen A (2019) Design of lightweight metakaolin based geopolymer foamed with hydrogen peroxide. Ceram Int 45(1):1322–1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.021CrossRef

35.

Xu F, Gu G, Zhang W, Wang H, Huang X, Zhu J (2018) Pore structure analysis and properties evaluations of fly ash-based geopolymer foams by chemical foaming method. Ceram Int 44(16):19989–19997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.267CrossRef

36.

Zhang X, Zhang X, Li X, Tian D, Ma M, Wang T (2022) Optimized pore structure and high permeability of metakaolin/fly-ash-based geopolymer foams from Al– and H2O2–sodium oleate foaming systems. Ceram Int 48(13):18348–18360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.094CrossRef

37.

Abd Elaty MA, Ghazy MF, Taman M, Elnokrashy ES (2021) Improvement the setting time and strength gain of the fly ash-based geopolymer mortars by using mineral additives. Des Eng 20(2021):8394–8415

38.

Wattanasiriwech D, Yomthong K, Wattanasiriwech S (2021) Adsorption efficiency and photocatalytic activity of fly ash-based geopolymer foam mortar. Ceram Int 47(19):27361–27371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.158CrossRef

39.

Li H et al (2022) Preparation and fireproofing performance of the wollastonite-metakaolin-based geopolymer foams. Mater Lett 307:131020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.131020CrossRef

40.

Yang J, Chen B, Su J, Xu G, Zhang D, Zhou J (2022) Effects of fibers on the mechanical properties of UHPC: a review”. J Traffic Transp Eng (English Edition). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2022.05.001CrossRef

41.

Li M et al (2022) Coagulation mechanism and compressive strength characteristics analysis of high-strength alkali-activated slag grouting material. Polymers. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14193980CrossRef

42.

Nuaklong P, Jongvivatsakul P, Pothisiri T, Sata V, Chindaprasirt P (2020) Influence of rice husk ash on mechanical properties and fire resistance of recycled aggregate high-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. J Clean Prod 252:119797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119797CrossRef

43.

Fernando S, Gunasekara C, Law DW, Nasvi MCM, Setunge S, Dissanayake R (2021) Engineering properties of waste-based alkali activated concrete brick containing low calcium fly ash and rice husk ash: a comparison with traditional Portland cement concrete brick. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103810CrossRef

44.

Shah SN, Mo KH, Yap SP, Yang J, Ling T-C (2021) Lightweight foamed concrete as a promising avenue for incorporating waste materials: a review. Resour Conserv Recycl 164:105103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105103CrossRef

45.

Hajimohammadi A, Ngo T, Mendis P (2018) Enhancing the strength of pre-made foams for foam concrete applications. Cem Concr Compos 87:164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.12.014CrossRef

46.

Senff L, Novais RM, Carvalheiras J, Labrincha JA (2020) Eco-friendly approach to enhance the mechanical performance of geopolymer foams: using glass fibre waste coming from wind blade production. Constr Build Mater 239:117805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117805CrossRef

47.

Tayeh BA, Hakamy A, Amin M, Zeyad AM, Agwa IS (2022) Effect of air agent on mechanical properties and microstructure of lightweight geopolymer concrete under high temperature. Case Stud Constr Mater 1(16):e00951

48.

Vaičiukynienė D, Tamošaitis G, Kantautas A, Nizevičienė D, Pupeikis D (2021) Porous alkali-activated materials based on municipal solid waste incineration ash with addition of phosphogypsum powder. Constr Build Mater 301:123962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123962CrossRef

49.

Kioupis D, Zisimopoulou A, Tsivilis S, Kakali G (2021) Development of porous geopolymers foamed by aluminum and zinc powders. Ceram Int 47(18):26280–26292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.037CrossRef

50.

Farouk GM (2020) Optimization of recycled concrete aggregate geopolymer bricks by Taguchi Method. Revista de la construcción 19(2):244–254CrossRef

51.

Eliche-Quesada D, Ruiz-Molina S, Pérez-Villarejo L, Castro E, Sánchez-Soto PJ (2020) Dust filter of secondary aluminium industry as raw material of geopolymer foams. J Build Eng 32:101656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101656CrossRef

52.

Cambronero LEG, Ruiz-Roman JM, Corpas FA, Ruiz Prieto JM (2009) Manufacturing of Al–Mg–Si alloy foam using calcium carbonate as foaming agent. J Mater Process Technol 209(4):1803–1809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.04.032CrossRef

53.

Pantongsuk T et al (2021) Effect of hydrogen peroxide and bagasse ash additions on thermal conductivity and thermal resistance of geopolymer foams. Mater Today Commun 26:102149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102149CrossRef

54.

Shi J et al (2020) Preparation and characterization of lightweight aggregate foamed geopolymer concretes aerated using hydrogen peroxide. Constr Build Mater 256:119442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119442CrossRef

55.

Yan S et al (2020) Mechanical properties of geopolymer composite foams reinforced with carbon nanofibers via modified hydrogen peroxide method. Mater Chem Phys 253:123258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123258CrossRef

56.

Yang DH, Hur BY, He DP, Yang SR (2007) Effect of decomposition properties of titanium hydride on the foaming process and pore structures of Al alloy melt foam. Mater Sci Eng, A 445–446:415–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.09.064CrossRef

57.

Yang D, Hur B (2006) The relationship between thermal decomposition properties of titanium hydride and the Al alloy melt foaming process. Mater Lett 60(29):3635–3641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2006.03.074CrossRef

58.

Zhou X, Li Y, Chen X (2020) Development of AlMg35-TiH2 composite foaming agent and fabrication of small pore size aluminium foams. J Mater Process Technol 283:116698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116698CrossRef

59.

Papadopoulos DP, Omar H, Stergioudi F, Tsipas SA, Michailidis N (2011) The use of dolomite as foaming agent and its effect on the microstructure of aluminium metal foams—Comparison to titanium hydride. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 382(1):118–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.12.005CrossRef

60.

Yang D, Chen J, Wang H, Jiang J, Ma A, Lu ZP (2015) Effect of decomposition kinetics of titanium hydride on the Al Alloy melt foaming process. J Mater Sci Technol 31(4):361–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2014.09.013CrossRef

61.

Dhasindrakrishna K, Pasupathy K, Ramakrishnan S, Sanjayan J (2021) Progress, current thinking and challenges in geopolymer foam concrete technology. Cem Concr Compos 116:103886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103886CrossRef

62.

Degefu DM, Liao Z, Berardi U, Doan H (2021) Salient parameters affecting the performance of foamed geopolymers as sustainable insulating materials. Constr Build Mater 313:125400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125400CrossRef

63.

Raut A, Singh RJ, Murmu A, Khan KA (2022) Evaluation of thermal and energy consumption behavior of novel foamed copper slag based geopolymer masonry blocks. Ceram Int 48(9):12098–12111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.070CrossRef

64.

Ji Z, Li M, Su L, Pei Y (2020) Porosity, mechanical strength and structure of waste-based geopolymer foams by different stabilizing agents. Constr Build Mater 258:119555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119555CrossRef

65.

Song N, Li Z, Wang S, Xiong Y (2022) Preparation and application of foaming agent based on the compound system of short-chain fluorocarbon and soybean residue protein. Materials 15:20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15207384CrossRef

66.

Hashim M, Tantray M (2021) Comparative study on the performance of protein and synthetic-based foaming agents used in foamed concrete. Case Stud Constr Mater 14:e00524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00524CrossRef

67.

Verdolotti L et al (2015) Synergistic effect of vegetable protein and silicon addition on geopolymeric foams properties. J Mater Sci 50(6):2459–2466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8801-3CrossRef

68.

Panesar DK (2013) Cellular concrete properties and the effect of synthetic and protein foaming agents. Constr Build Mater 44:575–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.024CrossRef

69.

Wattanasiriwech D, Yomthong K, Wattanasiriwech S (2021) Characterisation and properties of class C-fly ash based geopolymer foams: effects of foaming agent content, aggregates, and surfactant. Constr Build Mater 306:124847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124847CrossRef

70.

Amin M, Zeyad AM, Tayeh BA, Agwa IS (2021) Effect of high temperatures on mechanical, radiation attenuation and microstructure properties of heavyweight geopolymer concrete. Struct Eng Mech 80(2):181

71.

Hassan HS, Abdel-Gawwad HA, García SRV, Israde-Alcántara I (2018) Fabrication and characterization of thermally-insulating coconut ash-based geopolymer foam. Waste Manage 80:235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.022CrossRef

72.

Duan P, Yan C, Zhou W, Ren D (2016) Development of fly ash and iron ore tailing based porous geopolymer for removal of Cu(II) from wastewater. Ceram Int 42(12):13507–13518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.143CrossRef

73.

Natali Murri A, Medri V, Papa E, Laghi L, Mingazzini C, Landi E (2017) Porous geopolymer insulating core from a Metakaolin/Biomass ash composite. Environments. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments4040086CrossRef

74.

Vaou V, Panias D (2010) Thermal insulating foamy geopolymers from perlite. Miner Eng 23(14):1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2010.07.015CrossRef

75.

Liang G, Liu T, Li H, Dong B, Shi T (2022) A novel synthesis of lightweight and high-strength green geopolymer foamed material by rice husk ash and ground-granulated blast-furnace slag. Resour Conserv Recycl 176:105922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105922CrossRef

76.

Shao Z et al (2022) The influence of ZSM-5 waste on the properties of fly ash-based foamed geopolymer. J Clean Prod 355:131800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131800CrossRef

77.

Wang X et al (2022) Facile synthesis of porous geopolymers via the addition of a water-soluble pore forming agent. Ceram Int 48(2):2853–2864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.10.075CrossRef

78.

Chen YX, Klima KM, Brouwers HJH, Yu Q (2022) Effect of silica aerogel on thermal insulation and acoustic absorption of geopolymer foam composites: the role of aerogel particle size. Compos B Eng 242:110048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110048CrossRef

79.

Ascensão G, Seabra MP, Aguiar JB, Labrincha JA (2017) Red mud-based geopolymers with tailored alkali diffusion properties and pH buffering ability. J Clean Prod 148:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.150CrossRef

80.

Dembovska L, Bajare D, Ducman V, Korat L, Bumanis G (2017) The use of different by-products in the production of lightweight alkali activated building materials. Constr Build Mater 135:315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.005CrossRef

81.

Hajimohammadi A, Ngo T, Mendis P, Sanjayan J (2017) Regulating the chemical foaming reaction to control the porosity of geopolymer foams. Mater Des 120:255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.026CrossRef

82.

Ziegler D, Formia A, Tulliani J-M, Palmero P (2016) “Environmentally-friendly dense and porous geopolymers using fly ash and rice husk ash as raw materials. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9060466CrossRef

83.

Masi G, Rickard WDA, Vickers L, Bignozzi MC, van Riessen A (2014) A comparison between different foaming methods for the synthesis of light weight geopolymers. Ceram Int 40(9):13891–13902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.05.108CrossRef

84.

Gu G, Xu F, Huang X, Ruan S, Peng C, Lin J (2020) Foamed geopolymer: The relationship between rheological properties of geopolymer paste and pore-formation mechanism. J Clean Prod 277:123238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123238CrossRef

85.

Amin M, Tayeh BA (2020) Investigating the mechanical and microstructure properties of fibre-reinforced lightweight concrete under elevated temperatures. Case Stud Constr Mater 1(13):e00459

86.

Novais RM, Ascensão G, Ferreira N, Seabra MP, Labrincha JA (2018) Influence of water and aluminium powder content on the properties of waste-containing geopolymer foams. Ceram Int 44(6):6242–6249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.009CrossRef

87.

Le Chi H, Hájková P, Le Van S, Louda P, Voleský L (2019) Water absorption properties of geopolymer foam after being impregnated with hydrophobic agents. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244162CrossRef

88.

Korniejenko K, Figiela B, Kozub B, Azzopardi B, Łach M (2022) Environmental degradation of foamed geopolymers. Continuum Mech Thermodyn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-022-01102-xCrossRef

89.

Agustini NK, Triwiyono A, Sulistyo D, Suyitno S (2021) Mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of fly ash-based geopolymer foams with polypropylene fibers. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11114886CrossRef

90.

Le VS et al (2020) Mechanical properties of geopolymer foam at high temperature. Sci Eng Compos Mater 27(1):129–138. https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2020-0013CrossRef

91.

Ranjani IS, Ramamurthy K (2010) Relative assessment of density and stability of foam produced with four synthetic surfactants. Mater Struct 43(10):1317–1325. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9582-zCrossRef

92.

Gołaszewski J et al (2022) Effect of foaming agent, binder and density on the compressive strength and thermal conductivity of ultra-light foam concrete. Buildings. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081176CrossRef

93.

Kuzielová E, Pach L, Palou M (2016) Effect of activated foaming agent on the foam concrete properties. Constr Build Mater 125:998–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.122CrossRef

94.

Z. Abdollahnejad, Z. Zhang, H. Wang, and M. Mastali, “Comparative Study on the Drying Shrinkage and Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Foam Concrete Incorporating Different Dosages of Fiber, Sand and Foam Agents BT - High Tech Concrete: Where Technology and Engineering Meet,” D. A. Hordijk and M. Luković, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 42–48.

95.

Dhasindrakrishna K, Pasupathy K, Ramakrishnan S, Sanjayan J (2020) Effect of yield stress development on the foam-stability of aerated geopolymer concrete. Cem Concr Res 138:106233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106233CrossRef

96.

Gadkar A, Subramaniam KVL (2021) Rheology control of alkali-activated fly ash with nano clay for cellular geopolymer application. Constr Build Mater 283:122687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122687CrossRef

97.

Ercoli R et al (2022) Mechanical and thermal properties of geopolymer foams (GFs) doped with By-products of the secondary aluminum industry. Polymers. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14040703CrossRef

98.

Ma B et al (2022) The influence of calcium hydroxide on the performance of MK-based geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 329:127224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127224CrossRef

99.

Hao Y, Yang G, Liang K (2022) Development of fly ash and slag based high-strength alkali-activated foam concrete. Cem Concr Compos 128:104447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104447CrossRef

100.

Kaddami A, Pitois O (2019) A physical approach towards controlling the microstructure of metakaolin-based geopolymer foams. Cem Concr Res 124:105807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105807CrossRef

101.

Shakouri S, Bayer Ö, Erdoğan ST (2020) Development of silica fume-based geopolymer foams. Constr Build Mater 260:120442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120442CrossRef

102.

Cui Y, Wang D, Zhao J, Li D, Ng S, Rui Y (2018) Effect of calcium stearate based foam stabilizer on pore characteristics and thermal conductivity of geopolymer foam material. J Build Eng 20:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.06.002CrossRef

103.

Zhang Z, Wang H (2016) The pore characteristics of geopolymer foam concrete and their impact on the compressive strength and modulus. Front Mater. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2016.00038CrossRef

104.

Nambiar EKK, Ramamurthy K (2007) Air-void characterisation of foam concrete. Cem Concr Res 37(2):221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.009CrossRef

105.

Bai C, Ni T, Wang Q, Li H, Colombo P (2018) Porosity, mechanical and insulating properties of geopolymer foams using vegetable oil as the stabilizing agent. J Eur Ceram Soc 38(2):799–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.09.021CrossRef

106.

Cilla MS, Morelli MR, Colombo P (2014) Open cell geopolymer foams by a novel saponification/peroxide/gelcasting combined route. J Eur Ceram Soc 34(12):3133–3137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.04.001CrossRef

107.

Strozi Cilla M, Colombo P, Raymundo Morelli M (2014) Geopolymer foams by gelcasting. Ceram Int 40(4):5723–5730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.11.011CrossRef

108.

Hilal AA, Thom NH, Dawson AR (2015) On entrained pore size distribution of foamed concrete. Constr Build Mater 75:227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.117CrossRef

109.

Fameau A-L, Salonen A (2014) Effect of particles and aggregated structures on the foam stability and aging. C R Phys 15(8):748–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2014.09.009CrossRef

110.

Li C et al (2022) Effect of maintenance and water-cement ratio on foamed concrete shrinkage cracking. Polymers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132703CrossRef

111.

Alnahhal AM, Alengaram UJ, Yusoff S, Darvish P, Srinivas K, Sumesh M (2022) Engineering performance of sustainable geopolymer foamed and non-foamed concretes. Constr Build Mater 316:125601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125601CrossRef

112.

Mermerdaş K, Algın Z, Oleiwi SM, Nassani DE (2017) Optimization of lightweight GGBFS and FA geopolymer mortars by response surface method. Constr Build Mater 139:159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.050CrossRef

113.

Pasupathy K, Ramakrishnan S, Sanjayan J (2021) Influence of recycled concrete aggregate on the foam stability of aerated geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 271:121850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121850CrossRef

114.

Liu M, Wang J, Wang C, Liu Z, Zhang H, He F (2022) Stress-solid materials-voids interaction of foamed concrete in isotropic compression. Constr Build Mater 358:129468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129468CrossRef

115.

Nguyen TT, Bui HH, Ngo TD, Nguyen GD (2017) Experimental and numerical investigation of influence of air-voids on the compressive behaviour of foamed concrete. Mater Des 130:103–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.054CrossRef

116.

Yao B, Ren G, Huang J, Gao X (2022) Influence of self-ignition coal gangue on properties of foam concrete with steam curing. Case Stud Constr Mater 17:e01316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01316CrossRef

117.

Pasupathy K, Ramakrishnan S, Sanjayan J (2022) Enhancing the properties of foam concrete 3D printing using porous aggregates. Cem Concr Compos 133:104687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104687CrossRef

118.

Siddika A, Hajimohammadi A, Sahajwalla V (2023) A novel eco-friendly foaming technique for developing sustainable glass foams from the waste glass. Resour Conserv Recycl 190:106801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106801CrossRef

119.

Dong C, Shao N, Yan F, Ji R, Wei X, Zhang Z (2022) A novel integration strategy for the foaming and hydrophobization of geopolymer foams. Cem Concr Res 160:106919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106919CrossRef

120.

Yan S et al (2019) Green synthesis of high porosity waste gangue microsphere/geopolymer composite foams via hydrogen peroxide modification. J Clean Prod 227:483–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.185CrossRef

121.

Bai C, Colombo P (2017) High-porosity geopolymer membrane supports by peroxide route with the addition of egg white as surfactant. Ceram Int 43(2):2267–2273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.10.205CrossRef

122.

Korat L, Ducman V (2017) The influence of the stabilizing agent SDS on porosity development in alkali-activated fly-ash based foams. Cem Concr Compos 80:168–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.03.010CrossRef

123.

Shen S, Tian J, Zhu Y, Zhang X, Hu P (2022) Synthesis of industrial solid wastes based geopolymer foams for building energy conservation: effects of metallic aluminium and reclaimed materials. Constr Build Mater 328:127083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127083CrossRef

124.

Degefu DM, Liao Z, Berardi U, Labbé G, Akhmetova I (2023) Geopolymer concrete for net-zero buildings: correlating paste chemistry with monolith hygrothermal performance. Resour Conserv Recycl 189:106743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106743CrossRef

125.

Fang Y, Ahmad MR, Lao J-C, Qian L-P, Dai J-G (2023) Development of artificial geopolymer aggregates with thermal energy storage capacity. Cem Concr Compos 135:104834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104834CrossRef

126.

Hussein YM, Abd Elrahman M, Elsakhawy Y, Tayeh BA, Tahwia AM (2022) Development and performance of sustainable structural lightweight concrete containing waste clay bricks. J Market Res 1(21):4344–4359

127.

Peceño B, Perez-Soriano EM, Ríos JD, Luna-Galiano Y, Cifuentes H, Leiva Fernández C (2022) Morphological analysis of porosity and sound absorption in sustainable materials from rice husk. Build Acoust 29(3):387–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X221103674CrossRef

128.

Papa E et al (2016) Porosity and insulating properties of silica-fume based foams. Energy Build 131:223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.09.031CrossRef

129.

Li G, Tan H, He X, Zhang J, Deng X, Zheng Z (2022) Research on the properties of wet-ground waste limestone powder as foam stabilizer in foamed concrete. Constr Build Mater 329:127203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127203CrossRef

130.

Khan M, Shakeel M, Khan K, Akbar S, Khan A (2022) A review on fiber-reinforced foam concrete. Eng Proceed 22(1):2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022022013CrossRef

131.

Salami BA et al (2022) Estimating compressive strength of lightweight foamed concrete using neural, genetic and ensemble machine learning approaches. Cem Concr Compos 133:104721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104721CrossRef

132.

Ullah HS, Khushnood RA, Ahmad J, Farooq F (2022) Predictive modelling of sustainable lightweight foamed concrete using machine learning novel approach. J Build Eng 56:104746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104746CrossRef

133.

Lassinantti Gualtieri M, Romagnoli M, Gualtieri AF (2015) Preparation of phosphoric acid-based geopolymer foams using limestone as pore forming agent–Thermal properties by in situ XRPD and Rietveld refinements. J Eur Ceram Soc 35(11):3167–3178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.04.030CrossRef

134.

Helmy SH, Tahwia AM, Mahdy MG, Abd EM (2023) Development and characterization of sustainable concrete incorporating a high volume of industrial waste materials. Constr Build Mater 15(365):130160CrossRef

135.

Damjanovic A, Genshaw MA, Bockris JO (1967) Hydrogen peroxide formation in oxygen reduction at gold electrodes: II. Alkaline solution. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem 15:173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0728(67)85021-6CrossRef

136.

Provis JL, Bernal SA (2014) Geopolymers and related alkali-activated materials. Ann Rev Mater Res 44:299–327

137.

PJL Provis, JS Van Deventer (Eds.) (2009) Geopolymers: structures and 2009. properties and industrial applications, Elsevier, geopolymers: structures, processing properties and industrial applications, 1st ed. Boca Raton Boston New York Washington, DC: Boca Raton Boston New York Washington, DC

138.

Abdullah MMAB, Hussin K, Bnhussain M, Ismail KN, Yahya Z, Abdul Razak R (2012) Fly ash-based geopolymer lightweight concrete using foaming agent. Int J Mol Sci 13(6):7186–7198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13067186CrossRef

139.

Tahwia AM, Abd Ellatief M, Heneigel AM, Abd Elrahman M (2022) Characteristics of eco-friendly ultra-high-performance geopolymer concrete incorporating waste materials. Ceram Int 48(14):19662–19674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.103CrossRef

140.

Abdellatief M, Abd Elrahman M, Elgendy G, Bassioni G, Tahwia AM (2023) Response surface methodology-based modelling and optimization of sustainable UHPC containing ultrafine fly ash and metakaolin. Constr Build Mater 24(388):131696CrossRef

141.

Tahwia AM, Heniegal AM, Abdellatief M, Tayeh BA, Elrahman MA (2022) Properties of ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete incorporating recycled waste glass. Case Stud Constr Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01393CrossRef

142.

Younis MO, Amin M, Tahwia AM (2022) Durability and mechanical characteristics of sustainable self-curing concrete utilizing crushed ceramic and brick wastes. Case Stud Constr Mater 1(17):e01251

143.

Sameer H, Weber V, Mostert C, Bringezu S, Fehling E, Wetzel A (2019) Environmental assessment of ultra-high-performance concrete using carbon, material, and water footprint. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060851CrossRef

144.

Singh RJ, Raut A, Murmu AL, Jameel M (2021) Influence of glass powder incorporated foamed geopolymer blocks on thermal and energy analysis of building envelope. J Build Eng 43:102520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102520CrossRef

145.

John SK, Nadir Y, Girija K (2021) Effect of source materials, additives on the mechanical properties and durability of fly ash and fly ash-slag geopolymer mortar: a review. Constr Build Mater 280:122443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122443CrossRef

146.

Vafaei M, Allahverdi A (2017) Durability of geopolymer mortar based on waste-glass powder and calcium aluminate cement in acid solutions. J Mater Civ Eng 29(10):04017196. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002053CrossRef

147.

Abdellatief M, Elemam WE, Alanazi H, Tahwia AM (2022) Production and optimization of sustainable cement brick incorporating clay brick wastes using response surface method. Ceram Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.11.144CrossRef

148.

Abdellatief M, Al-Tam SM, Elemam WE, Alanazi H, Elgendy GM, Tahwia AM (2022) Development of ultra-high-performance concrete with low environmental impact integrated with metakaolin and industrial wastes. Case Stud Constr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01724CrossRef

149.

Banhart J (2001) Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Prog Mater Sci 46(6):559–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5CrossRef

150.

Parveez B, Jamal NA, Anuar H, Ahmad Y, Aabid A, Baig M (2022) Microstructure and mechanical properties of metal foams fabricated via melt foaming and powder metallurgy technique: a review. Materials (Basel) 15:7. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155302CrossRef

151.

Şahmaran M, Özbay E, Yücel HE, Lachemi M, Li VC (2011) Effect of fly ash and PVA fiber on microstructural damage and residual properties of engineered cementitious composites exposed to high temperatures. J Mater Civ Eng 23(12):1735–1745. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000335CrossRef

152.

Tahwia AM (2017) Performance of ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete at high temperatures. Int J Eng Innov Technol (IJEIT) 6(10):1–7

153.

Tahwia AM, Elgendy GM, Amin M (2021) Durability and microstructure of eco-efficient ultra-high-performance concrete. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124491CrossRef

154.

Tahwia AM, El-Far O, Amin M (2021) Characteristics of sustainable high strength concrete incorporating eco-friendly materials. Innov Infrastruct Solut 7(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00609-7CrossRef

155.

Albidah A, Alqarni AS, Abbas H, Almusallam T, Al-Salloum Y (2021) Behavior of Metakaolin-Based geopolymer concrete at ambient and elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater 317:125910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125910CrossRef

156.

Sarker PK, Mcbeath S (2015) Fire endurance of steel reinforced fly ash geopolymer concrete elements. Constr Build Mater 90:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.04.054CrossRef

157.

Tahwia AM, Ellatief MA, Bassioni G, Heniegal AM, Elrahman MA (2023) Influence of high temperature exposure on compressive strength and microstructure of ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete with waste glass and ceramic. J Market Res 23:5681–5697. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2023.02.177CrossRef

158.

Das SK et al (2020) Fresh, strength and microstructure properties of geopolymer concrete incorporating lime and silica fume as replacement of fly ash. J Build Eng 32:101780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.1017804CrossRef

159.

Aboulayt A, Riahi M, Ouazzani Touhami M, Hannache H, Gomina M, Moussa R (2017) Properties of metakaolin based geopolymer incorporating calcium carbonate. Adv Powder Technol 28(9):2393–2401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2017.06.022CrossRef

160.

Zhang HY, Kodur V, Qi SL, Cao L, Wu B (2014) Development of metakaolin–fly ash based geopolymers for fire resistance applications. Constr Build Mater 55:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.040CrossRef

161.

Almutairi AL, Tayeh BA, Adesina A, Isleem HF, Zeyad AM (2021) Potential applications of geopolymer concrete in construction: a review. Case Stud Constr Mater 15:e00733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00733CrossRef

162.

Parathi S, Nagarajan P, Pallikkara SA (2021) Ecofriendly geopolymer concrete: a comprehensive review. Clean Technol Environ Policy 23(6):1701–1713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02085-0CrossRef

163.

Alharbi YR, Abadel AA (2022) Engineering properties of high-volume fly ash modified cement incorporated with bottle glass waste nanoparticles. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912459CrossRef

164.

Abadel AA, Alghamdi H (2023) Effect of high-volume tile ceramic wastes on resistance of geopolymer mortars to abrasion and freezing-thawing cycles: experimental and deep learning modelling. Ceram Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.01.089CrossRef

165.

Liu H et al (2021) Thermal stability of geopolymer modified by different silicon source materials prepared from solid wastes. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125709CrossRef

166.

Ha NS, Marundrury SS, Pham TM, Pournasiri E, Shi F, Hao H (2022) Effect of grounded blast furnace slag and rice husk ash on performance of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) subjected to impact loading. Constr Build Mater 329:127213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127213CrossRef

167.

Badanoiu AI, Al Saadi THA, Stoleriu S, Voicu G (2015) Preparation and characterization of foamed geopolymers from waste glass and red mud. Constr Build Mater 84:284–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.004CrossRef

168.

Rashad AM, Gharieb M, Shoukry H, Mokhtar MM (2022) Valorization of sugar beet waste as a foaming agent for metakaolin geopolymer activated with phosphoric acid. Constr Build Mater 344:128240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128240CrossRef

169.

Polat D, Güden M (2021) Processing and characterization of geopolymer and sintered geopolymer foams of waste glass powders. Constr Build Mater 300:124259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124259CrossRef

170.

Shao Z et al (2021) The performance of micropore-foamed geopolymers produced from industrial wastes. Constr Build Mater 304:124636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124636CrossRef

Titel: A state-of-the-art review on geopolymer foam concrete with solid waste materials: components, characteristics, and microstructure
verfasst von: Mohamed Abdellatief
Mohamed Abd Elrahman
Hani Alanazi
Aref A. Abadel
Ahmed Tahwia
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2023
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions / Ausgabe 9/2023
Print ISSN: 2364-4176
Elektronische ISSN: 2364-4184
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01202-w

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphical abstracts

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2023

Thermal stress–strain analysis of CFRP-laminated concrete beam with partial replacement of fine aggregate by PET granules

Seismic evaluation of traditional timber framed masonry systems using shake table tests and finite element modelling

Geomechanical characteristics and failure analysis of the limestone slope at Sahastradhara–Chamasari road Dehradun Uttarakhand India

Cyclic degradation of weakly cemented soil and artificial bedding plane in cyclic ring shear test

Multidimensional tensor strategy for the inverse analysis of in-service bridge based on SHM data

Experimental study on in-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced and damaged unreinforced masonry walls retrofitted with vertical concrete ties and bed rebar with and without shotcrete