Skip to main content

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

16. Combining Mathematical Programming and Monte Carlo Simulation to Deal with Uncertainty in Energy Project Portfolio Selection

verfasst von : George Mavrotas, Olena Pechak

Erschienen in: Assessment and Simulation Tools for Sustainable Energy Systems

Verlag: Springer London

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Mathematical programming (MP) is the most common methodology for modeling and optimization of energy systems. Energy systems’ planning and optimization assume the knowledge of future situation, which is usually known with limited certainty. Therefore, the parameters of the model (data which assumed to be known during the modeling process) have usually a degree of uncertainty. Various methods have been proposed for dealing with this uncertainty, the most common ones being fuzzy programming, chance constrained programming, robust programming, and stochastic programming. In this work, we consider the implied uncertainty in the parameters as being of stochastic nature. Each uncertain parameter is characterized by a probability distribution. Subsequently, a Monte Carlo simulation samples the values from these distributions, and the MP models with the sampled values are solved. This process is repeated many times (1,000) in order to have an adequate sample for drawing robust conclusions. Relationships between the values of these parameters (i.e., interdependent parameters) can also be incorporated in the Monte Carlo process. The specific work is focused on the energy project portfolio selection problem where the output of each project as well as other parameters may be uncertain. In the current work, we introduce the iterative trichotomic approach (ITA) that gradually separates projects into green (selected under all circumstances), red (rejected under all circumstances), and gray sets (need further elaboration), combining Monte Carlo simulation and MP. The process output is not only the final portfolio, but also information about the certainty of participation or exclusion of every project in the final portfolio. A case study with real data from clean development mechanism (CDM) projects’ database is elaborated in order to illustrate the method.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abu-Taleb M, Mareschal B (1995) Water resources planning in the Middle East: application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method. Eur J Oper Res 81:500–511MATHCrossRef Abu-Taleb M, Mareschal B (1995) Water resources planning in the Middle East: application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method. Eur J Oper Res 81:500–511MATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Albright SC (1975) Allocation of research grants to university research proposals. Socio-Econ Plann Sci 9:189–195CrossRef Albright SC (1975) Allocation of research grants to university research proposals. Socio-Econ Plann Sci 9:189–195CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Badri MA, Davis D, Davis D (2001) A comprehensive 0–1 goal programming model for project selection. Int J Project Manage 19:243–252CrossRef Badri MA, Davis D, Davis D (2001) A comprehensive 0–1 goal programming model for project selection. Int J Project Manage 19:243–252CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Belton V, Stewart T (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis. An integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, UKCrossRef Belton V, Stewart T (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis. An integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, UKCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bernhard RH (1969) Mathematical programming models for capital budgeting–a survey, generalization, and critique. J Financ Quant Anal 4(2):111–158CrossRef Bernhard RH (1969) Mathematical programming models for capital budgeting–a survey, generalization, and critique. J Financ Quant Anal 4(2):111–158CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brooke A, Kendrick D, Meeraus A, Raman R (1998) GAMS. A user’s guide. GAMS development corporation, Washington. Available:www.gams.com Brooke A, Kendrick D, Meeraus A, Raman R (1998) GAMS. A user’s guide. GAMS development corporation, Washington. Available:www.​gams.​com
Zurück zum Zitat Cavallaro F (2010) Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for assessing thermal-energy storage in concentrated solar power (CSP) systems. Appl Energ 87(2):496–503CrossRef Cavallaro F (2010) Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for assessing thermal-energy storage in concentrated solar power (CSP) systems. Appl Energ 87(2):496–503CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cook WD, Green RH (2000) Project prioritisation: a resource-constrained data envelopment analysis approach. Socio-Econ PlanN Sci 34:85–99CrossRef Cook WD, Green RH (2000) Project prioritisation: a resource-constrained data envelopment analysis approach. Socio-Econ PlanN Sci 34:85–99CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Damghani KK, Sadi-Nezhad S, Aryanezhad MB (2011) A modular decision support system for optimum investment selection in presence of uncertainty: combination of fuzzy mathematical programming and fuzzy rule based system. Int J Expert Syst Appl 38:824–834CrossRef Damghani KK, Sadi-Nezhad S, Aryanezhad MB (2011) A modular decision support system for optimum investment selection in presence of uncertainty: combination of fuzzy mathematical programming and fuzzy rule based system. Int J Expert Syst Appl 38:824–834CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fandel G, Gal T (2001) Redistribution of funds for teaching and research among universities: the case of North Rhine—Westphalia. Eur J Oper Res 130:111–120MATHCrossRef Fandel G, Gal T (2001) Redistribution of funds for teaching and research among universities: the case of North Rhine—Westphalia. Eur J Oper Res 130:111–120MATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Georgopoulou E, Sarafidis Y, Diakoulaki D (1998) Design and implementation of a group DSS for sustaining renewable energies exploitation. Eur J Oper Res 109(2): 483–500 Georgopoulou E, Sarafidis Y, Diakoulaki D (1998) Design and implementation of a group DSS for sustaining renewable energies exploitation. Eur J Oper Res 109(2): 483–500
Zurück zum Zitat Golabi K, Kirkwood CW, Sicherman A (1981) Selecting a portfolio of solar energy projects using multi-attribute preference theory. Manage Sci 27:174–189CrossRef Golabi K, Kirkwood CW, Sicherman A (1981) Selecting a portfolio of solar energy projects using multi-attribute preference theory. Manage Sci 27:174–189CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hyde K, Maier HR, Colby C (2003) Incorporating uncertainty in the PROMETHEE MCDA method. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 12:245–259CrossRef Hyde K, Maier HR, Colby C (2003) Incorporating uncertainty in the PROMETHEE MCDA method. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 12:245–259CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Karakosta C, Doukas H, Psarras J (2010) Technology transfer through climate change: setting a sustainable energy pattern. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:1546–1557CrossRef Karakosta C, Doukas H, Psarras J (2010) Technology transfer through climate change: setting a sustainable energy pattern. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:1546–1557CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kwak NK, Lee C (1998) A multicriteria decision-making approach to university resource allocation and information infrastructure planning. Eur J Oper Res 110:234–242MATHCrossRef Kwak NK, Lee C (1998) A multicriteria decision-making approach to university resource allocation and information infrastructure planning. Eur J Oper Res 110:234–242MATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lahdelma R, Hokkanen J, Salminen P (1998) SMAA: stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. Eur J Oper Res 106:137–143CrossRef Lahdelma R, Hokkanen J, Salminen P (1998) SMAA: stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. Eur J Oper Res 106:137–143CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liesio J, Mild P, Salo A (2007) Preference programming for robust portfolio modeling and project selection. Eur J Oper Res 181(3):1488–1505MathSciNetCrossRef Liesio J, Mild P, Salo A (2007) Preference programming for robust portfolio modeling and project selection. Eur J Oper Res 181(3):1488–1505MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liesio J, Mild P, Salo A (2008) Robust portfolio modeling with incomplete cost information and project interdependencies. Eur J Oper Res 190(3):679–695MathSciNetCrossRef Liesio J, Mild P, Salo A (2008) Robust portfolio modeling with incomplete cost information and project interdependencies. Eur J Oper Res 190(3):679–695MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lorie JH, Savage LJ (1955) Three problems in rationing capital. J Bus 28(4):229–239CrossRef Lorie JH, Savage LJ (1955) Three problems in rationing capital. J Bus 28(4):229–239CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7(1):77–91 Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7(1):77–91
Zurück zum Zitat Mavrotas G, Rozakis S (2009) Extensions of the PROMETHEE method to deal with segmentations constraints. J Decis Syst 18:203–229CrossRef Mavrotas G, Rozakis S (2009) Extensions of the PROMETHEE method to deal with segmentations constraints. J Decis Syst 18:203–229CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mavrotas G, Diakoulaki D, Capros P (2003) Combined MCDA: IP approach for project selection in the electricity market. Ann Oper Res 120:159–170MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Mavrotas G, Diakoulaki D, Capros P (2003) Combined MCDA: IP approach for project selection in the electricity market. Ann Oper Res 120:159–170MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mavrotas G, Diakoulaki D, Caloghirou Y (2006) Project prioritization under policy restrictions. A combination of MCDA with 0–1 programming. Eur J Oper Res 171:296–308MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Mavrotas G, Diakoulaki D, Caloghirou Y (2006) Project prioritization under policy restrictions. A combination of MCDA with 0–1 programming. Eur J Oper Res 171:296–308MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mavrotas G, Diakoulaki D, Kourentzis A (2008) Selection among ranked projects under segmentation, policy and logical constraints. Eur J Oper Res 187:177–192MATHCrossRef Mavrotas G, Diakoulaki D, Kourentzis A (2008) Selection among ranked projects under segmentation, policy and logical constraints. Eur J Oper Res 187:177–192MATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mukherjee K, Bera A (1995) Application of goal programming in project selection: a case study from the Indian Coal mining industry. Eur J Oper Res 82:18–25MATHCrossRef Mukherjee K, Bera A (1995) Application of goal programming in project selection: a case study from the Indian Coal mining industry. Eur J Oper Res 82:18–25MATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oral M, Kettani O, Lang P (1991) A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects. Manage Sci 37:871–885MATHCrossRef Oral M, Kettani O, Lang P (1991) A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects. Manage Sci 37:871–885MATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oral M, Kettani O, Cinar U (2001) Project evaluation and selection in a network of collaboration: a consensual disaggregation multi-criterion approach. Eur J Oper Res 130:332–346MATHCrossRef Oral M, Kettani O, Cinar U (2001) Project evaluation and selection in a network of collaboration: a consensual disaggregation multi-criterion approach. Eur J Oper Res 130:332–346MATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pechak O, Mavrotas G, Diakoulaki D (2011) Role and contribution of clean development mechanism to the development of wind energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:3380–3387CrossRef Pechak O, Mavrotas G, Diakoulaki D (2011) Role and contribution of clean development mechanism to the development of wind energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:3380–3387CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Santhanam R, Kyparisis GJ (1996) A decision model for interdependent information system project selection. Eur J Oper Res 89:380–399MATHCrossRef Santhanam R, Kyparisis GJ (1996) A decision model for interdependent information system project selection. Eur J Oper Res 89:380–399MATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Santhanam R, Muralidhar K, Scniederjans M (1989) A zero-one goal programming approach for information system project selection. Omega 17:583–593CrossRef Santhanam R, Muralidhar K, Scniederjans M (1989) A zero-one goal programming approach for information system project selection. Omega 17:583–593CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shakhsi-Niaei M, Torabi SA, Iranmanesh SH (2011) A comprehensive framework for project selection problem under uncertainty and real-world constraints. Comp Ind Eng 61:226–237CrossRef Shakhsi-Niaei M, Torabi SA, Iranmanesh SH (2011) A comprehensive framework for project selection problem under uncertainty and real-world constraints. Comp Ind Eng 61:226–237CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tervonen T, Lahdelma R (2007) Implementing stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Eur J Oper Res 178:500–513MATHCrossRef Tervonen T, Lahdelma R (2007) Implementing stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Eur J Oper Res 178:500–513MATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vose D (1996) Quantitative risk analysis: a guide to Monte Carlo simulation modeling. Wiley, UKMATH Vose D (1996) Quantitative risk analysis: a guide to Monte Carlo simulation modeling. Wiley, UKMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Vose D (2006) Risk analysis: a quantitative guide, 2nd edn. Wiley, UK Vose D (2006) Risk analysis: a quantitative guide, 2nd edn. Wiley, UK
Zurück zum Zitat Zanakis SH, Mandakovic T, Gupta SK, Sahay S, Hong S (1995) a review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors. Socio-Econ Plann Sci 29:59–79CrossRef Zanakis SH, Mandakovic T, Gupta SK, Sahay S, Hong S (1995) a review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors. Socio-Econ Plann Sci 29:59–79CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Combining Mathematical Programming and Monte Carlo Simulation to Deal with Uncertainty in Energy Project Portfolio Selection
verfasst von
George Mavrotas
Olena Pechak
Copyright-Jahr
2013
Verlag
Springer London
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5143-2_16