Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Recommender Systems: Introduction and Challenges Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

22. Group Recommender Systems: Aggregation, Satisfaction and Group Attributes

verfasst von : Judith Masthoff

Erschienen in: Recommender Systems Handbook

Verlag: Springer US

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter shows how a system can recommend to a group of users by aggregating information from individual user models and modeling the user’s affective state. It summarizes results from previous research in these areas. It explores how group attributes can be incorporated in aggregation strategies. Additionally, it shows how group recommendation techniques can be applied when recommending to individuals, in particular for solving the cold-start problem and dealing with multiple criteria.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Personality and Recommender Systems
Nächstes Kapitel Aggregation Functions for Recommender Systems
Fußnoten
1
These strategies are too complicated to fully explain here, see the original papers for details.
 
2
This does not necessarily mean that these strategies are bad, as complexity can also play a role. In fact, in Experiment 2 Borda count was amongst the best performing strategies.
 
3
In terms of satisfaction functions predicting the same relative satisfaction scores for group members as predicted by participants, see [28] for details.
 
4
We transformed a rating r into (r-scale_midpoint)2 if r ≥ scale_midpoint, and -(r-scale_midpoint)2 if r<scale_midpoint.
 
5
We transformed a rating r by a user u into r × (TotalRatingsAverage ÷ TotalRatings(u)), where TotalRatingsAverage is the sum for all items of the average ratings by all users, and TotalRatings(u) is the sum for all items of u’s rating.
 
6
In a between-subject design, two different topics were used evoking different moods.
 
7
For reasons explained in [30], a learning rather than recommender task was used, and satisfaction with performance measured. There was an easy (E), medium (M) and difficult (D) variant of the task, so we could predict accurately how satisfied participants would be with performance on an individual task, and could focus on modeling the effect of sequences on satisfaction. Half the participants did tasks in order E-D-M, the other half in order D-E-M.
 
8
Additionally, it seems plausible (but requires investigation) that users would be more dissatisfied with disliked selected items when their expertise is higher than that of other group members.
 
9
This may work well when using an Additive or Multiplicative strategy, but does not really work for the Least Misery and Most Pleasure strategies used in [15], and hence unfortunately some of the formulas in [15] which incorporate expertise lack validity.
 
10
Personal impact is not completely distinct from Role: somebody’s role may influence their personal impact. However, it is still possible for people with the same official roles to have a different cognitive centrality.
 
11
We have added the word positional to the terms homogeneous and heterogeneous used in [47] to avoid confusion with the earlier use of these words to indicate how diverse group preferences are.
 
12
This initially offers the user non-personalized recommendations, however not necessarily by purely using popularity (e.g. Average without Misery can be used and fairness principles can be applied towards the other group members when recommending a sequence).
 
Literatur
1.
Alfonseca, E., Carro, R.M., Martín, E., Ortigosa, A., Paredes, P.: The Impact of Learning Styles on Student Grouping for Collaborative Learning: A Case Study. UMUAI 16 (2006) 377–401
2.
Ardissono, L., Goy,A., Petrone, G., Segnan, M., Torasso, P.: Tailoring the Recommendation of Tourist Information to Heterogeneous User Groups. In S. Reich, M. Tzagarakis, P. De Bra (eds.), Hypermedia: Openness, Structural Awareness, and Adaptivity, International Workshops OHS-7, SC-3, and AH-3. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2266, Springer Verlag, Berlin (2002) 280–295
3.
Asch,S.E.:Studies of independence and conformity: a minority of one against a unanimous majority. Pschol. Monogr. 70 (1956) 1–70
4.
Baltrunas, L., Makcinskas, T., Ricci, F.: Group recommendations with rank aggregation and collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems (2010) 119–126. ACM.
5.
Beliakov, G., Calvo, T., James, S.: Aggregation functions for recommender systems. In this handbook (2015).
6.
Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J.: Group-based recipe recommendations: analysis of data aggregation strategies. In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems 111–118. ACM.
7.
Bermingham, A., O’Rourke, J., Gurrin, C., Collins, R., Irving, K., Smeaton, A. F.: Automatically recommending multimedia content for use in group reminiscence therapy. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Multimedia indexing and information retrieval for healthcare (2013) 49–58. ACM.
8.
Bourke, S., McCarthy, K., Smyth, B: Using social ties in group recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science (2011) University of Ulster-Magee. Intelligent Systems Research Centre.
9.
Carvalho, L. A., Macedo, H. T.: Users’ satisfaction in recommendation systems for groups: an approach based on noncooperative games. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web Companion (2013) 951–958.
10.
de Campos, L.M., Fernandez-Luna, J.M., Huete, J.F., Rueda-Morales, M.A.: Managing uncertainty in group recommending processes. UMUAI 19 (2009) 207–242
11.
De Carolis, B.: Adapting news and advertisements to groups. In: Pervasive Advertising (2011). 227–246. Springer. CITED identification of people in group; GAIN system
12.
de Mello Neto, W. L., Nowé, A.: Insights on social recommender system. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Recommendation Utility Evaluation: Beyond RMSE, at ACM RecSyS12 (2012) 33–38.
13.
De Pessemier, T., Dooms, S., Martens, L.: Comparison of group recommendation algorithms. Multimedia Tools and Applications, (2013) 1–45.
14.
Felfernig, A., Zehentner, C., Ninaus, G., Grabner, H., Maalej, W., Pagano, D., Reinfrank, F.: Group decision support for requirements negotiation. In: Advances in User Modeling (2012) 105–116. Springer.
15.
Gatrell, M., Xing, X., Lv, Q., Beach, A., Han, R., Mishra, S., Seada, K.: Enhancing group recommendation by incorporating social relationship interactions. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on Supporting group work (2010) 97–106. ACM.
16.
Gorla, J., Lathia, N., Robertson, S., Wang, J.: Probabilistic group recommendation via information matching. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web (2013) 495–504.
17.
Guzzi, F., Ricci, F., Burke, R. Interactive multi-party critiquing for group recommendation. In: Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems (2011) 265–268. ACM.
18.
Harrer, A., McLaren, B.M., Walker, E., Bollen L., Sewall, J.: Creating Cognitive Tutors for Collaborative Learning: Steps Toward Realization. UMUAI 16 (2006) 175–209
19.
Herr, S., Rösch, A., Beckmann, C., Gross, T.: Informing the design of group recommender systems. In: CHI12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2012) 2507–2512. ACM.
20.
Introne, J., Alterman,R.: Using Shared Representations to Improve Coordination and Intent Inference. UMUAI 16 (2006) 249–280
21.
Ioannidis, S., Muthukrishnan, S., Yan, J. (2013): A consensus-focused group recommender system. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.7076.
22.
Jameson, A.: More than the Sum of its Members: Challenges for Group Recommender Systems. International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, Gallipoli, Italy (2004)CrossRef
23.
Jameson, A., Smyth, B.: Recommendation to groups. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Njedl, W. (Eds). The Adaptive Web Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization. Springer (2007) 596–627
24.
Kim, H. N., Bloess, M., El Saddik, A.: Folkommender: a group recommender system based on a graph-based ranking algorithm. Multimedia Systems (2013) 1–17
25.
Kurdyukova, E., Hammer, S., André, E.: Personalization of content on public displays driven by the recognition of group context. In: Ambient Intelligence (2012) 272–287. Springer.
26.
Liu, X., Tian, Y., Ye, M., Lee, W. C.: Exploring personal impact for group recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management (2012) 674–683. ACM.
27.
Masthoff, J.: Modeling the multiple people that are me. In: P. Brusilovsky, A.Corbett, and F. de Rosis (eds.) Proceedings of the 2003 User Modeling Conference, Johnstown, PA. Springer Verlag, Berlin (2003) 258–262
28.
Masthoff, J.: Group Modeling: Selecting a Sequence of Television Items to Suit a Group of Viewers. UMUAI 14 (2004) 37–85
29.
Masthoff, J.: Selecting News to Suit a Group of Criteria: An Exploration. 4th Workshop on Personalization in Future TV - Methods, Technologies, Applications for Personalized TV, Eindhoven, the Netherlands (2004)
30.
Masthoff, J., Gatt, A.: In Pursuit of Satisfaction and the Prevention of Embarrassment: Affective state in Group Recommender Systems. UMUAI 16 (2006) 281–319
31.
Masthoff, J.: The user as wizard: A method for early involvement in the design and evaluation of adaptive systems. Fifth Workshop on User-Centred Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Systems (2006)
32.
Masthoff, J., Vasconcelos, W.W., Aitken, C., Correa da Silva, F.S.: Agent-Based Group Modelling for Ambient Intelligence. AISB symposium on Affective Smart Environments, Newcastle, UK (2007)
33.
McCarthy, J., Anagnost, T.: MusicFX: An Arbiter of Group Preferences for Computer Supported Collaborative Workouts. CSCW, Seattle, WA. (1998) 363–372
34.
McCarthy, K., McGinty, L., Smyth, B., Salamo, M.: The needs of the many: A case-based group recommender system. European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Springer (2006) 196–210
35.
McGinty, L., Reilly, J. On the evolution of critiquing recommenders. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, and P.B. Kantor: Recommender Systems Handbook, First Edition, Springer (2011) 73–105
36.
37.
Pera, M. S., Ng, Y. K.: A group recommender for movies based on content similarity and popularity. Information Processing & Management. (2012)
38.
Piliponyte, A., Ricci, F., Koschwitz, J. Sequential music recommendations for groups by balancing user satisfaction. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Group Recommender Systems: Concepts, Technology, Evaluation at UMAP13.(2013) 6–11.
39.
Quijano-Sanchez, L., Recio-Garcia, J. A., Diaz-Agudo, B., Jimenez-Diaz, G.: Social factors in group recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 4(1) 8 (2013).CrossRef
40.
Read, T., Barros, B., Bárcena, E., Pancorbo, J.: Coalescing Individual and Collaborative Learning to Model User Linguistic Competences. UMUAI 16 (2006) 349–376
41.
Salamó, M., McCarthy, K., Smyth, B.: Generating recommendations for consensus negotiation in group personalization services. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(5) (2012) 597–610.
42.
Senot, C., Kostadinov, D., Bouzid, M., Picault, J., Aghasaryan, A., Bernier, C.: Analysis of strategies for building group profiles. In: Proceedings of User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (2010) 40–51. Springer.
43.
Stettinger, M., Ninaus, G., Jeran, M., Reinfrank, F., Reiterer, S.: WE-DECIDE: A decision support environment for groups of users. In: Recent Trends in Applied Artificial Intelligence (2013) 382–391. Springer.
44.
Suebnukarn, S., Haddawy, P.: Modeling Individual and Collaborative Problem-Solving in Medical Problem-Based Learning. UMUAI 16 (2006) 211–248
45.
Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Explaining recommendations: Design and evaluation. In this handbook (2015).
46.
Umyarov, A., Tuzhilin, A.: Using external aggregate ratings for improving individual recommendations. ACM Transactions on the Web 5 (2011) 1–45CrossRef
47.
Wang, Z., Zhou, X., Yu, Z., Wang, H., Ni, H.: Quantitative evaluation of group user experience in smart spaces. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal 41:2 (2010) 105–122CrossRefMATH
48.
Ye, M., Liu, X., Lee, W. C.: Exploring social influence for recommendation: a generative model approach. In Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (2012) ACM: 671–680
49.
Yu, Z., Zhou, X., Hao, Y. Gu, J.: TV Program Recommendation for Multiple Viewers Based on User Profile Merging. UMUAI 16 (2006) 63–82
Metadaten
Titel
Group Recommender Systems: Aggregation, Satisfaction and Group Attributes
verfasst von
Judith Masthoff
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Verlag
Springer US
Buch
Recommender Systems Handbook

Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7636-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4899-7637-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_22

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise