Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Which Apps Have Privacy Policies? Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Towards a Roadmap for Privacy Technologies and the General Data Protection Regulation: A Transatlantic Initiative

verfasst von : Stefan Schiffner, Bettina Berendt, Triin Siil, Martin Degeling, Robert Riemann, Florian Schaub, Kim Wuyts, Massimo Attoresi, Seda Gürses, Achim Klabunde, Jules Polonetsky, Norman Sadeh, Gabriela Zanfir-Fortuna

Erschienen in: Privacy Technologies and Policy

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation is poised to present major challenges in bridging the gap between law and technology. This paper reports on a workshop on the deployment, content and design of the GDPR that brought together academics, practitioners, civil-society actors, and regulators from the EU and the US. Discussions aimed at advancing current knowledge on the use of abstract legal terms in the context of applied technologies together with best practices following state of the art technologies. Five themes were discussed: state of the art, consent, de-identification, transparency, and development and deployment practices. Four traversal conflicts were identified, and research recommendations were outlined to reconcile these conflicts.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Which Apps Have Privacy Policies?
Nächstes Kapitel RESPECT4U – Privacy as Innovation Opportunity
Fußnoten
Literatur
1.
2.
3.
Schaub, F., Balebako, R., Durity, A.L., Cranor, L.F.: A design space for effective privacy notices. In: Eleventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2015), Ottawa, pp. 1–17. USENIX Association (2015)
4.
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology: Big data and privacy: a technological perspective. Report to the U.S. President, Executive Office of the President, May 2014
5.
Cranor, L.F.: Necessary but not sufficient: standard mechanisms for privacy notice and choice. J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law 10, 273 (2012)
6.
Cate, F.H.: The limits of notice and choice. IEEE Secur. Priv. 8(2), 59–62 (2010)CrossRef
7.
Schaub, F., Balebako, R., Cranor, L.F.: Designing effective privacy notices and controls. IEEE Internet Comput. 21(3), 70–77 (2017)CrossRef
8.
9.
10.
11.
Narayanan, A., Shmatikov, V.: Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets. In: 2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, SP 2008 (2008)
12.
Cavoukian, A., Castro, D.: Big data and innovation, setting the record straight: de-identification does work. In: Information and Privacy Commissioner, p. 18 (2014)
13.
Hu, R., Stalla-Bourdillon, S., Yang, M., Schiavo, V., Sassone, V.: Bridging policy, regulation and practice? A techno-legal analysis of three types of data in the GDPR. In: Data Protection and Privacy: The Age of Intelligent Machines, p. 39 (2017)
14.
Ye, L.R.: The value of explanation in expert systems for auditing: an experimental investigation. Expert Syst. Appl. 9(4), 543–556 (1995)CrossRef
15.
16.
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Floridi, L.: Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the general data protection regulation. Int. Data Priv. Law 7, 76–99 (2017)CrossRef
17.
Selbst, A.D., Powles, J.: Meaningful information and the right to explanation. Int. Data Priv. Law 7(4), 233–242 (2017)CrossRef
18.
19.
20.
Edwards, L., Veale, M.: Slave to the algorithm? Why a ’right to an explanation’ is probably not the remedy you are looking for. Duke Law Technol. Rev. 16, 18 (2017)
21.
22.
Obar, J.A., Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., The biggest lie on the internet: ignoring the privacy policies and terms of service policies of social networking services. In: TPRC 44: The 44th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (2016)
23.
24.
Atzori, M., Bonchi, F., Giannotti, F., Pedreschi, D.: Anonymity preserving pattern discovery. VLDB J. 17(4), 703–727 (2008)CrossRef
25.
Hansen, M., Jensen, M., Rost, M.: Protection goals for privacy engineering. In: 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), pp. 159–166, May 2015
26.
Schmidt , A., Herrmann, T., Degeling, M.: From interaction to intervention: an approach for keeping humans in control in the context of socio-technical systems. In: 4th Workshop on Socio-Technical Perspective in IS development (STPIS 2018) (2018)
27.
Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., Guestrin, C.: “Why should I trust you?”: explaining the predictions of any classifier. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2016, pp. 1135–1144. ACM, New York (2016)
28.
Gürses, S., van Hoboken, J.: Privacy after the agile turn. In: Selinger, E., Polonetsky, J., Tene, O. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy (Cambridge Law Handbooks, pp. 579–601). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2018). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1017/​9781316831960.​032
29.
30.
Oliver, I.: Privacy Engineering: A Data Flow and Ontological Approach. CreateSpace Independent Publishing, July 2014. 978-1497569713
31.
Anton, A.I., Earp, J.B.: A requirements taxonomy for reducing web site privacy vulnerabilities. Requirements Eng. 9(3), 169–185 (2004)CrossRef
32.
Solove, D.J.: A taxonomy of privacy. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 154(3), 477 (2006). GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 129CrossRef
33.
Solove, D.J.: Conceptualizing privacy. Calif. Law Rev. 90(4), 1087–1155 (2002)CrossRef
34.
Kost, M., Freytag, J.C., Kargl, F., Kung, A.: Privacy verification using ontologies. In: ARES, pp. 627–632. IEEE (2011)
35.
Kern, T.: Flight Discipline. McGraw-Hill Education, New York (1998)
36.
Card, A.J., Ward, J.R., Clarkson, P.J.: Beyond FMEA: the structured what-if technique (SWIFT). J. Healthc. Risk Manag. 31, 23–29 (2012)CrossRef
37.
Scandariato, R., Wuyts, K., Joosen, W.: A descriptive study of Microsoft’s threat modeling technique. Requirements Eng. 20(2), 163–180 (2015)CrossRef
38.
Gawande, A.: The Checklist Manifesto. Profile Books (2011)
39.
Reason, J.T.: Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Ashgate, Farnham (1997)
40.
Pfleeger, S.L.: Risky business: what we have yet to learn about risk management. J. Syst. Softw. 53(3), 265–273 (2000)CrossRef
41.
Oliver, I.: Experiences in the development and usage of a privacy requirements framework. In: 24th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2016, Beijing, China, 12–16 September 2016, pp. 293–302. IEEE Computer Society (2016)
42.
Power, M.: The risk management of everything. J. Risk Finance 5, 58–65 (2004)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Towards a Roadmap for Privacy Technologies and the General Data Protection Regulation: A Transatlantic Initiative
verfasst von
Stefan Schiffner
Bettina Berendt
Triin Siil
Martin Degeling
Robert Riemann
Florian Schaub
Kim Wuyts
Massimo Attoresi
Seda Gürses
Achim Klabunde
Jules Polonetsky
Norman Sadeh
Gabriela Zanfir-Fortuna
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Privacy Technologies and Policy

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02546-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-02547-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02547-2_2

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise