Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction: A Framework for Managing Food Waste Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Creating Resilient Interventions to Food Waste: Aligning and Leveraging Systems and Design Thinking

verfasst von : Danielle Lake, Amy McFarland, Jody Vogelzang

Erschienen in: Food Waste Management

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Food waste interventions often end up shifting waste instead of reducing it. Lake, McFarland, and Vogelzang suggest efforts to ameliorate the food waste crisis could be better served through integrating theories and tools from systems thinking and design thinking. They analyse several systemic influences on food change and then recommend ten practical strategies for fostering and supporting change agents. Lake et al. suggest these ten intervention strategies will help change agents uncover and leverage the otherwise hidden interconnections between social, economic, and political systems. These strategies may open opportunities to address the underlying factors contributing to food waste and yield more inclusive, effective, and sustainable change.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Between Kitchen Sink and City Sewer: A Socio-Ecological Approach to Food Waste in Environmental Design
Nächstes Kapitel Assumptions About Consumers in Food Waste Campaigns: A Visual Analysis
Literatur
Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58, 239–275.CrossRef
Aschemann-Witzel, J., deHooge, I., Amani, P., Bech-Larson, T., & Oostindjer, M. (2015). Consumer-related food waste: Causes and potential for action. Sustainability, 7, 6457–6477.CrossRef
Aschemann-Witzel, J., deHooge, I. E., Rohm, H., Normann, A., Bossle-Bonzanini, M., Gronhoj, A. et al. (2017). Key characteristics and success factors of supply chain initiatives tackling consumer-related food waste—A multiple case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 33–45.CrossRef
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Brown, V. A., Deane, P. M., Harris, J., & Russell, J. (2010). Towards a just and sustainable future. In V. A. Brown, J. A. Harris, & J. Russell (Eds.), Tackling wicked problems: Through the transdisciplinary imagination (pp. 3–15). Washington, DC: Earthscan.
Brown, V. A., & Lambert, J. A. (2013). Collective learning for transformational change: A guide to collaborative action. New York, NY: Routledge.
Burns, D. (2014). Assessing impact in dynamic and complex environments: Systemic action research and participatory systemic inquiry. Centre for Development Impact: Practice Paper, 8, 1–10.
Checkland, P. (1999). Systems thinking, systems practice: Includes a 30 year retrospective. New York, NY: Wiley.
Crosby, A., Fam, D., & Mellick Lopes, A. (2018). Transdisciplinarity and the ‘living lab model’: Food waste management as a site for collaborative learning. In D. Fam, L. Neuhauser, & P. Gibbs (Eds.), Transdisciplinary theory, practice and education (pp. 117–131). Cham: Springer.CrossRef
Crouch, C., & Pearce, J. (2012). Doing research in design. Oxford: Berg.CrossRef
Curtis, S. (2015). An investigation of living labs for sustainability: Reflections on the living lab methodology (Course Paper: Applied Research in Sustainable Consumption and Production (ARSCP), Master of Science in Environmental Management and Policy). Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Dolan, P. (2002). The sustainability of “sustainable consumption”. Journal of Macromarketing, 22(2), 170–181.CrossRef
Emery, M., & Flora, C. (2006). Spiraling up: Mapping community transformation with community capitals framework. Community Development, 37, 19–35.CrossRef
Evans, D. (2014). Food waste: Home consumption, material culture, and everyday life. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.CrossRef
Fam, D., Mellick Lopes, A., Crosby, A., & Ross, K. (2020). The transdisciplinary living lab model (TDLL). In W. Leal Filho, A. L. Salvia, R. Pretorius, L. L. Brandli, E. Manolas, F. Alves, … A. Do Paco (Eds.), Universities as living labs for sustainable development: Supporting the implementation of the sustainable development goals (pp. 167–182). Springer World Sustainability Series. Springer.
Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–267.CrossRef
Fraser, C., & Parizeau, K. (2018). Waste management as foodwork: A feminist food studies approach to household food waste. Canadian Food Studies, 5, 39–62.
Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66, 290–302.CrossRef
Green, K., & Vergragt, P. (2002). Towards sustainable households: A methodology for developing sustainable technological and social innovations. Futures, 34(5), 381–400.CrossRef
Hebrok, M., & Boks, C. (2017). Household food waste: Drivers and potential intervention points for design—An extensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 380–392.CrossRef
Hebrok, M., & Heidenstrøm, N. (2019). Contextualising food waste prevention—Decisive moments within everyday practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 1435–1448.CrossRef
Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive environmental assessment and management. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Huutoniemi, K. (2015). Interdisciplinarity as academic accountability: Prospects for quality control across disciplinary boundaries. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, 30, 163–185.CrossRef
Irwin, T. (2015). Transition design: A proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research. Design and Culture, 7(2), 229–246.CrossRef
Kallbekken, S., & Saelen, H. (2013). ‘Nudging’ hotel guests to reduce food waste as a win-win environmental measure. Economics Letters, 119, 325–327.CrossRef
Kezar, A. (2014). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kumar, V. (2012). 101 design methods: A structured approach for driving innovation in your organization. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Lake, D., McFarland, A., & Jennrich, J. (2018). Remaking the academy: The potential and the challenge of transdisciplinary collaborative engagement. In A. Stoller & E. Kramer (Eds.), Contemporary philosophical proposals for the university. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lieberman, L., Golden, S. D., & Earp, J. l. (2013). Structural approaches to health promotion: What do we need to know about policy and environmental change? Health Education & Behavior, 40, 520–525.
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17, 445–459.CrossRef
Lynch, K. (1990). Wasting away: An exploration of waste: What it is, how it happens, why we fear it, how to do it well. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
Mathews, L. G., & Jones, A. (2008). Using systems thinking to improve interdisciplinary outcomes. Issues in Integrative Studies, 26, 73–104.
McHugh, N. A. (2015). The limits of knowledge: Generating pragmatist feminist cases for situated knowing. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Mena, C., Adenso-Diaz, B., & Yurt, O. (2011). The causes of food waste in the supplier-retailer interface: Evidence from the UK and Spain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55, 648–658.CrossRef
Meneely, L., Burns, A., & Strugnell, C. (2009). Age associated changes in older consumers retail behaviour. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 37(12), 1041–1056.CrossRef
Murray, T. (2010). Exploring epistemic wisdom: Ethical and practical implications of integral studies and methodological pluralism for collaboration and knowledge building. In S. Esbjorn-Hargens (Ed.), Integral theory in action: Applied, theoretical, and constructive perspectives on the AQAL model. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Neff, R. A., Spiker, M. L., & Truant, P. L. (2015). Wasted food: U.S. consumers’ reported awareness, attitudes, and behaviors. PLoS One, 10(6), e0127881.
Nigbur, D., Lyons, E., & Uzzell, D. (2010). Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: Using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 259–284.CrossRef
Niitamo, V., Kulkki, S., Eriksson, M., & Hribernik, K. A. (2006, June). State-of-the-art and good practice in the field of living labs. Paper presented at the IEEE International Technology Management Conference, Milan, Italy, 26–28.
O’Connell, E. (2012). Talking trash: Bringing research into action while reducing household solid waste (Order No. 3513501). Available from Psychology Database (1027764327).
O’Kane, G. (2016). A moveable feast: Contemporary relational food cultures emerging from local food networks. Appetite, 105, 2018–2231.CrossRef
Osbaldiston, R., & Schott, J. P. (2012). Environmental sustainability and behavioural science: Meta-analysis of proenvironmental behaviour experiments. Environmental Behaviour, 44(2), 257–299.CrossRef
Parfitt, J., Barthel, M., & Macnaughton, S. (2010). Food waste within food supply chains: Quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 3065–3081.CrossRef
Pateman, C. (1983). Feminist critiques of the public/private dichotomy. In S. I. Benn., & G. F. Gaus (Eds.), Public and private in social life (pp. 281–303). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
Pearson, D., Minehan, M., & Wakefield-Rann, R. (2013). Food waste in Australian households: Why does it occur? Locale: The Australian-Pacific Journal of Regional Food Studies, 3, 118–132.
Plumwood, V. (1999). Paths beyond human centeredness. In A. Weston (Ed.), An invitation to environmental philosophy (pp. 69–106). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Porpino, G., Parente, J., & Wansink, B. (2015). Food waste paradox: Antecedents of food disposal in low income households. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39, 619–629.CrossRef
Porpino, G., Wansink, B., & Parente, J. (2016). Wasted positive intentions: The role of affection and abundance on household food waste. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 22, 733–751.CrossRef
Ritchey, T. (2011). Wicked problems, social messes: Decision support modeling with morphological analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRef
Roberts, P. (2009). The end of food: The ending crisis in the world food industry. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
Roodhuyzen, D. M. A., Luning, P. A., Fogliano, V., & Steenbekkers, L. P. A. (2017). Putting together the puzzle of consumer food waste: Towards an integral perspective. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 68, 37–50.CrossRef
Schmidt, K., & Matthies, E. (2018). Where to start fighting the food waste problem? Identifying most promising entry points for intervention programs to reduce household food waste and overconsumption of food. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 139, 1–14.CrossRef
Selinger, E., & Whyte, K. (2011). Is there a right way to nudge? The Practice and ethics of choice architecture: Practice and ethics of choice architecture. Sociology Compass, 5, 923–935.CrossRef
Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 282–292.CrossRef
Stöckli, S., Niklaus, E., & Dorn, M. (2018). Call for testing interventions to prevent consumer food waste. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 136, 462–554.CrossRef
Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Thompson, P. B. (2017). The spirit of the soil: Agricultural and environmental ethics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRef
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology & Society, 9(2), 5.CrossRef
Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5, 131–153.CrossRef
Watson, M., & Meah, A. (2012). Food, waste and safety: Negotiating conflicting social anxieties into the practices of domestic provisioning. The Sociological Review, 60, 102–120.CrossRef
Williams, H., Wikström, F., Otterbring, T., Löfgren, M., & Gustafsson, A. (2012). Reasons for household food waste with special attention to packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production, 24, 141–148.CrossRef
Zolli, A., & Healy, A. M. (2012). Resilience: Why things bounce back. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Metadaten
Titel
Creating Resilient Interventions to Food Waste: Aligning and Leveraging Systems and Design Thinking
verfasst von
Danielle Lake
Amy McFarland
Jody Vogelzang
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Buch
Food Waste Management

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20560-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-20561-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20561-4_8

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise