Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Phoenix: A Scalable Streaming Hypergraph Analysis Framework Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Extending Micromobility Deployments: A Concept and Local Case Study

verfasst von : Zhila Dehdari Ebrahimi, Raj Bridgelall, Mohsen Momenitabar

Erschienen in: Advances in Data Science and Information Engineering

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Micromobility is a recent phenomenon that refers to the use of small human- or electric-powered vehicles such as scooters and bikes to travel short distances, and sometimes to connect with other modes of transportation such as bus, train, or car. Deployments in major cities of the world have been both successful and challenging. This paper reviews the evolution of micromobility services from shared bicycles, dockless systems, and shared electric scooters. The authors evaluated benefits, deficiencies, and factors in adoption to inform more rigorous and extensive geospatial analysis that will examine intersections with land-use, public transit, socio-economic demographics, road networks, and traffic. This work conducted exploratory spatial data analysis and correlation of publicly available datasets on land use, trip production, traffic, and travel behavior. Data from Washington D.C. served as a case study of best practices for scaling deployments to meet the social, economic, and mobility needs of the city.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Deep Ensemble Learning for Early-Stage Churn Management in Subscription-Based Business
Nächstes Kapitel Real-Time Spatiotemporal Air Pollution Prediction with Deep Convolutional LSTM Through Satellite Image Analysis
Literatur
1.
NGA, Governors Staying Ahead of the Transportation Innovation Curve: A Policy Roadmap for States (National Governors Association (NGA), Washington, DC, 2018)
2.
NACTO, Guidelines for Regulating Shared Mobility: Version 2 (National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), Washington, DC, 2019)
3.
F. Soriguera, V. Casado, E. Jiménez, A simulation model for public bike-sharing systems. Transp. Res. Procedia 33, 139–146 (2018)CrossRef
4.
P. DeMaio, Bike-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision and future. J. Public Transp. 12(4), 41–56 (2009)CrossRef
5.
S. Shaheen, S. Guzman, Worldwide bike sharing. Access Mag. Fall 2011(39), 22–27 (2011)
6.
7.
B. Jiang, S. Liang, Z.-R. Peng, H. Cong, M. Levy, Q. Cheng, T. Wang, J.V. Remais, Transport and public health in China: The road to a healthy future. Lancet 390(10104), 1781–1791 (2017)CrossRef
8.
Y. Zhang, T. Thomas, M. Brussel, M. Maarseveen, Exploring the impact of built environment factors on the use of public bikes at bike stations: Case study in Zhongshan, China. J. Transp. Geogr. 58, 59–70 (2017)CrossRef
9.
NATCO, Bike share in the U.S.: 2017 (National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), 2017)
10.
NACTO, Shared micromobility in the U.S.: 2018 (National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), 2018)
11.
S. Gössling, Integrating e-scooters in urban transportation: Problems, policies, and the prospect of system change. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 79, 102230 (2020)CrossRef
12.
13.
D.M. Luke Peters, The death and rebirth of bikesharing in Seattle: Implications for policy and system design. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 130, 208–226 (2019)CrossRef
14.
Z.Z.J.W.G.B. Hannah Younes, Comparing the temporal determinants of dockless scooter-share and station-based bike-share in Washington, D.C. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 134, 308–320 (2020)CrossRef
15.
D. van Lierop, D. Ettema, Z. Chen, Dockless bike-sharing systems: What are the implications? Transp. Rev. 40(3), 333–353 (2020)CrossRef
16.
17.
E. Fishman, C. Cherry, E-bikes in the mainstream: Reviewing a decade of research. Transp. Rev. 36(1), 72–91 (2015)CrossRef
18.
K. Lovejoy, S. Handy, Developments in bicycle equipment and its role in promoting cycling as a travel mode, in City Cycling, ed. by J. Pucher, R. Buehler, (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012), pp. 75–104
19.
20.
E. Hannon, S. Knupfer, S. Stern, B. Sumers, J.T. Nijssen, An Integrated Perspective on the Future of Mobility, Part 3: Setting the Direction Towards Seamless Mobility (McKinsey & Company, 2019)
21.
I.T. Forum, Safe Micromobility (International Transport Forum, Paris, 2020)
22.
23.
N. DuPuis, J. Griess, C. Klein, Micromobility in Cities: A History and Policy Overview (National League of Cities, Washington, DC, 2019)
24.
N.A. Gallagher, The Influence of Neighborhood Environment, Mobility Limitations, and Psychosocial Factors on Neighborhood Walking in Older Adults (The University of Michigan, Michigan, 2010)
25.
C. Nuworsoo, E. Cooper, K. Cushing, Integration of Bicycling and Walking Facilities into the Infrastructure of Urban Communities (Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, 2012)
26.
27.
A. Fyhri, N. Fearnley, Effects of e-bikes on bicycle use and mode share. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 36, 45–52 (2015)CrossRef
28.
S. Haustein, M. Møller, Age and attitude: Changes in cycling patterns of different e-bike user segments. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 10(9), 836–846 (2016)CrossRef
29.
L. Winslott Hiselius, Å. Svensson, Could the increased use of e-bikes (pedelecs) in Sweden contribute to a more sustainable transport system? in 9th International Conference on Environmental Engineering (ICEE), (2014)
30.
B.E. Saelens, J.F. Sallis, L.D. Frank, Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann. Behav. Med. 25(2), 80–91 (2003)CrossRef
31.
R. Cervero, M. Duncan, Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Am. J. Public Health 93(9), 1478–1483 (2003)CrossRef
32.
S.D. Lawson, B. Morris, Out of cars and onto bikes: What chance? Traffic Eng. Control 40(5), 272–276 (1999)
33.
Y. Shen, X. Zhang, J. Zhao, Understanding the usage of dockless bike sharing. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 12(9), 686–700 (2018)CrossRef
34.
J. Corcoran, T. Li, D. Rohde, E. Charles-Edwards, D. Mateo-Babiano, Spatio-temporal patterns of a public bicycle sharing program: The effect of weather and calendar events. J. Transp. Geogr. 41, 292–305 (2014)CrossRef
35.
W. El-Assi, M.S. Mahmoud, K.N. Habib, Effects of built environment and weather on bike sharing demand: A station level analysis of commercial bike sharing in Toronto. Transportation 44(3), 589–613 (2017)CrossRef
36.
C.M.D. Chardon, G. Caruso, I. Thomas, Bicycle sharing system ‘success’ determinants. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 100, 202–214 (2017)CrossRef
37.
X. Wang, G. Lindsey, J.E. Schoner, A. Harrison, Modeling bike share station activity: Effects of nearby businesses and jobs on trips to and from stations. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 142(1), 04015001 (2015)CrossRef
38.
A. Faghih-Imani, N. Eluru, Examining the impact of sample size in the analysis of bicycle-sharing systems. Transportmetrica A Transp. Sci. 13(2), 139–161 (2017)CrossRef
39.
D.G. Chatman, Residential choice, the built environment, and nonwork travel: Evidence using new data and methods. Environ. Plann. A Econ. Space 41(5), 1072–1089 (2009)CrossRef
40.
B. Caulfield, M. O’Mahony, W. Brazil, P. Weldon, Examining usage patterns of a bike-sharing scheme in a medium sized city. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 100, 152–161 (2017)CrossRef
41.
E. Fishman, Bikeshare: A review of recent literature. Transp. Rev. 36(1), 92–113 (2016)CrossRef
42.
Y. Zhao, L. Chen, C. Teng, S. Li, G. Pan, Green bicycling: A smartphone-based public bicycle sharing system for healthy life, in Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom), 2013 IEEE and Internet of Things (iThings/CPSCom), IEEE International Conference on and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, (Atlanta, 2013)
43.
D. Buck, R. Buehler, P. Happ, B. Rawls, P. Chung, N. Borecki, Are bikeshare users different from regular cyclists? A first look at short-term users, annual members, and area cyclists in the Washington, DC, region. Transp. Res. Rec. 2387(1), 112–119 (2013)CrossRef
44.
S. Rosenbloom, E. Burns, Gender differences in commuter travel in Tucson: Implications for travel demand management programs. Transp. Res. Rec. 1404, 82–90 (1993)
45.
J. Wu, S. Wang, Y. Zhang, A. Zhang, C. Xia, Urban landscape as a spatial representation of land rent: A quantitative analysis. Comput. Environ. Urban. Syst. 74, 62–73 (2019)CrossRef
46.
47.
S. Bouton, E. Hannon, L. Haydamous, S. Ramanathan, B. Heid, S. Knupfer, T. Nauclér, F. Neuhaus, J.T. Nijssen, Urban Commercial Transport and the Future of Mobility (McKinsey & Company, 2017)
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
Y. Zhang, M. Brussel, T. Thomas, M.V. Maarseveen, Mining bike-sharing travel behavior data: An investigation into trip chains and transition activities. Comput. Environ. Urban. Syst. 69, 39–50 (2018)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Extending Micromobility Deployments: A Concept and Local Case Study
verfasst von
Zhila Dehdari Ebrahimi
Raj Bridgelall
Mohsen Momenitabar
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Buch
Advances in Data Science and Information Engineering

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71703-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-71704-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71704-9_19

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise