nach oben

Erschienen in:

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Beyond SAE J3016: New Design Spaces for Human-Centered Driving Automation

verfasst von : Lorenz Steckhan, Wolfgang Spiessl, Nils Quetschlich, Klaus Bengler

Erschienen in: HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The SAE International plays a major role in shaping research and development in the field of automated driving through its SAE J3016 automation taxonomy. Although the taxonomy contributed significantly to classification and development of automated driving, it has certain limitations. SAE J3016 implies an “all or nothing” approach for the human operation of the driving task. Within this paper, we describe the potential of moving considerations regarding automated driving beyond the SAE J3016. To this end, we have taken a structured look at the system consisting of the human driver and the automated vehicle. This paper presents an abstraction hierarchy based on a literature review. The focus lies particularly on the functional purpose of the system under consideration. In particular, optional parts of the functional purpose like driver satisfaction are introduced as a main part of the target function. We extend the classification into optional and mandatory aspects to the lower levels of abstraction within the developed hierarchy. Especially the decisions on movement and dynamics in terms of driving parameters and driving maneuvers offer a so far underestimated design space for (optional) driver interventions. This paper reveals that the SAE J3016 lacks a consideration of these kind of interventions. The identified design space does not replace the SAE J3016, it does however broaden the perspective provided by this important taxonomy.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Social Acceptability of Autonomous Vehicles: Unveiling Correlation of Passenger Trust and Emotional Response

Nächstes Kapitel Study of the Hazard Perception Model for Automated Driving Systems

SAE International: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems: J3016_202104 (2021)

Stayton, E., Stilgoe, J.: It’s time to rethink levels of automation for self-driving vehicles [opinion]. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 39(3), 13–19 (2020)CrossRef

Bengler, K., Winner, H., Wachenfeld, W.: No human – no cry?. at – Automatisierungstechnik 65, 471–476 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/auto-2017-0021

Inagaki, T., Sheridan, T.B.: A critique of the SAE conditional driving automation definition, and analyses of options for improvement. Cogn. Technol. Work 21(4), 569–578 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0471-5CrossRef

Seppelt, B., Reimer, B., Russo, L., Mehler, B., Fisher, J., Friedman, D.: Consumer confusion with levels of vehicle automation. Driving Assess. Conf. 10, 391–397 (2019)CrossRef

Abraham, H., Seppelt, B., Mehler, B., Reimer, B.: What’s in a name: vehicle technology branding & consumer expectations for automation. In: Boll, S., Pfleging, B., Donmez, B., Politis, I., Large, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. AutomotiveUI 2017, pp. 226–234. ACM (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3122986.3123018

Homans, H., Radlmayr, J., Bengler, K.: Levels of driving automation from a user’s perspective: how are the levels represented in the user’s mental model? In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R., Colson, S., Choplin, A. (eds.) IHIET 2019. AISC, vol. 1018, pp. 21–27. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25629-6_4CrossRef

Zacherl, L., Radlmayr, J., Bengler, K.: Constructing a mental model of automation levels in the area of vehicle guidance. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Vergnano, A., Leali, F., Taiar, R. (eds.) IHSI 2020. AISC, vol. 1131, pp. 73–79. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39512-4_12CrossRef

Flemisch, F.O., Bengler, K., Bubb, H., Winner, H., Bruder, R.: Towards cooperative guidance and control of highly automated vehicles: H-Mode and conduct-by-wire. Ergonomics 57(3), 343–360 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.869355CrossRef

10.

Rasmussen, J.: The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 15(2), 234–243 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313353

11.

Allison, C.K., Stanton, N.A.: Constraining design: applying the insights of cognitive work analysis to the design of novel in-car interfaces to support eco-driving. Automot. Innov. 3(1), 30–41 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42154-020-00090-5CrossRef

12.

Lee, S., Nam, T., Myung, R.: Work domain analysis (WDA) for ecological interface design (EID) of vehicle control display. In: ICAI 2008, pp. 387–392 (2008)

13.

Li, M., Katrahmani, A., Kamaraj, A.V., Lee, J.D.: Defining a design space of the auto-mobile office: a computational abstraction hierarchy analysis. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meet. 64(1), 293–297 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181320641068CrossRef

14.

Stoner, H.A., Wiese, E.E., Lee, J.D.: Applying ecological interface design to the driving domain: the results of an abstraction hierarchy analysis. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meet. 47(3), 444–448 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120304700341CrossRef

15.

Birrell, S.A., Young, M.S., Jenkins, D.P., Stanton, N.A.: Cognitive work analysis for safe and efficient driving. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 13(4), 430–449 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2010.539285CrossRef

16.

Walker, G., et al.: Modelling driver decision-making at railway level crossings using the abstraction decomposition space. Cogn. Technol. Work 23(2), 225–237 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00659-4CrossRef

17.

Burns, C.M., Vicente, K.J.: Model-based approaches for analyzing cognitive work: a comparison of abstraction hierarchy, multilevel flow modeling, and decision ladder modeling. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 5(3), 357–366 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0503_13CrossRef

18.

Reising, D.V.C.: The abstraction hierarchy and its extension beyond process control. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meet. 44(1), 194–197 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120004400152CrossRef

19.

McIlroy, R.C., Stanton, N.A.: Getting past first base: going all the way with cognitive work analysis. Appl. Ergon. 42(2), 358–370 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.006CrossRef

20.

Lind, M.: Making sense of the abstraction hierarchy in the power plant domain. Cogn. Tech Work 5, 67–81 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-002-0109-4CrossRef

21.

Chan, C.-Y.: Advancements, prospects, and impacts of automated driving systems. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 6(3), 208–216 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.07.008CrossRef

22.

Hartwich, F., Schmidt, C., Gräfing, D., Krems, J.F.: In the passenger seat: differences in the perception of human vs. automated vehicle control and resulting HMI demands of users. In: Krömker, H. (ed.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12212, pp. 31–45. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50523-3_3CrossRef

23.

Simon, K., Jentsch, M., Bullinger, A.C., Schamber, G., Meincke, E.: Sicher aber langweilig? Auswirkungen vollautomatisierten Fahrens auf den erlebten Fahrspaß. Z. Arb. Wiss. 69, 81–88 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03373944CrossRef

24.

Mühl, K., Strauch, C., Grabmaier, C., Reithinger, S., Huckauf, A., Baumann, M.: Get ready for being chauffeured: passenger’s preferences and trust while being driven by human and automation. Hum. Factors 62(8), 1322–1338 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819872893CrossRef

25.

Zhang, Y., Angell, L., Bao, S.: A fallback mechanism or a commander? A discussion about the role and skill needs of future drivers within partially automated vehicles. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100337

26.

Gardner, B., Abraham, C.: What drives car use? A grounded theory analysis of commuters’ reasons for driving. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 10(3), 187–200 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2006.09.004CrossRef

27.

Sciarretta, A., Vahidi, A.: Energy-Efficient Driving of Road Vehicles. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24127-8

28.

Naddeo, A., Califano, R., Cappetti, N., Vallone, M.: The effect of external and environmental factors on perceived comfort: the car-seat experience. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe, pp. 291–308 (2016)

29.

Eberl, T.X.: Charakterisierung und Gestaltung des Fahr-Erlebens der Längsführung von Elektrofahrzeugen. Dissertation, Technische Universität München (2014)

30.

Klebelsberg, D.: Das Modell der subjektiven und objektiven Sicherheit. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie und ihre Anwendungen, pp. 285–294 (1977)

31.

Frison, A.-K., Wintersberger, P., Liu, T., Riener, A.: Why do you like to drive automated? In: Fu, W.-T., Pan, S., Brdiczka, O., Chau, P., Calvary, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 2019, pp. 528–537. ACM, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302331

32.

Rödel, C., Stadler, S., Meschtscherjakov, A., Tscheligi, M.: Towards Autonomous Cars. In: Miller, E. (ed.) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2014. ACM, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2667317.2667330

33.

Helgath, J., Braun, P., Pritschet, A., Schubert, M., Böhm, P., Isemann, D.: Investigating the effect of different autonomy levels on user acceptance and user experience in self-driving cars with a VR driving simulator. In: Marcus, A., Wang, W. (eds.) DUXU 2018. LNCS, vol. 10920, pp. 247–256. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91806-8_19CrossRef

34.

Hartwich, F., Beggiato, M., Krems, J.F.: Driving comfort, enjoyment and acceptance of automated driving - effects of drivers’ age and driving style familiarity. Ergonomics 61(8), 1017–1032 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1441448CrossRef

35.

Engeln, A., Vratil, B.: Fahrkomfort und Fahrgenuss durch den Einsatz von Fahrerassistenzsystemen. In: Schade, J., Engeln, A. (eds.) Fortschritte der Verkehrspsychologie. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 175–288 (2008)

36.

Bier, L., Joisten, P., Abendroth, B.: Warum nutzt der Mensch bevorzugt das Auto als Verkehrsmittel? Eine Analyse zum erlebten Fahrspaß unterschiedlicher Verkehrsmittelnutzer. Z. Arb. Wiss. 73, 58–68 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-018-00144-9

37.

van Huysduynen, H.H., Terken, J., Eggen, B.: Why disable the autopilot? In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2018, pp. 247–257. ACM, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239063

38.

von Rosenstiel, L.: Wertewandel und Kooperation. In: Spieß, E. (ed.) Formen der Kooperation. Bedingungen und Perspektiven. Schriftenreihe Wirtschaftspsychologie, pp. 279–294. Verlag für angewandte Psychologie, Göttingen (1998)

39.

Donges, E.: Aspekte der aktiven Sicherheit bei der Führung von Personenkraftwagen. Automobil-Industrie 27(2), 183–190 (1982)

40.

Sagberg, F., Selpi, Piccinini, G.F., Engström, J.: A review of research on driving styles and road safety. Hum. Factors 57(7), 1248–1275 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815591313

41.

Colombo, T., Panzani, G., Savaresi, S.M., Paparo, P.: Absolute driving style estimation for ground vehicles. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications. CCTA, pp. 2196–2201. IEEE (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCTA.2017.8062777

42.

Ossig, J., Cramer, S., Bengler, K.: Concept of an ontology for automated vehicle behavior in the context of human-centered research on automated driving styles. Information 12(1), 21 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/info12010021CrossRef

43.

Chen, S.-W., Fang, C.-Y., Tien, C.-T.: Driving behaviour modelling system based on graph construction. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 26, 314–330 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.10.004CrossRef

44.

Han, W., Wang, W., Li, X., Xi, J.: Statistical-based approach for driving style recognition using Bayesian probability with kernel density estimation. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 13, 22–30 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2017.0379CrossRef

45.

Craig, J., Nojoumian, M.: Should self-driving cars mimic human driving behaviors? In: Krömker, H. (ed.) HCII 2021. LNCS, vol. 12791, pp. 213–225. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78358-7_14CrossRef

46.

Schreiber, M., Kauer, M., Schlesinger, D., Hakuli, S., Bruder, R.: Verification of a maneuver catalog for a maneuver-based vehicle guidance system. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC 2010, pp. 3683–3689 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2010.5641862

47.

Kauer, M., Schreiber, M., Bruder, R.: How to conduct a car? A design example for maneuver based driver-vehicle interaction. In: 2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 1214–1221 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2010.5548099

48.

Naujoks, F., Befelein, D., Wiedemann, K., Neukum, A.: A review of non-driving-related tasks used in studies on automated driving. In: Stanton, N.A. (ed.) AHFE 2017. AISC, vol. 597, pp. 525–537. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_52CrossRef

49.

Pfleging, B., Rang, M., Broy, N.: Investigating user needs for non-driving-related activities during automated driving. In: Häkkila, J., Ojala, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, MUM 2016, pp. 91–99. ACM (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/3012709.3012735

50.

Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D.: A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 30(3), 286–297 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354

51.

Endsley, M.R., Kaber, D.B.: Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics 42(3), 462–492 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399185595CrossRef

52.

Lu, Z., Happee, R., Cabrall, C.D.D., Kyriakidis, M., de Winter, J.C.F.: Human factors of transitions in automated driving: a general framework and literature survey. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 43, 183–198 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.007CrossRef

53.

Vagia, M., Transeth, A.A., Fjerdingen, S.A.: A literature review on the levels of automation during the years. What are the different taxonomies that have been proposed? Appl. Ergon. 53, 190–202 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.013

54.

Sheridan, T.B., Verplank, W.L.: Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators (1978)

55.

Sheridan, T.B.: Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)

56.

Festner, M., Eicher, A., Schramm, D.: Beeinflussung der Komfort- und Sicherheitswahrnehmung beim hochautomatisierten Fahren durch fahrfremde Tätigkeiten und Spurwechseldynamik. In: 11. Workshop Fahrerassistenzsysteme und automatisertes Fahren, pp. 63–73 (2017)

57.

Beggiato, M., Hartwich, F., Krems, J.: Der Einfluss von Fahrermerkmalen auf den erlebten Fahrkomfort im hochautomatisierten Fahren. at – Automatisierungstechnik 65(7), 512–521 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/auto-2016-0130

58.

Hecht, T., Sievers, M., Bengler, K.: Investigating user needs for trip planning with limited availability of automated driving functions. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) HCII 2020. CCIS, vol. 1226, pp. 359–366. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_48CrossRef

Titel: Beyond SAE J3016: New Design Spaces for Human-Centered Driving Automation
verfasst von: Lorenz Steckhan
Wolfgang Spiessl
Nils Quetschlich
Klaus Bengler
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04986-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-04987-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04987-3_28

Neuer Inhalt

Bildnachweise

VDI-Icon, Profil Icon, inhalt2, Springer Professional Modul/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Die Gewinner und Laudatoren des Sustainability Award in Automotive 2024/© Uli Regenscheit | ATZlive, Search Icon, Banner Hanser, Sebastian Glenschek/© Hermes International, Dinko Eror/© Red Hat GmbH, Suresh Vittal/© Alteryx, Zeitschrift Wissensmanagement Cover, PatentFit-Logo/© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ATZ-Webinar: Prototypenfreie Entwicklung durch Offline- und Driver-in-the-Loop-HiL-Tests /© (c) VI-grade, chassis.tech plus 2023/© [M] ATZlive / TÜV SÜD PRODUCT SERVICE GMBH, adäsion-Webinar-Matinee/© krystiannawrocki_ Getty Images

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Neuer Inhalt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.