2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel
Benchmarking Multi-criteria Evaluation: A Proposed Method for the Definition of Benchmarks in Negotiation Public-Private Partnerships
verfasst von : Maria Rosaria Guarini, Fabrizio Battisti
Erschienen in: Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2014
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by
In Italy, new processes of settlement transformation based on negotiation-type public-private partnerships (PPPN) have been standardised to cope with the degradation of many urban areas. However, these standards have not provided for
benchmarks
referring to the contents of partnerships or assessment procedures aimed at assessing the initiatives undertaken with respect to public utility objectives. This has often led to redevelopment initiatives geared more towards the satisfaction of private rather than public interests. The proposed methodology, structured on the integration of a
Benchmarking
process with multi-criteria evaluation techniques known as
Benchmarking Multi-criteria Evaluation
(BME) enables the definition of
benchmarks
through a participatory process of the different
Stakeholders
involved in a PPPN to which the BME is applied. The
benchmarks
can be used both for renewing the planning of the PPPN concerned and for verifying the quality of the initiatives within the same PPPN process.