Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Does Character’s Visual Style Affect Viewer’s Perception of Signing Avatars? Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

E-learning Project Assessment Using Learners’ Topic in Social Media

verfasst von : Adriana Caione, Anna Lisa Guido, Roberto Paiano, Andrea Pandurino, Stefania Pasanisi

Erschienen in: E-Learning, E-Education, and Online Training

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A correct assessment of e-learning projects is a complex task because there are several aspects (such as contents, technologies, organizations etc.) that must be considered and many actors (learners, teachers, pedagogues, etc.) each one with specific requirements to be met. In recent years, in order to standardize the evaluation and to define the quality features of an e-learning project, several sets of factors (called Critical Success Factors) have been defined. The Critical Success Factors are focused on many aspects but, in our vision, they don’t consider properly the learners’ opinions. The learner is exactly the main e-learning project stakeholder. Thus, he/she could be considered at the centre of the e-learning system and his/her opinions must be carefully evaluated. In this paper, we describe our idea to support the analysis of the learners’ discussions posted on the web2.0 media (like forums, wikis, etc.) and to support the subsequent evaluation of the lacks and the benefits of e-learning projects.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Making Neuroscience Important and Relevant: Online Learning in an Innovative Bachelor of Dementia Care Program
Nächstes Kapitel Enhancing Student Support with a Virtual Assistant
Literatur
1.
Urdan, T.A., Weggen, C.C.: Corporate e-learning: exploring a new frontier (2000)
2.
Freire, P.: Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum, London (1994)
3.
Khan, B.H.: A Framework for Web-based Learning. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs (2001)
4.
Freund, Y.P.: Critical success factors. Plann. Rev. 16(4), 20–25 (1988)CrossRef
5.
Papp, R.: Critical success factors for distance learning. In: Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA
6.
Benigno, V., Trentin, G.: The evaluation of online courses. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 16, 259–270 (2000)CrossRef
7.
Volery, T., Lord, D.: Critical success factors in online education. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 14(5), 216–223 (2000)CrossRef
8.
Soong, B.M.H., Chan, H.C., Chua, B.C., Loh, K.F.: Critical success factors for on-line course resources. Comput. Educ. 36(2), 101–120 (2001)CrossRef
9.
Dillon, C.L., Guawardena, C.N.: A framework for the evaluation of telecommunications-based distance education. In: Paper presented at the 17th Congress of the International Council for Distance Education. Open University, Milton Keynes (1995)
10.
Leidner, D.E., Jarvenpaa, S.L.: The information age confronts education: case studies on electronic classroom. Inf. Syst. Res. 4(1), 24–54 (1993)CrossRef
11.
Govindasamy, T.: Successful implementation of e-learning; pedagogical considerations. Internet High. Educ. 4(3–4), 287–299 (2002)
12.
Baylor, A.L., Ritchie, D.: What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Comput. Educ. 39, 395–414 (2002)CrossRef
13.
Kadry, M.A., El Fadl, A.R.M.: A proposed model for assessment of social networking supported learning and its influence on learner behaviour. In: 2012 International Conference on Interactive Mobile and Computer Aided Learning (IMCL), pp. 101–108, 6–8 November 2012. doi:10.​1109/​IMCL.​2012.​6396459
14.
Mahmood, J., Dahlan, H.M., Hussin, A.R.C.: Enhancement of e-learning system by using social network features. In: 2013 IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e), pp. 24–29, 2–4 December 2013. doi:10.​1109/​IC3e.​2013.​6735960
15.
Paiano, R., Caione, A., Guido, A.L., Pandurino, A., Fait, M., Scorrano, P.: Unstructured data analysis for marketing decisions in agri-food sector. In: Paper presented at 18th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (WMSCI), Orlando, Florida, USA (2014)
16.
Caione, A., Paiano, R., Guido, A.L., Fait, M., Scorrano, P.: Technological tools integration and ontologies for knowledge extraction from unstructured sources. a case of study for marketing in agri-food sector. In: Paper Presented at 22nd International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA), Rome, Italy (2013)
17.
Herlocker, L., Konstan, J.A., Teveen, L.G., Riedl, J.T.: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 5–53 (2004)CrossRef
18.
Studer, R., Benjamins, R., Fensel, D.: Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data Knowl. Eng. 25(1), 161–197 (1998)CrossRefMATH
19.
Ding, L., Finin, T., Joshi, A., Pan, R., Cost, R.S., Peng, Y., Reddivari, P., Doshi, V., Sachs, J.: Swoogle: a search and metadata engine for the semantic web. In: Paper Presented at ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 652–659. ACM (2004)
20.
Sridevi, K., Umarani, R.: A novel and hybrid Ontology ranking framework using semantic closeness measure. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 87(5), 44–48 (2014)
Metadaten
Titel
E-learning Project Assessment Using Learners’ Topic in Social Media
verfasst von
Adriana Caione
Anna Lisa Guido
Roberto Paiano
Andrea Pandurino
Stefania Pasanisi
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
E-Learning, E-Education, and Online Training

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28882-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-28883-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28883-3_12