Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Risk-Aware Multi-stakeholder Next Release Planning Using Multi-objective Optimization Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The Use and Effectiveness of User Stories in Practice

verfasst von : Garm Lucassen, Fabiano Dalpiaz, Jan Martijn E. M. van der Werf, Sjaak Brinkkemper

Erschienen in: Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

[Context and motivation] User stories are an increasingly popular textual notation to capture requirements in agile software development. [Question/Problem] To date there is no scientific evidence on the effectiveness of user stories. The goal of this paper is to explore how practicioners perceive this artifact in the context of requirements engineering. [Principal ideas/results] We explore perceived effectiveness of user stories by reporting on a survey with 182 responses from practitioners and 21 follow-up semi-structured interviews. The data shows that practitioners agree that using user stories, a user story template and quality guidelines such as the INVEST mnemonic improve their productivity and the quality of their work deliverables. [Contribution] By combining the survey data with 21 semi-structured follow-up interviews, we present 12 findings on the usage and perception of user stories by practitioners that employ user stories in their everyday work environment.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Documenting Relations Between Requirements and Design Decisions: A Case Study on Design Session Transcripts
Nächstes Kapitel Foundations for Transparency Requirements Engineering
Fußnoten
1
Note that 7 responses are excluded. These respondents gave unique ‘other’ answers, whose samples are too small for statistical analysis.
 
Literatur
1.
Abrahão, S., Insfran, E., Carsí, J.A., Genero, M.: Evaluating requirements modeling methods based on user perceptions: a family of experiments. Inf. Sci. 181(16), 3356–3378 (2011)CrossRef
2.
3.
Boehm, B.W.: Understanding and controlling software costs. J. Parametrics 8(1), 32–68 (1988)MathSciNet
4.
Boone, H.N., Boone, D.A.: Analyzing likert data. J. Extension 50(2), 1–5 (2012)MathSciNet
5.
Clason, D.L., Dormody, T.J.: Analyzing data measured by individual likert-type items. J. Agric. Educ. 35(4), 31–35 (1994)CrossRef
6.
Cohn, M.: User stories applied: for agile software development. Addison Wesley, Redwood City (2004)
7.
Condori-Fernandez, N., Daneva, M., Sikkel, K., Wieringa, R., Dieste, O., Pastor, O.: A systematic mapping study on empirical evaluation of software requirements specifications techniques. In: Proceedings of the ESEM, pp. 502–505. IEEE Computer Society (2009)
8.
Cruz-Lemus, J.A., Genero, M., Morasca, S., Piattini, M.: Using practitioners for assessing the understandability of UML statechart diagrams with composite states. In: Hainaut, J.-L., et al. (eds.) ER Workshops 2007. LNCS, vol. 4802, pp. 213–222. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRef
9.
Dieste, O., Juristo, N.: Systematic review and aggregation of empirical studies on elicitation techniques. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 37(2), 283–304 (2011)CrossRef
10.
Gomez, A., Rueda, G., Alarcón, P.P.: A systematic and lightweight method to identify dependencies between user stories. In: Sillitti, A., Martin, A., Wang, X., Whitworth, E. (eds.) XP 2010. LNBIP, vol. 48, pp. 190–195. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRef
11.
Hoda, R., Kruchten, P., Noble, J., Marshall, S.: Agility in context. In: Proceedings of OOPSLA, pp. 74–88. ACM (2010)
12.
Hofmann, H., Lehner, F.: Requirements engineering as a success factor in software projects. IEEE Softw. 18(4), 58–66 (2001)CrossRef
13.
Jeffries, R.: Essential XP: Card, Conversation, and Confirmation, August 2001
14.
Kassab, M.: The changing landscape of requirements engineering practices over the past decade. In: Proceedings of EmpiRE, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2015)
15.
Kruger, J., Dunning, D.: Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77(6), 1121–1134 (1999)CrossRef
16.
Lee, J., Lai, K.Y.: What’s in design rationale? Hum. Comput. Interact. 6(3), 251–280 (1991)CrossRef
17.
Lin, J., Yu, H., Shen, Z., Miao, C.: Using goal net to model user stories in agile software development. In: Proceedings of the SNPD, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2014)
18.
Liskin, O., Pham, R., Kiesling, S., Schneider, K.: Why we need a granularity concept for user stories. In: Cantone, G., Marchesi, M. (eds.) XP 2014. LNBIP, vol. 179, pp. 110–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
19.
Lombriser, P., Dalpiaz, F., Lucassen, G., Brinkkemper, S.: Gamified requirements engineering: model and experimentation. In: Proceedings of the REFSQ (2016)
20.
21.
Lucassen, G., Dalpiaz, F., van der Werf, J.M., Brinkkemper, S.: Forging high-quality user stories: towards a discipline for agile requirements. In: Proceedings of the RE, pp. 126–135. IEEE (2015)
22.
23.
Mesquita, R., Jaqueira, A., Agra, C., Lucena, M., Alencar, F.: US2StarTool: generating i* models from user stories. In: Proceedings of the iStar (2015)
24.
Penzenstadler, B., Eckhardt, J., Mendez Fernandez, D.: Two replication studies for evaluating artefact models in re: results and lessons learnt. In: Proceedings of the RESER, pp. 66–75 (2013)
25.
Potts, C., Bruns, G.: Recording the reasons for design decisions. In: Proceedings of the ICSE, pp. 418–427. IEEE Computer Society (1988)
26.
Ramesh, B., Cao, L., Baskerville, R.: Agile requirements engineering practices and challenges: an empirical study. Inf. Syst. J. 20(5), 449–480 (2010)CrossRef
27.
Rouibah, K., Al-Rafee, S.: Requirement engineering elicitation methods: a kuwaiti empirical study about familiarity, usage and perceived value. Inf. Manage. Comput. Secur. 17(3), 192–217 (2009)
28.
29.
Wang, X., Zhao, L., Wang, Y., Sun, J.: The role of requirements engineering practices in agile development: an empirical study. In: Zowghi, D., Jin, Z. (eds.) APRES 2014. CCIS, vol. 432, pp. 195–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRef
30.
Wautelet, Y., Heng, S., Kolp, M., Mirbel, I.: Unifying and extending user story models. In: Jarke, M., Mylopoulos, J., Quix, C., Rolland, C., Manolopoulos, Y., Mouratidis, H., Horkoff, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8484, pp. 211–225. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
31.
Yu, E.S.K., Mylopoulos, J.: Understanding “Why” in software process modelling, analysis, and design. In: Proceedings of the ICSE, pp. 159–168. IEEE (1994)
32.
Zave, P., Jackson, M.: Four dark corners of requirements engineering. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 6(1), 1–30 (1997)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Use and Effectiveness of User Stories in Practice
verfasst von
Garm Lucassen
Fabiano Dalpiaz
Jan Martijn E. M. van der Werf
Sjaak Brinkkemper
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30281-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-30282-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30282-9_14

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise