Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Selection of Collaborative Learning Techniques Using Bloom’s Taxonomy Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Gamification of Collaborative Learning Scenarios: Structuring Persuasive Strategies Using Game Elements and Ontologies

verfasst von : Geiser Chalco Challco, Riichiro Mizoguchi, Ig Ibert Bittencourt, Seiji Isotani

Erschienen in: Social Computing in Digital Education

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This work presents an ontological model for the formal systematization and representation of knowledge that describes concepts from gamification and its use as Persuasive Technology (PT) in Collaborative Learning (CL) scenarios. This model enables the creation of intelligent systems that can personalize and apply the gamification techniques in group learning contexts in which the scripted collaboration decreases the motivation and engagement of students. Thus, our approach proposes to formalize the connection of concepts from theories and models to design PT in order to specify gamified CSCL scripts that induce students to willingly follow an intended learning behavior. To demonstrate the applicability of our approach, we also present a case study that shows how our ontological model could be used by in an intelligent theory-aware system to build better personalized gamified CL scenarios.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Selection of Collaborative Learning Techniques Using Bloom’s Taxonomy
Nächstes Kapitel A Full-Body Interaction Game for Children with Hearing Disabilities to Gain the Immersive Experience in a Puppet Show
Literatur
1.
Busch, M., et al.: Personalization in serious and persuasive games and gamified interactions. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, CHI PLAY 2015, pp. 811–816. ACM (2015)
2.
Challco, G.C., Moreira, D.A., Bittencourt, I.I., Mizoguchi, R., Isotani, S.: Personalization of gamification in collaborative learning contexts using ontologies. IEEE Latin Am. Trans. 13, 1995–2002 (2015)CrossRef
3.
Challco, G.C., Andrade, F., Oliveira, T., Mizoguchi, R., Isotani, S.: An ontological model to apply gamification as persuasive technology in collaborative learning scenarios. Anais do XXVI Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação 26, 499–508 (2015)CrossRef
4.
Challco, G.C., Moreira, D.A., Mizoguchi, R., Isotani, S.: An ontology engineering approach to gamify collaborative learning scenarios. In: Baloian, N., Burstein, F., Ogata, H., Santoro, F., Zurita, G. (eds.) CRIWG 2014. LNCS, vol. 8658, pp. 185–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
5.
Challco, G.C., Moreira, D., Mizoguchi, R., Isotani, S.: Towards an ontology for gamifying collaborative learning scenarios. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8474, pp. 404–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRef
6.
Falout, J., Elwood, J., Hood, M.: Demotivation: affective states and learning outcomes. System 37, 403–417 (2009)CrossRef
7.
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. Psychology Press, New York (2009)
8.
Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2002)
9.
Grimes, A., Kantroo, V., Grinter, R.E.: Let’s play!: mobile health games for adults. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp 2010, pp. 241–250. ACM (2010)
10.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., Pakkanen, T.: Do persuasive technologies persuade? - a review of empirical studies. In: Spagnolli, A., Chittaro, L., Gamberini, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8462, pp. 118–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRef
11.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., Sarsa, H.: Does gamification work?–a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In: Proceedings of the 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2014, pp. 3025–3034. IEEE Computer Society (2014)
12.
Hayashi, Y., Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R.: Structuring learning/instructional strategies through a state-based modeling. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems That Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling, pp. 215–222. IOS Press (2009)
13.
Isotani, S., Mizoguchi, R., Isotani, S., Capeli, O.M., Isotani, N., de Albuquerque, A.R.: An authoring tool to support the design and use of theory-based collaborative learning activities. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6095, pp. 92–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRef
14.
Isotani, S., et al.: A Semantic Web-based authoring tool to facilitate the planning of collaborative learning scenarios compliant with learning theories. Comput. Educ. 63, 267–284 (2013)CrossRef
15.
Isotani, S., Inaba, A., Ikeda, M., Mizoguchi, R.: An ontology engineering approach to the realization of theory-driven group formation. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn. 4, 445–478 (2009)CrossRef
16.
Kaptein, M., De Ruyter, B., Markopoulos, P., Aarts, E.: Adaptive persuasive systems: a study of tailored persuasive text messages to reduce snacking. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 2, 10:1–10:25 (2012)CrossRef
17.
Kaptein, M., Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B., Aarts, E.: Personalizing persuasive technologies: Explicit and implicit personalization using persuasion profiles. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 77, 38–51 (2015)CrossRef
18.
19.
Khaled, R., Barr, P., Biddle, R., Fischer, R., Noble, J.: Game design strategies for collectivist persuasion. In: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games, Sandbox 2009, pp. 31–38. ACM (2009)
20.
Khaled, R., Barr, P., Boyland, J., Fischer, R., Biddle, R.: Fine tuning the persuasion in persuasive games. In: de Kort, Y.A., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 36–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRef
21.
Kozaki, K., Kitamura, Y., Ikeda, M., Mizoguchi, R.: Hozo: an environment for building/using ontologies based on a fundamental consideration of “Role” and “Relationship”. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 213–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRef
22.
Lockton, D., Harrison, D., Stanton, N.A.: The Design with Intent Method: A design tool for influencing user behaviour. Appl. Ergonomics 41, 382–392 (2010)CrossRef
23.
Masthoff, J., Vassileva, J.: Tutorial on personalization for behaviour change. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 2015, pp. 439–442. ACM (2015)
24.
Mizoguchi, R.: Tutorial on ontological engineering Part 2: Ontology development, tools and languages. New Gener. Comput. 22, 61–96 (2004)CrossRefMATH
25.
Mizoguchi, R.: YAMATO: yet another more advanced top-level ontology. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Ontology Workshop, pp. 1–16 (2010)
26.
Mizoguchi, R., Sunagawa, E., Kozaki, K., Kitamura, Y.: The model of roles within an ontology development tool: hozo. Appl. Ontology Roles Interdisc. Perspect. 2, 159–179 (2007)
27.
Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 164–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRef
28.
Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 28 (2009)
29.
Orji, R., Vassileva, J., Mandryk, R.L.: Modeling the efficacy of persuasive strategies for different gamer types in serious games for health. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 24, 453–498 (2014)CrossRef
30.
Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. In: Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T. (eds.) Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. Springer Series in Social Psychology, pp. 1–24. Springer, New York (1986)CrossRef
31.
de Sousa Borges, S., Durelli, V.H.S., Reis, H.M., Isotani, S.: A systematic mapping on gamification applied to education. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2014, pp. 216–222. ACM (2014)
32.
Srivastava, J., Shu, L.H.: An ontology for unifying behavior-change literature. CIRP Ann. Manufact. Technol. 63, 173–176 (2014)CrossRef
33.
Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., Fischer, F.: Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn. 2, 421–447 (2007)CrossRef
34.
Sundar, S., Bellur, S., Jia, H.: Motivational technologies: a theoretical framework for designing preventive health applications. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7284, pp. 112–122. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
35.
Torning, K.: A review of four persuasive design models. Int. J. Conceptual Struct. Smart Appl. 1, 17–27 (2013)CrossRef
36.
Torning, K., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Persuasive system design: state of the art and future directions. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Persuasive 2009, pp. 30:1–30:8. ACM (2009)
37.
Yusoff, Z., Kamsin, A.: Game rhetoric: interaction design model of persuasive learning for serious games. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9192, pp. 644–654. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Gamification of Collaborative Learning Scenarios: Structuring Persuasive Strategies Using Game Elements and Ontologies
verfasst von
Geiser Chalco Challco
Riichiro Mizoguchi
Ig Ibert Bittencourt
Seiji Isotani
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Social Computing in Digital Education

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39671-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-39672-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39672-9_2