nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Chapter 3: Trajectories of Political Development in the Post-Soviet States

verfasst von : Graeme Gill

Erschienen in: A Quarter Century of Post-Communism Assessed

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Some 25 years after the collapse of the USSR, most successor states are ruled by non-democratic regimes. This chapter explores why this is so. After looking at some arguments about culture, the chapter turns to an argument about the circumstances of these countries’ emergence from the USSR, and especially the role of mass-based civil society forces in that process. Most of the post-Soviet countries experienced an overwhelmingly elite-based transition in which the populace played only a subsidiary part. The result was the creation of political systems that were semi-closed, in the sense of providing little scope for real popular participation. Politics was overwhelmingly an elite phenomenon, and those elites acted to maintain the semi-closed nature of their polities.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Chapter 2: Post-Communist Transition Under the Umbrella of Uneven EUropeanisation: East Central Europe, the Baltic States and the Balkans

Nächstes Kapitel Chapter 4: Curbing Post-Communist Corruption: External Pressure vs. Domestic Commitment

This chapter is only concerned with the 15 former union republics of the USSR and does not include those statelets that have emerged as a result of frozen conflicts, North Ossetia, Abkhazia or Transdnistr.

A regime is defined as the set of rules that govern access to power in the political system.

The danger of circularity also exists when scholars shift from an understanding of political culture as subjective values to a wider one including institutions and patterns of action (Lukin 2000, pp. 28–31; McAuley 1984).

This is a more general argument about the effect of authoritarian parties in mitigating elite conflict and bringing about unity. For an extended analysis, see Brownlee (2007).

Although, he does acknowledge some failures in this initially: Gamsakhurdia in Georgia, Elchibey in Azerbaijan, Nabiev in Tajikistan and Kravchuk in Ukraine (Hale 2015, pp. 127–133).

Berdyaev, N. (1948). The Russian idea. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Billington, J. H. (1966). The icon and the axe. An interpretive history of Russian culture. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Bremmer, I., & Taras, R. (Eds.) (1997). New politics. Building the post-Soviet nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brownlee, J. (2007). Authoritarianism in an age of democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Bunce, V. J., & Wolchik, S. L. (2011), Defeating authoritarian leaders in post-communist countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Dawisha, K., & Parrott, B. (Eds.) (1997a). Conflict, cleavage and change in Central Asia and the Caucasus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dawisha, K., & Parrott, B. (Eds.) (1997b). Democratic changes and authoritarian reactions in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Diamond, L. J. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35.CrossRef

Dicks, H. V. (1960). Some notes on the Russian national character. In: C. E. Black (Ed.), The transformation of Russian society (pp. 558–573). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gill, G. (2002). Democracy and post-communism. Political change in the post-communist world. London: Routledge.

Gill, G. (2015). Building an authoritarian polity. Russia in post-Soviet times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Gorer, G., & Rickman, J. (1949). The people of Great Russia. A psychological study. London: The Cresset Press.

Hahn, G. (2002). Russia’s revolution from above. Reform, transition and revolution in the fall of the Soviet communist regime 1985–2000. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Hale, H. E. (2015). Patronal politics. Eurasian regime dynamics in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

https://freedomhouse.org (accessed 27 October 2015).

Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Comparative authoritarianism. Hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Lukin, A. (2000). Political culture of Russian democrats. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McAuley, M. (1984). Political culture and communist studies: one step forward, two steps back. In: A. Brown (Ed.), Political culture and communist studies (pp. 13–39). Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef

McMann, K. M. (2006). Economic autonomy and democracy. Hybrid regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Mead, M. (1955). Soviet attitudes toward authority. An introductory approach to problems of Soviet character. New York: William Morrow.

Pipes, R. (1974). Russia under the old regime. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Smith, G. (1999). The post-Soviet states. Mapping the politics of transition. London: Arnold.

Szamuely, T. (1974). The Russian tradition. London: Secker & Warburg.

Way, L. A. (2005) Authoritarian state building and the sources of regime competitiveness in the fourth wave. The cases of Belarus, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine. World Politics, 57(2), 231–261.CrossRef

Way, L. (2010). Resistance to contagion: Sources of authoritarian stability in the former Soviet Union. In: V. Bunce, M. McFaul, K. Stoner-Weiss (Eds.), Democracy and authoritarianism in the post-communist world (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Way, L. A., & Levitsky, S. (2006). The dynamics of autocratic coercion after the cold war. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39(3), 387–410.CrossRef

White, S. (1979). Political culture and Soviet politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Titel: Chapter 3: Trajectories of Political Development in the Post-Soviet States
verfasst von: Graeme Gill
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: A Quarter Century of Post-Communism Assessed
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43436-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-43437-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43437-7_4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner