Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

A Model Classification for Digital 3D Reconstruction in the Context of Humanities Research

verfasst von : Sander Münster, Wolfgang Hegel, Cindy Kröber

Erschienen in: 3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage II

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Digital 3D reconstruction methods have been widely applied to support research and the presentation of historical objects since the 1990s. While technological backgrounds, project opportunities as well as methodological considerations for application are widely discussed in literature, a comprehensive, model classification for digital 3D reconstruction is still lacking. Against this background, this article aims to discuss common approaches to classification of scholarly work. The identification of specific issues and challenges in the context of humanities research is also discussed. A prototype classification scheme for digital reconstruction in humanities research is proposed. It has been applied to and tested in two case studies.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Nächstes Kapitel Typical Workflows, Documentation Approaches and Principles of 3D Digital Reconstruction of Cultural Heritage
Fußnoten
3
Relevant approaches and principles have been defined by Information Science, see [10].
 
4
Object-relation stands in contrast to process-related human interpretation which is required, e.g. for algorithm development in context of data-driven acquisition.
 
5
A distinction between Digital Humanities and eHumanities is complex. A usual definition determines e(nhanced)Humanities as cooperation between information technologies and Humanities to investigate research questions in the Humanities (c.f. http://​www.​bmbf.​de/​foerderungen/​21126.​php. Accessed 10 Jun 2015) while Digital Humanities means a hybrid discipline, combining computing and humanities methods and approaches [28].
 
6
On difficulties concerning the classification and transdisciplinary digital heritage as an ‘Agora’, which are also relevant to Cultural Heritage, see [29].
 
7
On the history of the discipline, see [41‐44].
 
8
On the art term, see [45].
 
9
On the critique of style, see [46, pp. 20–32]. On the term style, see [47].
 
10
On the methods of iconography and iconology, see [46, pp. 33–49].
 
11
Cited according to [50, pp. 131].
 
13
On the concept of simulation see [63, pp. 33–41 and 68–69].
 
14
One can observe a new trend in the humanities called the “cognitive revolution”, which means adapting scientific methods to systematization or formalization of certain phenomena, see [65].
 
16
 
17
Further discussed–although dealing with another subject-matter–in [82].
 
18
Further discussed in the chapter of Prechtel et al. which is also part of this book.
 
19
For example, removing alterations of statues introduced in the course of an earlier conservation treatment. Discussed in [94]; For the restoration of fragmented objects, see [95].
 
20
The approaches followed until now concentrated mainly on analyzing architectural plans. Discussed in [97, 98].
 
21
See [99].
 
22
For example: Creating simulations of ancient ventilation systems. See [101].
 
23
A definition of “simulation”: [63].
 
24
The distinction between the type of source and inherent knowledge relies on outer and inner source criticism as formal vs. content-based quality [105].
 
25
These prerequisites also apply to an automated model creation process, see [108].
 
26
Further discussed in the chapter of Kuroczynski et al. which is also part of this book.
 
Literatur
1.
Rasch, R.F.R.: The nature of taxonomy. 19(3), 147–149 (1987)
2.
Münster, S., Ioannides, M.: The scientific community of digital heritage in time and space. In: Guidi, G., Scopigno, R., Torres, J.C., Graf, H. (eds.) 2nd International Congress on Digital Heritage 2015, Granada (2015). doi:978-1-5090-0048-7/15
3.
Mayring, P.: Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qual. Sozialforschung 1(2), Article No 20 (2000)
4.
Münster, S.: Researching scientific structures via joint authorships – the case of virtual 3D modelling in humanities. In: International Conference on Infrastructures and Cooperation in E-Science and E-Humanities (in print)
5.
Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U.: Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Springer, Berlin (2006)
6.
Münster, S.: Interdisziplinäre Kooperation bei der Erstellung geschichtswissenschaftlicher 3D-Rekonstruktionen. Springer, Wiesbaden (2016)CrossRef
7.
Münster, S.: Workflows and the role of images for a virtual 3D reconstruction of no longer extant historic objects. In: Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci II-5/W1 (XXIV International CIPA Symposium), pp. 197–202 (2013)
8.
Münster, S., Prechtel, N.: Beyond software. Design implications for virtual libraries and platforms for cultural heritage from practical findings. In: Ioannides, M., Magnenat-Thalmann, N., Fink, E., Žarnić, R., Yen, A.-Y., Quak, E. (eds.) Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection. LNCS, vol. 8740, pp. 131–145. Springer, Cham (2014)
9.
Kelle, U.: The development of categories different approaches in grounded theory. In: Bryant, A., Charmaz, K. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory, pp. 191–213. Thousand Oaks, SAGE (2010)
10.
Stock, W., Stock, M.: Handbook of Information Science. De Gruyter Saur, Berlin/Boston (2015)MATH
11.
Krishnan, A.: What are academic disciplines. Some observations on the Disciplinarity vs. Interdisciplinarity debate. University of Southampton. National Centre for Research Methods, Southhampton (2009)
12.
Knorr-Cetina, K.: Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1999)
13.
Weingart, P.: Interdisziplinarität als List der Institutionen. In: Kocka, J. (ed.) Interdisziplinarität. Praxis - Herausforderung - Ideologie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M., pp. 159–166 (1987)
14.
Knorr-Cetina, K.: Die Fabrikation von Erkenntnis. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. (2002)
15.
Dilthey, W.: Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. Main (1970)
16.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Frascati Manual. Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. OECD Publications Service, Paris (2002)
17.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Revised Field of Science and Technology (FOS) Classification in the Frascati Manual. Paris (2007)
18.
Semenova, E., Stricker, M.: Eine Ontologie der Wissenschaftsdisziplinen. Entwicklung eines Instrumentariums für die Wissenskommunikation. In: Ball, R. (ed.) Wissenschaftskommunikation der Zukunft, 4. Konferenz der Zentralbibliothek im Forschungszentrum Jülich, 6–8 November 2007, vol Band 18. Reihe Bibliothek/Library edn. Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich, Jülich, pp. 61–69 (2007)
19.
Bialas, V.: Allgemeine Wissenschaftsgeschichte: Philosophische Orientierungen. Böhlau, Wien (1990)
20.
De Solla Price, D.: Little Science - Big Science. Columbia University Press, New York (1963)
21.
Glänzel, W., Schubert, A.: A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics 56(3), 357–367 (2003)CrossRef
22.
Wissenschaftsrat. Empfehlungen zu einem Kerndatensatz Forschung. Berlin (2013)
23.
Vargas-Quesada, B., Moya-Anegón, F.: Visualizing the structure of science. Springer, Berlin (2007)
24.
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., Di Costa, F.: Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63(11), 2206–2222 (2012). doi:10.​1002/​asi.​22647 CrossRef
25.
Biljecki, I.F.: The concept of level of detail in 3D city models, vol. 62. GISt Report. TU Delft, Delft (2013)
26.
Luebke, D.P.: Level of Detail for 3D Graphics. The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling, 1st edn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Boston (2003)
27.
De Francesco, G., D’Andrea, A.: Standards and guidelines for quality digital cultural three-dimensional content creation. In: Ioannides, M., Addison, A., Georgopoulos, A., Kalisperis, L. (eds.) Digital Heritage: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia. Project Papers, pp. 229–233. Archaeolingua, Budapest (2008)
28.
eHumanities CCf. Digitale Geisteswissenschaften. Köln (2011)
29.
Ch’ng, E., Gaffney, V., Chapman, H.: Visual Heritage in the Digital Age. Springer, London (2013)CrossRef
30.
Arnold, D., Geser, G.: EPOCH Research Agenda – Final report. Brighton (2008)
31.
European Commission. Survey and outcomes of cultural heritage research projects supported in the context of EU environmental research programmes. In: From 5th to 7th Framework Programme. European Commission, Brussels (2011)
32.
Renfrew, C., Bahn, P.: Archaeology. The Key Concepts. Routledge, New York (2005)
33.
Rua, H., Alvito, P.: Living the past: 3D models, virtual reality and game engines as tools for supporting archaeology and the reconstruction of cultural heritage – the case-study of the Roman villa of Casal de Freiria. J. Archaeol. Sci. 38(12), 3296–3308 (2011). doi:10.​1016/​j.​jas.​2011.​07.​015 CrossRef
34.
Christofori, E., Bierwagen, J.: Recording cultural heritage using terrestrial laserscanning – dealing with the system, the huge datasets they create and ways to extract the necessary deliverables you can work with. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 1(2), 183–188 (2013)CrossRef
35.
Clini, P., Nespeca, R., Bernetti, A.: All-in-one laser scanning methods for surveying, representing and sharing information on archaeology. Via Flaminia and the Furlo tunnel complex. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci
36.
Lasaponara, R., Coluzzi, R., Masini, N.: Flights into the past: full-waveform airborne laser scanning data for archaeological investigation. J. Archaeol. Sci. 38, 2061–2070 (2011)CrossRef
37.
Brutto, M.L., Meli, P.: Computer vision tools for 3D modelling in archaeology. In: Ioannides, M. (ed.) Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation – EUROMED 2012, pp. 1–6 (2012)
38.
Martin-Beaumont, N., Nony, N., Deshayes, B., Pierrot-Deseilligny, M., Luca, L.D.: Photographer-friendly work-flows for image-based modelling of heritage artefacts. In: International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-5/W2, 2013, XXIV International CIPA Symposium, 2–6 September 2013, Strasbourg, pp. 421–424 (2013)
39.
Bruno, F., Bruno, S., De Sensi, G., Luchi, M.-L., Mancuso, S., Muzzupappa, M.: From 3D reconstruction to virtual reality: a complete methodology for digital archaeological exhibition. J. Cult. Heritage 11(1), 42–49 (2010). doi:10.​1016/​j.​culher.​2009.​02.​006 CrossRef
40.
41.
Dilly, H.: Kunstgeschichte als Institution. Studien zur Geschichte einer Disziplin. Frankfurt a.M (1979)
42.
Locher, H.: Kunstgeschichte als historische Theorie der Kunst 1750–1950, München (2001)
43.
Ratzeburg, W.: Mediendiskussion im 19. Jahrhundert. Wie die Kunstgeschichte ihre wissenschaftliche Grundlage in der Fotografie fand. Kritische Berichte 30(1), 22–39 (2002)
44.
Rößler, J.: Kunstgeschichte als Realpolitik. In: Bałus, W. (ed.) Die Etablierung des Faches Kunstgeschichte in Deutschland, Polen und Mitteleuropa, Warszawa, pp. 61–85 (2010)
45.
Locher, H.: Kunstbegriff und Kunstgeschichte – Schlosser, Gombrich, Warburg. In: Bałus, W. (ed.) Die Etablierung des Faches Kunstgeschichte in Deutschland, Polen und Mitteleuropa, Warszawa, pp. 391–410 (2010)
46.
Seippel, R.-P.: Architektur und Interpretation. Methoden und Ansätze der Kunstgeschichte in ihrer Bedeutung für die Architekturinterpretation, Essen (1989)
47.
Suckale, R.: Stilgeschichte. Kunsthistorische Arbeitsblätter 11, 17–26 (2001)
48.
49.
50.
51.
Wilton-Ely, J.: Architectural model. In: n.b. (ed.) The Dictionary of Art, Bd. 2. London [u. a.], pp. 335–338 (1996)
52.
De Chadarevian, S., Hopwood, N.: Models - The Third Dimension of Science. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2004)
53.
Carpo, M.: Architecture in the Age of Printing. Orality, Writing, Typography, and Printed Images in the History of Architectural Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)
54.
Kurz, M.: Die Modellmethodik im Formfindungsprozess am Beispiel des Automobildesigns. Baden-Baden (2008)
55.
56.
Yang, C., Sun, S., Xu, C.: Recovery of cultural activity for digital safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage*. In: IEEE Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, 21–23 June 2006, Dalian, China, pp. 10337–10341. IEEE (2006)
57.
Hisatomi, K., Tomiyama, K., Katayama, M., Iwadate, Y.: Method of 3D reconstruction using graph cuts, and its application to preserving intangible cultural heritage. In: IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops, pp. 923–930 (2009)
58.
Mahr, B.: Das Wissen im Modell. Technische Universität, Fakultät IV, Berlin (2004)
59.
Stephan, P.E.: Denken am modell. In: Bürdek, B.E. (ed.) Der digitale Wahn, Frankfurt a. M., pp. 109–129 (2001)
60.
Niccolucci, F.: Setting standards for 3D visualization of cultural heritage in Europe and beyond. In: Bentkowska-Kafel, A., Denard, H., Baker, D. (eds.) Paradata and Transparency in Virtual Heritage, pp. 23–36. Ashgate, Burlington (2012)
61.
Kuhn, T.S.: Die Entstehung des Neuen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. (1978)
62.
Köhler, T.: Die Konstruktion des Selbst in der computervermittelten Kommunikation. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (2003)
63.
Hinterwaldner, I.: Das systemische Bild. Ikonizität im Rahmen computerbasierter Echtzeitsimulationen. eikones, München (2010)
64.
Lenhard, J.: (Im Druck) Designing an image. Functions of imagery in simulation modeling (Arbeitstitel). In: Ammon, S., Hinterwaldner, I. (eds.) Bildlichkeit im Zeitalter der Modellierung
65.
Honing, H.: On the growing role of observation, formalization and experimental method in musicology. Empirical Musicology Rev. 1(1), 3 (2006)
66.
Schophaus, M., Dienel, H.-L., von Braun, C.-F.: Von Brücken und Einbahnstraßen. Aufgaben für das Kooperationsmanagement interdisziplinärer Forschung (Discussion paper Nr. 08/03). Berlin (2003)
67.
Gibbons, M.: The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. SAGE, London (1994)
68.
Münster, S.: Interdisziplinäre Kooperation bei der Erstellung virtueller geschichtswissenschaftlicher 3D-Rekonstruktionen. In: Stelzer, R. (ed.) ENTWERFEN ENTWICKELN ERLEBEN 2014. Beiträge zur virtuellen Produktentwicklung und Konstruktionstechnik, pp. 299–312. TUD Press, Dresden (2014)
69.
Klein, J.T.: A conceptual vocabulary of interdisciplinary science. In: Weingart, P., Stehr, N. (eds.) Practising Interdisciplinarity, pp. 3–24. University of Toronto Press, Toronto (2000)
70.
Münster, S., Köhler, T., Hoppe, S.: 3D modeling technologies as tools for the reconstruction and visualization of historic items in humanities. A literature-based survey. In: Traviglia, A. (ed.) Across Space and Time. Papers from the 41st Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Perth, 25–28 March 2013, pp. 430–441. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (2015)
71.
Peterßen, W.H.: Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten. nicht leicht, aber erlernbar. München (1987)
72.
Meinsen, S.: Konstruktivistisches Wissensmanagement. Weinheim (2003)
73.
Baumgartner, P.: Der Hintergrund des Wissens. Vorarbeiten zu einer Kritik der programmierbaren Vernunft. Kärntner Druck- und Verlagsgesellschaft, Klagenfurt (1993)
74.
Polanyi, M.: The tacit dimension, 18th edn (2009). University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1966)
75.
76.
Osborne, J.W., Holland, A.: What is authorship, and what should it be? A survey of prominent guidelines for determining authorship in scientific publications. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 14(15), 1–19 (2009)
77.
Biagioli, M.: Rights or rewards? Changing frameworks of scientific authorship. J. Coll. Univ. Law 27(1), 83–108 (2000)
78.
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Vorschläge zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis. Empfehlungen der Kommission “Selbstkontrolle in der Wissenschaft” (Denkschrift). Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (1998)
79.
Goetz, H.-W.: Proseminar Geschichte. Mittelalter, vol. 1719. Ulmer, Stuttgart (1993)
80.
Jablonka, P., Kirchner, S., Serangeli, J.: Troia VR. A virtual reality model of troy and the troad. In: Proceedings of Computer Applications in Archaeology (CAA) 2002, 2003, pp. 13–20 (2002)
81.
Howell, M., Prevenier, W.: Werkstatt des Historikers Eine Einführung in die historischen Methoden. Köln (2004)
82.
Ronzino, P., Amico, N., Niccolucci, F.: Assessment and comparison of metadata schemas for architectural heritage. In: XXIII CIPA Symposium – Proceedings (2011)
83.
Pfarr-Harfst, M.: Virtual scientific models. In: Ng, K., Bowen, J.P., McDaid, S. (eds.) Electronic Visualisation and the Arts, London, pp. 157–163 (2013)
84.
Günther, H.: Kritische Computer-Visualisierung in der kunsthistorischen Lehre. In: Frings, M. (ed.) Der Modelle Tugend. CAD und die neuen Räume der Kunstgeschichte. Weimar, pp. 111–122 (2001)
85.
Fleck, L.: Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M (1980)
86.
Peirce, C.S.: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 1, besucht am, 10 January 2014 (1931)
87.
Latour, B., Woolgar, S.: Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1986)
88.
Ware, C.: Information Visualization: Perception for Design. The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies, vol. 22. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco (2004)
89.
Frischer, B., Dakouri-Hild, A.: Beyond Illustration: 2D and 3D Digital Technologies as Tools for Discovery in Archaeology. BAR International Series, vol. 1805. Archaeopress, Oxford (2008)
90.
Ling, Z., Ruoming, S., Keqin, Z.: Rule-based 3D modeling for chinese traditional architecture. In: Remondino, F., El-Hakim, S. (eds.) 3D-ARCH 2007, Zürich (2007)
91.
Sachse, P.: Idea materialis. Entwurfsdenken und Darstellungshandeln. über die allmähliche Verfertigung der Gedanken beim Skizzieren und Modellieren. Logos-Verl., Berlin (2002)
92.
Wulf, U., Riedel, A.: Investigating buildings three-dimensionally. The “Domus Severiana” on the palatine. In: Haselberger, L., Humphrey, J., Abernathy, D.: (eds.) Imaging Ancient Rome: Documentation, Visualization, Imagination: Proceedings of the 3rd Williams Symposium on Classical Architecture, Rome, 20–23 May 2004, pp. 221–233. Journal of Roman Archaeology, Portsmouth (2006)
93.
Carrozzino, M., Evangelista, C., Brondi, R., Tecchia, F., Bergamasco, M.: Virtual reconstruction of paintings as a tool for research and learning. J. Cult. Heritage 15, 308–312 (2014)CrossRef
94.
Fontana, R., Greco, M., Materazzi, M., Pampaloni, E., Pezzati, L., Rocchini, C., Scopigno, R.: Three-dimensional modelling of statues: the Minerva of Arezzo. J. Cult. Heritage 3(4), 325–331. doi:10.​1016/​s1296-2074(02)01242-6
95.
96.
Saft, S., Kaliske, M.: Computational approach towards structural investigations for the restoration of historical keyboard instruments. J. Cult. Heritage 135, 165–174 (2012)CrossRef
97.
Wiemer, W.: Harmonie und Maß – Ergebnisse der Proportionsanalysen der Abteikirche Ebrach. In: Archaeology in Architecture: Studies in Honor of Cecli L. Striker, Mainz, pp. 199–216 (2005)
98.
99.
Kohle, H.: Digitale Bildwissenschaft. Glückstadt (2013)
100.
101.
102.
Havemann, S., Wagener, O.: Castles and their landscape – a case study towards parametric historic reconstruction. In: Hoppe, S., Breitling, S., Fitzner, S. (eds.) Virtual Palaces II: Lost Palaces and Their Afterlife, Virtual Reconstruction Between Science and Media, Proceedings of the European Science Foundation Research Networking Programme PALATIUM Meeting at Munich, 13–15 April 2012 (2016)
103.
Hermon, S.: Reasoning in 3D. A critical appraisal of the role of 3D modelling and virtual reconstructions in archaeology. In: Frischer, B. (ed.) Beyond Illustration: 2D and 3D Digital Technologies as Tools for Discovery in Archaeology, vol. 1805, pp. 36–45. Tempus Reparatum, Oxford (2008)
104.
Remondino, F., El-Hakim, S., Girardi, S., Rizzi, A., Benedetti, S., Gonzo, L.: 3D virtual reconstruction and visualization of complex architectures - the 3D-ARCH project. In: Remondino, F., El-Hakim, S., Gonzo, L. (eds.) 3D-ARCH 2009, Zürich (2009)
105.
Munslow, A.: The Routledge Companion to Historical Studies. Routledge, New York (2006)
106.
Münster, S., Jahn, P.-H., Wacker, M.: Von Plan- und Bildquellen zum virtuellen Gebäudemodell. Zur Bedeutung der Bildlichkeit für die digitale 3D-Rekonstruktion historischer Architektur. In: Ammon, S., Hinterwaldner, I. (eds.) Bildlichkeit im Zeitalter der Modellierung. Operative Artefakte in Entwurfsprozessen der Architektur und des Ingenieurwesens. eikones. Wilhelm Fink Verlag, München (in print)
107.
Hasler Roumois, U.: Studienbuch Wissensmanagement. Grundlagen der Wissensarbeit in Wirtschafts-, Non-Profit- und Public-Organisationen. vol. 2954, 2., *berarb. und erw. Aufl.. edn. Orell Füssli, Zürich (2010)
108.
Schumann, H., Müller, W.: Visualisierung. Grundlagen und allgemeine Methoden. Springer, Berlin (2000)
109.
Reers, J.: The properties of materials and their everyday uses. In: Reers, J. (ed.) That’s Chemistry! abpi, pp. 11–24 (2000)
110.
Pfarr-Harfst, M.: Documentation system for digital reconstructions. Reference to the Mausoleum of the Tang-Dynastie at Zhaoling, in Shaanxi Province, China. In: 16th International Conference on “Cultural Heritage and New Technologies” Vienna, Wien, pp. 648–658 (2011)
111.
Doerr, M.: The CIDOC CRM – an ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Mag. 24(3) (2003)
112.
Felicetti, A., Lorenzini, M.: Metadata and tools for integration and preservation of cultural heritage 3D information. In: XXIII CIPA Symposium – Proceedings (2011)
113.
Hermon, S., Nikodem, J., Perlingieri, C.: Deconstructing the VR - data transparency, quantified uncertainty and reliability of 3D models. In: Arnold, D., Ioannides, M., Niccolucci, F., Mania, K. (eds.) 7th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (VAST 2006), pp. 123–129. Eurographics Association, Nicosia (2006)
114.
Stojakovic, V., Tepavcevic, B.: Optimal methods for 3D modeling of devastated architectural objects. In: Remondino, F., El-Hakim, S., Gonzo, L. (eds.) 3D-ARCH 2009, Zürich (2009)
115.
Havemann, S., Fellner, D.W.: Generative parametric design of gothic window tracery. In: VAST 2004: The 5th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. Eurographics Association, Brussels (2004)
116.
Garagnani, S., Manferdini, A.M.: Parametric accuracy: building information modeling process applied to the cultural heritage preservation. In: 3DARCH 2013 (2013)
117.
Prechtel, N., Münster, S., Kröber, C., Schubert, C., Sebastian, S.: Presenting cultural heritage landscapes - from GIS via 3D models to interactive presentation frameworks. In: ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-5/W2 (XXIV International CIPA Symposium), pp. 253–258 (2013)
118.
Bourgeois, J., De Wulf, A., Goosens, R., Gheyle, W.: Saving the frozen Scythian tombs of the Altai Mountains (Central Asia). World Archaeol. 39, 458–474 (2007)CrossRef
119.
Wengenroth, U.: Was ist Technikgeschichte? (1998)
Metadaten
Titel
A Model Classification for Digital 3D Reconstruction in the Context of Humanities Research
verfasst von
Sander Münster
Wolfgang Hegel
Cindy Kröber
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage II

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47646-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-47647-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47647-6_1

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise