Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Relay Technology for 5G Networks and IoT Applications Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Two-Way Authentication for the Internet-of-Things

verfasst von : Corinna Schmitt, Thomas Kothmayr, Wen Hu, Burkhard Stiller

Erschienen in: Internet of Things: Novel Advances and Envisioned Applications

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter introduces the first fully implemented two-way authentication security scheme for Internet-of-Things (IoT) based on existing Internet standards, specifically the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) protocol. By relying on an established standard, existing implementations, engineering techniques, and security infrastructure can be reused, which enables an easy security uptake. The proposed security scheme uses two public key cryptography algorithms, RSA (Rivest, Shamir und Adleman) and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), tailored for the resource heterogeneous nature of IoT devices. The two-way authentication solution presented is designed to work over standard communication stacks that offer UDP/IPv6 networking for Low power Wireless Personal Area Networks (LoWPANs). A prototype implementation of DTLS is presented here in the context of a system architecture, and the scheme’s feasibility (low overheads and high interoperability) is demonstrated through extensive evaluations on the DTLS-supporting platform OPAL as clusterhead with children of different IoT hardware platforms.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Relay Technology for 5G Networks and IoT Applications
Nächstes Kapitel Mobility Support and Service Discovery for Industrial Process Monitoring
Literatur
1.
Lehong, H., Velosa, A.: Hype cycle for the internet of things. White Paper, Stamford CT, Gartner Inc (2012)
2.
European Telecommunications Standards Institute: Machine-to-machine communications (M2M); Smart Metering Use Cases (2010)
3.
Leontiadi, I., Efstratiou, C., Mascolo, C., and Crowcroft, J.: SenShare: transforming sensor networks into multi-application sensing infrastructures. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks, pp. 65–81, Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
4.
Shelby, Z., Bormann, C.: 6LoWPAN: The Wireless Embedded Internet. Wiley, United Kingdom (2009)CrossRef
5.
Shelby, Z., Hartke, K., Bormann, C.: The constrained application protocol (CoAP). Req. Comments 7252, 1–112 (2014)
6.
Dawson-Haggerty, S., Tavakoli, A., and Culler, D: Hydro: A hybrid routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks. In: Proceedings of 1st IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, pp. 268–273 (2010)
7.
Kothmayr, T., Schmitt, C., Hu, W., Brünig, M., Carle, G.: DTLS based security and two-way authentication for the internet of things. Ad Hoc Netw. 11(8), 2710–2723 (2013)CrossRef
8.
Noack, M.: Optimization of two-way authentication protocol in internet of things. Master thesis, University of Zurich, Communication Systems Group, Department of Informatics, Zurich, Switzerland (2014)
9.
Bellare, M., Canetti, R., and Krawczyk, H.: Keyed hash functions and message authentication. In: Proceedings of Advances in Cryptology, pp. 1–15 (1996)
10.
Karl, H., Willig, A.: Protocols and Architectures for Wireless Sensor Networks. Wiley, England (2007)
11.
Miorande, D., Siciari, S., De Pellegrini, F., Chlamtac, I.: Internet of things: vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. 10(7), 1497–1516 (2012)CrossRef
12.
Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The internet of things: a survey. Comput. Netw. 54(15), 2787–2805 (2010)CrossRefMATH
13.
Bormann, C., Ersue, M., Keranen, A.: Terminology for constrained-node networks. Req. Comments 7228, 1–17 (2014)
14.
Akyildiz, I.F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci, E.: Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Comput. Netw. 38(4), 393–422 (2002)CrossRef
15.
Raymond, D.R., Midkiff, S.F.: Denial-of-service in wireless sensor networks: attacks and defenses. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 7(1), 74–81 (2008)CrossRef
16.
Luk, M., Mezzour, G., Perrig, A., Gligor, V.: MiniSec: A secure sensor network communication architecture. In: Proceedings of 6th ACM International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 470–488 (2007)
17.
Gupta, V., Wurm, M., Zhu, Y., Millard, M., Fung, S., Gura, N., Eberle, H., Shantz, S.C.: Sizzle: a standards-based end-to-end security architecture for the embedded internet. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 1(4), 425–445 (2005)CrossRef
18.
Hu, W., Tan, H., Corke, P., Shih, W.C., Jha, S.: Toward trusted wireless sensorn networks. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 7(1), 5 (2010)CrossRef
19.
Chan, H., Perrig, A., Song, D.: Random key predistribution schemes for sensor networks. In: Proccedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 197–213 (2003)
20.
Jung, W., Hong, S., Ha, M., Kim, Y.J., Kim, D.: SSL-based lightweight security of IP-based wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, pp. 1112–1117 (2009)
21.
Raza, S., Voigt, T., Rödig, U.: 6LoWPAN extension for IPsec. In: Proceedings of Workshop Interconnecting Smart Objects with the Internet, IAB, pp. 1–3 (2011)
22.
Raza, S., Voigt, T., and Jutvik, V.: Lightweight IKEv2: a key management solution for both the compressed IPsec and the IEEE 802.15.4 security. In: Proceedings of the IETF Workshop on Smart Object Security, pp. 1–2 (2012)
23.
Raza, S., Trabalza, D., Voigt, T.: 6LoWPAN compressed DTLS for CoAP. In: Proceedings of 8th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, pp. 287–289 (2012)
24.
Winter, T., Thubert, P., Brandt, A., Hui, J., Kelsey, P., Levis, K., Pister, K., Struik, R., Vasseur, J.P., Alexander, R.: RPL: IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks. Req. Comments 6550, 1–157 (2012)
25.
Schmitt, C.: Secure data transmission in wireless sensor networks. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, Institut für Informatik, pp. 1–190 (2013)
26.
Schmitt, C., Stiller, B., Noack, M.: Two-way authentication for internet of things. White Paper, IETF ser. ACE Working. Group 14, 1–19 (2014)
27.
Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S., Housley, R., Polk, W.: Internet X.509 public key infrastructure certificate and certificate revocation list (CRL) profile. Request for Comments, 5280, pp. 1–151 (2008)
28.
Watro, R., Kong, D., Cuti, S., Gardiner, C., Lynn, C., Kruus, P.: TinyPK: securing sensor networks with public key technology. In: Proceedings of 2nd ACM Workshop on Security of AdHoc and Sensor Networks, pp. 59–64 (2004)
29.
Modadugu, N., Rescorla, E.: The design and implementation of datagram TLS. In: Proccedings of Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, pp. 1–13 (2004)
30.
31.
Schmitt, C., Kothmayr, T., Benjamin, E., Wen, H., Braun, L., Carle, G.: TinyIPFIX: an efficient application protocol for data exchange in cyber physical systems. Comput. Commun. 74(2), 63–76 (2016)CrossRef
32.
Blake-Wilson, S., Menezes, A.: Authenticated Diffie-Hellman key agreement protocols. In: Proceedings of the Selected Areas in Cryptography, pp. 339–361 (1998)
33.
34.
Jurdak, R., Klues, K., Kusy, B., Richter, C., Langendoen, K., Brunig, M.: OPAL: a multiradio platform for high throughput wireless sensor networks. IEEE Embed. Syst. Lett. 3(4), 121–124 (2011)CrossRef
35.
Kothmayr, T.: A security architecture for wireless sensor networks based on DTLS. Master’s thesis, Technische Universität München, pp. 1–83 (2011)
36.
37.
38.
Grossschaedl, J., Tillich, S., Rechberger, C., Hofmann, M., Medwed, M.: Energy evaluation of software implementations of block ciphers under memory constraints. In: Proceedings of Conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 1110–1115 (2007)
39.
Barker, E., Barker, W., Burr, W., Polk, W., Smid, M.: Recommendation for key management - Part 1: General (Revised). White Paper, National Institute of Standards and Technology, pp. 1–143 (2007)
40.
McGrew, D.A., Viega, J.: The galois/counter mode of operation (GCM). White Paper, National Institute of Standards and Technology, pp. 1–43 (2005)
41.
42.
Liu, A., Ning, P.: TinyECC: a configurable library for elliptic curve cryptography in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 245–256 (2008)
43.
44.
45.
NIST: Recommended elliptic curves for federal government use. White Paper, pp. 1–43 (1999)
46.
Fouladgar, S., Mainaud, B., Masmoudi, K., Afifi, H.: Tiny 3-TLS: a trust delegation protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: Levente, B., Gligor, V.D., Westhoff, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Security and Privacy in Ad-Hoc and Sensor Networks, pp. 32–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRef
47.
Raza, S., Chung, T., Duquennoy, S., Dogan, Y., Voigt, T., Rodig, U.: Securing internet of things with lightweight IPsec. SICS Technical report, 1–27 (2011)
Metadaten
Titel
Two-Way Authentication for the Internet-of-Things
verfasst von
Corinna Schmitt
Thomas Kothmayr
Wen Hu
Burkhard Stiller
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Internet of Things: Novel Advances and Envisioned Applications

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53470-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-53472-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53472-5_2

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise