Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Assessing the Accuracy of Survey Research Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

42. Evidence-Based Survey Operations: Choosing and Mixing Modes

verfasst von : Michael Bosnjak

Erschienen in: The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Evidence-based survey operations (EBSO) is an approach to the design, preparation, implementation, and post-processing of survey-based projects, requiring that all survey operations-related decisions, such as mode choice, the use of incentives, and fieldwork strategies, should be based on the best available evidence available in the area of survey methodology. The overall aim of this chapter is to (1) briefly describe the historical roots, mindset, and rationale of EBSO, and (2) to describe how EBSO can help in identifying promising solutions in decision call situations emerging while designing, preparing, implementing, and post-processing a survey-based project. Finally, (3) the value of EBSO in designing survey guidelines and policies will be illustrated.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel The Role of Transparency in Maintaining the Legitimacy and Credibility of Survey Research
Nächstes Kapitel Best Practices for Survey Research
Fußnoten
Literatur
Blom, A.G., Bosnjak, M., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A.-S., Das, M., Douhou, S., & Krieger, U. (2016). A comparison of four probability-based online and mixed-mode panels in Europe. Social Science Computer Review, 34(1), 8–25.CrossRef
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T, & Rothstein, H.R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley, Chichester, UK.CrossRef
Bosnjak, M., & Danner, D. (2015). Survey participation and response. Psihologija, 48(4), 307–310.CrossRef
Bosnjak, M., Das, M., & Lynn, P. (2016). Methods for probability-based online and mixed-mode panels: Recent trends and future perspectives. Social Science Computer Review, 34(1), 3–7.CrossRef
De Leeuw, E. D., & Van Der Zouwen, J. (1988). Data quality in face to face interviews: A comparative meta-analysis. Telephone survey methodology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
De Leeuw, E.D. (1992). Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face Surveys. TT Publikaties, Plantage Daklaan 40, 1018CN Amsterdam.
De Leeuw, E. D. (2005). To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 21(2), 233–255.
Dillman, D.A. & Messer, B.L. (2010). Mixed-mode survey. In J.D. Wright & P.V. Marsden (Eds.), Handbook of Survey Research (2nd edition) (pp. 551–574). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D., & Christian, L.M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons.
Dodou, D., & De Winter, J.C.F. (2014). Social desirability is the same in offline, online, and paper surveys: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 487–495.CrossRef
Dwight, S.A., & Feigelson, M.E. (2000). A quantitative review of the effect of computerized testing on the measurement of social desirability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(3), 340–360.CrossRef
Dybä, T., Kitchenham, B.A., & Jorgensen, M. (2005). Evidence-based software engineering for practitioners. Software, IEEE, 22(1), 58–65.CrossRef
Farrington, D.P., MacKenzie, D.L., Sherman, L.W., & Welsh, B.C. (Eds.). (2003). Evidence-based crime prevention. Routledge.
Gnambs, T., & Kaspar, K. (2015). Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: A meta-analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1237–1259.CrossRef
Goyder, J. (1987). The silent minority: Nonrespondents on sample surveys. Westview Press.
Groves, R. M., & Peytcheva, E. (2008). The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias. A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 167–189.CrossRef
Groves, R.M., Fowler Jr, F.J., Couper, M.P., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2011). Survey methodology (Vol. 561). John Wiley & Sons.
Hox, J. J., & De Leeuw, E. D. (1994). A comparison of nonresponse in mail. telephone, and face-to-face surveys. Quality and Quantity, 28(4), 329–344.
Lozar Manfreda, K. L., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., Vehovar, V., & Berzelak, N. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes: A meta-analysis comparing response rates. Journal of the Market Research Society, 50(1), 79.
Mavletova, A. & Couper, M.P. (2015). A meta-analysis of breakoff rates in mobile web surveys. In D. Toninelli, R. Pinter & P. de Pedraza (Eds.), Mobile research methods. Opportunities and challenges of mobile research methodologies (pp. 81–98). Ubiquity Press, London, UK.
Medway, R. L., & Fulton, J. (2012). When more gets you less: a meta-analysis of the effect of concurrent web options on mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(4), 733–746.CrossRef
Mercer, A., Caporaso, A., Cantor, D., & Townsend, R. (2015). How much gets you how much? Monetary incentives and response rates in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79(1), 105–129.CrossRef
Pring, R., & Thomas, G. (2004). Evidence-based practice in education. McGraw- Hill Education, UK.
Richman, W.L., Kiesler, S., Weisband, S., & Drasgow, F. (1999). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 754–775.CrossRef
Rousseau, D.M. (2012). The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management. Oxford University Press.
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312(7023), 71–72.CrossRef
Shih, T.H., & Fan, X. (2007). Response rates and mode preferences in web-mail mixed-mode surveys: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Internet Science, 2(1), 59–82.
Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859–883.CrossRef
Ye, C., Fulton, J., & Tourangeau, R. (2011). More positive or more extreme? A meta-analysis of mode differences in response choice. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(2), 349–365.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Evidence-Based Survey Operations: Choosing and Mixing Modes
verfasst von
Michael Bosnjak
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54394-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-54395-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_42

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise