Skip to main content

2017 | Supplement | Buchkapitel

5. Content of the Contract

verfasst von : İlhan Helvacı

Erschienen in: Turkish Contract Law

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The principle of freedom of contract has its basis in TCO art. 26. Pursuant to this article, the parties may freely determine the content of the contract, their obligations, duties, responsibilities, liabilities, rights, entitlements, remedies, etc. within the limits of the law. According to this principle, within the limits of the law, persons are free to conclude or not to conclude a contract and they also have freedom of choice of the contracting parties.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Antalya (2012), pp. 273–284; Aybay (2011), pp. 37–41; Becker (1941), art. 19–20; Berger (2012), pp. 58–59, 370–385; Engel (1997), pp. 94–99, 267–297; Eren (2015), pp. 297–301, 316–345; Feyzioğlu (1976), pp. 231–248, 266–273; Gauch et al. (2008), pp. 120–152; Honsell et al. (2003), art. 19–20; Kılıçoğlu (2013), pp. 75–80, 86–104; Kocayusufpaşaoğlu (2014), pp. 525–619; Nomer (2015), pp. 56–81; Oser and Schönenberger (1929), art. 19–20; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 81–90, 173–183; Özsunay (1983), pp. 55–59; Reisoğlu (2014), pp. 133–140; Schwenzer (2009), pp. 246–259; Tekinay et al. (1993), pp. 362–364, 369–407; Tercier (2004), pp. 98–111, 137–146; Tercier et al. (2016), pp. 221–236; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 19–20, and von Tuhr and Peter (1979), pp. 223–233, 247–266.
 
2
Such freedom has two exceptions that are considered below. See Chap. 7.
 
3
For further explanations see Helvacı (2001).
 
4
Engel (1997), p. 107.
 
5
von Tuhr and Peter (1979), § 31, II, pp. 250–251; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 82; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 134.
 
6
Oğuzman and Öz (2015) p. 84.
 
7
For further explanations see Ateş (2007).
 
8
In most cases illegality and immorality may overlap. Kocayusufpaşaoğlu (2014), p. 555.
 
9
Kocayusufpaşaoğlu (2014), pp. 556–557, see and compare to von Tuhr and Peter (1979) § 31, V, 1, pp. 257–258; Oğuzman and Öz (2015) p. 86.
 
10
Decision to Unify the Jurisprudence of the Court of Cassation, 14.01.1948, File No: 30, Decision No: 2 (Official Gazette 30.07.1948; No: 6971).
 
11
Kocayusufpaşaoğlu (2014), p. 546. For further explanations see Honsell et al. (2003), art. 19–20, N. 23.
 
12
Becker (1941), art. 19, N. 28.
 
13
Becker (1941), art. 19, N. 25.
 
14
Kocayusufpaşaoğlu (2014), p. 549.
 
15
Kocayusufpaşaoğlu (2014), p. 546.
 
16
For further explanations see Altunkaya (2005).
 
17
Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 19–20, N. 76; Engel (1997), p. 270; Gauch et al. (2008), p. 124; Honsell et al. (2003), art. 19–20, N. 46; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 404; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 88; Feyzioğlu (1976), p. 268.
 
18
Tekinay et al. (1993), pp. 405–406; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 88; Feyzioğlu (1976), pp. 267–268; Nomer (2015), pp. 80–81.
 
19
Impossibilium nulla obligatio est: No-one has a legal obligation to do the impossible or there is no obligation to perform an impossible act.
 
20
For further explanations see Kuru and Budak (2010).
 
21
von Tuhr and Peter (1979), § 29, II, p. 225; Becker (1941), art. 20, N. 11; Gauch et al. (2008), p. 138; Tercier (2004), p. 101; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 19–20, N. 94.
 
22
Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 175; Kocayusufpaşaoğlu (2014), pp. 585–586; Nomer (2015), p. 58; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 146; Eren (2015), p. 334; Tercier et al. (2016), p. 156.
 
23
See Sects. 1.​10 and 22.​6.
 
24
For further explanations see Başpınar (1998), Üçer (2013).
 
25
It should be kept in mind that the Act on Movable Pledge on Commercial Transactions sets a specific rule. According to article 14 of this Act, in the case of non-performance of a loan agreement the creditor may demand that ownership of the pledged assets be transferred to him in lieu of performance. However, if the value of the pledged asset exceeds the amount of the secured debt, the creditor must pay this difference to the pledgor or, if there are other creditors in the subsequent rank, to them.
 
26
For further explanations see Helvacı (1997), pp. 102–107.
 
27
Kocayusufpaşaoğlu (2014), pp. 598–599.
 
28
Kocayusufpaşaoğlu (2014), pp. 599–600, 602.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Altunkaya M (2005) Edimin başlangıçtaki imkânsızlığı. Yetkin, Ankara Altunkaya M (2005) Edimin başlangıçtaki imkânsızlığı. Yetkin, Ankara
Zurück zum Zitat Antalya OG (2012) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler, vol 1. Legal, İstanbul Antalya OG (2012) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler, vol 1. Legal, İstanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Ateş D (2007) Borçlar hukuku sözleşmelerinde genel ahlaka aykırılık. Turhan, Ankara Ateş D (2007) Borçlar hukuku sözleşmelerinde genel ahlaka aykırılık. Turhan, Ankara
Zurück zum Zitat Aybay A (2011) Borçlar hukuku dersleri genel bölüm. Filiz, İstanbul Aybay A (2011) Borçlar hukuku dersleri genel bölüm. Filiz, İstanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Başpınar V (1998) Borç sözleşmelerinin kısmi butlanı. Güncel, Ankara Başpınar V (1998) Borç sözleşmelerinin kısmi butlanı. Güncel, Ankara
Zurück zum Zitat Becker H (1941) Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch, Volume VI, Obligationenrecht, 1. Abteilung: Allgemeine Bestimmungen, Art. 1-183. Stämpfli, Bern Becker H (1941) Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch, Volume VI, Obligationenrecht, 1. Abteilung: Allgemeine Bestimmungen, Art. 1-183. Stämpfli, Bern
Zurück zum Zitat Berger B (2012) Allgemeines Schuldrecht. Stämpfli, Bern Berger B (2012) Allgemeines Schuldrecht. Stämpfli, Bern
Zurück zum Zitat Engel P (1997) Traité des obligations en droit Suisse. Stämpfli, Bern Engel P (1997) Traité des obligations en droit Suisse. Stämpfli, Bern
Zurück zum Zitat Eren F (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Yetkin, Ankara Eren F (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Yetkin, Ankara
Zurück zum Zitat Feyzioğlu FN (1976) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler, vol 1. Fakülteler, İstanbul Feyzioğlu FN (1976) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler, vol 1. Fakülteler, İstanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Gauch P, Schluep WR, Schmid J (2008) Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, vol 1. Schulthess, Zürich Gauch P, Schluep WR, Schmid J (2008) Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, vol 1. Schulthess, Zürich
Zurück zum Zitat Helvacı İ (1997) Türk medenî kanununa göre lex commissoria (mürtehinin merhunu temellük) yasağı (mk. m. 788/c.2 ve mk. m. 863). Alfa, İstanbul Helvacı İ (1997) Türk medenî kanununa göre lex commissoria (mürtehinin merhunu temellük) yasağı (mk. m. 788/c.2 ve mk. m. 863). Alfa, İstanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Helvacı S (2001) Türk ve İsviçre hukuklarında kişilik hakkını koruyucu davalar (mk. md. 24/a fıkra I/imk. md. 28a fıkra I). Beta, İstanbul Helvacı S (2001) Türk ve İsviçre hukuklarında kişilik hakkını koruyucu davalar (mk. md. 24/a fıkra I/imk. md. 28a fıkra I). Beta, İstanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Honsell H, Vogt NP, Wiegand W (eds) (2003) Basler Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Privatrecht, Obligationenrecht 1: Art. 1-529 OR. Helbing Lichtenhahn, Basel Honsell H, Vogt NP, Wiegand W (eds) (2003) Basler Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Privatrecht, Obligationenrecht 1: Art. 1-529 OR. Helbing Lichtenhahn, Basel
Zurück zum Zitat Kılıçoğlu AM (2013) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Turhan, İstanbul Kılıçoğlu AM (2013) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Turhan, İstanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Kocayusufpaşaoğlu N (2014) Borçlar hukuku genel bölüm, vol 1 (Kocayusufpaşaoğlu/Hatemi/Serozan/Arpacı). Filiz, İstanbul Kocayusufpaşaoğlu N (2014) Borçlar hukuku genel bölüm, vol 1 (Kocayusufpaşaoğlu/Hatemi/Serozan/Arpacı). Filiz, İstanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Kuru B, Budak AC (2010) Tespit davaları. On iki levha, İstanbul Kuru B, Budak AC (2010) Tespit davaları. On iki levha, İstanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Nomer HN (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Beta, İstanbul Nomer HN (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Beta, İstanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Oğuzman K, Öz T (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler, vol 1. Vedat, İstanbul Oğuzman K, Öz T (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler, vol 1. Vedat, İstanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Oser H, Schönenberger W (1929) Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch, Volume V: Das Obligationenrecht, Erster Halbband: Art. 1-183. Schulthess, Zürich Oser H, Schönenberger W (1929) Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch, Volume V: Das Obligationenrecht, Erster Halbband: Art. 1-183. Schulthess, Zürich
Zurück zum Zitat Özsunay E (1983) Borçlar hukuku, vol I. Filiz, İstanbul Özsunay E (1983) Borçlar hukuku, vol I. Filiz, İstanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Reisoğlu S (2014) Türk borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Beta, İstanbul Reisoğlu S (2014) Türk borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Beta, İstanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Schwenzer I (2009) Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht, Allgemeiner Teil. Schulthess, Bern Schwenzer I (2009) Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht, Allgemeiner Teil. Schulthess, Bern
Zurück zum Zitat Tekinay SS, Akman S, Burcuoğlu H, Altop A (1993) Tekinay borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Filiz, İstanbul Tekinay SS, Akman S, Burcuoğlu H, Altop A (1993) Tekinay borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Filiz, İstanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Tercier P (2004) Le droit des obligations. Schulthess, Zurich Tercier P (2004) Le droit des obligations. Schulthess, Zurich
Zurück zum Zitat Tercier P, Pichonnaz P, Develioğlu HM (2016) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. On iki levha, İstanbul Tercier P, Pichonnaz P, Develioğlu HM (2016) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. On iki levha, İstanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Thévenoz L, Werro F (éd) (2012) Commentaire romand code des obligations 1: art. 1-529 CO. Helbing Lichtenhahn, Bâle Thévenoz L, Werro F (éd) (2012) Commentaire romand code des obligations 1: art. 1-529 CO. Helbing Lichtenhahn, Bâle
Zurück zum Zitat Üçer M (2013) Roma hukukunda ve karşılaştırmalı hukukta sözleşmelerin kısmi butlanı. Yetkin, Ankara Üçer M (2013) Roma hukukunda ve karşılaştırmalı hukukta sözleşmelerin kısmi butlanı. Yetkin, Ankara
Zurück zum Zitat von Tuhr A, Peter H (1979) Allgemeiner Teil des Schweizerischen Obligationenrecht, vol 1. Schulthess, Zürich von Tuhr A, Peter H (1979) Allgemeiner Teil des Schweizerischen Obligationenrecht, vol 1. Schulthess, Zürich
Metadaten
Titel
Content of the Contract
verfasst von
İlhan Helvacı
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60061-1_5

Premium Partner