Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
An Adaptive Coach for Invention Activities Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Evaluating the Effect of Uncertainty Visualisation in Open Learner Models on Students’ Metacognitive Skills

verfasst von : Lamiya Al-Shanfari, Carrie Demmans Epp, Chris Baber

Erschienen in: Artificial Intelligence in Education

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Self-assessment is widely used in open learner models (OLMs) as a metacognitive process to enhance students’ self-regulated learning. Yet little research has investigated the impact of the visualisation when the OLM shows the conflict (i.e., uncertainty) between the system’s beliefs about student knowledge and students’ confidence in the correctness of their answers. We deployed such an OLM and studied its use. The impact of the uncertainty visualisation on student learning, confidence gains and actions was determined by comparing these measures across two treatment conditions and a control condition. Those who accessed the OLM performed significantly better on the post-test, and those in the treatment group who could see both sets of beliefs separately showed greater confidence gains and used the system more.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel An Adaptive Coach for Invention Activities
Nächstes Kapitel Collaboration Improves Student Interest in Online Tutoring
Literatur
1.
Boud, D.: The role of self-assessment in student grading. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 14(1), 20–30 (1989)CrossRef
2.
Jackson, S.A., Kleitman, S.: Metacognit. Learn. 9(1), 25–49 (2014). SpringerCrossRef
3.
Butler, D.L., Winne, P.H.: Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Rev. Educ. Res. 65(3), 245–281 (1995)CrossRef
4.
Kulhavy, R.W., Stock, W.A.: Feedback in written instruction: the place of response certitude. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 1(4), 279–308 (1989)CrossRef
5.
Bull, S., Kay, J.: Open learner models as drivers for metacognitive processes. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. SIHE, vol. 28, pp. 349–365. Springer, New York (2013). doi:10.​1007/​978-1-4419-5546-3_​23 CrossRef
6.
Woolf, B.: Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-Centered Strategies for Revolutionizing E-learning, pp. 49–94. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2009)
7.
Demmans Epp, C., Bull, S.: Uncertainty representation in visualizations of learning analytics for learners: current approaches and opportunities. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 8(3), 242–260 (2015)CrossRef
8.
Zwick, R., Zapata-Rivera, D., Hegarty, M.: Comparing graphical and verbal representations of measurement error in test score reports. Educ. Assess. 19(2), 116–138 (2014). RoutledgeCrossRef
9.
Zapata-Rivera, J.D., Greer, J.E.: Interacting with inspectable bayesian models. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 14, 127–163 (2004)
10.
Mohanarajah, S., Kemp, R.H., Kemp, E.: Opening a fuzzy learner model. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 62–71 (2005)
11.
Aleven, V., Popescu, O., Ogan, A., Koedinger, K.R.: A formative classroom evaluation of a tutorial dialogue system that supports self-explanation. In: Aleven, V., Hoppe, U., Kay, J., Mizoguchi, R., Pain, H., Verdejo, F., Yacef, K. (eds.) Supplemental Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2003, vol. VI, pp. 345–355. School of Information Technologies, University of Sydney (2003)
12.
Bull, S., Kay, J.: SMILI☺: a framework for interfaces to learning data in open learner models, learning analytics and related fields. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(1), 293–331 (2016)CrossRef
13.
Mitrovic, A., Martin, B.: Evaluating the effect of open student models on self-assessment. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 17(2), 121–144 (2007)
14.
Kerly, A., Bull, S.: Children’s interactions with inspectable and negotiated learner models. In: Woolf, Beverley P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 132–141. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-540-69132-7_​18 CrossRef
15.
Brusilovsky, P., Somyürek, S., Guerra, J., Hosseini, R., Zadorozhny, V.: The value of social: comparing open student modeling and open social student modeling. In: Ricci, F., Bontcheva, K., Conlan, O., Lawless, S. (eds.) UMAP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9146, pp. 44–55. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-319-20267-9_​4 CrossRef
16.
Long, Y., Aleven, V.: Supporting students’ self-regulated learning with an open learner model in a linear equation tutor. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS, vol. 7926, pp. 219–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-39112-5_​23 CrossRef
17.
Bull, S., Pain, H.: “Did i say what i think i said, and do you agree with me?” Inspecting and questioning the student model. In: Greer, J. (ed.) Proceedings of World Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, VA, USA, pp. 501–508 (1995)
18.
Kinkeldey, C., MacEachren, A.M., Schiewe, J.: How to assess visual communication of uncertainty? A systematic review of geospatial uncertainty visualisation user studies. Cartographic J. 51(4), 372–386 (2014). Taylor & FrancisCrossRef
19.
Al-Shanfari, L., Demmans Epp, C., Bull, S.: Uncertainty in open learner models: visualising inconsistencies in the underlying data. In: Bull, S., Ginon, B., Kickmeier-Rust, M., Kay, J., Johnson, M.D. (eds.) Workshop on Learning Analytics for Learners (LAK 2016), CEUR, pp. 23–30 (2016)
20.
Bull, S., Jackson, T., Lancaster, M.: Students’ interest in their misconceptions in first year electrical circuits and mathematics courses. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ. 47(3), 307–318 (2010)CrossRef
21.
Schön, D.A.: Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (1987)
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluating the Effect of Uncertainty Visualisation in Open Learner Models on Students’ Metacognitive Skills
verfasst von
Lamiya Al-Shanfari
Carrie Demmans Epp
Chris Baber
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Artificial Intelligence in Education

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61424-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-61425-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_2

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise