nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

An Adaptive Coach for Invention Activities

verfasst von : Vincent Aleven, Helena Connolly, Octav Popescu, Jenna Marks, Marianna Lamnina, Catherine Chase

Erschienen in: Artificial Intelligence in Education

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

A focus in recent AIED research is to create adaptive support for learners in inquiry learning environments. However, only few examples of such support have been demonstrated. Our work focuses on Invention activities, inquiry activities in which students generate representations that explain data presented as contrasting cases. To help teachers implement these activities in their classrooms, we have created and pilot-tested a dedicated adaptive computer coach (the Invention Coach) and are currently evaluating it in a classroom study. The Coach’s pedagogical strategy balances structuring and problematizing, unlike many ITSs, which favor structuring. The Coach is implemented in CTAT as a model-tracing tutor, with a rule-based model that captures its pedagogical coaching strategy, designed in part based on data from human tutors. We describe the Invention Coach and its pedagogical model. We present evidence from our pilot tests that illustrate the tutor’s versatility and provide preliminary evidence of its effectiveness. The contributions of the work are: identifying an adaptive coaching strategy for Invention tasks that balances structuring and problematizing, and an automated coach for a successful instructional method (Invention) for which few tutors have been built.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Erratum to: Dusting Off the Messy Middle: Assessing Students’ Inquiry Skills Through Doing and Writing

Nächstes Kapitel Evaluating the Effect of Uncertainty Visualisation in Open Learner Models on Students’ Metacognitive Skills

Aleven, V.: Rule-based cognitive modeling for intelligent tutoring systems. In: Nkambou, R., Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R. (eds.) Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 33–62. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRef

Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M., Sewall, J., van Velsen, M., et al.: Example-tracing tutors: intelligent tutor development for non-programmers. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26, 224–269 (2016)CrossRef

Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Pelletier, R.: Cognitive tutors: lessons learned. J. Learn. Sci. 4, 167–207 (1995)CrossRef

Bransford, J.D., Franks, J.J., Vye, N.J., Sherwood, R.D.: New approaches to instruction: because wisdom can’t be told. In: Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A. (eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, pp. 470–497. Cambridge University Press, New York (1989)

Chase, C., Marks, J., Bernett, D., Aleven, V.: The design of an exploratory learning environment to support invention. In: Proceedings, Workshop on Intelligent Support in Exploratory and Open-Ended Learning Environments, held during AIED 2015 (2015)

Chase, C.C., Marks, J., Bernett, D., Bradley, M., Aleven, V.: Towards the development of the invention coach: a naturalistic study of teacher guidance for an exploratory learning task. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M. (eds.) AIED 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9112, pp. 558–561. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_61 CrossRef

Chi, M.T.H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., LaVancher, C.: Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognit. Sci. 18, 439–477 (1994)

de Jong, T., van Joolingen, W.R.: Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Rev. Educ. Res. 68, 179–201 (1998)CrossRef

Donnelly, D.F., Linn, M.C., Ludvigsen, S.: Impacts and characteristics of computer-based science inquiry learning environments for precollege students. Rev. Educ. Res. 84, 572–608 (2014)CrossRef

10.

Dragon, T., Arroyo, I., Woolf, B.P., Burleson, W., Kaliouby, R., Eydgahi, H.: Viewing student affect and learning through classroom observation and physical sensors. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 29–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_8 CrossRef

11.

Gobert, J.D., Sao Pedro, M., Raziuddin, J., Baker, R.S.: From log files to assessment metrics: measuring students’ science inquiry skills using educational data mining. J. Learn. Sci. 22, 521–563 (2013)CrossRef

12.

Heffernan, N.T., Koedinger, K.R., Razzaq, L.: Expanding the model-tracing architecture: a 3rd generation intelligent tutor for Algebra symbolization. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 18, 153–178 (2008)

13.

Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Duncan, R.G., Chinn, C.A.: Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educ. Psychol. 42, 99–107 (2007)CrossRef

14.

Kapur, M., Bielaczyc, K.: Designing for productive failure. J. Learn. Sci. 21, 45–83 (2012)CrossRef

15.

Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., Clark, R.E.: Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educ. Psychol. 41, 75–86 (2006)CrossRef

16.

Koedinger, K.R., Aleven, V.: Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19, 239–264 (2007)CrossRef

17.

Kuhn, D., Crowell, A.: Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking. Psychol. Sci. 22, 545–552 (2011)CrossRef

18.

Loibl, K., Roll, I., Rummel, N.: Towards a theory of when and how problem solving followed by instruction supports learning. Educ. Psychol. Rev., 1–23 (2016). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-016-9379-x

19.

Loibl, K., Rummel, N.: Knowing what you don’t know makes failure productive. Learn. Instruct. 34, 74–85 (2014)CrossRef

20.

Marks, J., Bernett, D., Chase, C.C.: The invention coach: integrating data and theory in the design of an exploratory learning environment. Int. J. Des. Learn. 7, 74–92 (2016)

21.

Mayer, R.E.: Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? Am. Psychol. 59, 14–19 (2004)CrossRef

22.

Mitrovic, A.: Fifteen years of constraint-based tutors: what we have achieved and where we are going. User Model. User Adapt. Interact. 22, 39–72 (2011)CrossRef

23.

Papert S.: Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, Inc., New York (1980)

24.

Pea, R.D.: The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. J. Learn. Sci. 13, 423–451 (2004)CrossRef

25.

Poitras, E.G., Lajoie, S.P.: Developing an agent-based adaptive system for scaffolding self-regulated inquiry learning in history education. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 62, 335–366 (2014)CrossRef

26.

Puntambekar, S., Hubscher, R.: Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: what have we gained and what have we missed? Educ. Psychol. 40, 1–12 (2005)CrossRef

27.

Quintana, C., Reiser, B.J., Davis, E.A., Krajcik, J., et al.: A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. J. Learn. Sci. 13, 337–386 (2004)CrossRef

28.

Reiser, B.J.: Scaffolding complex learning: the mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. J. Learn. Sci. 13(3), 273–304 (2004)CrossRef

29.

Roll, I., Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.R.: Helping students know ‘further’—increasing the flexibility of students’ knowledge using symbolic invention tasks. In: Taatgen, N.A., van Rijn H. (eds.), Proceedings (CogSci 2009), pp. 1169–1174. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2009)

30.

Roll, I., Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.R.: The invention lab: using a hybrid of model tracing and constraint-based modeling to offer intelligent support in inquiry environments. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6094, pp. 115–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_16 CrossRef

31.

Roll, I., Holmes, N.G., Day, J., Bonn, D.: Evaluating metacognitive scaffolding in guided invention activities. Instruct. Sci. 40, 1–20 (2012)CrossRef

32.

Shemwell, J.T., Chase, C.C., Schwartz, D.L.: Seeking the general explanation: a test of inductive activities for learning and transfer. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 52, 58–83 (2015)CrossRef

33.

Shute, V.J., Glaser, R.: A large-scale evaluation of an intelligent discovery world: smithtown. Interact. Learn. Environ. 1, 51–77 (1990)CrossRef

34.

Schwartz, D.L., Martin, T.: Inventing to prepare for future learning: the hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognit. Instruct. 22, 129–184 (2004)CrossRef

35.

Schwartz, D.L., Chase, C.C., Oppezzo, M.A., Chin, D.B.: Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases: the effects of telling first on learning and transfer. J. Educ. Psychol. 103, 759–775 (2011)CrossRef

36.

VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J.A., et al.: The Andes physics tutoring system: lessons learned. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 15, 147–204 (2005)

37.

Xun, G.E., Land, S.M.: A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 52, 5–22 (2004)CrossRef

Titel: An Adaptive Coach for Invention Activities
verfasst von: Vincent Aleven
Helena Connolly
Octav Popescu
Jenna Marks
Marianna Lamnina
Catherine Chase
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Artificial Intelligence in Education
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61424-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-61425-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner