nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Towards a Goal-Oriented Framework for Partial Agile Adoption

verfasst von : Soreangsey Kiv, Samedi Heng, Yves Wautelet, Manuel Kolp

Erschienen in: Software Technologies

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The agile paradigm is used today for software development and project as an alternative to structured and traditional heavier life cycles. Different meta-models have been proposed trying to unify agile methods. Yet, very few of them focus on agile partial method adoption. Intuitively, choosing which practices to adopt from agile methods should be made based on their most prioritized goals in the software development process. The paper answers this issue by building a goal-oriented meta-model where each agile concept is seen as a goal to achieve and explaining how goal modeling can help the software team to partially adopt agile methods. This will also make it easier to identify vulnerabilities associated with each goal and minimize risks.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel From Specification to Implementation of an Automotive Transport System

Nächstes Kapitel Using Semantic Web to Establish Traceability Links Between Heterogeneous Artifacts

Principles are denoted as \(Px, x \in \{1\ldots 12\}\) as seen in Table 3.

Scrum practices are denoted as \(SPx, x \in \{1\ldots 14\}\) and XP practices are denoted as \(XPx, x \in \{1\ldots 13\}\) as seen in Table 3.

One iteration per method candidate to be partially adapted.

Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc., Boston (2000)

Palmer, S.R., Felsing, M.: A Practical Guide to Feature-Driven Development, 1st edn. Pearson Education, New York City (2001)

Stapleton, J.: DSDM: The Method in Practice. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc., Boston (1997)

Cockburn, A.: Surviving Object-oriented Projects: A Manager’s Guide. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc., Boston (1998)

Schwaber, K., Beedle, M.: Agile Software Development with Scrum, vol. 1. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)MATH

Fowler, M., Highsmith, J.: The agile manifesto. Softw. Dev. 9, 28–35 (2001)

Abrahamsson, P., Warsta, J., Siponen, M.T., Ronkainen, J.: New directions on agile methods: a comparative analysis. In: Clarke, L.A., Dillon, L., Tichy, W.F. (eds.) Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 3–10 May 2003, pp. 244–254. IEEE Computer Society, Portland (2003)

Tripp, J.F., Armstrong, D.J.: Exploring the relationship between organizational adoption motives and the tailoring of agile methods. In: 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 4799–4806. IEEE (2014)

Campanelli, A.S., Parreiras, F.S.: Agile methods tailoring - a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 110, 85–100 (2015)CrossRef

10.

Esfahani, H.C., Yu, E.S.K., Annosi, M.C.: Towards the strategic analysis of agile practices. In: Nurcan, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the CAiSE Forum 2011, Volume 734 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, London, UK, 22–24 June 2011, pp. 155–162. CEUR-WS.org (2011)

11.

Henderson-Sellers, B., Gonzalez-Perez, C.: A comparison of four process metamodels and the creation of a new generic standard. Inf. Softw. Technol. 47, 49–65 (2005)CrossRef

12.

Mikulėnas, G., Butleris, R., Nemuraitė, L.: An approach for the metamodel of the framework for a partial agile method adaptation. Inf. Technol. Control 40, 71–82 (2011)

13.

Esfahani, H.C., Cabot, J., Yu, E.S.K.: Adopting agile methods: can goal-oriented social modeling help? In: Loucopoulos, P., Cavarero, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, RCIS 2010, Nice, France, 19–21 May 2010, pp. 223–234. IEEE (2010)

14.

Madi, T., Dahalin, Z., Baharom, F.: Content analysis on agile values: a perception from software practitioners. In: 2011 5th Malaysian Conference on Software Engineering (MySEC), pp. 423–428. IEEE (2011)

15.

Kiv, S., Heng, S., Kolp, M., Wautelet, Y.: An intentional perspective on partial agile adoption. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Software Technologies - Volume 1, pp. 116–127. ICSOFT, INSTICC, SciTePress (2017)

16.

Yu, E.S.: Social modeling and i*. In: Borgida, A.T., Chaudhri, V.K., Giorgini, P., Yu, E.S. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications. LNCS, vol. 5600, pp. 99–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02463-4_7CrossRef

17.

Jacobson, I., Ng, P.W., Spence, I.: The essential unified process-a fresh start for processd. Dr. Dobbs J. 31, 40+ (2006)

18.

Ambler, S.: The Agile Unified Process (AUP). Ambysoft (2005). http://www.agilealliance.hu/materials/books/SWA-AUP.pdf

19.

Kroll, P., MacIsaac, B.: Agility and Discipline Made Easy: Practices from OpenUP and RUP (Addison-Wesley Object Technology (Paperback)). Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2006)

20.

Ambler, S.: Agile Modeling: Effective Practices for Extreme Programming and the Unified Process. Wiley, Hoboken (2002)

21.

Ahmad, M.O., Markkula, J., Oivo, M.: Kanban in software development: a systematic literature review. In: 2013 39th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), pp. 9–16. IEEE (2013)

22.

Liker, J.K.: The Toyota Way. Esensi (2004)

23.

Poppendieck, M., Poppendieck, T.: Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)

24.

Chiarini, A.: Lean Organization: From the Tools of the Toyota Production System to Lean Office. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2510-3CrossRef

25.

Schwaber, K.: Agile Project Management with Scrum. Microsoft Press (2004)

26.

Henderson-Sellers, B., Ralyté, J., Ågerfalk, P.J., Rossi, M.: Situational Method Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRef

27.

Lin, J., Yu, H., Shen, Z., Miao, C.: Using goal net to model user stories in agile software development. In: 15th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, SNPD 2014, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 30 June–2 July 2014, pp. 1–6. IEEE Computer Society (2014)

28.

Shen, Z., Miao, C., Tao, X., Gay, R.: Goal oriented modeling for intelligent software agents. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT 2004), pp. 540–543. IEEE (2004)

29.

Bézivin, J.: In search of a basic principle for model driven engineering. Novatica J. Special Issue 5, 21–24 (2004)

30.

Schuppenies, R., Steinhauer, S.: Software process engineering metamodel. OMG group, November 2002

31.

Damiani, E., Colombo, A., Frati, F., Bellettini, C.: A metamodel for modeling and measuring scrum development process. In: Concas, G., Damiani, E., Scotto, M., Succi, G. (eds.) XP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4536, pp. 74–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73101-6_11CrossRef

32.

Wautelet, Y., Heng, S., Kiv, S., Kolp, M.: User-story driven development of multi-agent systems: a process fragment for agile methods. Comput. Lang. Syst. Struct. 50, 159–176 (2017)

33.

Pourmasoumi, A., Kahani, M., Bagheri, E., Asadi, M.: Process fragmentation: an ontological perspective. In: Gaaloul, K., Schmidt, R., Nurcan, S., Guerreiro, S., Ma, Q. (eds.) CAISE 2015. LNBIP, vol. 214, pp. 184–199. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19237-6_12CrossRef

34.

Wautelet, Y., Heng, S., Kolp, M., Mirbel, I.: Unifying and extending user story models. In: Jarke, M., Mylopoulos, J., Quix, C., Rolland, C., Manolopoulos, Y., Mouratidis, H., Horkoff, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8484, pp. 211–225. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07881-6_15CrossRef

35.

Wautelet, Y., Heng, S., Kolp, M., Mirbel, I., Poelmans, S.: Building a rationale diagram for evaluating user story sets. In: Tenth IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, RCIS 2016, Grenoble, France, 1–3 June 2016, pp. 1–12. IEEE (2016)

36.

Wautelet, Y., Heng, S., Hintea, D., Kolp, M., Poelmans, S.: Bridging user story sets with the use case model. In: Link, S., Trujillo, J.C. (eds.) ER 2016. LNCS, vol. 9975, pp. 127–138. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47717-6_11CrossRef

37.

Seidita, V., Cossentino, M., Chella, A.: A proposal of process fragment definition and documentation. In: Cossentino, M., Kaisers, M., Tuyls, K., Weiss, G. (eds.) EUMAS 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7541, pp. 221–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34799-3_15CrossRef

38.

Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: Understanding “why” in software process modelling, analysis, and design. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 159–168. IEEE Computer Society Press (1994)

39.

OMG: Software & systems process engineering meta-model specification. Version 2.0. Technical report, Object Management Group (2008)

40.

Faulkner, S., Kolp, M., Wautelet, Y., Achbany, Y.: A formal description language for multi-agent architectures. In: Kolp, M., Henderson-Sellers, B., Mouratidis, H., Garcia, A., Ghose, A.K., Bresciani, P. (eds.) AOIS-2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4898, pp. 143–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77990-2_9CrossRef

41.

ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 12207:2008: Systems and software engineering - software life cycle processes (2008)

42.

Van Loon, H.: Process Assessment and ISO/IEC 15504: A Reference Book. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

43.

Madeyski, L.: Test-Driven Development: An Empirical Evaluation of Agile Practice, 1st edn. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRef

44.

Sidky, A.S., Arthur, J.D., Bohner, S.A.: A disciplined approach to adopting agile practices: the agile adoption framework. ISSE 3, 203–216 (2007)

45.

Karlström, D., Runeson, P.: Integrating agile software development into stage-gate managed product development. Empirical Softw. Eng. 11, 203–225 (2006)CrossRef

46.

Laanti, M., Similä, J., Abrahamsson, P.: Definitions of agile software development and agility. In: McCaffery, F., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2013. CCIS, vol. 364, pp. 247–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39179-8_22CrossRef

47.

Pressman, R.S.: Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2005)MATH

48.

Cohn, M.: User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc., Redwood City (2004)

49.

Yu, E., Giorgini, P., Maiden, N., Mylopoulos, J.: Social Modeling for Requirements Engineering. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)

50.

AgileAlliance: Subway map to agile practices (2005). https://www.agilealliance.org/

51.

VersionOne: 10th annual state of agile development survey (2016)

52.

Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J.: The scrum guide. Scrum Alliance 21 (2011)

Titel: Towards a Goal-Oriented Framework for Partial Agile Adoption
verfasst von: Soreangsey Kiv
Samedi Heng
Yves Wautelet
Manuel Kolp
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Software Technologies
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93640-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-93641-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93641-3_4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner