Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Determining the Ecological Validity of Simulation Environments in Support of Human Competency Development Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Human Behavior Under Emergency and Its Simulation Modeling: A Review

verfasst von : Yixuan Cheng, Dahai Liu, Jie Chen, Sirish Namilae, Jennifer Thropp, Younho Seong

Erschienen in: Advances in Human Factors in Simulation and Modeling

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

An emergency is a serious, unexpected, and potentially life-threatening situation requiring immediate action. Emergency evacuation is the most critical step to save people’s lives. The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of various factors to investigate human behavior under emergency situations. Computational modeling and simulation as a practical way to replicate human behavior change requires quantifying psychological and physical parameters. Previous studies on humans and animals, as well as common simulation approaches were reviewed. According to the results of this literature review, future experiments or simulations can consider not only physical parameters such as human dynamics, but also quantifying psychological parameters such as interpersonal relationship, goal-seeking behavior, decision-making differences, and many more.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Conditional Deterrence: An Agent-Based Framework of Escalation Dynamics in an Era of WMD Proliferation
Nächstes Kapitel ACT-R Modeling to Simulate Information Amalgamation Strategies
Literatur
1.
Alexander, D.E.: Definition of emergency. In: Penuel, K.B., Statler, M., Hagen, R. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Crisis Management, pp. 324–325. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2013)
2.
Fagel, M.J., Krill, S., Lawrence, M.: Policy and laws relating to emergency management planning. In: Fagel, M.J. (ed.) Crisis Management and Emergency Planning: Preparing for Today’s Challenges, pp. 3–17. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)
3.
Guha-Sapir, D., Hoyois, P., Below, R.: Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2015: The Numbers and Trends. CRED, Brussels (2016)
4.
Cassidy, T.: Problem-solving style, achievement motivation, psychological distress and response to a simulated emergency. Couns. Psychol. Q. 15, 325–332 (2002)CrossRef
5.
6.
Van de Walle, B., Turoff, M.: Decision support for emergency situations. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manag. 6, 295–316 (2008)CrossRef
7.
Neria, Y., Nandi, A., Galea, S.: Post-traumatic stress disorder following disasters: a systematic review. Psychol. Med. 38, 467–480 (2008)CrossRef
8.
Aldag, R.J.: Decision making: a psychological analysis of conflict. Acad. Manag. Rev. 5, 141–143 (1980)
9.
Helbing, D., Farkas, I.J., Molnar, P., Vicsek, T.: Simulation of pedestrian crowds in normal and evacuation situations. In: Schreckenberg, M., Sharma, S.D. (eds.) Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, pp. 21–58. Springer, Berlin (2002)
10.
Pine, J.C.: Natural Hazards Analysis: Reducing the Impact of Disasters. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)
11.
Cocking, C., Drury, J., Reicher, S.: The psychology of crowd behaviour in emergency evacuations: results from two interview studies and implications for the fire and rescue services. Irish J. Psychol. 30, 59–73 (2009)CrossRef
12.
Purser, D.A., Raggio, A.J.T.: Behaviour of crowds when subjected to fire intelligence. Building Research Establishing Report CR 143/95. Building Research Establishment Ltd., Watford (1995)
13.
Purser, D.A., Bensilum, M.: Quantification of escape behavior during experimental evacuations. Building Research Establishment Report CR 30/99. Building Research Establishment Ltd., Watford (1999)
14.
Vorst, H.C.M.: Evacuation models and disaster psychology. Procedia Eng. 3, 15–21 (2010)CrossRef
15.
16.
Purser, D.A., Bensilum, M.: Quantification of behaviour for engineering design standards and escape time calculations. Saf. Sci. 38, 157–182 (2001)CrossRef
17.
18.
Kobes, M., Helsloot, I., de Vries, B., Post, J.G., Oberijé́, N., Groenewegen, K.: Way finding during fire evacuation; an analysis of unannounced fire drills in a hotel at night. Build. Environ. 45, 537–548 (2010)CrossRef
19.
Sime, J., Breaux, J., Canter, D.: Human Behaviour Patterns in Domestic and Hospital Fires. BRE Report, UK (1994)
20.
Gwynne, S., Galea, E.R., Lawrence, P.J., Filippidis, L.: Modelling occupant interaction with fire conditions using the buildingEXODUS evacuation model. Fire Saf. J. 36, 327–357 (2001)CrossRef
21.
Ozel, F.: Time pressure and stress as a factor during emergency egress. Saf. Sci. 38, 95–107 (2001)CrossRef
22.
Knuth, D., Kehl, D., Hulse, L., Schmidt, S.: Perievent distress during fires-the impact of perceived emergency knowledge. J. Environ. Psychol. 34, 10–17 (2013)CrossRef
23.
Heliovaara, S., Kuusinen, J., Rinne, T., Korhonen, T., Ehtamo, H.: Pedestrian behavior and exit selection in evacuation of a corridor-an experimental study. Saf. Sci. 50, 221–227 (2012)CrossRef
24.
Mu, H.L., Wang, J.H., Mao, Z.L., Sun, J.H., Lo, S.M., Wang, Q.S.: Pre-evacuation human reactions in fires: an attribution analysis considering psychological process. Procedia Eng. 52, 290–296 (2013)CrossRef
25.
Yoon, S.W., Velasquez, J.D., Partridge, B.K., Nof, S.Y.: Transportation security decision support system for emergency response: a training prototype. Decis. Support Syst. 46, 139–148 (2008)CrossRef
26.
Ben Zur, H., Breznitz, J.S.: The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Physiol. 47, 89–104 (1981)
27.
Gantt, P., Gantt, R.: Disaster psychology: dispelling the myths of panic. Prof. Saf. 57(8), 42–49 (2012)
28.
Staw, B.M., Sandelands, L.E., Dutton, J.E.: Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: a multilevel analysis. Adm. Sci. Q. 26, 501–524 (1981)CrossRef
29.
Rice, R.E.: From adversity to diversity: applications of communication technology to crisis management. Adv. Telecommun. Manag. 3, 91–112 (1990)
30.
Abolghasemzadeh, P.: A comprehensive method for environmentally sensitive and behavioral microscopic egress analysis in case of fire in buildings. Saf. Sci. 59, 1–9 (2013)CrossRef
31.
Bode, N.W.F., Codling, E.A.: Human exit route choice in virtual crowd evacuations. Anim. Behav. 86, 347–358 (2013)CrossRef
32.
Turner, R.H., Killian, L.M.: Collective Behaviour. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1957)
33.
Kahnemen, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–292 (1979)CrossRefMATH
34.
Pan, X., Han, C.S., Dauber, K., Law, K.H.: Human and social behavior in computational modeling and analysis of egress. Autom. Constr. 15, 448–461 (2006)CrossRef
35.
Tucker, C.W., Schweingruber, D., McPhail, C.: Simulating arcs and rings in gatherings. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 50, 581–588 (1999)CrossRef
36.
Aveni, A.F.: The not-so-lonely crowd: friendship groups in collective behavior. Sociometry 48, 96–99 (1977)CrossRef
37.
McPhail, C.: The Myth of the Madding Crowd. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne (1991)
38.
McPhail, C., Wohlstein, R.T.: Collective locomotion as collective behavior. Am. Sociol. Rev. 51, 447–463 (1986)CrossRef
39.
Sime, J.D.: Affiliate behaviour during escape to building exits. J. Environ. Psychol. 3, 21–41 (1983)CrossRef
40.
Nilsson, D., Johansson, A.: Social influence during the initial phase of a fire evacuation - analysis of evacuation experiments in a cinema theatre. Fire Saf. J. 44, 71–79 (2009)CrossRef
41.
Armfield, J.M.: Cognitive vulnerability: a model of the etiology of fear. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 26, 746–768 (2006)CrossRef
42.
Zakaria, W., Yusof, U.K.: Modelling crowd behaviour during emergency evacuation: a proposed framework. In: 2016 International Conference on Advanced Informatics: Concepts, Theory And Application (ICAICTA) (2016)
43.
Schneider, B.: The reference model SimPan - agent-based modelling of human behaviour in panic situations. In: Tenth International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation (2008)
44.
Helbing, D., Farkas, I., Vicsek, T.: Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407, 487–490 (2000)CrossRef
45.
Hu, Z., Sheu, J., Xiao, L.: Post-disaster evacuation and temporary resettlement considering panic and panic spread. Transp. Res. Part B 69, 112–132 (2014)CrossRef
46.
Blake, S.J., Galea, E.R., Westeng, H., Dixon, A.J.P.: An analysis of human behavior during the WTC disaster of 11 September 2001 based on published survivor accounts. In: 3rd International Symposium on Human Behavior in Fire, pp. 181–192. InterScience Communications, Belfast (2004)
47.
Aguirre, B.E.: Commentary on “understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster”: emergency evacuations, panic, and social psychology. Psychiatry 68, 121–129 (2005)CrossRef
48.
Bohannon, J.: Directing the herd: crowds and the science of evacuation. Science 310, 219–221 (2005)CrossRef
49.
Mawson, A.R.: Understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster. Psychiatry 68, 95–113 (2005)CrossRef
50.
Oswald, M., Lebeda, C., Schneider, U., Kirchberger, H.: Full-scale evacuation experiments in a smoke filled rail carriage-a detailed study of passenger behavior under reduced visibility. In: Waldau, N., Gattermann, P., Knoflacher, H., Schreckenberg, M. (eds.) Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
51.
Proulx, G.: Evacuation time. In: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 4th edn, pp. 3–355. National Fire Protection Association Quincy, MA (2008)
52.
Benight, C.C., Harper, M.L.: Coping self-efficacy perceptions as a mediator between acute stress response and long-term distress following natural disasters. J. Trauma. Stress 15, 177–186 (2002)CrossRef
53.
Zhan, X., Yang, L., Zhu, K., Kong, X., Rao, P., Zhang, T.: Experimental study of the impact of personality traits on occupant exit choice during building evacuation. Procedia Eng. 62, 548–553 (2013)CrossRef
54.
Purser, D.A.: Behavioural impairment in smoke environments. Toxicology 115, 25–40 (1996)CrossRef
55.
Proulx, G., Sime, J.D.: To prevent panic in an underground emergency, why not tell people the truth? Fire Saf. Sci. 3, 843–852 (1991)CrossRef
56.
57.
58.
A380 successful evacuation trial. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 78(4) (2006)
59.
60.
Penslar, R.: Protecting Human Research Subjects. National Institutes of Health, Washington DC (1933)
61.
Battey, J., Jordan, E., Cox, D., Dove, W.: An action plan for mouse genomics. Nat. Genet. 21, 73–75 (1999)CrossRef
62.
Wasserman, W.W., Palumbo, M., Thompson, W., Fickett, J.W., Lawrence, C.E.: Human-mouse genome comparisons to locate regulatory sites. Nat. Genet. 26, 225 (2000)CrossRef
63.
Saloma, C., Perez, G.J., Tapang, G., Lim, M., Palmes-Saloma, C.: Self-organized queuing and scale-free behavior in real escape panic. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 11947–11952 (2003)CrossRef
64.
Lin, P., Ma, J., Liu, T., Ran, T., Si, Y., Li, T.: An experimental study of the “faster-is-slower” effect using mice under panic. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 452, 157 (2016)CrossRef
65.
Shiwakoti, N., Sarvi, M.: Enhancing the panic escape of crowd through architectural design. Transp. Res. Part C 37, 260–267 (2013)CrossRef
66.
Shiwakoti, N., Sarvi, M., Rose, G., Burd, M.: Animal dynamics based approach for modeling pedestrian crowd egress under panic conditions. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 17, 438–461 (2011)CrossRef
67.
Soria, S., Josens, R., Parisi, D.: Experimental evidence of the “faster is slower” effect in the evacuation of ants. Saf. Sci. 50, 1584–1588 (2012)CrossRef
68.
Parisi, D., Soria, S., Josens, R.: Faster-is-slower effect in escaping ants revisited: ants do not behave like humans. Saf. Sci. 72, 274–282 (2015)CrossRef
69.
Shi, J., Ren, A., Chen, C.: Agent-based evacuation model of large public buildings under fire conditions. Autom. Constr. 18, 338–347 (2009)CrossRef
70.
Sharma, S., Singh, H., Prakash, A.: Multi-agent modeling and simulation of human behavior in aircraft evacuation. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 44, 1477–1499 (2008)CrossRef
71.
Treiber, M., Hennecke, A., Helbing, D.: Derivation, properties, and simulation of a gas-kinetic-based, nonlocal traffic model. Phys. Rev. E 59(1), 239 (1999)CrossRef
72.
Wei-Guo, S., Yan-Fei, Y., Bing-Hong, W., Wei-Cheng, F.: Evacuation behaviors at exit in ca model with force essentials: a comparison with social force model. Phys. A 371(2), 658–666 (2006)CrossRef
73.
Li, F., Chen, S., Wang, X., Feng, F.: Pedestrian evacuation modeling and simulation on metro platforms considering panic impacts. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 138, 314–322 (2014)CrossRef
74.
Mehran, R., Oyama, A., Shah, M.: Abnormal crowd behavior detection using social force model. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition IEEE Conference, pp. 935–942. IEEE Press, New York (2009)
75.
Zanlungo, F., Ikeda, T., Kanda, T.: Social force model with explicit collision prediction. EPL (Europhy. Lett.) 93(6), 68005 (2011)CrossRef
76.
Flötteröd, G., Lämmel, G.: Bidirectional pedestrian fundamental diagram. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 71, 194–212 (2015)CrossRef
77.
Lakoba, T.I., Kaup, D.J., Finkelstein, N.M.: Modifications of the helbing-molnar-farkas-vicsek social force model for pedestrian evolution. Simulation 81, 339–352 (2005)CrossRef
78.
Bruno, L., Venuti, F.: The pedestrian speed–density relation: modelling and application. In: 3rd Footbridge International Conference (2008)
Metadaten
Titel
Human Behavior Under Emergency and Its Simulation Modeling: A Review
verfasst von
Yixuan Cheng
Dahai Liu
Jie Chen
Sirish Namilae
Jennifer Thropp
Younho Seong
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Buch
Advances in Human Factors in Simulation and Modeling

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94222-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-94223-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94223-0_30

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise