Skip to main content

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Applications for Pricing Decisions

verfasst von : Vithala R. Rao

Erschienen in: Applied Conjoint Analysis

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

One significant application of conjoint analysis is in helping the manager with pricing decisions. Determination of optimal price for a new product (or brand) is a typical application. One way to determine the best price is to estimate the market obtainable from the new product at different feasible prices for the new product profile. We described the use of conjoint simulators in Chap.​ 3. Additional information on cost functions can be integrated into the estimates of market share to yield estimates of profit from the new product at various prices. The price at which the computed profit is highest can be deemed to be the best price for the new product. This approach can also yield a generic estimate of price elasticity for the product category as a whole.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
While we use the notion of maximum price for a reservation price here (i.e. the probability of buying a product beyond the price is zero), other concepts using other probabilities can be employed. See Wang et al. (2007).
 
2
See Mahajan et al. (1982)
 
3
This procedure can also incorporate dynamics of the market, if desired. For this purpose, a brand-switching matrix can be constructed for each experimental price condition by forming subgroups of respondents according to the brand last purchased and the matrix of average of responses for each subgroup or brand constitutes the brand-switching matrix. Using the initial market shares as the base, this brand-switching matrix can be powered to obtain market shares for subsequent (hypothetical) periods of time. The market shares for a future time period can be the starting point for logit analysis
 
4
This discussion is adapted from Kohli and Mahajan (1991)
 
5
This is a convenient assumption. It can be relaxed, if needed.
 
6
Ignoring the constant m, the derivative is: −h(pn)(pn−cn)−(1−H(pn)) and when this is set equal to zero, we get the solution in (8.7).
 
7
Reservation prices can also be elicited directly for product concepts. Kalish and Nelson (1991) found that the method of direct elicitation of reservation prices has worse predictive validity than the conjoint methods using ranking or rating.
 
8
We will return to this issue in the section on separating the informational and allocative effects of price.
 
9
Both preferences were measured on a zero to 100 scale. The authors explicitly tested the assumption of equality of effects of attributes (excluding price) in the unconstrained and constrained preferences at the individual level and found that this assumption is justified for over 82 % of the respondents at a 0.10 significance level. Thus, the estimation method employed seems appropriate.
 
10
The data were also analyzed using a latent class model and the results were about the same in terms of fit and predictive ability for the two procedures. Both methods account for heterogeneity among the sample individuals. The paper contains predictive validity results as well.
 
11
The catering company also sets fixed fees for setting up the catering arrangement and arranging special banquets; but these were beyond the scope this study.
 
12
This method involves dividing the range for each parameter into a number of intervals and computing the value of the objective function for various combinations of the intervals across parameters.
 
13
The authors also developed a two-segment solution for choice data that excludes the bundle option. But, for our purpose, the choice data with bundle is more appropriate.
 
14
In an unpublished paper, Iyengar and Jedidi (2012) applied choice-based conjoint methods for determining quantity discounts.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Datoo, B. (1994). Measuring price elasticity. Marketing Research, 6(2), 30–34. Datoo, B. (1994). Measuring price elasticity. Marketing Research, 6(2), 30–34.
Zurück zum Zitat Erickson, G. M., & Johansson, J. K. (1985). The role of price in multi-attribute product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 195–199.CrossRef Erickson, G. M., & Johansson, J. K. (1985). The role of price in multi-attribute product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 195–199.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gautschi, D. A., & Rao, V. R. (1990). A methodology for specification and aggregation in product concept testing. In A. DE Fontenay, M. H. Shugard, & D. S. Sibley (Eds.), Telecommunications demand modeling (pp. 37–63). Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland. Gautschi, D. A., & Rao, V. R. (1990). A methodology for specification and aggregation in product concept testing. In A. DE Fontenay, M. H. Shugard, & D. S. Sibley (Eds.), Telecommunications demand modeling (pp. 37–63). Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldberg, S. M., Green, P. E., & Wind, Y. (1984). Conjoint analysis of price premiums for hotel amenities. Journal of Business, 57(1, pt. 2), S111–S132.CrossRef Goldberg, S. M., Green, P. E., & Wind, Y. (1984). Conjoint analysis of price premiums for hotel amenities. Journal of Business, 57(1, pt. 2), S111–S132.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Green, P. E., & Savitz, J. (1994). Applying conjoint analysis to product assortment and pricing in retailing research. Pricing Strategy and Practice, 2(3), 4–19. Green, P. E., & Savitz, J. (1994). Applying conjoint analysis to product assortment and pricing in retailing research. Pricing Strategy and Practice, 2(3), 4–19.
Zurück zum Zitat Iyengar, R., & Jedidi, K. (2012). A conjoint model for quantity discounts. Marketing Science, 31(2), 334–350. Iyengar, R., & Jedidi, K. (2012). A conjoint model for quantity discounts. Marketing Science, 31(2), 334–350.
Zurück zum Zitat Iyengar, R., Jedidi, K., & Kohli, R. (2008). A conjoint approach to multipart pricing. Marketing Science, 28(4), 620–636. Iyengar, R., Jedidi, K., & Kohli, R. (2008). A conjoint approach to multipart pricing. Marketing Science, 28(4), 620–636.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalish, S., & Nelson, P. (1991). A comparison of ranking, rating and reservation price measurement in conjoint analysis. Marketing Letters, 2(4), 327–325.CrossRef Kalish, S., & Nelson, P. (1991). A comparison of ranking, rating and reservation price measurement in conjoint analysis. Marketing Letters, 2(4), 327–325.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kannan, P. K., Pope, B. K., & Jain, S. (2009). Pricing digital content product lines: A model and application to the national academies press. Marketing Science, 28(4), 620–636.CrossRef Kannan, P. K., Pope, B. K., & Jain, S. (2009). Pricing digital content product lines: A model and application to the national academies press. Marketing Science, 28(4), 620–636.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kohli, R., & Mahajan, V. (1991). A reservation-price model for optimal pricing of multiattribute products in conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 347–354.CrossRef Kohli, R., & Mahajan, V. (1991). A reservation-price model for optimal pricing of multiattribute products in conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 347–354.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Little, J. D. C. (1970). Models and managers: The concept of decision calulus. Management Science, 16(April), B446–B485. Little, J. D. C. (1970). Models and managers: The concept of decision calulus. Management Science, 16(April), B446–B485.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahajan, V., Green, P. E., & Goldberg, S. M. (1982). A conjoint model for measuring self- and cross- price/demand relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(August), 334–342.CrossRef Mahajan, V., Green, P. E., & Goldberg, S. M. (1982). A conjoint model for measuring self- and cross- price/demand relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(August), 334–342.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mohn, N. C. (1995). Pricing research for decision making. Marketing Research, 7(1), 11–19. Mohn, N. C. (1995). Pricing research for decision making. Marketing Research, 7(1), 11–19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao, V. R., & Sattler, H. (2000). Measurement of allocative and informational effects of price. In A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann, & F. Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement. Berlin: Springer. Rao, V. R., & Sattler, H. (2000). Measurement of allocative and informational effects of price. In A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann, & F. Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement. Berlin: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao, V. R., & Steckel, J. H. (1995). A cross-cultural analysis of price responses to environmental changes. Marketing Letters, 6(1), 5–14.CrossRef Rao, V. R., & Steckel, J. H. (1995). A cross-cultural analysis of price responses to environmental changes. Marketing Letters, 6(1), 5–14.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simon, H. (1969). Price management. Amsterdam: North-Holland Elsevier. Simon, H. (1969). Price management. Amsterdam: North-Holland Elsevier.
Zurück zum Zitat Simon, H. (1992). Pricing opportunities—And how to exploit them. Sloan Management Review, 33(Winter), 55–65. Simon, H. (1992). Pricing opportunities—And how to exploit them. Sloan Management Review, 33(Winter), 55–65.
Zurück zum Zitat Tellis, G. J. (1988). The price-elasticity of selective demand: A meta-analysis of econometric models of sales. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 331–341.CrossRef Tellis, G. J. (1988). The price-elasticity of selective demand: A meta-analysis of econometric models of sales. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 331–341.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Völckner, F., & Sattler, H. (2005). Separating negative and positive effects of price with choice-based conjoint analysis. Marketing- JRM, 1, 5–13. Völckner, F., & Sattler, H. (2005). Separating negative and positive effects of price with choice-based conjoint analysis. Marketing- JRM, 1, 5–13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, T., Venkatesh, R., & Chatteyre, R. (2007). Reservation price as a range: An incentive compatible measurement approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 200–213.CrossRef Wang, T., Venkatesh, R., & Chatteyre, R. (2007). Reservation price as a range: An incentive compatible measurement approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 200–213.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Applications for Pricing Decisions
verfasst von
Vithala R. Rao
Copyright-Jahr
2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87753-0_8