Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Using Games to Create Language Resources: Successes and Limitations of the Approach Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Senso Comune: A Collaborative Knowledge Resource for Italian

verfasst von : Alessandro Oltramari, Guido Vetere, Isabella Chiari, Elisabetta Jezek, Fabio Massimo Zanzotto, Malvina Nissim, Aldo Gangemi

Erschienen in: The People’s Web Meets NLP

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Senso Comune is an open knowledge base for the Italian language, available through a Web-based collaborative platform, whose construction is in progress. The resource integrates dictionary data coming from both users and legacy resources with an ontological backbone, which provides foundations for a formal characterization of lexical semantic structures (frames). A nucleus of basic Italian lemmas, which have been semantically analyzed and classified, is available for both online access and download. A restricted community of contributors is currently working on increasing the lexical coverage of the resource.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Using Games to Create Language Resources: Successes and Limitations of the Approach
Nächstes Kapitel Building Multilingual Language Resources in Web Localisation: A Crowdsourcing Approach
Fußnoten
2
Besides the authors of this paper, the group, lead by Tullio De Mauro, includes Nicola Guarino, Maurizio Lenzerini and Laure Vieu.
 
3
IBM Italia Foundation’s symposium La dimensione semantica dell’Information Technology (The semantic dimension of Information Technology), Rome, November 27, 2006.
 
7
Lexicons often omit any reference to ontological categories that are not lexicalised in a language, although it sometimes happens, as with EuroWordNet’s ILIs or FrameNet’s non-lexicalised frames.
 
8
In this respect, our approach is essentially different from OntoNotes [32], where multi-lingual corpora have been annotated with shallow semantic features based on the Omega ontology. Omega contains“no formal concept definitions and only relatively few interconnections” [33] while Senso Comune, conversely, is explicitly grounded on an ontological model (see Sect. 2.2).
 
9
Hyponymy, antonymy, troponymy, causality, similarity, etc.
 
12
For an updated list of wordnet projects see: http://​www.​globalwordnet.​org/​
 
16
There is yet another WordNet for Italian developed by a company, but it is not freely accessible.
 
17
Grande dizionario italiano dell’uso (Gradit), Torino, UTET
 
18
Two teams of five linguists each, based in Rome and Bologna, under the supervision of Isabella Chiari and Malvina Nissim, were dedicated to this task.
 
21
For the sake of readability, we don’t go through the basic senses of the verb ‘to walk’, also assuming that s1 is adequately selected by the user.
 
22
Note that we may wish to distinguish descriptions of functions from actual ones, namely those functions which are performed at a certain time by a given object. In the above example we simplify this distinction only focusing on the latter case.
 
23
Uncertainty will be included only in future releases of the TMEO system.
 
24
Please refer to [9] for a more complete version of Table 2.1 and a more detailed analysis of this experiment.
 
Literatur
1.
Assem Mv, Gangemi A, Schreiber G (2006) Conversion of WordNet to a standard RDF/OWL representation. In: Proceedings of the international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC), Genoa, Italy
2.
Baader F, Calvanese D, Mcguinness DL, Nardi D, Patel-Schneider PF (eds) (2003) The description logic handbook: theory, implementation and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York
3.
Basile V, Bos J, Evang K, Venhuizen N (2012) Developing a large semantically annotated corpus. In: To appear in proceedings of LREC, Istanbul, Turkey
4.
Bonial C, Corvey W, Palmer M, Petukhova V, Bunt H (2011) A hierarchical unification of lirics and verbnet semantic roles. In: 2011 fifth IEEE international conference on semantic computing (ICSC), Palo Alto. IEEE, pp 483–489
5.
Bortolini U, Tagliavini C, Zampolli A (1972) Lessico di frequenza della lingua italiana contemporanea. Garzanti, Milano
6.
Buitelaar P, Cimiano P, Haase P, Sintek M (2009) Towards linguistically grounded ontologies. In: Aroyo L, Traverso P, Ciravegna F, Cimiano P, Heath T, Hyvönen E, Mizoguchi R, Oren E, Sabou M, Simperl E (eds) The semantic web: research and applications. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5554, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 111–125
7.
Burchardt A, Erk K, Frank A, Kowalski A, Pado S, Pinkal M (2006) The SALSA corpus: a German corpus resource for lexical semantics. In: Proceedings of LREC 2006, Genoa
8.
Chiarcos C, Nordhoff S, Hellman S (eds) (2012) Integrating WordNet and Wiktionary with lemon. Springer, Frankfurt
9.
Chiari I, Alessandro Oltramari GV (2010) Di cosa parliamo quando parliamo fondamentale? In: Atti del Convegno della Società di linguistica italiana (SLI 2010), Viterbo, pp 221–236
10.
De Mauro T (1965) Introduzione alla semantica. Laterza, Bari
11.
De Mauro T (1980) Guida all’uso delle Parole. Editori riuniti, Roma
12.
De Mauro T, Mancini F, Vedovelli M, Voghera M (1993) Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato (LIP). Etaslibri, Milano
13.
Fellbaum C (1998) WordNet - An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsCrossRef
14.
Fillmore CJ (1968) The case for case. In: Bach E, Harms T (eds) Universals in linguistic theory. Rinehart and Wiston, New York
15.
Gangemi A (2010) What’s in a schema? A formal metamodel for ECG and FrameNet. Studies in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
16.
Gildea D, Jurafsky D (2002) Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Comput Linguist 28(3):245–288CrossRef
17.
Giuglea AM, Moschitti A (2006) Semantic role labeling via FrameNet, VerbNet and PropBank. In: Proceedings of the COLING-ACL, association for computational linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, ACL-44, pp 929–936. DOI 10.3115/1220175.1220292CrossRef
18.
Kipper K, Korhonen A, Ryant N, Palmer M (2008) A large-scale classification of English verbs. Lang Resour Eval 42(1):21–40CrossRef
19.
Lenci A, Bel N, Busa F, Calzolari N, Gola E, Monachini M, Ogonowski A, Peters I, Peters W, Ruimy N, Villegas M, Zampolli A (2000) Simple: a general framework for the development of multilingual lexicons. Int J Lexicogr 13(4):249–263CrossRef
20.
Lenci A, Calzolari N, Zampolli A (2002) From text to content: computational lexicons and the semantic web. In: Eighteenth national conference on artificial intelligence; AAAI workshop, “Semantic web meets language resources”, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
21.
Lenci A, Johnson M, Lapesa G (2010) Building an Italian framenet through semi-automatic corpus analysis. In: Proceedings of LREC 2010, Valletta, pp 12–19
22.
Levin B (2003) English verb classes and alternation: a preliminary investigation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
23.
Màrquez L, Carreras X, Litkowski KC, Stevenson S (2008) Semantic role labeling: an introduction to the special issue. Comput Linguist 34(2):145–159CrossRef
24.
Masolo C, Gangemi A, Guarino N, Oltramari A, Schneider L (2002) WonderWeb deliverable D17: the WonderWeb library of foundational ontologies. Technical report
25.
Minsky M (1997) A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston P (ed) Mind design. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 111–142
26.
Nuzzolese AG, Gangemi A, Presutti V (2011) Gathering lexical linked data and knowledge patterns from FrameNet. In: Proceedings of international conference on knowledge capture (K-CAP2011), Banff
27.
Oltramari A, Mehler A, Kühnberger KU, Lobin H, Lüngen H, Storrer A, Witt A (2012) An introduction to hybrid semantics: the role of cognition in semantic resources, vol 370. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 97–109
28.
Pantel P, Bhagat R, Coppola B, Chklovski T, Hovy EH (2007) ISP: learning inferential selectional preferences. In: Proceedings of HLT-NAACL, Rochester, pp 564–571
29.
Patwardhan S, Pedersen T (2006) Using WordNet-based context vectors to estimate the semantic relatedness of concepts. In: Proceedings of the EACL 2006 workshop on making sense of sense: bringing computational linguistics and psycholinguistics together, Trento, Italy, pp 1–8
30.
Pianta E, Bentivogli L, Girardi C (2002) MultiWordNet: developing an aligned multilingual database. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on global WordNet. Central Institute of Indian Languages, Mysore
31.
Poesio M (2005) Domain modelling and NLP: formal ontologies? Lexica? Or a bit of both? Appl Ontol (1):27–33
32.
Pradhan S, Hovy E, Marcys M, Palmer M, Ramshaw L, Weischede R (2002) Ontonotes: a unified relational semantic representation. In: Proceedings of the first IEEE international conference on semantic computing (ICSC-07), Irvine, CA
33.
Prev́ot L, Huang CR, Calzolari N, Gangemi A, Lenci A, Oltramari A (eds) (2010) Ontology and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York
34.
Pustejovsky J (1995) The generative lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge
35.
Pustejovsky J, Jezek E (2008) Semantic coercion in language: beyond distributional analysis. Ital J Linguist 20(1):175–208
36.
Reale G (1990) A history of ancient philosophy: Plato and Aristotle. SUNY Press, Albany
37.
Resnik P (1996) Selectional constraints: an information-theoretic model and its computational realization. Cognition 61:127–159CrossRef
38.
Roventini A, Alonge A, Calzolari N, Magnini B, Bertagna F (2000) ItalWordNet: a large semantic database for italian. In: Proceedings LREC 2000, Athens, pp 783–790
39.
40.
Searle J (1995) The construction of social reality. Paperback. Free Press, New York
41.
Settles B, Small K, Tomanek K (eds) (2010) Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 workshop on active learning for natural language processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, Los Angeles
42.
Shi L, Mihalcea R (2005) Putting pieces together: combining FrameNet, VerbNet and WordNet for robust semantic parsing. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on computational linguistics and intelligent text processing, CICLing 2005. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 100–111
43.
Simons P (ed) (1987) Parts: a study in ontology. Clarendon Press, Oxford
44.
Stevenson M, Greenwood M (2006) Learning information extraction patterns using wordnet. In: Third international global WordNet conference (GWNC-2006), Jeju Island, Korea, pp 52–60
45.
Suárez-Figueroa MC, Gómez-Pérez A, Motta E, Gangemi A (eds) (2012) Ontology engineering in a networked world. Springer, Berlin
46.
Tonelli S (2010) Semi-automatic techniques for extending the framenet lexical database to new languages. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Language Sciences, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Venezia
47.
Tonelli S, Pighin D, Giuliano C, Pianta E (2009) Semi-automatic development of framenet for italian. In: Proceedings of the FrameNet workshop and masterclass, Milano
48.
Vetere G, Oltramari A, Chiari I, Jezek E, Vieu L, Zanzotto FM (2012) Senso comune, an open knowledge base for Italian. TAL – Traitement Automatique des Langues, Special Issue of the on “Free language resources”. 52(3):217–243
Metadaten
Titel
Senso Comune: A Collaborative Knowledge Resource for Italian
verfasst von
Alessandro Oltramari
Guido Vetere
Isabella Chiari
Elisabetta Jezek
Fabio Massimo Zanzotto
Malvina Nissim
Aldo Gangemi
Copyright-Jahr
2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
The People’s Web Meets NLP

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35084-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-35085-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2013

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35085-6_2

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise