Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Long-Term Ecosystem Research Between Theory and Application – An Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2010 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

26. Conceptualising Long-Term Socio-ecological Research (LTSER): Integrating the Social Dimension

verfasst von : Simron J. Singh, Helmut Haberl, Veronika Gaube, Clemens M. Grünbühel, Petru Lisivieveci, Julia Lutz, Robin Matthews, Michael Mirtl, Angheluta Vadineanu, Martin Wildenberg

Erschienen in: Long-Term Ecological Research

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In order to support the emerging network of long-term ecological research (LTER) sites across Europe, the European Union has launched ALTER-Net, a network aiming at lasting integration of long-term socio-economic, ecological and biodiversity research. Due to its high population density and long history of human habitation, however, Europe’s ecosystems are generally intensively used. Social and natural drivers are so inextricably intertwined that the notion of ‘socio-ecological’ systems is appropriate. Traditional natural science-based approaches are insufficient to understand these integrated systems, as they cannot adequately capture their relevant socio-economic dimensions. This is particularly relevant because the EU launched ALTER-Net has an explicit aim to support sustainability, a goal that requires integration of socio-economic and ecological dimensions. As such, LTER is challenged to significantly expand its focus from ecological to socio-ecological systems, thus transforming itself from LTER to long-term socio-ecological research or LTSER. In order to support this transformation, this chapter explores several approaches for conceptualising socio-economic dimensions of LTSER. It discusses how the socio-economic metabolism approach can be combined with theories of complex adaptive systems to generate heuristic models of society–nature interaction which can then be used to integrate concepts from the social sciences. In particular, the chapter discusses possible contributions from the fields of ecological anthropology and ecological economics and shows how participatory approaches can be integrated with innovative agent-based modelling concepts to arrive at an integrated representation of socio-ecological systems that can help to support local communities to move towards sustainability.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Design and Importance of Multi-tiered Ecological Monitoring Networks
Nächstes Kapitel Integrating Social Sciences into Long-Term Ecological Research
Literatur
Abel, T. (1998). Complex adaptive systems, evolutionism, and ecology within anthropology: Interdisciplinary research for understanding cultural and ecological dynamics. Georgia Journal of Ecological Anthropology, 2, 6–29.
Adams, W. M., Brockington, D., Dyson, J., & Vira, B. (2003). Managing tragedies: Understanding conflict over common pool resources. Science, 302, 1915–1916.CrossRef
Alcamo, J., Kreileman, E., & Leemans, R. (1996). Global models meet global policy: How can global and regional modellers connect with environmental policy makers? What has hindered them? What has helped? Global Environmental Change, 6, 255–259.CrossRef
Allen, T. H. F., Bandurski, B., & King, A. (1993). The ecosystem approach: Theory and ecosystem integrity (Report to the Great Lakes Advisory Board). Windsor, Ontario: International Joint Commission.
Axtell, R. L., Andrews, C. J., & Small, M. J. (2002). Agent-based modelling and industrial ecology. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5, 10–13.CrossRef
Ayres, R. U., & Simonis, U. E. (1994). Industrial metabolism: Restructuring for sustainable development. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press.
Barabási, A. L., Albert, R., & Jeong, H. (2000). Scale-free characteristics of random networks: The topology of the world-wide web. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 281, 69–77.CrossRef
Barabási, A.-L., Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Bianconi, G. (2000). Power-law distribution of the World Wide Web. Science, 287, 2115a.CrossRef
Barnard, A., & Spencer, J. (1996). Encyclopedia of social and cultural anthropology. New York: Routledge.
Bayliss-Smith, T. (1974). Constrains on population growth: The case of the Polynesian outlier atolls in the precontact period. Human Ecology, 2, 259–295.CrossRef
Bennett, J. W. (1976). The Ecological transition: Cultural anthropology and human adaption. New York: Pergamon Press.
Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1998). Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. In F. Berkes & C. Folke (Eds.), Linking social and ecological systems. Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berkhout, F., Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2003). Socio-technical regimes and transition contexts. Brighton: University of Sussex.
Bettinger, R. L. (1978). Alternative adaptation strategies in the prehistoric Great Basin. Journal of Anthropological Research, 34, 27–46.
Boserup, E. (1965). The conditions of agricultural growth – the economics of agrarian change under population pressure. London: Earthscan.
Boserup, E. (1981). Population and technological change – A study of long-term trends. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., & Abel, N. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems, 4, 765–781.CrossRef
Catton, W. R., Jr. (2002). Has the Durkheim legacy misled sociology? In R. E. Dunlap, F. H. Buttel, P. Dickens, & A. Gijswijt (Eds.), Sociological theory and the environment. Classical foundations, contemporary insights (pp. 90–115). Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Clark, W. C., Crutzen, P. J., & Schellnhuber, H.-J. (2004). Science for global sustainability. In H.-J. Schellnhuber, P. J. Crutzen, W. C. Clark, M. Claussen, & H. Held (Eds.), Earth system analysis for sustainability. Report of the 91st Dahlem Workshop (pp. 1–28). Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.
Costanza, R., Cumberland, J., Daly, H. E., Goodland, R., & Norgaard, R. B. (1998). An introduction to ecological economics. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Croll, E., & Parkin, D. (1992). Anthropology, the environment and development. In E. Croll & D. Parkin (Eds.), Bush base: Forest farm (pp. 1–10). London: Routledge.
Daniels, P. L., & Moore, S. (2001). Approaches for quantifying the metabolism of physical economies, Part I: Methodological overview. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5, 69–93.CrossRef
Dearing, J. A., Graumlich, L. J., Grove, R., Grübler, A., Haberl, H., Hole, F., et al. (2006). Integrating socio-environment interactions over centennial timescales: Needs and issues. Dahlem Workshop Report 96. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Deffuant, G., Huet, S., Bousset, J. P., Henriot, J., Amon, G., & Weisbuch, G. (2002). Agent-based simulation of organic farming conversion in Allier department. In M. Janssen (Ed.), Complexity and ecosystem management: The theory and practice of multi-agent systems (pp. 158–187). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Delbaere, B. (2005). European policy review: Biodiversity research to support European policy. Journal of Nature Conservation, 13, 213–214.CrossRef
Descola, P., & Pálsson, G. (1996). Nature and society. Anthropological perspectives. London, New York: Pergamon.
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–1912.CrossRef
Dunlap, R. E., & Catton, W. R., Jr. (1994). Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline and revitalizaton of environmental sociology. The American Sociologist, 25, 5–29.CrossRef
Dunlap, R. E., & Catton, W. R. (2002). Which function(s) of the environment do we study? A comparison of environmental and natural resource sociology. Society and Natural Resources, 15, 239–249.CrossRef
Dunne, J. A., Williams, R. J., Martinez, N. D. (2002). Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: Robustness increases with connectance. Ecology Letters, 5, 558–567.CrossRef
EEA. (1995). Europe’s environment: The Dobris assessment. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
Eurostat. (2001). Economy-wide material flow accounts and derived indicators. A methodological guide. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1997a). Dynamik und Selbststeuerung industrieller Gesellschaften. In M. Fischer-Kowalski, H. Haberl, W. Hüttler, H. Payer, H. Schandl, V. Winiwarter, & Zangerl-Weisz, H. (Eds.), Gesellschaftlicher Stoffwechsel und Kolonisierung von Natur. Ein Versuch in Sozialer Ökologie (pp. 203–221). Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach Fakultas.
Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1997b). Society’s metabolism: On the childhood and adolescence of a rising conceptual star. In M. Redclift & G. R. Woodgate (Eds.), The international handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 119–137). Cheltenham, Northhampton: Edward Elgar.
Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Haberl, H. (1997). Tons, joules and money: Modes of production and their sustainability problems. Society and Natural Resources, 10, 61–85.CrossRef
Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Haberl, H. (2006). Global environmental change and socio-ecological transitions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Fischer-Kowalski, M., Haberl, H., Hüttler, W., Payer, H., Schandl, H., Winiwarter, V., et al. (1997). Gesellschaftlicher Stoffwechsel und Kolonisierung von Natur. Ein Versuch in Sozialer Ökologie. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach Fakultas.
Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Weisz, H. (1999). Society as hybrid between material and symbolic realms. Toward a Theoretical Framework of Society-Nature Interaction. Advances in Human Ecology, 8, 215–251.
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., Walker, B., et al. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio, 31, 437–440.
Foster, D., Swanson, F., Aber, J., Burke, I., Brokaw, N., Tilman, D., et al. (2003). The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. BioScience, 53, 77–88.CrossRef
Friedman, J. (1974). Marxism, structuralism and vulgar materialism. Man, 9, 444–469.CrossRef
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25, 739–755.CrossRef
Gaube, V., Adensam, H., Erb, K.-H., & Haberl, H. (2005, August). Modelling the impacts of CAP 2006 on sustainable regional development considering land use change, social structure and economic performance. An Austrian case study. Paper presented at the “45th Congress of the Regional Science Association”, Amsterdam.
Gaube, V., Kaiser, C., Wildenberg, M., Adensam, H., Fleissner, P., Kobler, J., et al. (2009). Combining agent-based and stock-flow modelling approaches in a participative analysis of the integrated land system in Reichraming, Austria. Landscape Ecology, 24(9), 1149–1165.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRef
Granovetter, M. (1995). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Greenland, D., & Kittel, T. G. F. (2002). Temporal variability of climate at the US Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites. Climate Research, 19, 213–231.CrossRef
Gruber, B. (1998). Die Rohstoffe der oberösterreichischen Eisenwurzen. In: R. Sandgruber (Ed.), Land der Hämmer – Heimat Eisenwurzen. Die Oberösterreichische Landesausstellung 1998 und die Region Pyhrn-Eisenwurzen (pp. 24–35). Salzburg: Residenz-Verlag.
Grünbühel, C. M., Haberl, H., Schandl, H., & Winiwarter, V. (2003). Socio-economic metabolism and colonization of natural processes in SangSaeng village: Material and energy flows, land use, and cultural change in Northeast Thailand. Human Ecology, 31, 53–87.CrossRef
Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy. Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Haberl, H. (1997). Human propriation of net primary production as an environmental indicator: Implications for sustainable development. Ambio, 26, 143–146.
Haberl, H. (2001a). The energetic metabolism of societies, Part I: Accounting concepts. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5, 11–33.CrossRef
Haberl, H. (2001b). The energetic metabolism of societies, Part II: Empirical examples. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5, 71–88.CrossRef
Haberl, H., Erb, K.-H., Krausmann, F., Loibl, W., Schulz, N. B., & Weisz, H. (2001). Changes in ecosystem processes induced by land use: Human appropriation of net primary production and its influence on standing crop in Austria. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 15(4), 929–942..CrossRef
Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Weisz, H., & Winiwarter, V. (2004). Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer. Land Use Policy, 21, 199–213.CrossRef
Haberl, H., Gaube, V., Díaz-Delgado, R., Krauze, K., Neuner, A., Peterseil, J., et al. (2009). Towards an integrated model of socioeconomic biodiversity drivers, pressures and impacts. A feasibility study based on three European long-term socio-ecological research platforms. Ecological Economics, 68(6), 1797–1812.
Hall, C. A. S. (1995). Maximum Power. The Ideas and Applications of H.T. Odum. Niwot, Colorado: The University Press of Colorado.
Hall, C. A. S., Cleveland, C. J., & Kaufmann, R. K. (1986). Energy and resource quality, the ecology of the economic process. New York: Wiley Interscience.
Hare, M., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2002). Stakeholder categorisation in participatory integrated assessment processes. Integrated Assessment, 3, 50–62.CrossRef
Hobbie, J. E., Carpenter, S. R., Grimm, N. B., Gosz, J. R., & Seastedt, T. R. (2003). The US long term ecological research program. BioScience, 53, 21–32.CrossRef
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecological Systematics, 4, 1–24.CrossRef
Holling, C. S. (1986). The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change. In W. C. Clark & R. E. Munn (Eds.), Sustainable development of the biosphere (pp. 292–320). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4, 390–405.CrossRef
Holten-Andersen, J., Paalby, H., Christensen, N., Wier, M., & Andersen, F.M. (1995). Recommendations on Strategies for Integrated Assessment of Broad Environmental Problems. Report Submitted to the European Environmental Agency (EEA) by the National Environmental Research Institute (NERI). Copenhagen: National Environmental Research Institute.
Huber, J. (1989). Eine sozialwissenschaftliche Interpretation der Humanökologie. In B. Glaeser(Ed.), Humanökologie, Grundlagen präventiver Umweltpolitik (pp. 57–75). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Janssen, A. M. (2004). Agent-based models. In J. Proops & P. Safonov (Eds.), Modelling in ecological economics (pp. 155–172). Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
Kasemir, B., Jäger, J., Jaeger, C. C., & Gardner, M. T. (2003). Public participation in sustainability science. A handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292, 641–642.CrossRef
Kauffmann, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for laws of complexity. London: Penguin Books.
Kay, J. J., Regier, H. A., Boyle, M., & Francis, G. (1999). An ecosystem approach for sustainability: Addressing the challenge of complexity. Futures, 31, 721–742.CrossRef
Koestler, A. (1967). The ghost in the machine. London, UK: Arkana.
Krausmann, F. (2004). Milk, manure and muscular power. Livestock and the industrialization of agriculture. Human Ecology, 32, 735–773.CrossRef
Krausmann, F., & Haberl, H. (2002). The process of industrialization from the perspective of energetic metabolism. Socioeconomic energy flows in Austria 1830–1995. Ecological Economics, 41, 177–201.CrossRef
Krausmann, F., Haberl, H., Erb, K.-H., & Wackernagel, M. (2004). Resource flows and land use in Austria 1950–2000: Using the MEFA framework to monitor society-nature interaction for sustainability. Land Use Policy, 21, 215–230.CrossRef
Krech, S. I. (1978). Disease, starvation and Northern Athapaskan social organisation. American Ethnology, 5, 710–732.CrossRef
Lees, S. H. (1974). Hydraulic development as a process of response. Human Ecology, 2, 159–175.CrossRef
Luhmann, N. (1986). Ökologische Kommunikation: Kann die moderne Gesellschaft sich auf ökologische Gefährdungen einstellen? Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Luks, F. (1996). Post-Normal Science, Dematerialisierung und die Ökonomie – Über den (wirtschafts) wissenschaftlichen Umgang mit Umweltproblemen. In J. Köhn & M. J. Welfens (Eds.), Neue Ansätze in der Umweltökonomie (pp. 89–108). Marburg: Metropolis.
Martens, P., & Rotmans, J. (2002). Transitions in a globalising world. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
Martinez-Alier, J. (1987). Ecological economics. Energy, environment and society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Martinez-Alier, J. (Ed.) (1990). Ecological economics. Energy, evironment and society. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
Matthews, E., Amann, C., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Bringezu, S., Hüttler, W., Kleijn, R., et al. (2000). The weight of nations: Material outflows from industrial economies. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Matthews, R. (2006). The People and Landscape Model (PALM): An agent-based spatial model of livelihood generation and resource flows in rural households and their environment. Ecological Modelling, 194, 329–343.CrossRef
Matthews, R., & Selman, P. (2006). Landscape as a focus for integrating human and environmental processes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57, 199–212.CrossRef
McCann, K. S. (2000). The diversity-stability debate. Nature, 405, 228–233.CrossRef
McConnell, W. (2001). Agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change. Belgium: LUCC International Project Office).
Meyer, W. B., & Turner, B. L. I. (1994). Changes in land use and land cover, a global perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Netting, R. M. (1993). Smallholders, householders. farm families and the ecology of intensive, sustainable agriculture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Norgaard, R. B. (1994). The coevolution of economic and environmental systems and the emergence of unsustainability. In R. England (Ed.), Evolutionary concepts in contemporary economics (pp. 213–225). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
NRC. (2004). NEON, addressing the nations environmental challenges. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
Odum, H. T., & Pinkerton, R. C. (1955). Time’s speed regulator: The Optimum efficiency for maximum power output in physical and biological systems. American Scientist, 43, 331–343.
Oliver-Smith, A. (1977). Traditional agriculture, central places, and postdisaster urban relocation in Peru. American Ethnology, 4, 102–116.CrossRef
Orlove, B. S. (1980). Ecological anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, 235–273.CrossRef
Orlove, B. S., & Custtred, G. (1980). The alternative model of agrarian society in the Andes: Households, networks and corporate groups. In B. S. Orlove & G. Custtred (Eds.), Land and power in Latinamerica: Agrerian economics and social processes in the Andes (pp. 31–54). New York: Holmes & Meier.
Ostrom, E. (1996). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2002). Participative and stakeholder-based policy design, evaluation and modelling processes. Integrated Assessment, 3, 3–14.CrossRef
Parris, T. M., & Kates, R. W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 559–586.CrossRef
Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
Prigogine, I. (1976). Order through fluctuations: Self-organisation and social systems. In E. Jantsch & C. H. Waddington (Eds.), Evolution and consciousness: Human systems in transition (pp. 93–130). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Rappaport, R. A. (1967). Pigs for the ancestors. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rappaport, R. A. (1971). The flow of energy in an agricultural society. Scientific American, 225, 116–136.CrossRef
Redman, C. L. (1999). Human dimensions of ecosystem studies. Ecosystems, 2, 296–298.CrossRef
Redman, C. L., Grove, J. M., & Kuby, L. H. (2004). Integrating social science into the long-term ecological research (LTER) network: Social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems, 7, 161–171.CrossRef
Reyna, S. P. (1975). Making do when the rain stops: Adjustment of the domestic structure to climate variation among the Barma. American Ethnologist, 2, 535–551.CrossRef
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & Van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3, 15–31.CrossRef
Schandl, H., & Grünbühel, C. M. (2005). Using land-time budgets to analyse farming systems and poverty alleviation policies in Lao PDR. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 5, 142–180.CrossRef
Schandl, H., & Schulz, N. B. (2002). Changes in United Kingdom´s natural relations in terms of society’s metabolism and land use from 1850 to the present day. Ecological Economics, 41, 203–221.CrossRef
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001). Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature, 413, 591–596.CrossRef
Schellnhuber, H. J. (1999). ‘Earth system’ analysis and the second Copernican revolution. Nature, 402, C19-C23.CrossRef
Schlesinger, W. H. (1997). Biogeochemistry – An analysis of global change. San Diego: Academic Press.
Singh, S. J. (2003). In the sea of influence: A world system perspective of the Nicobar Islands. Lund: Lund University.
Steward, J. H. (1955). Theory of culture change. The methodology of multilinear evolution. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Teich, M., Porter, R., & Gustafsson, B. (1997). Nature and society in historical context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, C. (1988). Durable inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Turner, B. L. I., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., et al. (2003). Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: Three case studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 100, 8080–8085.CrossRef
UNEP (2002). Global Environment Outlook 3. Past, present and future perspectives. London: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). London: Earthscan.
Vadineanu, A. (1998). Sustainable development, theory and practice. Bucarest: Bucarest University Press.
Vadineanu, A. (2001). Sustainable development: Theory and practice regarding the transition of socio-economic systems towards sustainability. Bucarest: UNESCO – CEPES.
Vadineanu, A., Adamescu, M. C., Cazacu, C., Bodescu, F., & Danielescu, S. (2001). Past and future management of the Lower Danube Wetlands. Working paper of the Departement of System Ecology. Bucarest: Bucarest University.
Vadineanu, A., Adamescu, M. C., Vadineanu, R. S., Christofor, S., & Negrei, C. (2003). Past and future management of the Lower Danube Wetland System: A bioeconomic appraisal. The Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 14, 415–447.
Van der Leeuw, S. E. (2004). Why Model? Cybernetics and Systems, 35, 117–128.CrossRef
Van der Leeuw, S. E., & Aschan-Leygonie, C. (2005). A long-term perspective on resilience in socio-natural systems. In H. Liljenström, & U. Svedin (Eds.), Micro, Meso, Macro. Addressing Complex Systems Couplings (pp. 227–264). New Jersey: World Scientific.
Van Keulen, H. (1993). Options for agricultural development: A new quantitative approach. In F. W. T. PenningDeVries, P. Teng, & K. Metselaar (Eds.), Systems approaches for agricultural development (pp. 355–365). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Varela, F. G., Maturana, H. R., & Uribe, R. (1974). Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Biosystems, 5, 187–196.CrossRef
Vayda, A. P., & MacKay, B. (1977). Problems in the identification of environmental problems. In T. P. Bayliss-Smith & R. G. A. Feachem (Eds.), Subsistence and survival: Rural ecology in the Pacific (pp. 476–498). New York, London: Academic.
Vitousek, P. M., Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H., & Matson, P. A. (1986). Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. BioScience, 36, 363–373.CrossRef
Wackernagel, M. (1999). Ecological economics forum: Why sustainability analysis must include biophysical assessments. Ecological Economics, 29, 13–15.CrossRef
Wackernagel, M., Schulz, N. B., Deumling, D., Linares, A. C., Jenkins, M., Kapos, V., et al. (2002). Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 99, 9266–9271.CrossRef
Waddell, E. (1975). How the Enga cope with frost: Responses to climatic perturbations in the Central Highlands of New Guinea. Human Ecology, 3, 249–73.CrossRef
Waltner-Toews, D., Kay, J. J., Neudoerffer, C., & Gitau, T. (2003). Perspective changes everything: Managing ecosystems from the inside out. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 1, 23–30.CrossRef
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of `small-world’ networks. Nature, 393, 440–442.CrossRef
WCED. (1987). World commission on environment and development: Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weisz, H. (2002). Gesellschaft-Natur Koevolution: Bedingungen der Möglichkeit nachhaltiger Entwicklung. Dissertation, Humboldt Universität, Berlin..
Weisz, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Grünbühel, C. M., Haberl, H., Krausmann, F., & Winiwarter, V. (2001). Global environmental change and historical transitions. Innovation – The European Journal of Social Sciences, 14, 117–142.
Weisz, H., Krausmann, F., Amann, C., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K.-H., Hubacek, K., et al. (2006). The physical economy of the European Union: Cross-country comparison and determinants of material consumption. Ecological Economics, 58, 676–698.CrossRef
White, L. A. (1959). The evolution of culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wilbanks, T. J., & Kates, R. W. (1999). Global change in local places: How scale matters. Climatic Change, 43, 601–628.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Conceptualising Long-Term Socio-ecological Research (LTSER): Integrating the Social Dimension
verfasst von
Simron J. Singh
Helmut Haberl
Veronika Gaube
Clemens M. Grünbühel
Petru Lisivieveci
Julia Lutz
Robin Matthews
Michael Mirtl
Angheluta Vadineanu
Martin Wildenberg
Copyright-Jahr
2010
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Buch
Long-Term Ecological Research

Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8781-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-90-481-8782-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2010

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8782-9_26