Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Catastrophe Models for Informing Risk Management Policy: An Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Flood Risk Management

verfasst von : Karin Hansson, Mats Danielson, Love Ekenberg, Joost Buurman

Erschienen in: Integrated Catastrophe Risk Modeling

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper describes a framework for multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) for flood risk management. To date, most models assessing flood impacts and coping strategies focus on economic impacts and neglect environmental and social considerations. In this paper, we develop and test an ex-ante framework for flood damage assessment, which includes a flood simulation model, a decision tool, and suggested policy strategies. Environmental and social criteria are introduced into the framework, and soft evaluations are performed in order to demonstrate the usability of the framework. The Bac Hung Hai polder in northern Vietnam serves as a case study. Results show that it is useful to add a multi-criteria perspective to flood management decisions to account for differing views and preferences. Furthermore, such a framework enables stakeholder participation in consequence analyses as well as in formulating more elaborated criteria weights.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Modeling Catastrophe Risk for Designing Insurance Systems
Nächstes Kapitel Dams and Catastrophe Risk: Discounting in Long Term Planning
Fußnoten
1
A flood event is calculated as the probability of a failure of the flood protection measures (using the probabilities for each type of event and for each location) conditional on a 100-year flood occurring. That is, the events of levee breach and overtopping may only occur if a 100-year flood event has struck at a specific location.
 
2
Sometimes, these estimates are difficult to provide. Bana e Costa and Soares de Oliveira (2004) suggest a method that can be applied to such estimates, the MACBETH method (Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique).
 
Literatur
ADRC (2005) Total disaster risk management: good practices. Asian Disaster Reduction Centre, Kobe
AHC (2002) Protecting local heritage places: a guide for communities. Australian Heritage Commission, Canberra, Australia. ISBN 0642305382
Ahern M, Kovats RS, Wilkinson P, Few R, Matthies F (2005) Global health impacts of floods: epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiol Rev 27:36–46CrossRef
Arriens WL (2004) Participatory processes in IWRM, first training program on IWRM and strengthening of River Basin Committees (RBC). Bangkok and Chiang Mai, Thailand, 26 July–6 August
Bana e Costa CA, Soares de Oliveira R (2004) A multicriteria model for portfolio management. Eur J Financ 10(3):198–211CrossRef
Black MC, Williams PL (2001) Preliminary assessment of metal toxicity in the Middle Tisza River (Hungary) flood plain. J Soil Sediment 1(4):203–206CrossRef
Brouwers L, Riabacke M (2012) Consensus by simulation: a flood model for participatory policy. In: Amendola A, Ermolieva T, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Mechler R (eds) Integrated catastrophe risk modeling: supporting policy processes. Springer, Dordrecent, Netherlands
Brouwers L, Hansson K, Ekenberg L (2002) Simulation of three competing flood management strategies – a case study. In: Ubertini L (eds) Proceedings of applied simulation and modelling (ASM). Applied Simulation and Modelling (ASM 2002), Crete, Greece, 25–28 June
Brouwers L, Danielson M, Ekenberg L, Hansson K (2004) Multi-criteria decision-making of policy strategies with public-private re-insurance systems. J Risk Decis Policy 9:23–45CrossRef
CCFSC (2009) Implementation plan of the national strategy for natural disaster prevention, response and mitigation to 2020. N. 20090929, The Central Committee of Flood and Storm Control Office 6, Hanoi
Cornwall A, Jewkes R (1995) What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med 41(12):1667–1676CrossRef
Danielson M, Ekenberg L (1998) A framework for analysing decisions under risk. Eur J Oper Res 104(3):474–484CrossRef
Danielson M, Ekenberg L (2012) A risk-based decision analytic approach to assessing multi-stakeholder policy problems. In: Amendola A, Ermolieva T, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Mechler R (eds) Integrated catastrophe risk modeling: supporting policy processes. Springer, Dordrecent, Netherlands
Danielson M, Ekenberg L, Hansson K, Idefeldt, J, Larsson A, Påhlman M, Riabacke A, Sundgren, D (2006) Cross-disciplinary research in analytic decision support systems. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on information technology interfaces, IEEE ITI. Cavtatm, Dubrovnik
Danielson M, Ekenberg L, Larsson A (2007) Distribution of expected utility in decision trees. Int J Approx Reason 46(2):387–407CrossRef
De Silva N (2003) Preparedness and response for cultural heritage disasters in developing countries. In: International symposium proceedings of cultural heritage disaster preparedness and response, Hyderabad, India, 23–27 November, pp 223–226
Ekenberg L, Brouwers L, Danielson M, Hansson K, Johansson J, Riabacke A, Vári A (2003) Flood risk management policy in the upper Tisza Basin: a system analytical approach – simulation and analysis of three flood management strategies. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Interim report IR-03-003, Laxenburg, Austria
French JG, Holt KW (1989) Floods. In: Gregg MB (ed) The public health consequences of disasters. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, CDC, Atlanta, pp 69–78
Ghesquiere F, Mahul O (2007) Sovereign natural disaster insurance for developing countries: a paradigm shift in catastrophe risk financing. Hazard Risk Management Unit, Working paper 4345, The World Bank, Washington, DC
GlobalAgRisk (2009) Designing agricultural index insurance in developing countries: a GlobalAgRisk market. Development model handbook for policy and decision makers, Lexington, KY
GSO (2005) Statistics documentation centre. General Statistics Office of Vietnam, Hanoi
Hansson K, Ekenberg E (2002) Flood mitigation strategies for the Red River Delta. In: Proceedings of the international conference on environmental engineering, Niagara Falls, Canada
Hansson K, Ekenberg L, Danielson M (2006) Implementation of a decision theoretical framework: a case study of the Red River Delta in Vietnam. In: Proceedings of the 19th international Florida AI research society conference. AAAI Press, Menlo Park
Hansson K, Danielson M, Ekenberg L (2008) A framework for evaluation of flood management strategies. J Environ Manage 86(3):465–480CrossRef
IMECH/NIAPP (2005) Report 4. Case study of ECLAC’s methodology (Draft). In: Roundtable workshop on assessing socio-economic impact of flood in Vietnam Institute of Mechanics and National Institute for Agricultural Policy and Planning, Hanoi
Kondo H, Seo N, Yasuda T, Hasizume M, Koido Y, Ninomiya N, Yamamoto Y (2002) Post flood – infectious diseases in Mozambique. Prehosp Disaster Med 17:126–133CrossRef
Larsson A, Johansson J, Ekenberg L, Danielson M (2005) Decision analysis with multiple objectives in a framework for evaluating imprecision. Int J Uncertain Fuzz Knowl-Based Syst 13(5):495–509CrossRef
Lee SL, Krishnapillay B (2003) Forest genetic resources conservation and management. In: Luoma-aho T et al (eds) Proceedings of the Asia Pacific forest genetic resources programme (APFORGEN) inception workshop. IPGRI-APO, Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 15–18 July
Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Kiker G, Seager TP, Bridges TS, Gardner KH, Rogers SH, Meyer A (2006) Multicriteria decision analysis: a comprehensive decision approach for management of contaminated sediments. Risk Anal 26(1):61–78CrossRef
Linnerooth-Bayer J, Vári A, Brouwers L (2012) Designing a flood management and insurance system in Hungary: a model-based stakeholder approach. In: Amendola A, Ermolieva T, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Mechler R (eds) Integrated catastrophe risk modeling: supporting policy processes. Springer, Dordrecent, Netherlands
Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Ermoliev, Y., Ermolieva, T., Galambos, I. Flood risk management in Hungary’s Upper Tiszabasin: the potential use of a flood catastrophe model. American Geophysical Union, Spring meeting (2001).
Matsatsinis NF, Samaras AP (2001) MCDA and preference disaggregation in group decision support systems. Eur J Oper Res 130(2):414–429CrossRef
Miao Z, Trevisan M, Capri E, Padovani L, Del Re AA (2004) Uncertainty assessment of the model RICEWQ in Northern Italy. J Environ Qual 33(6):2217–2228CrossRef
Riabacke M, Danielson M, Ekenberg L, Larsson A (2009) A prescriptive approach for eliciting imprecise weight statements in an MCDA process. In: Proceedings of 1st international conference on algorithmic decision theory. Venice, Italy
Rice J (1994) Mathematical statistics and data analysis, 2nd edn. Duxbury, Belmont Calif., USA
SWECO/WL (2005) Flood risk assessment for Bac Hung Hai Polder. 2nd RedRiver basinsector project. Report part a: water resources management. Project number 30292-03. Asian development bank (ADB),Viet Nam
UN United Nations Viet Nam (2010) Annual report. Hoan Kiem, Ha Noi, Vietnam, June
UNDP (1998) Support to the disaster management system in Vietnam. United Nations Development Programme, Hanoi
UNDP (2002) UNDP’s statement on the international disaster reduction day: on disaster reduction for sustainable mountain development. J Ryan. United Nations Development Programme, Hanoi
van Ogtrop F, Hoekstra F, Arjen Y, van der Meulen F (2005) Flood management in the lower Incomati river basin,Mozambique, two alternatives. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41(3):607–619CrossRef
Vári A, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Ferencz Z (2003) Stakeholder views on flood risk management inHungary’s upperTiszabasin. Risk Anal 23(3):585–600CrossRef
Viljoen MF, du Plessis LA, Booysen HJ (2001) Extending flood damage assessment methodology to include sociological and environmental dimensions. J Water SA 27(4):517–522
Virola RA, Estrella V, Domingo EV, Amoranto GV, Lopez-Dee EP (2008) Gearing a national statistical system, towards the measurement of the Impact of climate change: the case of the Philippines. Conference on climate change and official statistics. Norway, 14–16 April
Watson-Smyth K (2000) Red Cross aims to reunite shattered families. Wednesday, 30 August 2000 in the independent. independent.co.uk. Accessed 2 Apr 2009
West B, Jacobs K, Breazeale L (2006) Disaster relief. Minimizing wildlife problems after a flood. Forest and wildlife research center. Mississippistate university, information sheets, IS1786
Metadaten
Titel
Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Flood Risk Management
verfasst von
Karin Hansson
Mats Danielson
Love Ekenberg
Joost Buurman
Copyright-Jahr
2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Buch
Integrated Catastrophe Risk Modeling

Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2225-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-94-007-2226-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2013

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2226-2_4

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise