Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Game of Wall Cops and Robbers Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for the Identification of the Stages of Parkinson’s Disease

verfasst von : P. F. Deena, Kumudha Raimond

Erschienen in: Computational Intelligence, Cyber Security and Computational Models

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a degenerative disease of the central nervous system. This work performs a four-class classification using the motor assessments of subjects obtained from the Parkinson’s Progressive Markers Initiative (PPMI) database and a variety of techniques like Deep Neural Network (DNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Deep Belief Network (DBN) etc. The effect of using feature selection was also studied. Due to the skewness of the data, while evaluating the performance of the classifier, along with accuracy other metrics like precision, recall and F1-score were also used. The best classification performance was obtained when a feature selection technique based on Joint Mutual Information (JMI) was used for selecting the features that were then used as input to the classification algorithm like SVM. Such a combination of SVM and feature selection algorithm based on JMI yielded an average classification accuracy of 87.34 % and an F1-score of 0.84.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Improving Lifetime of Memory Devices Using Evolutionary Computing Based Error Correction Coding
Nächstes Kapitel Security Constrained Unit Commitment Problem Employing Artificial Computational Intelligence for Wind-Thermal Power System
Literatur
1.
Marek, K., Jennings, D., Lasch, S., Siderowf, A., Tanner, C., Simuni, T., et al.: The parkinson progression marker initiative (PPMI). Prog. Neurobiol. 95, 629–635 (2011)CrossRef
2.
Babu, G.S., Suresh, S.: Parkinson’s disease prediction using gene expression-A projection based learning meta-cognitive neural classifier approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 1519–1529. Elsevier (2013)
3.
Das, R.: A comparison of multiple classification methods for diagnosis of Parkinson disease. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 1568–1572. Elsevier (2010)
4.
Hazan, H., Hilu, D., Manevitz, L., Ramig, L.O., Sapir, S.: Early diagnosis of parkinson’s disease via machine learning on speech data. In: 2012 IEEE 27th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel (IEEEI), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2012)
5.
Mandal, I., Sairam, N.: Accurate telemonitoring of Parkinson’s disease diagnosis using robust inference system. Int. J. Med. Informatics 82, 359–377 (2013)CrossRef
6.
Rustempasic, I., Can, M.: Diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using fuzzy C-means clustering and pattern recognition. SouthEast Europe J. Soft Comput. 2, 42–49 (2013)
7.
Tsanas, A., Little, M.A., McSharry, P.E., Spielman, J., Ramig L.O.: Novel speech signal processing algorithms for high-accuracy classification of Parkinson’s disease. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 59, 1264–1271 (2012)
8.
Costin, H., Geman, O.: Parkinson’s disease prediction based on multistate markov models. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 8, 525–537 (2013)CrossRef
9.
Daliri, M.R.: Chi-square distance kernel of the gaits for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 8, 66–70. Elsevier (2013)
10.
Haller, S., Badoud, S., Nguyen, D., Garibotto, V., Lovblad, K.O., Burkhard, P.R.: Individual detection of patients with Parkinson disease using support vector machine analysis of diffusion tensor imaging data: initial results. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 33, 2123–2128 (2012)CrossRef
11.
Martínez-Murcia, F.J., Górriz, J.M., Ramírez, J., Illán, I.A., Ortiz, A.: The Parkinson’s progression markers initiative.: automatic detection of parkinsonism using significance measures and component analysis in DaTSCAN imaging. Neurocomputing 126, 58–70. Elsevier (2014)
12.
Prasanth, R., Roy, S.D., Mandal, P.K., Ghosh, S.: Automatic classification and prediction models for early Parkinson’s disease diagnosis from SPECT imaging. Expert Syst. Appl. 41, 3333–3342. Elsevier (2014)
13.
Segovia, F., Górriz, J.M., Ramírez, J., Álvarez, I., Jiménez-Hoyuela, J.M., Ortega, S.J.: Improved Parkinsonism diagnosis using a partial least squares based approach. Med. Phys. 39, 4395–4403 (2012)CrossRef
14.
Armañanzas, R., Bielza, C., Chaudhuri, K.R., Martinez-Martin, P., Larrañaga, P.: Unveiling relevant non-motor Parkinson’s disease severity symptoms using a machine learning approach. Artif. Intell. Med. 58, 195–202. Elsevier (2013)
15.
Babu, G.S., Suresh, S., Mahanand, B.S.: A novel PBL-McRBFN-RFE approach for identification of critical brain regions responsible for Parkinson’s disease. Expert Syst. Appl. 41, 478–488. Elsevier (2014)
16.
Gil, David, Johnson, Magnus: Diagnosing parkinson by using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. Glob. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 9(4), 63–71 (2009)
17.
Hoehn, M.M., Yahr, M.D.: Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 17, 427–442 (1967)CrossRef
18.
Fleuret, F.: Fast binary feature selection with conditional mutual information. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5, 1531–1555 (2004)MathSciNetMATH
19.
Yang, H.H., Moody, J.E.: Data visualization and feature selection: new algorithms for nongaussian data. In: NIPS, pp. 687–702 (1999)
20.
Meyer, P.E., Bontempi, G.: On the use of variable complementarity for feature selection in cancer classification. In: EvoWorkshops 2006: EvoBIO, LNCS, pp. 91–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
21.
22.
Brown, G., Pocock, A., Zhao, M.J., Luján, M.: Conditional likelihood maximisation: a unifying framework for information theoretic feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13, 27–66 (2012)MathSciNetMATH
23.
Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 273–297. Springer (1995)
24.
Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J.: LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2(27), 1–27 (2011)
25.
Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Bengio, Y., Manzagol, P.A.: Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. In: ICML ’08 Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1096–1103. ACM, New York (2008)
26.
Palm, R.B.: Prediction as a candidate for learning deep hierarchical models of data. Master’s Thesis. Technical University of Denmark. IMM-M.Sc.-2012-31 (2012)
27.
Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.: Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1929–1958 (2014)MathSciNetMATH
28.
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for the Identification of the Stages of Parkinson’s Disease
verfasst von
P. F. Deena
Kumudha Raimond
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Computational Intelligence, Cyber Security and Computational Models

Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0250-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-10-0251-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0251-9_25

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise