Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Commodification of Nature on the Plantation Frontier Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

26. Certifying Borneo’s Forest Landscape: Implementation Processes of Forest Certification in Sarawak

verfasst von : Daisuke Naito, Noboru Ishikawa

Erschienen in: Anthropogenic Tropical Forests

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Sarawak has a history of imposing political constraints on natural resource governance. Forest certification is expected to bring important changes to forestry in Sarawak, heralding a new era of forest management. However, the effects of a new environmental regulatory system have yet to be adequately examined, particularly the social consequences of certification which vary depending on the standards employed, audit procedures and the levels of stakeholder participation. This chapter examines experiences to date with forest certification in Malaysia, specifically certification by the Malaysian Timber Certification Council (MTCC) in Sarawak, to investigate the effects of certification on both forest management and rural communities. It is therefore important to focus attention on issues related to both indigenous peoples’ land and natural resources use. The example of Malaysia and the divergent experiences in different states illustrates that the situation on the ground can vary greatly, even with the same forest certification scheme and within the same country.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Tropical Timber Trading from Southeast Asia to Japan
Nächstes Kapitel Changing Patterns of Sarawak’s Exports, c.1870–2013
Fußnoten
1
The FSC was established by interested business representatives, social groups and environmental organisations to improve forest management as environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial and economically viable (Romero et al. 2013).
 
2
The FSC P&C are global standards of forest management that apply to all FSC-certified forests in the world. For the purposes of this chapter, the most relevant principles are principle 1: compliance with all applicable laws and international treaties; principle 2: tenure and use rights and responsibilities; principle 3: recognition and respect of indigenous peoples’ rights; and principle 4: maintenance or enhancement of the long-term social and economic wellbeing of forest workers and local communities and respect of workers’ rights. For this chapter, the FSC P&C are FSC-STD-01-001 V4-0 since the new V5-2 has not yet been implemented on the ground.
 
3
Formerly known as the National Timber Certification Council (NTCC), which was established in 1998 (Malaysiakini 2001).
 
4
The FSC does not directly certify, but sets credible standards. Certification bodies that are accredited can be found online at the Accreditation Services International website (ASI 2018). SGS is a certification body that conducts audits, with headquarters in Switzerland. The SGS Qualifor is a forest certification programme accredited by Accreditation Services International. The regional branch, SGS-Malaysia, also conducts MTCC certifications and other certification audits.
 
5
The National Forestry Council coordinates the work of the forestry department of each state of peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak and considers the direction of the national forestry policy.
 
6
Members of labour groups from the timber industry and the Malay Forest Officers Union, West Malaysia, replaced WWF-Malaysia on the board of trustees.
 
Literatur
Anap Muput. 2006. Forest Management Plan for Anap Muput (Year 2006–2025).
Bass, Stephen, Kirsti Thornber, Matthew Markopoulos, Sarah Roberts, and Maryanne Groge-Gran. 2001. Certification’s impacts on forests, stakeholders, and supply chains, Instruments for Sustainable Private Sector Forestry Series. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Brosius, J. Peter. 1997. Endangered forest, endangered people: Environmentalist representations of indigenous knowledge. Human Ecology 2 (1): 47–69.CrossRef
———. 1999. Green dots, pink hearts: Displacing politics from the Malaysian rainforest. American Anthropologist 101 (1): 36–57.CrossRef
Cooke, Fadzilah Majid. 1999. The challenge of sustainable forests: Forest resource policy in Malaysia, 1970–1995, ASAA Southeast Asia Publications Series. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Dentan, Robert Knox, Kirk Endicott, Alberto Gomes, and M.B. Hooker. 1997. Malaysia and the original people: Case study of the impact of development on indigenous peoples. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.
Forest Stewardship Council [FSC]. 2006. FSC principles 2 and 3: Guidance on interpretation. Bonn: Forest Stewardship Council.
Hong, Evelyne. 1987. Natives of Sarawak: Survival in Borneo’s vanishing forests. Penang: Institut Masyarakat.
Indufor. 2009. PEFC council and MTCC conformity assessment of Malaysian timber certification scheme to PEFC requirements—Final report. Helsinki: Indufor.
JOANGOHutan. 2002. Malaysian timber certification scheme ignores concerns of forest peoples. Press statement. Kuching, 30 January.
Klooster, Dan. 2006. Environmental certification of forests in Mexico: The political ecology of a nongovernmental market intervention. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96 (3): 541–565.CrossRef
Malaysiakini. 2001. Timber certification process ignores natives. 18 November.
Malaysian Timber Certification Council [MTCC]. 2000. Annual report 2000. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Timber Certification Council.
———. 2002a. Annual report 2002. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Timber Certification Council.
———. 2002b. Summary of FMU audit. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Timber Certification Council.
———. 2004. Annual report 2004. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Timber Certification Council.
———. 2006. Annual report 2006. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Timber Certification Council.
———. 2010. Annual report 2010. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Timber Certification Council.
———. 2012b. Malaysian criteria and indicators for forest management certification (Natural forest). Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Timber Certification Council.
Malaysian Timber Industry Board [MTIB]. 1998. Proceedings of the seminar on pilot study on timber certification. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Timber Industry Board.
Mannan, Sam, Yahya Awang, Albert Radin, Andurus Abi, and Peter Lagan. 2002. The Sabah Forestry Department experience from Deramakot Forest Reserve: Five years of practical experience in certified forest management. Paper presented at the Seminar on Practising Sustainable Forest Management: Lessons Learned and Future Challenges, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, 20–22 August.
Mannan, Sam, Yahya Awang, Albert Radin, Andurus Abi, Subari Hj Suparlan, and Peter Lagan. 2003. Conservation of the orangutan and forest management units: The Deramakot model. Paper presented at the Workshop on Orangutan Conservation in Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, 25–27 August.
National Timber Certification Council, Malaysia [NTCC]. 1999. Malaysian criteria, indicators, activities and standards of performance (MC&I) for forest management certification (Forest Management Unit level). Kuala Lumpur: NTCC.
Ng, Ginny. 2000. The certification process in Malaysia: A case study. Pilot project submitted in partial fulfilment for the certificate for the International Training Programme on Forest Certification, Sweden, 14 May–2 June, and South Africa, 14 May–24 November.
Ng, Ginny, Tong Pei Sin, and Lim Hin Fui. 2002. Environment impact and social components in forest certification: ‘Thorny issues in Malaysia?’ Paper presented at the Seminar on Practising Sustainable Forest Management: Lessons Learned and Future Challenges, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, 20–22 August.
Nicholas, Colin. 2000. The Orang Asli and the contest for resources: Indigenous politics, development and identity in Peninsular Malaysia. Subang Jaya: Center for Orang Asli Concerns.
Nussbaum, Ruth, and Markku Simula. 2005. The forest certification handbook. 2nd ed. London: Earthscan.
Romero, Claudia, Francis E. Putz, Manuel R. Guariguata, Erin O. Sills, Paolo O. Cerutti, and Guillaume Lescuyer. 2013. An overview of current knowledge about the impacts of forest management, CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 91. Bogor: Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
Sabah Forestry Department. 2016. Deramakot forest operations. In Annual report 2016, 259–276. Sandakan: Sabah Forestry Department.
Sandom, James, and Markku Simula. 2001. Assessment of compatibility of Malaysian criteria and indicators for forest certification with FSC requirements. Kuala Lumpur: National Timber Certification Council, Malaysia.
Scientific Certification Systems. 2010. Forest management and stump-to-forest gate chain-of-custody certification re evaluation report for the Perak Integrated Timber Complex (Perak ITC). Certificate Number: SCS-FM/COC-00046N, February.
Société générale de surveillance [SGS]. 1997. Forest management certification report 1997. Société générale de surveillance.
———. 2002. Forest management certification report 2002. Société générale de surveillance.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe/Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations [UNECE/FAO]. 2016. Forest products annual market review, 2015–2016. New York/Geneva: United Nations.
Vogt, Kristiina A., Bruce C. Larson, John C. Gordon, Daniel J. Vogt, and Anna Fanzeres. 1999. Forest certification: Roots, issues, challenges, and benefits. Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Certifying Borneo’s Forest Landscape: Implementation Processes of Forest Certification in Sarawak
verfasst von
Daisuke Naito
Noboru Ishikawa
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Anthropogenic Tropical Forests

Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7511-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-13-7513-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7513-2_26