nach oben

Research in Engineering Design

01.03.2004 | Original Paper

Evolving a model of learning in design

Erschienen in: Research in Engineering Design | Ausgabe 1/2004

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Learning in design is a phenomenon observed in design practice. Yet there is no comprehensive model or theory that explains the phenomenon and hence serves as a basis upon which a shared understanding can be evolved. This paper describes the development and evolution of a novel model of learning in design, LinD, which seeks to address the need for such a model. The model features formalisms for describing the cognitive activities of design and learning and three links that explain the interactions between these activities: the epistemic, teleological and temporal.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Allen TJ (1969) The differential performance of information channels in the transfer of technology. In: Grubber WH, Marquis DG (eds) Factors in the transfer of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

Anderson JR (1995) Learning and memory. Wiley, New York

Arciszewski T, Michalski RS (1994) Inferential design theory: a conceptual outline. In: Artificial intelligence in design ‘94. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 295–308

Arciszewski T, Mustafa M, Ziarko W (1987) A methodology of design knowledge acquisition for use in learning expert systems. Int J Man–Machine Studies 1(27):23–32

Arciszewski T, Ziarko W (1986) Adaptive expert system for preliminary engineering design. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Expert Systems, Avignon, France

Bond AH, Ricci RJ (1992) Co-operation in aircraft design. Res Eng Design 4:115–130

Boston OP, Court AW, Culley SJ, McMahon CA (1997) Design information issues in new product development. In: The design productivity debate. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 231–254.

Busby JA, Lloyd PA (1999) Influences on solution search processes in design organisation. Res Eng Design 11:158–171CrossRef

Busby JS (1998) Effective practices in design transfer. Res Eng Design 10:178–188

Chabot R, Brown DC (1994) Knowledge compilation using constraint inheritance. Artif Intell Eng Design Anal Manuf 8:125–142

Court AW, Culley SJ, McMahon CA (1994) Information sources and storage methods for engineering data. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ASME Biennial European Joint Conference on Engineering systems design and analysis, PD-vol 64-5. ASME, New York, pp 9–16

Cross N, Christiaans H, Dorst K (eds) (1996) Analysing design activity. Wiley, Chichester

Cross N, Cross, CC (1996) Design protocol data and novel design decisions. In: Cross N, Christiaans H, Dorst K (eds) Analysing design activity. Wiley, Chichester, pp 35–63

Cross N, Nathenson M (1984) Design methods and learning methods. In: Design: science: method. IPC Science and Technology Press, Guildford, UK, pp 281–294

D’Arcangelo AM (1973) Ship design and construction. The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, New York

Dasgupta S (1994) Creativity in invention and design: computational and cognitive explorations of technological originality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Dietterich T (1986) Learning at the knowledge level. Machine Learning 1:121–138

Duffy AHB (1998) AID’98 Machine learning in design. Workshop: Saturday 18 July 1998: Outcome. http://www.cad.strath.ac.uk/~alex/AID/AID98/outcome.html

Duffy AHB, Brown DC, Goel AK (1998) Special issue: Machine learning in design. Artif Intell Eng Design Anal Manuf 12(2)

Duffy AHB, Brown DC, Maher ML (1996) Special issue: Machine learning in design. Artif Intell Eng Design Anal Manuf 10(2)

Duffy AHB, Kerr SM (1993) Customised perspectives of past designs from automated group rationalisation. In: Artificial intelligence in engineering, vol 8. Computational Mechanics, Southampton, UK

Duffy SM, Duffy AHB, MacCallum KJ (1995) A design re-use model. In: Tenth International Conference of Engineering Design (ICED), Prague, 22–24 August 1995, vol 2. Heurista, Zurich, pp 490–495

Duffy SM, Duffy AHB (1996) Sharing the learning activity using intelligent CAD. Artif Intell Eng Design Anal Manuf 10:83–100

Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1993) Protocol analysis, verbal reports as data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

Fulcher AJ, Hills P (1996) Towards a strategic framework for design research. J Eng Design 7:183–193

Gero, JS (1990) Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Mag 11:4:27–26

Grecu DL, Brown DC (1996) Dimensions of learning in agent-based design. In: Proceedings of Machine learning in design workshop (AID ‘96: Fourth International Conference of Artificial intelligence in design), Stanford University, Stanford, CA

Grecu DL, Brown DC (1998) Dimensions of machine learning in design. Artif Intell Eng Design Anal Manuf 12:117–121CrossRef

Gruber T, Baudin C, Boose J, Weber J (1991) Design rationale capture as knowledge acquisition: tradeoffs in the design of interactive tools. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on machine learning, Evanston, IL, June 1991. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, pp 3–12

Hanson NR (1958) Patterns of discovery. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Hubka V, Eder WE (1996) Design science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

Kocabas S (1991) A review of learning. Knowl Eng Rev 6:195–222

Lloyd P, Scott P (1994) Discovering the design problem. Design Stud 15:125–140CrossRef

MacCallum KJ (1990) Does intelligent CAD exist? Artif Intell Eng 5:55–64CrossRef

Maher ML, Brown DC, Duffy AHB (1994) Special issue: Machine learning in design. Artif Intell Eng Design Anal Manuf 8(2)

Michalski RS (1993) Inferential theory of learning as a conceptual basis for multistrategy learning. Machine Learning 11:3–43

Newell A (1982) The knowledge level. Artif Intell 18:87–127CrossRef

Persidis A, Duffy A (1991) Learning in engineering design. In: Intelligent CAD—III. IFIP/Elsevier, Oxford, pp 251–272

Petroski H (1994) Design paradigms—case histories of error and judgment in engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Reffat R, Gero JS (2000) Computational situated learning in design. In: Sixth International Conference on Artificial intelligence in design—AID00. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, USA. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 589–610

Reich Y (1994) Layered models of research methodologies. Artif Intell Eng Design Anal Manuf 12:193–209

Reich Y (1998) Learning in design: from characterising dimensions to working systems. Artif Intell Eng Design Anal Manuf 12:161–172CrossRef

Sim SK (2000) Modelling learning in design. PhD thesis, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK

Sim SK, Duffy AHB (1998a) A formalism for coupled design/learning activities. In: Proceedings of Machine learning in design workshop (AID’98: Fifth International Conference of Artificial intelligence in design),18 July 1998, Portugal

Sim SK, Duffy AHB (1998b) A foundation for machine learning in design. Artif Intell Eng Design Anal Manuf 12:193–209CrossRef

Sim SK, Duffy AHB (2000) Evaluating a model of learning in design using protocol analysis. In: Sixth International Conference on Artificial intelligence in design—AID00. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, USA. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 455–477

Sim SK, Duffy AHB (2003) Towards an ontology of generic engineering design activities. Res Eng Design 15:200–223CrossRef

Simon HA (1981) The science of the artificial, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

Smithers T, Troxell W (1990) Design is intelligent behaviour, but what’s the formalism. Artif Intell Eng Design Anal Manuf 4:89–98

Stevenson S, Dooley KJ (1994) The use of best design practices: an analysis of US Navy contractors. Res Eng Design 6:14–24

Voland G (1999) Engineering by design. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA

Wilkes MV (1951) The best way to design an automatic calculating machine. Report of the Manchester University Computer Inaugural Conference, Manchester, pp 118–121

Wilkes MV (1986) The genesis of microprogramming. Ann Hist Comput 8:116–126

Wu ZC, Duffy A (2002) Using protocol analysis to investigate collective learning in design. In: Artificial intelligence in design 2002 Conference (AID02), Cambridge, UK. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 261–284

Titel: Evolving a model of learning in design
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2004
Erschienen in: Research in Engineering Design / Ausgabe 1/2004
Print ISSN: 0934-9839
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-6066
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-003-0044-2

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht