nach oben

Journal of Management Control

Erschienen in:

01.01.2014 | Short survey paper

Upper echelons theory in management accounting and control research

verfasst von: Martin R. W. Hiebl

Erschienen in: Journal of Management Control | Ausgabe 3/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In recent years, scholars have started to draw on upper echelons theory to analyze the relationship between the characteristics of top managers and management accounting and control systems. This short survey paper aims to give an overview of upper echelons theory and its current applications to management accounting and control research. The paper shows that existing research consistently finds that younger and shorter-tenured CFOs and top managers with business-related backgrounds are associated with more innovative and/or sophisticated management accounting and control systems. In contrast, the (sparse) extant results on CEO characteristics and on characteristics of top management teams are somewhat contradictory. The paper concludes with an outlook on fruitful future research avenues, which include the analysis of additional management accounting and control systems and additional upper echelon characteristics, moderators such as managerial discretion and executive job demands, and the combined effect of upper echelons and management accounting and control systems on organizational performance.

Vorheriger Artikel Top management impact on management control

Nächster Artikel Leadership impact on organizational commitment: the mediating role of management control systems choice

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Besides typical demographic upper echelon characteristics such as age, career experience, and education, Fig. 1 also contains leadership style, since Waldman et al. (2004) have shown that leadership style—as another upper echelon characteristic—significantly contributes to the ability of upper echelon models to predict organizational performance.

To be considered for this review, articles were required to feature the following keywords in their title, abstract and/or author-generated article keywords. The search phrase used was (“upper echelon*” OR “CFO characteristic*” OR “chief financial officer characteristic*” OR “CEO characteristic*” OR “chief executive officer characteristic*” OR “CEO demographic*” OR “CFO demographic*” OR “chief executive officer demographic*” OR “chief financial officer demographic*” OR “top management team*” OR “leadership style*”) AND (“management account*” OR “management control*”). Note that asterisks in the search phrase allowed for different keyword endings; for instance, “management account*” captured both “management accounting” and “management accountant”. The search results reflect the articles available in print or online ahead of print as per October 31, 2013.

Although Malmi and Brown (2008, p. 290) clearly distinguish between the purpose of management control systems (“put in place in order to direct employee behavior”) and management accounting systems (“designed to support decision-making at any organizational level, but leave the use of those systems unmonitored”), they acknowledge that the same instruments (such as planning or costing systems) can be used for management control and management accounting at the same time. Thus, their typology is used to map the results in this review paper, as their framework presents a comprehensive typology of management control systems and the present paper aims to summarize relationships between upper echelon characteristics and management accounting and control systems without a strict focus on their underlying purpose.

Note that considerate and structuring leadership styles are not opposites. Managers can score high (or low) on both types of leadership styles at the same time (Abernethy et al. 2010).

According to Abernethy et al.’s (2010) description, the “planning and control systems” they studied can be well classified as “budgets” in Malmi and Brown’s (2008) framework (see Table 2).

Delegation can be classified as an as aspect of governance structure and thus as a kind of administrative control according to Malmi and Brown (2008) (see Table 2).

Beliefs are part of the value system, and can thus—according to Malmi and Brown (2008)—be regarded as part of cultural/value-based controls (as classified in Table 2).

The “scope of management accounting systems” as studied by Naranjo-Gil and Hartmann (2006) can be classified—as shown in Table 2—as an aspect of hybrid measurement systems in Malmi and Brown’s (2008) framework.

Mian (2001) defines a CFO as the position responsible for overseeing the firm’s accounting function, for the preparation of financial results, for the firm’s treasury side of the business and consequently for raising capital.

Abernethy, M. A., Bouwens, J., & van Lent, L. (2010). Leadership and control system design. Management Accounting Research, 21(1), 2–16.CrossRef

Arthaud-Day, M. L., Certo, S. T., Dalton, C., & Dalton, D. R. (2006). A changing of the guard: executive and director turnover following corporate financial restatements. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1119–1136.CrossRef

Baxter, J., & Chua, W. F. (2008). Be(com)ing the chief financial officer of an organisation: Experimenting with Bourdieu’s practice theory. Management Accounting Research, 19(3), 212–230.CrossRef

Burkert, M., & Lueg, R. (2013). Differences in the sophistication of value-based management: The role of top executives. Management Accounting Research, 24(1), 3–22.CrossRef

Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778.

Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168.CrossRef

Crossland, C., & Hambrick, D. C. (2011). Differences in managerial discretion across countries: How nation-level institutions affect the degree to which CEOs matter. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 797–819.

Dunford, B. B., Boswell, W. R., & Boudreau, J. W. (2010). When do high-level managers believe they can influence the stock price? Antecedents of stock price expectancy cognitions. Human Resource Management, 49(1), 23–43.CrossRef

Elbashir, M. Z., Collier, P. A., & Sutton, S. G. (2011). The role of organizational absorptive capacity in strategic use of business intelligence to support integrated management control systems. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 155–184.CrossRef

Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gallo, M. A., Tàpies, J., & Cappuyns, K. (2004). Comparison of family and nonfamily business: Financial logic and personal preferences. Family Business Review, 17(4), 303–318.CrossRef

Gallo, M. A., & Vilaseca, A. (1998). A financial perspective on structure, conduct and performance in the family firm: An empirical study. Family Business Review, 11(1), 35–47.CrossRef

Ge, W., Matsumoto, D., & Zhang, J. L. (2011). Do CFOs have style? An empirical investigation of the effect of individual CFOs on accounting practices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(4), 1141–1179.CrossRef

Geiger, M. A., & North, D. S. (2006). Does hiring a new CFO change things? An investigation of changes in discretionary accruals. The Accounting Review, 81(4), 781–809.CrossRef

Goretzki, L. (2013). Management accounting and the construction of the legitimate manager. Journal of Management Control, 23(4), 319–344.CrossRef

Goretzki, L., Strauss, E., & Weber, J. (2013). An institutional perspective on the changes in management accountants’ professional role. Management Accounting Research, 24(1), 41–63.CrossRef

Guenther, T. W. (2013). Conceptualisations of ‘controlling’ in German-speaking countries: Analysis and comparison with Anglo-American management control frameworks. Journal of Management Control, 23(4), 269–290.CrossRef

Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.CrossRef

Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 369–406.

Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2005). Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 472–491.CrossRef

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

Hartmann, F., Naranjo-Gil, D., & Perego, P. (2010). The effects of leadership styles and use of performance measures on managerial work-related attitudes. European Accounting Review, 19(2), 275–310.CrossRef

Hiebl, M. R. W. (2013). Bean counter or strategist? Differences in the role of the CFO in family and non-family businesses. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(2), 147–161.CrossRef

Hilger, S., Richter, A., & Schäffer, U. (2013). Hanging together, together hung? Career implications of interpersonal ties between CEOs and top managers. BuR-Business Research, 6(1), 8–32.

Huang, J., & Kisgen, D. J. (2013). Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives? Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 822–839.CrossRef

IFERA. (2003). Family businesses dominate: Families are the key players around the world, but prefer the backstage positions. Family Business Review, 16(4), 235–239.

Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36–51.CrossRef

Kyj, L., & Parker, R. J. (2008). Antecedents of budget participation: Leadership style, information asymmetry, and evaluative use of budget. Abacus, 44(4), 423–442.CrossRef

Lee, J., Elbashir, M. Z., Mahama, H., & Sutton, S. G. (2013). Enablers of top management team support for integrated management control systems innovations. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2013.07.001.

Li, C., Sun, L., & Ettredge, M. (2010). Financial executive qualifications, financial executive turnover, and adverse SOX 404 opinions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(1), 93–110.CrossRef

Lucey, B. M., Plaksina, Y., & Dowling, M. (2013). CEO social status and acquisitiveness. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 5(2), 161–177.CrossRef

Luft, J., & Shields, M. D. (2003). Mapping management accounting: Graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 169–249.CrossRef

Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package: Opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 287–300.CrossRef

Mian, S. (2001). On the choice and replacement of chief financial officers. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(1), 143–175.CrossRef

Miller, C. C., Burke, L. M., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management Journal, 19(1), 39–58.CrossRef

Naranjo-Gil, D., & Hartmann, F. (2006). How top management teams use management accounting systems to implement strategy. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 18, 21–53.CrossRef

Naranjo-Gil, D., & Hartmann, F. (2007a). How CEOs use management information systems for strategy implementation in hospitals. Health Policy, 81(1), 29–41.CrossRef

Naranjo-Gil, D., & Hartmann, F. (2007b). Management accounting systems, top management team heterogeneity and strategic change. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 735–756.CrossRef

Naranjo-Gil, D., Maas, V. S., & Hartmann, F. G. H. (2009). How CFOs determine management accounting innovation: An examination of direct and indirect effects. European Accounting Review, 18(4), 667–695.CrossRef

Nielsen, S. (2010). Top management team diversity: A review of theories and methodologies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 301–316.

Pavlatos, O. (2012). The impact of CFOs’ characteristics and information technology on cost management systems. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 13(3), 242–254.CrossRef

Roussanov, N. (2010). Diversification and its discontents: Idiosyncratic and entrepreneurial risk in the quest for social status. The Journal of Finance, 65(5), 1755–1788.CrossRef

Speckbacher, G., & Wentges, P. (2012). The impact of family control on the use of performance measures in strategic target setting and incentive compensation: A research note. Management Accounting Research, 23(1), 34–46.CrossRef

Strauß, E., & Zecher, C. (2013). Management control systems: A review. Journal of Management Control, 23(4), 233–268.CrossRef

Waldman, D. A., Javidan, M., & Varella, P. (2004). Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: A new application of upper echelons theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(3), 355–380.CrossRef

Zander, K., Büttner, V., Hadem, M., Richter, A., & Schäffer, U. (2009). Unternehmenserfolg, Wechsel im Vorstandsvorsitz und Disziplinierung von Finanzvorständen. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 79(12), 1343–1386.CrossRef

Zorn, D. M. (2004). Here a chief, there a chief: The rise of the CFO in the American firm. American Sociological Review, 69(3), 345–364.CrossRef

Titel: Upper echelons theory in management accounting and control research
verfasst von: Martin R. W. Hiebl
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2014
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Journal of Management Control / Ausgabe 3/2014
Print ISSN: 2191-4761
Elektronische ISSN: 2191-477X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-013-0183-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner