Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management 1/2018

20.09.2017 | Perspectives

Globalization, entrepreneurship and paradox thinking

verfasst von: Shameen Prashantham, Mariya Eranova, Carole Couper

Erschienen in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Globalization has been facing a backlash. By contrast, entrepreneurship has come to be seen as a panacea for economic development and generating jobs that are perceived to be under threat from globalization. In this Perspectives paper, our central argument is that globalization and entrepreneurship must be viewed holistically, recognizing that globalization is an enabler of important entrepreneurship outcomes. We argue that networks created as a byproduct of globalization facilitate various forms of entrepreneurship. Interpersonal networks (e.g., diasporas) facilitate transnational entrepreneurship which can, in turn, reduce institutional distance between locations. Interorganizational networks (e.g., MNE-orchestrated ecosystems) facilitate technology entrepreneurship which reinforces the institutional work that gives rise to new technological domains and fields. Intergovernmental and civil society networks facilitate social entrepreneurship which helps redress institutional voids. Thus globalization can be a force for good by enabling forms of entrepreneurship that enable important institutional change. We highlight the importance of paradox thinking, which is rooted in ancient Chinese philosophy, in transcending an either/or perspective of globalization and entrepreneurship.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
This is not just in the period following World War I. To illustrate, Meyer (2017: 79) notes that in the fourteenth century, Chinese merchants were trading internationally, even to East Africa, but this was undermined by a new emperor and his “anti-globalization lobby at court.”
 
2
This is in contrast to some of the siloed discourse witnessed in the West: “Entrepreneurship… is often celebrated as a hero of the global economy. Globalization, on the other hand, is often criticized as a villain contributing to rising inequality.” The contrast between the two was highlighted recently in two opposing posts on The Huffington Post. One bears the headline “Entrepreneurs: Engines of our Economic Growth” and the other, “Globalization is Killing the Globe: Return to Local Economies” (Prashantham, 2016).
 
3
To be clear, calls for a more integrative understanding of globalization and entrepreneurship are not new. Jones (2013) has presented compelling historical evidence for the role of entrepreneurs and their enterprises in fostering globalization. For instance, a prominent historical figure in Sri Lanka’s tea industry (a critically important sector in that emerging market) is Thomas Lipton, whose enterprising sourcing of tea from that country (Ceylon, in those days) and subsequent retailing efforts in the UK, led to the mass commercialization of what had until then been a niche beverage of British society’s upper crust. This entrepreneur rose from humble origins as a grocer in Glasgow in the nineteenth century, using tricks of the trade he had picked up as a youth living in the United States, to become what we would today regard as a retail tycoon, before his eponymous tea brand became his crowning achievement. Lipton’s entrepreneurship was a major factor (albeit not the only one) in creating global demand for Ceylon tea. Here, however, we are concerned with the opposite directionality: that is, the effect of globalization on entrepreneurship.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Beckman, C., Eisenhardt, K., Kotha, S., Meyer, A., & Rajagopalan, N. 2012. Technology entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6: 89–93.CrossRef Beckman, C., Eisenhardt, K., Kotha, S., Meyer, A., & Rajagopalan, N. 2012. Technology entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6: 89–93.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bhagwati, J. N. 2004. In defense of globalization. New York: Oxford University Press. Bhagwati, J. N. 2004. In defense of globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhatt, B., Qureshi, I., & Riaz, S. 2017. Social entrepreneurship in non-munificent institutional environments and implications for institutional work: Insights from China. Journal of Business Ethics, in press. Bhatt, B., Qureshi, I., & Riaz, S. 2017. Social entrepreneurship in non-munificent institutional environments and implications for institutional work: Insights from China. Journal of Business Ethics, in press.
Zurück zum Zitat Buckley, P. J., & Ghauri, P. N. 2004. Globalisation, economic geography and the strategy of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 81–98.CrossRef Buckley, P. J., & Ghauri, P. N. 2004. Globalisation, economic geography and the strategy of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 81–98.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Buckley, P. J., & Prashantham, S. 2016. Global interfirm networks: The division of entrepreneurial labor between MNEs and SMEs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1): 40–58.CrossRef Buckley, P. J., & Prashantham, S. 2016. Global interfirm networks: The division of entrepreneurial labor between MNEs and SMEs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1): 40–58.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Mudambi, R., & Pedersen, T. 2017. Globalization: Rising skepticism. Global Strategy Journal, 7: 155–158.CrossRef Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Mudambi, R., & Pedersen, T. 2017. Globalization: Rising skepticism. Global Strategy Journal, 7: 155–158.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Djelic, M.-L., & Quack, S. 2003. Globalization and institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game. Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRef Djelic, M.-L., & Quack, S. 2003. Globalization and institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game. Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Drori, I., Honig, B., & Wright, M. 2009. Transnational entrepreneurship: An emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33: 1001–1022. Drori, I., Honig, B., & Wright, M. 2009. Transnational entrepreneurship: An emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33: 1001–1022.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunning, J. H. 2003. Making globalization good: The moral challenges of global capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Dunning, J. H. 2003. Making globalization good: The moral challenges of global capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eranova, M., & Prashantham, S. 2016. Decision making and paradox: Why study China?. European Journal of Management, 34: 193–201.CrossRef Eranova, M., & Prashantham, S. 2016. Decision making and paradox: Why study China?. European Journal of Management, 34: 193–201.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. 2002. Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technology standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 196–214.CrossRef Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. 2002. Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technology standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 196–214.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ghemawat, P. 2016. The laws of globalization and business applications. New York: Cambridge University Press. Ghemawat, P. 2016. The laws of globalization and business applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, G. 2013. Entrepreneurship and multinationals: Global business and the making of the modern world. Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRef Jones, G. 2013. Entrepreneurship and multinationals: Global business and the making of the modern world. Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4): 41–50. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4): 41–50.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobrin, S. J. 2017. Bricks and mortar in a borderless world: Globalization, the backlash, and the multinational enterprise. Global Strategy Journal, 7: 159–171.CrossRef Kobrin, S. J. 2017. Bricks and mortar in a borderless world: Globalization, the backlash, and the multinational enterprise. Global Strategy Journal, 7: 159–171.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. 2006. Institutions and institutional work. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.). Handbook of organization studies, 2d ed.: 215–254. London: Sage.CrossRef Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. 2006. Institutions and institutional work. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.). Handbook of organization studies, 2d ed.: 215–254. London: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, P. P. 2014. The unique value of yin-yang balancing: A critical response. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 321–332. Li, P. P. 2014. The unique value of yin-yang balancing: A critical response. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 321–332.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorenzen, M., & Mudambi, R. 2013. Clusters, connectivity and catch-up: Bollywood and Bangalore in the global economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(3): 501–534.CrossRef Lorenzen, M., & Mudambi, R. 2013. Clusters, connectivity and catch-up: Bollywood and Bangalore in the global economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(3): 501–534.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer, K. E. 2017. International business in an era of anti-globalization. Multinational Business Review, 25(2): 78–90. Meyer, K. E. 2017. International business in an era of anti-globalization. Multinational Business Review, 25(2): 78–90.
Zurück zum Zitat Peng, M. W., Li, Y., & Tian, L. 2016. Tian-ren-he-yi strategy: An Eastern perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(3): 695–722.CrossRef Peng, M. W., Li, Y., & Tian, L. 2016. Tian-ren-he-yi strategy: An Eastern perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(3): 695–722.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Prashantham, S., & Dhanaraj, C. 2015. MNE ties and new venture internationalization: Exploratory insights from India. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4): 901–924.CrossRef Prashantham, S., & Dhanaraj, C. 2015. MNE ties and new venture internationalization: Exploratory insights from India. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4): 901–924.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Prashantham, S., & Yip, G. S. 2017. Engaging with startups in emerging markets. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(2): 51–65. Prashantham, S., & Yip, G. S. 2017. Engaging with startups in emerging markets. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(2): 51–65.
Zurück zum Zitat Prashantham, S., & Zhao, L. 2017. Testin: Partnering with multinational corporations [teaching case]. London, Ontario: Ivey Publishing. Prashantham, S., & Zhao, L. 2017. Testin: Partnering with multinational corporations [teaching case]. London, Ontario: Ivey Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruggie, J. 2003. The United Nations and globalization: Patterns and limits of institutional adaptation. Global Governance, 9: 301–321. Ruggie, J. 2003. The United Nations and globalization: Patterns and limits of institutional adaptation. Global Governance, 9: 301–321.
Zurück zum Zitat Saxenian, A. 2006. The new argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Saxenian, A. 2006. The new argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Schad, J., Lewis, M., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. 2016. Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1): 5–64.CrossRef Schad, J., Lewis, M., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. 2016. Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1): 5–64.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, W. K., Lewis, M. W., & Tushman, M. L. 2016. “Both/and” leadership. Harvard Business Review, 94(5): 62–70. Smith, W. K., Lewis, M. W., & Tushman, M. L. 2016. “Both/and” leadership. Harvard Business Review, 94(5): 62–70.
Zurück zum Zitat Stiglitz, J. E. 2002. Globalization and its discontents. New York: Norton.Stiglitz, J. E. 2003. Globalization, technology, and Asian development. Asian Development Review, 20(2): 1–18. Stiglitz, J. E. 2002. Globalization and its discontents. New York: Norton.Stiglitz, J. E. 2003. Globalization, technology, and Asian development. Asian Development Review, 20(2): 1–18.
Zurück zum Zitat Woetzel, J., Lin, D.-Y., Seong, J., Madgavkar, A., & Lund, S. 2017. China’s role in the next phase of globalization. Discussion paper, McKinsey Global Institute. Woetzel, J., Lin, D.-Y., Seong, J., Madgavkar, A., & Lund, S. 2017. China’s role in the next phase of globalization. Discussion paper, McKinsey Global Institute. 
Zurück zum Zitat Wolf, M. 2004. In defense of globalization. New York: Yale University Press. Wolf, M. 2004. In defense of globalization. New York: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Zahra, S. A., & Wright, M. 2016. Understanding the social role of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 53: 610–629.CrossRef Zahra, S. A., & Wright, M. 2016. Understanding the social role of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 53: 610–629.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zoogah, D. B., Peng, M. W., & Woldu, H. 2015. Institutions, resources, and organizational effectiveness in Africa. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1): 7–31.CrossRef Zoogah, D. B., Peng, M. W., & Woldu, H. 2015. Institutions, resources, and organizational effectiveness in Africa. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1): 7–31.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Globalization, entrepreneurship and paradox thinking
verfasst von
Shameen Prashantham
Mariya Eranova
Carole Couper
Publikationsdatum
20.09.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Asia Pacific Journal of Management / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0217-4561
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9958
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9537-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Asia Pacific Journal of Management 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner