Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Argumentation 4/2016

23.01.2016

Review of: Frans H. van Eemeren (2015): Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics, Cham (CH), Springer (= Argumentation Library, 27), 880 pp.

verfasst von: Fernando Leal

Erschienen in: Argumentation | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

This is a book I am sure many of us wanted to see. Every scholar in the world who works in the field of argumentation studies knows the name of Frans van Eemeren and has heard of the tag ‘pragma-dialectics’. What not everyone is aware of is the sheer amount and variety of research associated with that name and this tag. Even though van Eemeren and his multiple collaborators in what is known as the Amsterdam School have been publishing a long string of books in pragma-dialectics over the years, the fact of the matter is that at the same time van Eemeren, alone or in collaboration, has been busy pouring forth an astounding amount of papers (over 300 actually) which either extended or deepened the pragma-dialectical research program, and are chock full of aperçus, arguments, and results that are not contained in those books. The book under review, almost 900 pages long, is the first publication to allow us a glimpse into the workshop of pragma-dialectics in its full glory. …

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
To save space I will be using dates preceded by an asterisk (*) to refer to the relevant publications listed at the end of this review. This review refers throughout to the international publications in English only. The Amsterdam School, however, has a considerable output in Dutch as well, which often precedes what eventually appeared in English. On Dutch publications see below notes 4 and 5.
 
2
By the way, the author’s version of this history is the subject of Chapter 7 in the book under review. I understand van Eemeren will soon publish a new book, titled The making of pragma-dialectics, which will contain a fuller account of his almost 40 years-old research program.
 
3
One common misunderstanding of standard pragma-dialectics consists in saying that no human being argues according to this model. Of course, they don’t. That’s why it is a model. That’s the way all models work.That’s why they are called models in the first place. Yet even such a sagacious theorist as John Woods (2006) has misunderstood standard pragma-dialectics in precisely this way.
 
4
I should perhaps also mention, as part of the empirical research done within pragma-dialectics, the sporadic contributions to the long history of argumentation studies (see Chapter 32 of the book under review as well as Chapter 3 of *2010). By the way, giving an account of that history has always been an integral part of the pragma-dialectical research program, as witnessed by another string of books (starting with *1978 and *1981 still in Dutch, continuing with *1996 already in English, and culminating in *2014).
 
5
I may be guilty of some distortion of the general picture of the history of pragma-dialectics in that certain things were published in English later than in Dutch. The author tells me in correspondence that “we (viz. he and Rob Grootendorst) not only started out with two Handbook publications in Dutch (*1978 and *1981), but also paid a lot more attention to the application of argumentation theory, and did so much earlier. In fact, from the early 1980's onwards Rob Grootendorst and I have published different kinds of textbooks in Dutch. The *1989 paper is based on these efforts.”
 
6
I became aware of the need for such a collection of papers immediately after the seminar at the University of Guadalajara mentioned above. So I translated a selection of ten papers that is now available as an Amazon Kindle together with a Festschrift by Spanish-speaking researchers (Leal 2015), a fact that may be of interest to some readers of this journal. Chapter 7 of the book under review was originally written for that other book at my request.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Eemeren, Frans H. van. *2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam-Filadelfia: John Benjamins.CrossRef Eemeren, Frans H. van. *2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam-Filadelfia: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eemeren, Frans H., and Grootendorst, Rob. *1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Berlín: de Gruyter.CrossRef Eemeren, Frans H., and Grootendorst, Rob. *1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Berlín: de Gruyter.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Grootendorst, Rob. *1989. Writing argumentative texts. From analysis to presentation: A pragma-dialectical approach. In: B. E. Gronbeck (Ed.), Spheres of argument: Proceedings of the 6th SCA/AFA conference on argumentation (pp. 324–330). Annandale (VA): Speech Communication Association. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Grootendorst, Rob. *1989. Writing argumentative texts. From analysis to presentation: A pragma-dialectical approach. In: B. E. Gronbeck (Ed.), Spheres of argument: Proceedings of the 6th SCA/AFA conference on argumentation (pp. 324–330). Annandale (VA): Speech Communication Association.
Zurück zum Zitat Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Grootendorst, Rob. *1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Grootendorst, Rob. *1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zurück zum Zitat Eemeren, Frans H. van, Grootendorst, Rob, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. *2002. Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Grootendorst, Rob, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. *2002. Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zurück zum Zitat Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Grootendorst, Rob. *2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Grootendorst, Rob. *2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Eemeren, Frans H. van, Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. *2007. Argumentative indicators in discourse. A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef Eemeren, Frans H. van, Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. *2007. Argumentative indicators in discourse. A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eemeren, Frans H. van, Grootendorst, Rob, Jackson, Sally, and Jacobs, Scott. *1993. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa (AL): University of Alabama Press. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Grootendorst, Rob, Jackson, Sally, and Jacobs, Scott. *1993. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa (AL): University of Alabama Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Eemeren, Frans H. van, Garssen, Bart J., van Haaften, Ton, Krabbe, Erik C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca, and Wagemans, Jean H. M. *2014. Handbook of argumentation theory: An overview of classical and neo-classical perspectives on argumentation and modern theoretical approaches to argumentative discourse. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef Eemeren, Frans H. van, Garssen, Bart J., van Haaften, Ton, Krabbe, Erik C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca, and Wagemans, Jean H. M. *2014. Handbook of argumentation theory: An overview of classical and neo-classical perspectives on argumentation and modern theoretical approaches to argumentative discourse. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eemeren, Frans H. van, Grootendorst, Rob, and Kruiger, Tjark. *1978, *1981. Argumentatietheorie [Theory of argumentation]. First and second editions. Utrecht: Het Spectrum. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Grootendorst, Rob, and Kruiger, Tjark. *1978, *1981. Argumentatietheorie [Theory of argumentation]. First and second editions. Utrecht: Het Spectrum.
Zurück zum Zitat Eemeren, Frans H. van, Garssen, Bart J., and Meuffels, Bert. *2009. Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness: Empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef Eemeren, Frans H. van, Garssen, Bart J., and Meuffels, Bert. *2009. Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness: Empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eemeren, Frans H. van, Grootendorst, Rob, Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca, J.A. Blair, R.H. Johnson, E.C.W. Krabbe, C. Plantin, D.N. Walton, C.A. Willard, J. Woods, John, and D. Zarefsky, David. *1996. Fundamentals of argumentation theory: Handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRef Eemeren, Frans H. van, Grootendorst, Rob, Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca, J.A. Blair, R.H. Johnson, E.C.W. Krabbe, C. Plantin, D.N. Walton, C.A. Willard, J. Woods, John, and D. Zarefsky, David. *1996. Fundamentals of argumentation theory: Handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gilbert, Michael. 2014. Arguing with people. Calgary: Broadview Press. Gilbert, Michael. 2014. Arguing with people. Calgary: Broadview Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Leal, Fernando, editor (2015). Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: Estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren. Guadalajara (MX): University Press. Leal, Fernando, editor (2015). Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: Estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren. Guadalajara (MX): University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Woods, John. 2006. Pragma-dialectics: A retrospective. In Considering pragma-dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday, ed. P. Houtlosser, and A. van Rees, 301–312. New York: Routledge. Woods, John. 2006. Pragma-dialectics: A retrospective. In Considering pragma-dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday, ed. P. Houtlosser, and A. van Rees, 301–312. New York: Routledge.
Metadaten
Titel
Review of: Frans H. van Eemeren (2015): Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics, Cham (CH), Springer (= Argumentation Library, 27), 880 pp.
verfasst von
Fernando Leal
Publikationsdatum
23.01.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Argumentation / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0920-427X
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8374
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9393-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Argumentation 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe