nach oben

Biodiversity and Conservation

Erschienen in:

01.01.2009 | Original Paper

Tree and stand level variables influencing diversity of lichens on temperate broad-leaved trees in boreo-nemoral floodplain forests

verfasst von: Inga Jüriado, Jaan Liira, Jaanus Paal, Ave Suija

Erschienen in: Biodiversity and Conservation | Ausgabe 1/2009

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Tree and stand level variables affecting the species richness, cover and composition of epiphytic lichens on temperate broad-leaved trees (Fraxinus excelsior, Quercus robur, Tilia cordata, Ulmus glabra, and U. laevis) were analysed in floodplain forest stands in Estonia. The effect of tree species, substrate characteristics, and stand and regional variables were tested by partial canonical correspondence analysis (pCCA) and by general linear mixed models (GLMM). The most pronounced factors affecting the species richness, cover and composition of epiphytic lichens are acidity of tree bark, bryophyte cover and circumference of tree stems. Stand level characteristics have less effects on the species richness of epiphytic lichens, however, lichen cover and composition was influenced by stand age and light availability. The boreo-nemoral floodplain forests represent valuable habitats for epiphytic lichens. As substrate-related factors influence the species diversity of lichens on temperate broad-leaved trees differently, it is important to consider the effect of each tree species in biodiversity and conservation studies of lichens.

Vorheriger Artikel The relationship between productivity and multiple aspects of biodiversity in six grassland communities

Nächster Artikel How ethnobotany can aid biodiversity conservation: reflections on investigations in the semi-arid region of NE Brazil

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Adams DB, Risser PG (1971) Some factors influencing the frequency of bark lichens in north central Oklahoma. Am J Bot 58:752–757. doi:10.2307/2441473 CrossRef

Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) 2nd international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281

Aude E, Poulsen RS (2000) Influence of management on the species composition of epiphytic cryptogams in Danish Fagus forests. Appl Veg Sci 3:81–88. doi:10.2307/1478921 CrossRef

Axelsson AL, Östlund L (2001) Retrospective gap analysis in a Swedish boreal forest landscape using historical data. For Ecol Manage 147:109–122CrossRef

Barkman JJ (1958) Phytosociology and ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes. Van Gorcum, Assen

Bates JW (1992) Influence of chemical and physical factors on Quercus and Fraxinus epiphytes at Loch Sunart, western Scotland: a multivariate analysis. J Ecol 80:163–179. doi:10.2307/2261073 CrossRef

Bates JW, Brown DH (1981) Epiphyte differentiation between Quercus petraea and Fraxinus excelsior trees in a maritime area of South West England. Vegetatio 48:61–70. doi:10.1007/BF00117362 CrossRef

Belinchón R, Martínez I, Escudero A et al (2007) Edge effects on epiphytic communities in a Mediterranean Quercus pyrenaica forest. J Veg Sci 18:81–90. doi:10.1658/1100-9233(2007)18[81:EEOECI]2.0.CO;2 CrossRef

Berg Å, Gärdenfors U, Hallingbäck T et al (2002) Habitat preferences of red-listed fungi and bryophytes in woodland key habitats in southern Sweden—analyses of data from a national survey. Biodivers Conserv 11:1479–1503. doi:10.1023/A:1016271823892 CrossRef

Boudreault C, Gauthier S, Bergeron Y (2000) Epiphytic lichens and bryophytes on Populus tremuloides along a chronosequence in the southwestern boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. Bryologist 103:725–738. doi:10.1639/0007-2745(2000)103[0725:ELABOP]2.0.CO;2 CrossRef

Brodo IM (1961) A study of lichen ecology in central Long Island, New York. Am Midl Nat 65:290–310. doi:10.2307/2422957 CrossRef

Brodo IM (1973) Substrate ecology. In: Ahmadjian V, Hale ME (eds) The lichens. Academic Press, New York, pp 401–441

Brown PM, Cook B (2006) Early settlement forest structure in Black Hills ponderosa pine forests. For Ecol Manage 1–3:284–290CrossRef

Burgaz AR, Fuertes E, Escudero A (1994) Ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes and their communities in deciduous forests in mediterranean Spain. Vegetatio 112:73–86. doi:10.1007/BF00045101 CrossRef

Cáceres MES, Lücking R, Rambold G (2007) Phorophyte specificity and environmental parameters versus stochasticity as determinants for species composition of corticolous crustose lichen communities in the Atlantic rain forest of northeastern Brazil. Mycol Prog 6:117–136. doi:10.1007/s11557-007-0532-2 CrossRef

Coote L, Smith GF, Kelly DL et al (2007) Epiphytes of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) plantations in Ireland and the effects of open spaces. Biodivers Conserv 16:4009–4024. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9203-5 CrossRef

Culberson WL (1955) The corticolous communities of lichens and bryophytes in the upland forests of northern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 25:215–231. doi:10.2307/1943551 CrossRef

Diekmann M (1994) Deciduous forest vegetation in Boreo-nemoral Scandinavia. Acta Phytogeogr Suec 80:1–112

Diekmann M (1996) Ecological behaviour of deciduous hardwood trees in Boreo-nemoral Sweden in relation to light and soil conditions. For Ecol Manag 86:1–14CrossRef

Du Rietz GE (1945) Om fattigbark-och rikbarksamhällen. Sven Bot Tidskr 39:147–150

EC (1992) Council directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Off J Eur Community L206:7–50

Ellenberg H (1979) Zeigerwerte der Gefässpflanzen Mitteleuropas, 2nd edn. Scripta Geobot 9:1–121

Ellis CJ, Coppins BJ (2006) Contrasting functional traits maintain lichen epiphyte diversity in response to climate and autogenic succession. J Biogeogr 33:1643–1656. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01522.x CrossRef

Ellis CJ, Coppins BJ (2007a) 19th century woodland structure controls stand-scale epiphyte diversity in present-day Scotland. Divers Distrib 13:84–91

Ellis CJ, Coppins BJ (2007b) Reproductive strategy and the compositional dynamics of crustose lichen communities on aspen (Populus tremula L.) in Scotland. Lichenologist 39:377–391. doi:10.1017/S0024282907006937 CrossRef

Emborg J (1998) Understorey light conditions and regeneration with respect to the structural dynamics of a near-natural temperate deciduous forest in Denmark. For Ecol Manage 106:83–95CrossRef

Esseen P-A, Ehnström B, Ericson L et al (1997) Boreal forests. Ecol Bull 46:16–47

Farmer AM, Bates JW, Bell JNB (1991) Comparisons of three woodland sites in NW Britain differing in richness of the epiphytic Lobarion pulmonariae community and levels of wet acidic deposition. Holarct Ecol 14:85–91

Frahm J-P (2003) Climatic habitat differences of epiphytic lichens and bryophytes. Cryptogam Bryol 24:3–14

Giordani P (2006) Variables influencing the distribution of epiphytic lichens in heterogeneous areas: a case study for Liguria, NW Italy. J Veg Sci 17:195–206. doi:10.1658/1100-9233(2006)17[195:VITDOE]2.0.CO;2 CrossRef

Gustafsson L, Eriksson I (1995) Factors of importance for the epiphytic vegetation of aspen Populus tremula with special emphasis on bark chemistry and soil chemistry. J Appl Ecol 32:412–424. doi:10.2307/2405107 CrossRef

Hager H, Schume H (2001) The floodplain forests along the Austrian Danube. In: Klimo E, Hager H (eds) The floodplain forests in Europe. Current situation and perspectives. European Forest Institute Research Report 10, Brill, Leiden, pp 83–100

Hawksworth DL (2002) Bioindication: calibrated scales and their utility. In: Nimis PL, Scheidegger C, Wolseley PA (eds) Monitoring with lichens—monitoring lichens. Proceedings of the NATO advanced research workshop on lichen monitoring, Wales, United Kingdom, 16–23 August 2000. Nato science series IV: earth and environmental sciences, vol 7. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 11–20

Hedenås H, Ericson L (2000) Epiphytic macrolichens as conservation indicators: successional sequence in Populus tremula stands. Biol Conserv 93:43–53. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00113-5 CrossRef

Hong WS, Glime JM (1997) Comparison of phorophyte communities on three major tree species on Ramsay Island, Queen Charlotte Islands, Canada: bryophyte vs lichen dominance. Lindbergia 22:21–30

Humphrey JW, Davey S, Peace AJ et al (2002) Lichens and bryophyte communities of planted and semi-natural forests in Britain: the influence of site type, stand structure and deadwood. Biol Conserv 107:165–180. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00057-5 CrossRef

Hyvärinen M, Halonen P, Kauppi M (1992) Influence of stand age and structure on the epiphytic lichen vegetation in the middle-boreal forests of Finland. Lichenologist 24:165–180

Insarov G, Schroeter B (2002) Lichen monitoring and climate change. In: Nimis PL, Scheidegger C, Wolseley PA (eds) Monitoring with lichens—monitoring lichens. Proceedings of the NATO advanced research workshop on lichen monitoring, Wales, United Kingdom, 16–23 August 2000. Nato science series IV: earth and environmental sciences, vol 7. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 183–201

Johansson P, Rydin H, Thor G (2007) Tree age relationships with epiphytic lichen diversity and lichen life history traits on ash in southern Sweden. Ecoscience 14:81–91. doi:10.2980/1195-6860(2007)14[81:TARWEL]2.0.CO;2 CrossRef

Jovan S, McCune B (2004) Regional variation in epiphytic macrolichen communities in northern and central California forests. Bryologist 107:328–339. doi:10.1639/0007-2745(2004)107[0328:RVIEMC]2.0.CO;2 CrossRef

Jüriado I (2007) Diversity of lichen species in Estonia: influence of regional and local factors. Dissertationes Biologicae Universitatis Tartuensis, vol 131. Tartu University Press, Tartu, pp 1–170

Jüriado I, Paal J, Liira J (2003) Epiphytic and epixylic lichen species diversity in Estonian natural forests. Biodivers Conserv 12:1587–1607. doi:10.1023/A:1023645730446 CrossRef

Kantvilas G, Jarman SJ (2004) Lichens and bryophytes on Eucalyptus obliqua in Tasmania: management implications in production forests. Biol Conserv 117:359–373. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.08.001 CrossRef

Keskkonnaministri määrus nr 51 (2004) III kaitsekategooria liikide kaitse alla võtmine (Decree of Estonian Minister of Environment no. 51. 19.05.2004). Riigi Teataja Lisa 27.05.2004, 69:1134

Klimo E, Hager H (2001) Executive summary. In: Klimo E, Hager H (eds) The floodplain forests in Europe. Current situation and perspectives. European Forest Institute Research Report 10. Brill, Leiden, pp vii–xi

Kricke R (2002) Measuring bark pH. In: Nimis PL, Scheidegger C, Wolseley PA (eds) Monitoring with lichens—monitoring lichens. Proceedings of the NATO advanced research workshop on lichen monitoring, Wales, United Kingdom, 16–23 August 2000. Nato science series IV: earth and environmental sciences, vol 7. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 333–336

Kuusinen M (1995) Epiphytic lichen diversity on Salix caprea and Populus tremula in old-growth forests of Finland. In: Scheidegger C, Wolseley PA, Thor G (eds) Conservation biology of lichenised fungi. Mitt Eidgenöss Forsch anst Wald, Schnee Landsc, vol 70. Birmensdorf, pp 125–132

Kuusinen M (1996) Epiphyte flora and diversity on basal trunks of six old-growth forest tree species in southern and middle boreal Finland. Lichenologist 28:443–463. doi:10.1006/lich.1996.0043 CrossRef

Laasimer L, Masing V (1995) Taimestik ja taimkate. In: Raukas A (ed) Eesti Loodus. Valgus & Eesti Entsüklopeediakirjastus, Tallinn, pp 364–401

Leht M (ed) (2007) Eesti taimede määraja. EMÜ Põllumajandus- ja keskkonnainstituut, Eesti Loodusfoto, Tartu

Liira J, Sepp T, Parrest O (2007) The forest structure and ecosystem quality in conditions of anthropogenic disturbance along productivity gradient. For Ecol Manage 250:34–46CrossRef

Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW et al (1996) SAS® system for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc, Cary

Lõhmus A (2002) The lack of old-growth forest—a threat to Estonian biodiversity. Proc Estonian Acad Sci Biol Ecol 51:138–144

Löbel S, Snäll T, Rydin H (2006) Species richness patterns and metapopulation processes—evidence from epiphyte communities in boreo-nemoral forests. Ecography 29:169–182. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04348.x CrossRef

McCune B (1993) Gradients in epiphyte biomass in three Pseudotsuga-Tsuga forests of different ages in western Oregon and Washington. Bryologist 96:405–411. doi:10.2307/3243870 CrossRef

McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 4. Mjm Software Design, Gleneden Beach

McCune B, Dey J, Peck J et al (1997) Regional gradients in lichen communities of the southeast United States. Bryologist 100:145–158

Meier E, Paal J, Liira J, Jüriado I (2005) Influence of tree stand age and management on the species diversity in Estonian eutrophic alvar and boreonemoral Pinus sylvestris forests. Scand J For Res 20:135–144. doi:10.1080/14004080510042155 CrossRef

Mielke PW Jr (1984) Meteorological applications of permutation techniques based on distance functions. In: Krishnaiah PR, Sen PK (eds) Handbook of statistics, vol 4. Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, pp 813–830

Mistry J, Berardi A (2005) Effects of phorophyte determinants on lichen abundance in the cerrado of central Brazil. Plant Ecol 178:61–76. doi:10.1007/s11258-004-2493-8 CrossRef

Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

Moe B, Botnen A (1997) A quantitative study of the epiphytic vegetation on pollarded trunks of Fraxinus excelsior at Havrå Osterøy, western Norway. Plant Ecol 129:157–177. doi:10.1023/A:1009720132726 CrossRef

Nilsson C (1992a) Conservation management of riparian communities. In: Hansson L (ed) Ecological principles of nature conservation. Conservation ecology series: principles, practices and management. Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp 352–372

Nilsson SG (1992b) Forests in the temperate-boreal transition—natural and man-made features. In: Hansson L (ed) Ecological principles of nature conservation. Conservation ecology series: principles, practices and management. Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp 373–393

Oksanen J (1988) Impact of habitat, substrate and microsite classes on the epiphyte vegetation: interpretation using exploratory and canonical correspondence analysis. Ann Bot Fenn 25:59–71

Paal J, Rooma I, Jeletsky E-M (2006) Typology and soils of the Estonian floodplain forests. In: Kurm M (ed) Forestry studies, vol 44. Eesti Loodusfoto, Tartu, pp 20–41

Paal J, Rannik R, Jeletsky E-M et al (2007) Floodplain forests in Estonia: typological diversity and growth conditions. Folia Geobot 42:383–400. doi:10.1007/BF02861701 CrossRef

Pharo EJ, Beattie AJ (2002) The association between substrate variability and bryophyte and lichen diversity in eastern Australian forests. Bryologist 105:11–26. doi:10.1639/0007-2745(2002)105[0011:TABSVA]2.0.CO;2 CrossRef

Price K, Hochachka G (2001) Epiphytic lichen abundance: effects of stand age and composition in coastal British Columbia. Ecol Appl 11:904–913. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0904:ELAEOS]2.0.CO;2 CrossRef

Pykälä J (2004) Effects of new forestry practices on rare epiphytic macrolichens. Conserv Biol 18:831–838. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00210.x CrossRef

Randlane T, Saag A (eds) (1999) Second checklist of lichenized, lichenicolous and allied fungi of Estonia. Folia Cryptog Estonica 35:1–132

Randlane T, Saag A, Suija A (2007) Lichenized, lichenicolous and allied fungi of Estonia. http://www.ut.ee/lichens/fce.html. Cited 11 Nov 2007

Randlane T, Jüriado I, Suija A et al (2008) Lichens in the new red data list of Estonia. Folia Cryptog Estonica 44:113–120

Ranius T, Johansson P, Berg N et al (2008) The influence of tree age and microhabitat quality on the occurrence of crustose lichens associated with old oaks. J Veg Sci 19:653–662CrossRef

Rose F (1992) Temperate forest management: its effects on bryophyte and lichen floras and habitats. In: Bates JW, Farmer AM (eds) Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 211–233

Sander E (1999) Comparison of the lichen flora of different broad-leaved trees in Estonia. Folia Cryptog Estonica 34:65–69

SAS Institute Inc (1989) SAS/STAT® user’s guide, ver 6, vol 2, 4th edn. SAS Institute Inc, Cary

Schmidt J, Kricke R, Feige GB (2001) Measurements of bark pH with a modified flathead electrode. Lichenologist 33:456–460. doi:10.1006/lich.2001.0341 CrossRef

Shao J (1997) An asymptotic theory for linear model selection. Stat Sin 7:221–264

Sõmermaa A (1972) Ecology of epiphytic lichens in main Estonian forest types. Scr Mycol 4:1–117

StatSoft, Inc (2005) Statistica for windows, ver 7.1. StatSoft, Inc, Tulsa

ter Braak CJF (1988) Partial canonical correspondence analysis. In: Bock HH (ed) Classification and related methods of data analysis. Elsevier Science Publisher, Amsterdam, pp 551–558

ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide. Biometris, Wageningen

Thor G (1998) Red-listed lichens in Sweden: habitats, threats, protection, and indicator value in boreal coniferous forests. Biodivers Conserv 7:59–72. doi:10.1023/A:1008807729048 CrossRef

Vabariigi Valitsuse määrus nr 195 (2004) I ja II kaitsekategooriana kaitse alla võetavate liikide loetelu (Decree of the Estonian Government no. 195. 20.05.2004). Riigi Teataja I 21.05.2004, 44:313

Will-Wolf S, Esseen P-A, Neitlich P (2002) Monitoring biodiversity and ecosystem function: forests. In: Nimis PL, Scheidegger C, Wolseley PA (eds) Monitoring with lichens—monitoring lichens. Proceedings of the NATO advanced research workshop on lichen monitoring, Wales, United Kingdom, 16–23 August 2000. Nato science series IV: earth and environmental sciences, vol 7. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 203–222

Will-Wolf S, Geiser LH, Neitlich P et al (2006) Forest lichen communities and environment—how consistent are relationships across scales? J Veg Sci 17:171–184. doi:10.1658/1100-9233(2006)17[171:FLCAEC]2.0.CO;2 CrossRef

Yarraton GA (1972) Distribution and succession of epiphytic lichens on black spruce near Cochrane, Ontario. Bryologist 75:462–480. doi:10.2307/3241203 CrossRef

Titel: Tree and stand level variables influencing diversity of lichens on temperate broad-leaved trees in boreo-nemoral floodplain forests
verfasst von: Inga Jüriado
Jaan Liira
Jaanus Paal
Ave Suija
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2009
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Biodiversity and Conservation / Ausgabe 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0960-3115
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9710
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9460-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2009

Seasonal fluctuations in butterflies and nectar resources in a semi-natural grassland near Mt. Fuji, central Japan

Biodiversity response to experimental induced hypoxic-anoxic conditions in seagrass sediments

Determinants of species richness patterns in the Netherlands across multiple taxonomic groups

Diatoms: unicellular surrogates for macroalgal community structure in streams?

Spatial variability in woody species richness along altitudinal gradient in a lowland-dryland site, Lokapel Turkana, Kenya

Cultivating participatory policy processes for genetic resources policy: lessons from the Genetic Resources Policy Initiative (GRPI) project