Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 1/2010

01.08.2010

Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What do we Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency?

verfasst von: Päivi Myllykangas, Johanna Kujala, Hanna Lehtimäki

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Sonderheft 1/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This article contributes to the body of stakeholder literature by providing an in-depth analysis of the dynamics of stakeholder relationships as a part of change in value creation. The article presents an argument that the stakeholder salience model as a tool for analyzing stakeholder relationships is not sufficient for understanding business value creation. In the recent stakeholder literature, understanding business value creation has become an important theme. Through an analysis of an empirical case, the article shows how the three stakeholder relationship attributes, legitimacy, power and urgency help to reveal the definitive stakeholders and to capture dynamics of stakeholder relations. However, in the case of strategic change, where the value creation of a firm is in transition, a more profound understanding of stakeholder relationships is needed. As a result of our empirical analysis, six characteristics of stakeholder relationships were identified. To conclude, the question of who and what really counts should be replaced by the question of how value is created in stakeholder relationships.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J., & Oijala, T. (2008). Stakeholder salience in global projects. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 509–516.CrossRef Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J., & Oijala, T. (2008). Stakeholder salience in global projects. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 509–516.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barringer, B. R., & Harrison, J. S. (2000). Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management and Governance, 9, 5–32. Barringer, B. R., & Harrison, J. S. (2000). Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management and Governance, 9, 5–32.
Zurück zum Zitat Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2009). Stakeholder prioritization and reporting: Evidence from Italy and the US. Accounting Forum, 33(2), 162–175.CrossRef Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2009). Stakeholder prioritization and reporting: Evidence from Italy and the US. Accounting Forum, 33(2), 162–175.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Calton, J. M., & Payne, S. L. (2003). Coping with paradox. Business and Society, 42, 7–42.CrossRef Calton, J. M., & Payne, S. L. (2003). Coping with paradox. Business and Society, 42, 7–42.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Co, H. C., & Barro, F. (2009). Stakeholder theory and dynamics in supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(6), 591–611.CrossRef Co, H. C., & Barro, F. (2009). Stakeholder theory and dynamics in supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(6), 591–611.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Vries, J. (2009). Assessing inventory projects from a stakeholder perspective: Results of an empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(1), 136–145.CrossRef de Vries, J. (2009). Assessing inventory projects from a stakeholder perspective: Results of an empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(1), 136–145.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1–28). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1–28). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Dyer, J. F., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679. Dyer, J. F., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.
Zurück zum Zitat Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8), 765–781.CrossRef Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8), 765–781.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pittman. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pittman.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J., & Wicks, A. (2007). Managing for stakeholders. Survival, reputation, and success. London: Yale University Press. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J., & Wicks, A. (2007). Managing for stakeholders. Survival, reputation, and success. London: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. E., & Liedtka, J. (1997). Stakeholder capitalism and the value chain. European Management Journal, 15(3), 286–296.CrossRef Freeman, R. E., & Liedtka, J. (1997). Stakeholder capitalism and the value chain. European Management Journal, 15(3), 286–296.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.CrossRef Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 1–21.CrossRef Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 1–21.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.
Zurück zum Zitat Goyder, M. (1999). Value and values: Lessons for tomorrow’s company. Long Range Planning, 32(2), 217–224.CrossRef Goyder, M. (1999). Value and values: Lessons for tomorrow’s company. Long Range Planning, 32(2), 217–224.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harvey, B., & Schaefer, A. (2001). Managing relationships with environmental stakeholders: A study of U. K. water and electricity utilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(3), 243–260.CrossRef Harvey, B., & Schaefer, A. (2001). Managing relationships with environmental stakeholders: A study of U. K. water and electricity utilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(3), 243–260.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.CrossRef Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jawahar, I. M., & Mclaughlin, G. L. (2001). Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life-cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 397–414. Jawahar, I. M., & Mclaughlin, G. L. (2001). Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life-cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 397–414.
Zurück zum Zitat Kyngäs, H., & Vanhanen, L. (1999). Sisällön analyysi. Hoitotiede, 11, 3–12. Kyngäs, H., & Vanhanen, L. (1999). Sisällön analyysi. Hoitotiede, 11, 3–12.
Zurück zum Zitat Magness, V. (2008). Who are the stakeholders now? An empirical examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood theory of stakeholder salience. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 177–192.CrossRef Magness, V. (2008). Who are the stakeholders now? An empirical examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood theory of stakeholder salience. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 177–192.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. (1982). Tracking strategy in an entrepreneurial company. Academy of Management Journal, 25(3), 465–499.CrossRef Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. (1982). Tracking strategy in an entrepreneurial company. Academy of Management Journal, 25(3), 465–499.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Zurück zum Zitat Näsi, J. (1995). What is stakeholder thinking? In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 19–32). Jyväskylä: Gummerus. Näsi, J. (1995). What is stakeholder thinking? In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 19–32). Jyväskylä: Gummerus.
Zurück zum Zitat Neill, J. D., & Stovall, O. S. (2005). Stakeholder salience and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from three companies. Journal of Applied Business Research, 21(3), 71–78. Neill, J. D., & Stovall, O. S. (2005). Stakeholder salience and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from three companies. Journal of Applied Business Research, 21(3), 71–78.
Zurück zum Zitat Neville, B., & Menguc, B. (2006). Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 377–391.CrossRef Neville, B., & Menguc, B. (2006). Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 377–391.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pajunen, K. (2006). Living in agreement with a contract: The management of moral and viable firm-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(3), 243–258.CrossRef Pajunen, K. (2006). Living in agreement with a contract: The management of moral and viable firm-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(3), 243–258.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Parent, M., & Deephouse, D. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 1–23.CrossRef Parent, M., & Deephouse, D. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 1–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45, 6–28. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45, 6–28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramírez, R. (1999). Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practise and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 49–65.CrossRef Ramírez, R. (1999). Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practise and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 49–65.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910. Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowley, T. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204–219. Rowley, T. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204–219.
Zurück zum Zitat Svendsen, A., Boutlier, R., Abbott, R., & Wheeler, D. (2002). Measuring the business value of stakeholder relationships. Vancouver: The Centre for Innovation in Management, Simon Fraser University. Svendsen, A., Boutlier, R., Abbott, R., & Wheeler, D. (2002). Measuring the business value of stakeholder relationships. Vancouver: The Centre for Innovation in Management, Simon Fraser University.
Zurück zum Zitat Tuomi, J., & Sarajärvi, A. (2006). Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi. Jyväskylä: Gummerus. Tuomi, J., & Sarajärvi, A. (2006). Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi. Jyväskylä: Gummerus.
Zurück zum Zitat Wheeler, D., & Davies, R. (2004). Gaining goodwill: Developing stakeholder approaches to corporate governance. Journal of General Management, 30, 51–74. Wheeler, D., & Davies, R. (2004). Gaining goodwill: Developing stakeholder approaches to corporate governance. Journal of General Management, 30, 51–74.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research. Design and methods (Revised ed.). London: Sage. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research. Design and methods (Revised ed.). London: Sage.
Metadaten
Titel
Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What do we Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency?
verfasst von
Päivi Myllykangas
Johanna Kujala
Hanna Lehtimäki
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2010
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0945-3

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2010

Journal of Business Ethics 1/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner