nach oben

Journal of Business Ethics

Erschienen in:

01.03.2014

Competitiveness and Legitimation: The Logic of Companies going Green in Geographical Clusters

verfasst von: Javier Martínez-del-Río, José Céspedes-Lorente

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study analyzes the logic behind the development of environmental responsiveness in companies that are located in geographical clusters. Drawing on previous research, we contend that competitiveness and legitimation are important sources of variation in these companies’ environmental responses. In particular, the companies’ perceived rivalry, competition tracking capabilities, interaction with industry associations and network embeddedness influence their competitiveness and legitimation motivations for environmental responsiveness. We used structural equation modeling to test these hypotheses on a sample of 251-clustered agricultural firms in Spain. The results support the hypotheses and provide a number of insights about the underlying motivations behind going green in geographical clusters.

Vorheriger Artikel The Influence of an Observer’s Value Orientation and Personality Type on Attitudes Toward Whistleblowing

Nächster Artikel Erratum to: Competitiveness and Legitimation: The Logic of Companies Going Green in Geographical Clusters

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

In this paper, we focus on competitiveness and legitimacy motivations. Ecological responsibility can be defined as “the concern that a firm has for its social obligations and values” (Bansal and Roth 2000, p. 728). Ecological responsibility is a rather endogenous motivation, being frequently originated by a leader or other internal forces. This fact explains why these firms tend to follow independent strategies rather than mimicking others. Competitiveness and legitimation, however, are induced by external factors to a greater extent. For this reason, although ecological responsibility might be present in many clustered firms, the potential of geographical clusters to enhance it is arguably lower than the potential to enhance competitiveness and legitimation.

We included organizations with ten or more employees to generate a larger sample size and because the industry experts noted that there were no problems with this threshold during the pretests. We replicated the proposed model, eliminating the firms with less than 15 and less than 20 employees (e.g., Kotey and Slade 2005). We obtained similar results in both cases, and the hypotheses that were confirmed with the current sample were also confirmed with smaller samples. The results are available upon request.

Aldrich, H., Rosen, B., & Woodward, W. (1987). The impact of social networks on business foundings and profit: A longitudinal study. In N. C. Churchill et al. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 154–168). Wellesley, MA: Center for Entrepreneurial Studies, Babson College.

Anderson, J., & Gerbing, C. (1998). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–435.CrossRef

Aragon-Correa, J. A. (1998). Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 556–568.CrossRef

Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3), 459–490.CrossRef

Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.CrossRef

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRef

Baum, J. C., & Mezias, S. J. (1992). Localized competition and organizational failure in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 580–605.CrossRef

Bell, G. (2005). Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 287–296.CrossRef

Bengtsson, M., & Sölvell, Ö. (2004). Climate of competition, clusters and innovative performance. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20(2), 225–244.CrossRef

Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126.CrossRef

Boari, C., Odorici, V., & Zamarian, M. (2003). Clusters and rivalry: Does localization really matter? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 19(4), 467–489.CrossRef

Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement—A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305–314.CrossRef

Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–365.CrossRef

Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2002). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(3), 453–470.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 95–120.CrossRef

Collins, C., & Clark, K. D. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 740–751.CrossRef

Cooke, J. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters and the knowledge economy. Industrial & Corporate Change, 10, 945–974.CrossRef

Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (1994). Growth regions under duress: Renewal strategies in Baden-Wurttemberg and Emilia-Romagna. In A. Amin & N. Thrift (Eds.), Globalization, institutions and regional development in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75–87.CrossRef

DeCarolis, D. M., & Deeds, D. L. (1999). The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 953–968.

Dess, G. G., Newport, S., & Rasheed, A. (1993). Configuration research in strategic management: Key issues and suggestions. Journal of Management, 19, 775–795.CrossRef

DiMaggio, P. J., & y Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 147–160.CrossRef

Dixon-Fowler, H., Slater, D. J., Johnson, J. L., Ellstrand, A. E., & Romi, A. M. (2013). Beyond ‘‘does it pay to be green?’’ A meta-analysis of moderators of the CEP–CFP relationship. Journal Business Ethics, 112(2), 353–366.CrossRef

Feldman, M. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (1999). Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review, 43(2), 409–423.CrossRef

Galdeano-Gomez, E., Cespedes-Lorente, J., & Martinez-del-Rio, J. (2008). Environmental performance and spillover effects on productivity: Evidence from horticultural firms. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 1552–1561.CrossRef

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1999). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Hambrick, D. C. (1983). High profit strategies in mature capital goods industries: A contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 687–707.CrossRef

Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.

Hart, S. L. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 66–76.

Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1996). The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 381–395.CrossRef

Hill, C. W. (1997). Establishing a standard: Competitive strategy and technological standards in winner-take-all industries. The Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005), 7–25.

Hoffman, Andrew. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371.CrossRef

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015–1052.

King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698–717.CrossRef

Kotey, B., & Slade, P. (2005). Formal human resource management in small growing firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 43, 16–40.

Lahdesmaki, M., & Suutari, T. (2012). Keeping at arm’s length or searching for social proximity? Corporate social responsibility as a reciprocal process between small businesses and the local community. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 481–493.CrossRef

Lenox, M. J., & Nash, J. (2003). Industry self-regulation and adverse selection: A comparison across four trade association programs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(6), 343–356.CrossRef

Marcus, A., Aragon-Correa, J., & Pinske, J. (2011). Firms, regulatory uncertainty, and the natural environment. California Management Review, 54, 1–17.

Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics (8th ed. 1920: 1st ed. 1890). London: English Language Book Society.

Mazzanti, A., & Zoboli, R. (2006). Economic instruments and induced innovation. The European policies on end of life vehicles. Ecological Economics, 58(4), 867–896.CrossRef

McEvily, B., & Marcus, A. (2005). Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1033–1055.CrossRef

McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1133–1158.CrossRef

Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Ozanne, L. (2010). The interactive effect of internal and external factors on a proactive environmental strategy and its influence on a firm’s performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 279–298.

Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., & Pfeffer, J. (1974). Organization-environment: Concepts and issues. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Industrial Relations, University of California.

Miller, D. (1987). The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 55–77.CrossRef

Min-Dong, P. L. (2011). Configuration of external influences: The combined effects of institutions and stakeholders on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 281–298.CrossRef

Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.

Molina-Morales, F. X. (2005). The territorial agglomerations of firms: A social capital perspective from the Spanish tile industry. Growth and Change, 36, 74–99.CrossRef

Molina-Morales, F. X., & Martínez-Fernández, M. T. (2009). Too much love in the neighborhood can hurt: How an excess of intensity and trust in relationships may produce negative effects on firms. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1013–1023.CrossRef

O’Neill, H. M., Pouder, R. W., & Buchholtz, A. K. (1998). Patterns in the diffusion of strategies across organizations: Insights from the innovation diffusion literature. Academy of Management Review, 23, 98–120.

Ozen, S., & Kusku, F. (2009). Corporate environmental citizenship variation in developing countries: An institutional framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 297–313.CrossRef

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Lee, L. Y. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRef

Porac, J., Thomas, H., Wilson, F., Paton, D., & Kanfer, A. (1995). Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 203–227.CrossRef

Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.

Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 82, 76–85.

Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15–34.CrossRef

Pouder, R., & St. John, C. H. (1996). Hot spots and blind spots: Geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1192–1225.

Rodan, S., & Galunic, C. (2004). More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3), 541–562.CrossRef

Roxas, B., & Coetzer, A. (2012). Institutional environment, managerial attitudes and environmental sustainability orientation of small firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 461–476. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1211-z.CrossRef

Rushton, B. (1993). How protecting the environment impacts R&D in the United States. Research Technology Management., 36(3), 13–22.

Russo, M. V. (2003). The emergence of sustainable industries: Building on natural capital. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 317–331.CrossRef

Sabel, C. (1993). Constitutional ordering in historical context. In F. Scharpf (Ed.), Games in hierarchies and networks. Frankfurt: Campus.

Satorra, A. and Bentler, P.M. (1988). Scaling corrections for Chi square statistics in covariance structure analysis. ASA proceedings, business and economic statistics section (pp. 308–313). Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.

Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Solomon, B. D., & Mihelchic, J. R. (2001). Environmental management codes and continuous environmental improvements: Insights from the chemical industry. Business Strategy and the Environment., 10(4), 215–224.CrossRef

Suchman, M.C. (1994). On advice of Counsel: Law firms and venture capital funds as information intermediaries in the structuration of Silicon Valley. Doctoral Dissertation Stanford University.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 20(3), 571–610.

Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2004). Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 258–271.

Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.CrossRef

Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G., & Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of Environmental Behaviour in Manufacturing SMEs and the Implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 317–330.CrossRef

Zaheer, A., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic Management Journal, 16(5), 373–393.CrossRef

Zahra, S., & Covin, J. (1995). Contextual Influence on the Corporate Entrepreneurship-Performance Relationship. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 43–58.CrossRef

Titel: Competitiveness and Legitimation: The Logic of Companies going Green in Geographical Clusters
verfasst von: Javier Martínez-del-Río
José Céspedes-Lorente
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2014
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1636-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

The Influence of Decision Frames and Vision Priming on Decision Outcomes in Work Groups: Motivating Stakeholder Considerations

Transformational Leadership and Follower’s Unethical Behavior for the Benefit of the Company: A Two-Study Investigation

‘Cursed’ Communities? Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Company Towns and the Mining Industry in Namibia

Sweet Little Lies: Social Context and the Use of Deception in Negotiation

Hang on to Your Ego: The Moderating Role of Leader Narcissism on Relationships Between Leader Charisma and Follower Psychological Empowerment and Moral Identity

The Influence of an Observer’s Value Orientation and Personality Type on Attitudes Toward Whistleblowing

Premium Partner