nach oben

Journal of Business Ethics

Erschienen in:

01.12.2014

Exploring Political Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Supply Chains

verfasst von: Julia Patrizia Rotter, Peppi-Emilia Airike, Cecilia Mark-Herbert

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Businesses increasingly assume political roles, despite issues of legitimacy. The presented two case studies illustrate how businesses harness their political influence in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices through collaboration and dialog with stakeholders and civil society actors. These cases are set around issues arising in global supply chains in sourcing activities where the core problem is associated with businesses managing extended responsibilities under conflicting institutional conditions. The article seeks to provide empirical examples of Political CSR and illustrates the role of deliberative democracy in contemporary business behavior. It adopts a Western business perspective, more specifically from an end-producer and retailer’s standpoint. Findings suggest that civil society is influential in driving these businesses to act responsibly. Joint collaboration is understood as key to strive toward holistic solutions. Political CSR theory remains an ideal, but offers fruitful grounds for speculating on what the political role of business is or could be and how this translates into pragmatic implications for businesses.

Vorheriger Artikel The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Commitment: Exploring Multiple Mediation Mechanisms

Nächster Artikel Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

According to the Linneaus (1758) taxonomy, prawns are classified as “insecta,” so technically crustacean, such as tiger shrimp, are not fish, but treated as such within the fish category of a food retailer.

1 SEK ≈ 0.156652 USD.

The data do not reveal the impact of fluctuations of the price of tiger shrimp, given that it represents value not volume.

Facilitator: RESOLVE. Businesses: Intel, Motorola Solutions, Nokia, Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard Company, AT&T, Sony, Toshiba, Advanced Micro Devices, Ford Motor Company, Verizon Communications, H.C. Starck, Research in Motion, General Electric, DELL, Telefonica, Sprint, Qualcomm. Civil society actors: Responsible Sourcing Network (RSN), Enough Project, Partnership Africa Canada, Pact, Jewish World Watch. Industry associations: Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition (EICC), iTSCi Secretariat, Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI), World Gold Council. Governmental and intergovernmental agencies: US Department of State, US Agency for International Development (USAID), International Conference on the Great Lakes Region (ICGLR) (RESOLVE 2013).

Consisting of the following eleven states: Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, Republic of Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Sudan, Tanzania, and Zambia.

Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54, 421–456.CrossRef

Agle, B., Mitchell, R., & Sonnenfeldt, J. (1999). Who matters for CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance and CEO values. The Academy of Management Journal, 42, 507–525.CrossRef

Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863.CrossRef

Albareda, L. (2008). Corporate responsibility, governance and accountability: From self-regulation to co-regulation. Corporate Governance, 8, 430–439.CrossRef

Axfood. (2010). Financial report. Available at: http://ir.myreport.se/show/axfood/show.asp?pid=135333910008&page=18. Accessed 26 February 2013.

Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34, 51–79.CrossRef

Banerjee, S. B. (2010). Governing the global corporation: A critical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 265–274.CrossRef

Begg, D., Fischer, S., & Dornbusch, R. (2003). Foundations of economics (2nd ed.). Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education Ltd.

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books.

Boatright, J. R. (2003). Ethics and the conduct of business (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.

Bohm, D. (1998). On dialogue. San Francisco: Harper.

Bonnafous-Boucher, M., & Porcher, S. (2010). Towards a stakeholder society: Stakeholder theory vs theory of civil society. European Management Review, 7, 205–216.CrossRef

BSR—Business for Social Responsibility. (2010). Conflict minerals and the Democratic Republic of Congo—Responsible action in supply chains, government engagement and capacity building. Available at: http://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR_Conflict_Minerals_and_the_DRC.pdf. Accessed 2 August 2013.

Buckley, P. J. (2009). The impact of global factory on economic development. Journal of World Business, 44, 131–143.CrossRef

Calton, J. M., & Payne, S. L. (2003). Coping with paradox, multistakeholder learning dialogue as a pluralist sensemaking process for addressing messy problems. Business and Society, 42, 7–42.CrossRef

Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why should corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946–967.CrossRef

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.

EICC—Electronics Industry Citizenship Coalition. (2012). Minerals extraction. Available at: http://www.eicc.info/tools_and_resources05.shtml. Accessed 26 February 2013.

Crowther, D., & Reis, C. (2011). Social responsibility or social business? Social Business, 1, 129–148.CrossRef

Deetz, S. A. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide (3rd ed.). Berkshire: Open University Press.

Detomasi, D. A. (2007). The multinational corporation and global governance: Modeling global public policy networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 321–334.CrossRef

Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2004). Globalization and corporate social responsibility: How non-governmental organizations influence labor and environmental codes of conduct. Management International Review, 44, 7–29.CrossRef

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.

Dryzek, J. S. (2010). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.

Enough Project. (2009a). A comprehensive approach to Congo’s conflict minerals. Available at: http://www.enoughproject.org/files/Comprehensive-Approach.pdf. Accessed 2 August 2013.

Enough Project. (2009b). Democratic Republic of the Congo—Roots of the crises. Available at: http://www.enoughproject.org/files/pdf/crisis_roots_congo.pdf. Accessed 2 August 2013.

Enough Project. (2012). From Congress to Congo: Turning the tide on conflict minerals, closing loopholes, and empowering miners. Available at: www.enoughproject.org/files/ConflictMinerals_CongoFINAL.pdf. Accessed 7 August 2013.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and freedom: Fortieth anniversary edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef

Garriga, E., & Melé, E. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories. Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.CrossRef

GeSI—Global e-Sustainability Initiative. (2013). Overview. Available at: http://gesi.org/portfolio/project/15. Accessed 26 February 2013.

Global Witness. (2010). A guide for companies. Do no harm—Excluding conflict minerals from the supply chain. Available at: www.globalwitness.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/do_no_harm_global_witness.pdf. Accessed 3 August 2013.

Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R. O., & Slaughter, A.-M. (2000). Introduction: Legalization and world politics. International Organization, 54, 1–15.CrossRef

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press.

Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Abingdon: Routledge.

IUCN—International Union for Conservation of Nature. (2013). Shrimp aquaculture: High value for whom? Available at: https://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/shrimps_shrimp_aquaculture.pdf. Accessed 9 February 2013.

Jewish World Watch. (2013). Conflict minerals. Available at: http://www.jewishworldwatch.org/conflictareas/congo/overview/conflict-minerals. Accessed 26 February 2013.

Kell, G. (2003). The global compact—Origins, operations, progress, challenges. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 11, 35–49.CrossRef

Lehr, A. (2010). Old and new governance approaches to conflict minerals: All are better than one. Harvard International Law Journal, 52, 148–170.

Lenox, M. J., & Nash, J. (2003). Industry self-regulation and adverse selection: A comparison across four trade associations programs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 343–356.CrossRef

Linneaus, C. (1758). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae; secundum classes, ordines genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis (10th ed.). Stockholm: Laurentius Salvius.

Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Towards an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30, 166–179.CrossRef

McElhaney, K. (2008). Just good business; The strategic guide to aligning corporate responsibility and brand. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.

Mena, S., & Palazzo, G. (2012). Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23, 527–556.CrossRef

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRef

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.

Motorola Solutions. (2011). Corporate responsibility report. Available at: http://www.google.se/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CEAQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fresponsibility.motorolasolutions.com%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2FCorporateResponsibilityReport.MG10.pdf&ei=EQkDUs2tH-SI4AT87oCQBQ&usg=AFQjCNFeO5omM76yc1lm88TaD72CHgIjtw&sig2=XZL-Z6gvY-yl3IOx-Cpc0g&bvm=bv.50500085,d.bGE. Accessed 8 August 2013.

Mäkinen, J., & Kourula, A. (2012). Pluralism in political corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 649–678.CrossRef

Naylor, R. L., Goldburg, R. J., Primavera, J., Kautsky, N., Malcolm, C. M., Beveridge, M. C. M., et al. (2001). Effects of Aquaculture on World Fish Supplies. Issues in Ecology, Nr. 8, Winter. ISSN 1092-8987. Available at: http://cfpub.epa.gov/watertrain/pdf/issue8.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2013.

Nielsen Sweden. (2010). Sales statistics for the food retail for 2008. 2009 and 2010 for tiger shrimps. Axfood internal documents and data. Sweden: The Nielsen Company.

PAC—Partnership Africa Canada. (2013). Conflict minerals. Available at: http://www.pacweb.org/en/conflict-minerals#. Accessed 27 February 2013.

Pact. (2013). Pact’s work on conflict minerals in the great lakes region. Available at: http://www.pactworld.org/cs/cce/conflict_minerals. Accessed 26 February 2013.

Palazzo, G., & Richter, U. (2005). CSR business as usual? The Case of the Tobacco Industry’, Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 387–401.CrossRef

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. C. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.

Rasche, A. (2012). Global policies and local practices: Loose and tight couplings in multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 679–708.CrossRef

RESOLVE. (2011). Public private alliance for responsible minerals trade (PPA). Available at: http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/files/2011/09/PPA-Overview-091511.pdf. Accessed 26 February 2013.

RESOLVE. (2013). Participation. Available at: http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/participation. Accessed 26 February 2013.

Risse, T. (2004). Global governance and communicative action. Government and Opposition, 39, 288–313.CrossRef

Robson, C. (2011). Real world research (3rd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

Roloff, J. (2008). Learning from multi-stakeholder networks: Issue-focused stakeholder management. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 233–250.CrossRef

RSN—Responsible Sourcing Network. (2013). What’s needed? An overview of multi-stakeholder and industry activities to achieve conflict free minerals. Available at: http://www.sourcingnetwork.org/storage/Minerals_WP.F_print.pdf. Accessed 8 August 2013.

Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Towards a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096–1120.CrossRef

Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 899–931.CrossRef

SEC—Securities and Exchange Commission. (2012). Final rule: Conflict minerals. Available at: http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2012/34-67716.pdf. Accessed 2 August 2013.

Shelton, D. (Ed.). (2000). Commitment and compliance: The role of non-binding norms in the international legal system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Simons, P. (2004). Corporate voluntarism and human rights: The adequacy and effectiveness of voluntary self-regulation regimes. Industrial Relations, 59, 101–141.CrossRef

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.

Sullivan, R. (2003). Business and human rights, dilemmas and solutions. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

UN—United Nations. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect, and Remedy’ framework. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf. Accessed 2 August 2013.

United States Department of Labor. (2010). Findings on the worst forms of child labor—Thailand, 3 October 2011. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/4e8c399012.html. Accessed 2 August 2013.

Visser, W., Matten, D., Pohl, M., & Tolhurst, N. (2007). The A to Z of corporate social responsibility: A complete reference guide to concepts, codes and organisations. Chichester: Wiley.

Vogel, D. (2007). Private global business regulation. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 261–282.CrossRef

Vogel, D. (2010). The private regulation of global corporate conduct: Achievements and limitations. Business Society, 49, 68–87.CrossRef

Waddell, S. (2003). Global action networks, A global invention helping business make globalisation work for all. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 12, 27–42.CrossRef

Whelan, G. (2012). The political perspective of corporate social responsibility: A critical research agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 709–737.CrossRef

Whitley, R. (2010). The institutional construction of firms. In G. Morgan, J. Campbell, C. Crouch, O. K. Pedersen, & R. Whitley (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis (pp. 453–495). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

World Bank. (2008). Democratic Republic of Congo, growth with governance in the mining sector. Report No. 43402-ZR. Document of the World Bank.

WWF Report. (2011) Sustainability: A blue print for moving towards sustainable tropical shrimp trawl fisheries. Available at: http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/tst_blueprint_august_2011_1.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2013.

WWF—World Wide Fund for Nature. (2013). Tropical shrimp. Available at: http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/footprint/smart_fishing/target_fisheries/tropical_shrimp/. Accessed 26 February 2013.

Yamin, M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). Infrastructure or foreign direct investment? An examination of the implications of MNE strategy for economic development’, Journal of World Business, 44, 144–157.

Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.) London: Sage.

Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

Young, I. M. (2006). Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. Social Philosophy and Policy, 23, 102–130.CrossRef

Titel: Exploring Political Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Supply Chains
verfasst von: Julia Patrizia Rotter
Peppi-Emilia Airike
Cecilia Mark-Herbert
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2014
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1927-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

Perceived Greenwashing: The Interactive Effects of Green Advertising and Corporate Environmental Performance on Consumer Reactions

Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Equity Prices

The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Commitment: Exploring Multiple Mediation Mechanisms

Toward A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship. On Maximizing Versus Satisficing Value Capture

Core Values and Beliefs: A Study of Leading Innovative Organizations

Does the Voluntary Adoption of Corporate Governance Mechanisms Improve Environmental Risk Disclosures? Evidence from Greenhouse Gas Emission Accounting

Premium Partner