Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Business Ethics
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 4/2020

25.04.2019 | Original Paper

Do LGBT Workplace Diversity Policies Create Value for Firms?

verfasst von: Mohammed Hossain, Muhammad Atif, Ammad Ahmed, Lokman Mia

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We show that the U.S. anti-discriminatory laws prohibiting discrimination in the workplace based on sexual orientation and gender identity (i.e. lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) identities) spur innovation, which ultimately leads to higher firm performance. We use the Human Rights Campaign’s Corporate Equality Index (CEI) of 398 (1592 firm-year observations) U.S. firms between 2011 and 2014, and find a significantly positive relationship between CEI and firm innovation. We also find that an interacting effect of CEI and firm innovation leads to higher firm performance. We use our understanding of Rawls’ Theory of Justice and stakeholder theory to show that firms with workplace diversity policies are likely to be more innovative and perform better than those without such policies. Our results are robust to endogeneity, reverse causality and simultaneity issues. Our results will trigger debate in similar markets around the globe on the economic benefits of LGBT workplace diversity policies for firms.
Vorheriger Artikel Ayn Rand’s Objectivist Ethics Applied to Video Game Business
Nächster Artikel Rewarding Collaborative Research: Role Congruity Bias and the Gender Pay Gap in Academe

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
The extant literature from various fields, including history, sociology, and psychology, concurs that discrimination against LGBT groups exists because of both sexual orientation and gender identity (e.g. Badgett 1995; Drydakis 2009; King and Cortina 2010; Ozeren 2014; Bonaventura and Biondo 2016).
 
2
These standards include respect, elimination and prevention of discrimination, support, and taking a stand for LGBT individuals.
 
3
LGBT workplace policy is measured through the Corporate Equality Index (CEI), which is published annually by Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the largest organization for LGBT rights in the U.S. This index rates the firms from 0 to 100 points with 100 as the highest score based on different sub-policies (e.g. sexual orientation non-discrimination policies, domestic partner benefits policies, workplace training and LGBT-supportive policy guidelines).
 
4
A detailed discussion has been included in the research design.
 
5
In 2002, the HRC (largest national LGBT civil rights organization in the USA) began conducting an annual survey to rate US firms on how they treat their LGBT employees, investors, and consumers. The HRC publishes an annual report on the Corporate Equality Index (CEI).
 
6
The HRC asks the largest organizations to submit a survey for this index. However, their compliance is voluntary, and organizations can also submit responses, if not asked by HRC. The HRC CEI measure includes a comprehensive set of sexual equality and gender-identity policies and the measure is used by extant literature. However, we acknowledge that it may not be a perfect measure due to the likelihood of certain perceptions and limitations of this organization (HRC).
 
7
Generally, the fixed effects (FE) technique is suggested for panel data estimation in the presence of unobserved firm fixed effects (e.g. Pathan 2009). However, this method (FE) may not be suitable for this study because it requires substantial variation in the variables to generate consistent and unbiased estimates. In our study, the variable of interest, CEI lacks substantial variations over time. Therefore, FE may provide imprecise estimation (Wooldridge 2002, p. 286). In addition, FE is not supported in a small number of firms over a limited time period, which is the case of our study (n = 398 and t = 4) (Baltagi et al. 2005, p. 13).
 
8
We do not report VIF results in the interest of brevity.
 
9
Lardaro (1993) suggests that multicollinearity can cause an issue if VIF exceeds 10.
 
10
We further apply restriction in our sample by including only those firms which have SONDP but not GINDP, DPB, or TG and run regression analysis. Our results remain consistent.
 
11
As a further robustness check, we also specify industry-adjusted PTC, and industry-adjusted sales turnover. Our results remain consistent.
 
12
As a robustness measure, we use the median to form CEI_dummy. Our results remain consistent.
 
13
We allow firms to be matched to multiple firms by changing the permissible difference in propensity scores to 1.0% and 0.5% in value; however, we find consistent results (untabulated).
 
14
Mean difference between the treatment and the control group is based on the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT).
 
15
The system GMM estimations are based on (Roodman 2006), using Stata module ‘xtabond2’. Refer to Roodman (2006) and Pathan (2009) for details on dynamic panel data estimations.
 
Literatur
Abdallah, W., Goergen, M., & O’Sullivan, N. (2015). Endogeneity: How failure to correct for it can cause wrong inferences and some remedies. British Journal of Management, 26(4), 791–804.
Alam, M. S., Atif, M., Chien-Chi, C., & Soytaş, U. (2019). Does corporate R&D investment affect firm environmental performance? Evidence from G-6 countries. Energy Economics, 78, 401–411.
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.
Atif, M., Huang, A., & Liu, B. (2019). Effect of say on pay on CEO compensation and spill-over effect on corporate cash holdings: Evidence from Australia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal.
Badgett, M. L. (1995). The wage effects of sexual orientation discrimination. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(4), 726–739.
Badgett, M. V., Lau, H., Sears, B., & Ho, D. (2007). Bias in the workplace: Consistent evidence of sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination.
Baker, H. K., & Anderson, R. (Eds.). (2010). Corporate governance: A synthesis of theory, research, and practice (Vol. 8). New York: Wiley.
Baltagi, B. H., Bratberg, E., & Holmås, T. H. (2005). A panel data study of physicians’ labor supply: the case of Norway. Health Economics, 14(10), 1035–1045.
Barbulescu, R., & Bidwell, M. (2013). Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organization Science, 24(3), 737–756.
Beckley, H. R. (1986). A Christian affirmation of Rawls’s idea of justice as fairness-part II. Journal of Religious Ethics, 14(2), 229.
Bidwell, M., Briscoe, F., Fernandez-Mateo, I., & Sterling, A. (2013). The employment relationship and inequality: How and why changes in employment practices are reshaping rewards in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 61–121.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
Bonaventura, L., & Biondo, A. E. (2016). Disclosure of sexual orientation in the USA and its consequences in the workplace. International Journal of Social Economics, 43(11), 1115–1123.
Bond, D., & Park, J. C. (1991). An empirical test of Rawls’s theory of justice: a second approach, in Korea and the United States. Simulation & Gaming, 22(4), 443–462.
Briscoe, F., Chin, M. K., & Hambrick, D. C. (2014). CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1786–1809.
Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A., Hughes, J., & Nahapiet, J. (1980). The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(1), 5–27.
Chapman, J. W. (1975). Rawls’ theory of justice. American Political Science Review, 69(2), 588–593.
Chen, J., Leung, W. S., & Goergen, M. (2017). The impact of board gender composition on dividend payouts. Journal of Corporate Finance, 43, 86–105.
Cohen, M. A. (2010). The narrow application of Rawls in business ethics: A political conception of both stakeholder theory and the morality of markets. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), 563–579.
Colgan, F. (2011). Equality, diversity and corporate responsibility: Sexual orientation and diversity management in the UK private sector. Equality, Diversity & Inclusion, 30(8), 719–734.
Cook, A., & Glass, C. (2016). Do women advance equity? The effect of gender leadership composition on LGBT-friendly policies in American firms. Human Relations, 69(7), 1431–1456.
Cordes, C. L. (2012). The business case for offering domestic partner benefits. Compensation & Benefits Review, 44(2), 110–116.
De Hart, J. S. (1994). Equality challenged: Equal rights and sexual difference. Journal of Policy History, 6(1), 40–72.
Dent, J. F. (1990). Strategy, organization and control: Some possibilities for accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(1–2), 3–25.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
Drydakis, N. (2009). Sexual orientation discrimination in the labour market. Labour Economics, 16(4), 364–372.
Ezzamel, M., & Bourn, M. (1990). The roles of accounting information systems in an organization experiencing financial crisis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(5), 399–424.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.
Fang, V. W., Tian, X., & Tice, S. (2014). Does stock liquidity enhance or impede firm innovation? The Journal of Finance, 69(5), 2085–2125.
Fieseler, C., Fleck, M., & Meckel, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in the blogosphere. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(4), 599–614.
Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 83–95.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
Freeman, S. (2006). The law of peoples, social cooperation, human rights, and distributive justice. Social Philosophy and Policy, 23(1), 29–68.
Gates, G. J. (2012). LGBT identity: A demographer’s perspective. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 45, 693–714.
Gavrilovic, V. (2016). Toleration and pluralism: an analysis of the contemporary debate on toleration and its practical implications on LGBT social movements and advocancy groups.
Grobler, B. R., Moloi, K. C., Loock, C. F., Bisschoff, T. C., & Mestry, R. J. (2006). Creating a school environment for the effective management of cultural diversity. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34(4), 449–472.
Gupta, A., Briscoe, F., & Hambrick, D. C. (2017). Red, blue, and purple firms: Organizational political ideology and corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 38(5), 1018–1040.
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 16–38.
Harford, J., Mansi, S. A., & Maxwell, W. F. (2008). Corporate governance and firm cash holdings in the US. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(3), 535–555.
Hopwood, A. G. (1987a). The archeology of accounting systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 207–234.
Hopwood, A. G. (1987b). Accounting and gender: An introduction. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(1), 65–69.
Jackson, S. E., & Joshi, A. (2004). Diversity in social context: A multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), 675–702.
Johnston, D., & Malina, M. A. (2008). Managing sexual orientation diversity: The impact on firm value. Group & Organization Management, 33(5), 602–625.
Kelly, G. M. (2016). Transitioning into modern society: Why the law is not keeping up with gender identity. JL & Com., 35, 101.
King, E. B., & Cortina, J. M. (2010). The social and economic imperative of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered supportive organizational policies. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3(1), 69–78.
Lardaro, L. (1993). Applied econometrics. New York: Harper Collins.
Lennox, C. S., Francis, J. R., & Wang, Z. (2011). Selection models in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 589–616.
Liddle, B. J., Luzzo, D. A., Hauenstein, A. L., & Schuck, K. (2004). Construction and validation of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered climate inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 12(1), 33–50.
Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169–184.
Lloren, A., & Parini, L. (2017). How LGBT-supportive workplace policies shape the experience of lesbian, gay men, and bisexual employees. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 14(3), 289–299.
Miller, T., & del Carmen Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755–786.
Mouritsen, J., & Kreiner, K. (2016). Accounting, decisions and promises. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 49, 21–31.
Omankhanlen, A. E., & Ogaga-Oghene, J. (2011). The impact of workforce diversity on organizational effectiveness: A study of a Nigerian bank. Annals of the University of Petroşani, Economics, 11(3), 93–110.
Østergaard, C. R., Timmermans, B., & Kristinsson, K. (2011). Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy, 40(3), 500–509.
Ozeren, E. (2014). Sexual orientation discrimination in the workplace: A systematic review of literature. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 1203–1215.
Ozturk, M. B., & Tatli, A. (2016). Gender identity inclusion in the workplace: Broadening diversity management research and practice through the case of transgender employees in the UK. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(8), 781–802.
Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345–375.
Pathan, S. (2009). Strong boards, CEO power and bank risk-taking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(7), 1340–1350.
Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480.
Petersmann, E. U. (2008). Human rights, international economic law and ‘constitutional justice’. European Journal of International Law, 19(4), 769–798.
Pichler, S., Blazovich, J. L., Cook, K. A., Huston, J. M., & Strawser, W. R. (2018). Do LGBT-supportive corporate policies enhance firm performance? Human Resource Management, 57(1), 263–278.
Pichler, S., Ruggs, E., & Trau, R. (2017). Worker outcomes of LGBT-supportive policies: A cross-level model. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 36(1), 17–32.
Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2001). Innovation: Location matters. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(4), 28.
Priola, V., Lasio, D., De Simone, S., & Serri, F. (2014). The sound of silence. Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender discrimination in ‘inclusive organizations’. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 488–502.
Ragins, B. R. (2008). Disclosure disconnects: Antecedents and consequences of disclosing invisible stigmas across life domains. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 194–215.
Ragins, B. R., & Cornwell, J. M. (2001). Pink triangles: Antecedents and consequences of perceived workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1244.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rhodes, C. (2017). Ethical praxis and the business case for LGBT diversity: Political insights from judith butler and emmanuel levinas. Gender, Work & Organization, 24(5), 533–546.
Roberts, J. (2009). No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 957–970.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
Rutherford, M. A., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2007). Investigating the relationship between board characteristics and board information. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 576–584.
Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388.
Sen, A. (1995). Gender inequality and theories of justice. In M. C. Nussbaum & J. Glover (Eds.), Women, culture and development: A study of human capabilities (pp. 259–273). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Shan, L., Fu, S., & Zheng, L. (2017). Corporate sexual equality and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 38(9), 1812–1826.
Snider, J., Hill, R. P., & Martin, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 175–187.
Stambaugh, C. T., & Carpenter, F. W. (1992). The roles of accounting and accountants in executive information systems. Accounting Horizons, 6(3), 52.
Theodorakopoulos, N., & Budhwar, P. (2015). Guest editors’ introduction: Diversity and inclusion in different work settings: Emerging patterns, challenges, and research agenda. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 177–197.
Tilscik, A. (2011). Pride and prejudice: Employment discrimination against openly gay men in the United States. Journal of Sociology, 117, 586–626.
Turnbull, H., Greenwood, R., Tworoger, L., & Golden, C. (2011). The inclusion skills measurement profile: Validating an assessment for identification of skill deficiencies in diversity and inclusion. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 15(1), 11.
Van Dijk, H., van Engen, M., & Paauwe, J. (2012). Reframing the business case for diversity: A values and virtues perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(1), 73–84.
Wang, P., & Schwarz, J. L. (2010). Stock price reactions to GLBT non-discrimination policies. Human Resource Management, 49(2), 195–216.
Webster, J. R., Adams, G. A., Maranto, C. L., Sawyer, K., & Thoroughgood, C. (2018). Workplace contextual supports for LGBT employees: A review, meta-analysis, and agenda for future research. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 193–210.
Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581–606.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Inverse probability weighted M-estimators for sample selection, attrition, and stratification. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1(2), 117–139.
Metadaten
Titel
Do LGBT Workplace Diversity Policies Create Value for Firms?
verfasst von
Mohammed Hossain
Muhammad Atif
Ammad Ahmed
Lokman Mia
Publikationsdatum
25.04.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04158-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Journal of Business Ethics 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Private Sector Corruption, Public Sector Corruption and the Organizational Structure of Foreign Subsidiaries

Original Paper

Unable to Resist the Temptation to Tell the Truth or to Lie for the Organization? Identification Makes the Difference

Original Paper

The Virtues Project: An Approach to Developing Good Leaders

Original Paper

Rewarding Collaborative Research: Role Congruity Bias and the Gender Pay Gap in Academe

Original Paper

The Deliberate Engagement of Narcissistic CEOs in Earnings Management

Original Paper

Linguistic Markers of CEO Hubris

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise