nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

03.05.2018

Blended learning at pre-service teacher education in Turkey: A systematic review

verfasst von: Abdullah Atmacasoy, Meral Aksu

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The literature shows an increase in blended learning implementations (N = 74) at faculties of education in Turkey whereas pre-service and in-service teachers’ ICT competencies have been identified as one of the areas where they are in need of professional development. This systematic review was conducted to find out the impact of blended learning on academic achievement and attitudes at teacher education programs in Turkey. 21 articles and 10 theses complying with all pre-determined criteria (i.e., studies having quantitative research design or at least a quantitative aspect conducted at pre-service teacher education programs) included within the scope of this review. With regard to academic achievement, it was synthesized that majority of the studies confirmed its positive impact on attaining course outcomes. Likewise, blended learning environment was revealed to contribute pre-service teachers to develop positive attitudes towards the courses. It was also concluded that face-to-face aspect of the courses was favoured considerably as it enhanced social interaction between peers and teachers. Other benefits of blended learning were listed as providing various materials, receiving prompt feedback, and tracking progress. Slow internet access, connection failure and anxiety in some pre-service teachers on using ICT were reported as obstacles. Regarding the positive results of blended learning and the significance of ICT integration, pre-service teacher education curricula are suggested to be reconstructed by infusing ICT into entire program through blended learning rather than delivering isolated ICT courses which may thus serve for prospective teachers as catalysts to integrate the use of ICT in their own teaching.

Vorheriger Artikel Using Slack for computer-mediated communication to support higher education students’ peer interactions during Master’s thesis seminar

Nächster Artikel The effect of simulation games on learning computer programming: A comparative study on high school students’ learning performance by assessing computational problem-solving strategies

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Admiraal, W., Vugt, F., Kranenburg, F., Koster, B., Smit, B., Weijers, S., & Lockhorst, D. (2017). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology into K-12 instruction: Evaluation of a technology-infused approach. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 105–120.CrossRef

Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. Y. (2006). A study on students’ views on blended learning environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 7(3), 43–56.

Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. Y. (2008). A study of student’s perceptions in a blended learning environment based on different learning styles. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 183–193.

Akyüz, H. I., & Kurt, M. (2010). Effect of teacher’s coaching in online discussion forums on students’ perceived self-efficacy for the educational software development. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 633–637.CrossRef

Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2017). Investigating variables predicting Turkish pre-service teachers’ integration of ICT into teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 552–570.CrossRef

Aydemir, S. (2012). Harmanlanmış öğrenme ortamının fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının bilimin doğası ve bilimsel araştırmayı anlamaları üzerine etkisi [The effect of blended learning on pre-service science teachers’ views about nature of science and scientific inquiry] (Unpublished Master Dissertation). Fırat University, Elazığ.

Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT impact report: A review of studies of ICT impact on school in Europe. European Schoolnet. Retrieved from http://colccti.colfinder.org/sites/default/files/ict_impact_report_0.pdf.

Balcı, M., & Soran, H. (2009). Students' opinions on blended learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 10(1), 21–35.

Barbour, M. K., Siko, J., Gross, E., & Waddell, K. (2013). Virtually unprepared: Examining the preparation of K-12 online teachers. In R. Hartshorne, T. L. Heafner, & T. M. Petty (Eds.), Teacher Education Programs and Online Learning Tools: Innovations in Teacher Preparation (pp. 60–81). PA: IGI Global.CrossRef

Betz, K. M., & Mitchell, J. W. (1996). Educational technology in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 4(3), 181–197.

Biçen, H., Özdamlı, F., & Uzunboylu, H. (2012). Online and blended learning approach on instructional media development courses in teacher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(4), 529–548.CrossRef

Blamire, R., Cassells, D., & Walsh, G. (2017). ITELab monitoring report 1. Brussels: European Schoolnet Retrieved from http://itelab.eun.org/documents/452109/469412/ITE+Monitoring+Report/1ff011b8-6613-4fd0-b5b8-2e188209e5a8.

Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R., & Pickard, P. (2003). Using blended learning to improve student success rates in learning to program. Journal of Educational Media, 28, 165–178.CrossRef

Bruner, J. (1999). Folk Pedagogies, in Foundations of New Reform. In J. Leach & B. Moon (Eds.), Learners and Pedagogy. London: Paul Chapman.

Cabı, E., & Yalın, H. I. (2011). Öz düzenlemeye dayalı karma öğrenimin öğrenci motivasyonuna etkisi [The effect of blended learning based on self-regulation on students’ motivation]. Educational Technology: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 125–141.

Caner, M. (2010). A blended learning model for teaching practice course. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 11(3), 78–97.

Çelik, B. (2001). Web-based history education in Turkey. Journal of the Association for History and Computing, 4(3) Retrieved from http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=jahc;view=text;rgn=main;idno=3310410.0004.302.

Çetin, İ. D. (2006). Students' and instructors' perceptions of a blended course: A case study. (Master of Science Master), Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

Çiftçi, S., Taşkaya, S. M., & Alemdar, M. (2013). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin Fatih projesine ilişkin görüşleri [The Opinions of Classroom Teachers about Fatih Project]. Elementary Education Online, 12(1), 227–240.

Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.CrossRef

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.

Çolakoğlu, Ö. M. (2009). ARCS motivasyon modeli kullanılarak oluşturulan ders modüllerinin harmanlanmış öğretim uygulamalarındaki öğrenci motivasyonuna etkisinin incelenmesi [The investigation of the effects of using course modules designed based on the ARCS motivation theory on students’ motivation on blended courses] (Unpublished Master Dissertation). Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Zonguldak.

Dağ, F. (2011). Harmanlanmış (karma) öğrenme ortamları ve tasarımına ilişkin öneriler [Suggestions on blended learning environments and design]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2), 73–97.

Delialioğlu, Ö. (2012). Student engageent in blended learning environments with lecture-based and problem-based instructional approaches. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 310–322.

Demirer, V., & Şahin, I. (2009). Effect of blended learning environment on transfer of learning: An experimental study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 518–529.CrossRef

Devaux, A., Belanger, J., Grand-Clement, S., & Manville, C. (2017). Education: Digital technology’s role in enabling skills development for a connected world. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE238.html.CrossRef

Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and Education. New York: Collier.

Dişli, Ö. (2012). Improving writing skills through supplementary computer-assisted activities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ankara: Gazi University.

Donnelly, R. (2006). Blended problem-based learning for teacher education: lessons learnt. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(2), 93–116.CrossRef

Döş, B. (2014). Developing and evaluating a blended learning course. Anthropologist, 14(1), 121–128.CrossRef

Dreyfus, H. L. (2009). On the Internet. London: Routledge.

Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. Retrieved from https://www-07.ibm.com/services/pdf/blended_learning.pdf

Ersoy, H. (2003). Blending online instruction with traditional instruction in the programming language course: A case study. (Master of Science Master), Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

Eurydice. (2015). The teaching profession in Europe: Practices, perceptions, and policies. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Finger, G., Albion, P., Jamieson-Proctor, R., Cavanagh, R., Grimbeek, P., Lloyd, M., et al. (2013). Teaching teachers for the future (TTF) Project TPACK survey: Summary of the key findings. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3), 13–25.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Orlando: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2007). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: Wiley.CrossRef

Garrisson, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95–105.CrossRef

Göktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 193–204.

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended Learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer. https://doi.org/10.2307/4022859.CrossRef

Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18(3), 4–14.CrossRef

Green, H., & Hannon, C. (2007). Their space: Education for a digital generation. London: Demos.

Green, S., & Higgins, J. (Ed.). (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, Retrieved from www.handbook.cochrane.org

Gülbahar, Y., & Guven, I. (2008). A Survey on ICT usage and the perceptions of social studies teachers in Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 37–51.

Güler, S. (2014). Podcasting in pre-service language teacher education: A constructivist perspective. (Masters of Arts Masters), Çukurova University, Adana.

Güler, B., & Şahin, M. (2016). Fen öğretiminde karma öğrenme: Öz-yeterlik inancı ve teknolojiye yönelik tutuma etkisi [Blended learning in science teaching: Effects on self-efficacy belief and attitude towards technology]. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 5(3), 908–923.

Hebebci, M. T., & Usta, E. (2015). Türkiye’de harmanlanmış öğrenme eğilimleri: Bir literatür çalışması [Blended learning trends in Turkey: A literature review study]. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(19), 195–219.CrossRef

Heterick, B., & Twigg, C. (2003). The Learning Market Space. Retrieved from http://www.thencat.org/Newsletters/Feb03.html

Joy II, E. H., & Garcia, F. E. (2000). Measuring learning effectiveness: A new look at no-significant-difference findings. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(1), 33–39.

Kahyaoğlu, Y. (2014). Bilgisayar dersinde sorgulayıcı ve harmanlanmış öğrenme ortamlarının etkilerinin araştırılması [The investigation of the effect of inquiry and blended learning environments on computer course] (Unpublished Master Dissertation). Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.

Karakaş, H., & Doğan, A. (2017). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin sınıfta kullandıkları bilgi iletişim teknolojilerine yönelik olumsuz tutumları ve yaşadıkları sorunlar [Primary school teachers’ negative attitudes towards information and communication technology (ICT) and their Problems]. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(1), 629–654.CrossRef

Karoğlu, A. K., Kiraz, E., & Özden, M. Y. (2014). Good practices in an undergraduate blended course design. Education and Science, 39(173), 249–263.

Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10.CrossRef

Kirişçioğlu, S. (2009). Fen laboratuar derslerinde harmanlanmış öğrenme etkinliğinin çeşitli boyutlarda incelenmesi [An investigation of the application of blended learning instruction in science laboratory lessons]. (Master of Science Masters), Celal Bayar University, Manisa.

Kirkwood, A. (2009). E-learning: you don’t always get what you hope for. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(2), 107–121.CrossRef

Kirschner, P. A., & Wopereis, I. G. J. H. (2003). Mindtools for teacher communities: A European perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(1), 105–124.CrossRef

Kortecamp, K., & Croninger, W. R. (1996). Addressing barriers to technology diffusion. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 5(1–2), 71–82.CrossRef

Küçük, Ş., & Şahin, I. (2013). From the perspective of community of inquiry framework: An examination of Facebook uses by pre-service teachers as a learning environment. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 142–156.

Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kupritz, V. W. (2006). Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 27–42.

Lopez-Perez, M. V., Perez-Lopez, M. C., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Teacher candidates’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56, 818–826.CrossRef

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.

Ministry of National Education (2017). About FATIH project. Retrieved from http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/en/?page_id=10.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta analyses: The PRISMA statement. Open Med, 3(3), 123–130.

Moodle (2017). (http://moodle.org/). Accessed 15 February 2017

Ocak, M. A., & Topal, A. D. (2015). Blended learning in anatomy education: A study investigating medical students’ perceptions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(3), 647–683.CrossRef

Öngöz, S. (2011). Eğitim fakültelerinde okutulan gelişim ve öğrenme dersine yönelik hazırlanan bir elektronik kitabın değerlendirilmesi [An evaluation of an e-book on development and learning theories utilized in pre-service teacher education] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon.

Orhan, F. (2008). Redesigning a course for blended learning environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 9(1), 54–66.

Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227–233.

Özerbaş, M. E., & Benli, N. (2015). Blended öğrenme ortamının öğrenci akademik başarı ve tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of blended learning on students’ academic achievement and their attitudes]. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1), 87–108.

Öztürk, E., Erdem, M., & Deryakulu, D. (2017). Toplumsal buradalık ve öğretimsel buradalığın bilişsel buradalığı yordama gücü [The predictive power of social and teaching presence on cognitive presence]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 25(4), 1319–1336.

Pamuk, S., Çakır, R., Ergun, M., Yılmaz, H. B., & Ayas, C. (2013). The use of tablet PC and interactive board from the perspectives of teachers and students: Evaluation of the FATİH Project. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1815–1822.

Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., Sieg, W., & McLaughlin, D. (2016). The effect of blended instruction on accelerated learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(3), 269–286.CrossRef

Perrow, M. (2017). Strengthening the conversation in blended and face-to-face courses: Connecting online and in-person learning with crossover protocols. College Teaching, 65(3), 97–105.CrossRef

Pesen, A. (2014). Harmanlanmış öğrenme ortamının öğretmen adaylarının akademik başarısına, ders çalışma alışkanlıklarına ve güdülenme düzeylerine etkisi [The effect of blended learning environment on academic success, studying habits and motivation of teacher candidates] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Dicle University, Diyarbakır.

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. UK: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRef

Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.

Rice, W. (2011). Moodle 2.0 e-learning course development: A complete guide to successful learning using Moodle. Birmingham: Packt Publishing.

Samsa, S., Akyüz, H. İ., Keser, H., & Numanoğlu, G. (2010). The effects of scenario based blended learning environment on attitudes of preservice technologie teachers toward teaching profession. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 11(2), 135–145.

So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51, 318–336 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009.CrossRef

Staker, H., & Horn, M. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Retrieved from the Innosight Institute website http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535180.pdf.

Sweeney, T., & Drummond, A. (2013). How prepared are our pre-service teachers to integrate technology? A pilot study. Australian Educational Computing, 27, 117–123.

Tezci, E. (2011). Factors that influence pre-service teachers’ ICT usage in education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(4), 483–499.CrossRef

The Council of Higher Education. (2007). Eğitim fakültesi öğretmen yetiştirme lisans programları [Pre-service teacher education undergraduate programs]. Retrieved from http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/10279/30217/E%C4%9E%C4%B0T%C4%B0M+FAK%C3%9CLTES%C4%B0%20%C3%96%C4%9ERETMEN+YET%C4%B0%C5%9ET%C4%B0RME+L%C4%B0SANS+PROGRAMLARI.pdf/054dfc9e-a753-42e6-a8ad-674180d6e382.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris: OECD Publishing.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). TALIS 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. TALIS: OECD Publishing.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Innovating education and educating for innovation: The power of digital technologies and skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Thompson, A., Bull, G., & Willis, J. (2002). SITE Position Paper: Statement of basic principles and suggested actions ('Ames white paper'). Retrieved from https://aace-sitestatic.s3.amazonaws.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/02/AmesWhitePaper.pdf?x51956ssss

Türel, Y. K. (2012). Öğretmenlerin akıllı tahta kullanımına yönelik olumsuz tutumları: Problemler ve ihtiyaçlar [Teachers’ negative attitudes towards the use of interactive whiteboard: Needs and problems]. İlköğretim Online, 11(2), 423–439.

Turula, A. (2017). The shallows and depths. Cognitive and social presence in blended tutoring. Technology, Pedagogy and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1370388.CrossRef

Uluyol, Ç., & Karadeniz, Ş. (2009). Bir harmanlanmış öğrenme ortamı örneği: Öğrenci başarısı ve görüşleri [An example of blended learning environment: Student achievement and perceptions]. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 60–84.

Ünsal, H. (2012). Harmanlanmış öğrenmenin başarı ve motivasyona etkisi [The effect of blended learning on achievement and motivation]. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(1), 1–27.

Usta, E., & Mahiroğlu, A. (2008). Harmanlanmış öğrenme ve çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarının akademik başarı ve doyuma etkisi [The effect of blended learning and online learning on academic achievement and learner satisfaction]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 1–15.

Uzun, A., & Özkılıç, R. (2012). Students' views on blended learning environment designed for programming languages course. E-journal of New World Sciences Academy, 7(2), 638–646.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Wetzel, K., Buss, R., Foulger, T. S., & Lindsey, L.-A. (2014). Infusing educational technology in teaching methods courses: Successes and dilemmas. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30, 89–103.CrossRef

World Economic Forum (2016). The Future of jobs: Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf

Yağcı, H., Çınarbaş, H. İ., & Hoş, R. (2016). Turkish EFL students' perceptions about blended English courses in a teacher education program. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 2(3), 959–972.

Yaman, M., & Graf, D. (2010). Evaluation of an international blended learning cooperation project in biology teacher education. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 87–96.

Yapici, İ. Ü. (2016). Effectiveness of blended cooperative learning environment in biology teaching: Classroom community sense, academic achievement and satisfaction. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1372.CrossRef

Yıldırım, S. (2007). Current utilization of ICT in Turkish basic education schools: A review of teacher’s ICT use and barriers to integration. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34(2), 171–186.

Yıldırım, İ. (2017). The effects of gamification-based teaching practices on student achievement and students' attitudes toward lesson. Internet and Higher Education, 33(86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.002.CrossRef

Yılmaz, M. B., & Orhan, F. (2010). Pre-service English teachers in blended learning environment in respect to their learning approaches. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 157–164.

Titel: Blended learning at pre-service teacher education in Turkey: A systematic review
verfasst von: Abdullah Atmacasoy
Meral Aksu
Publikationsdatum: 03.05.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9723-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Big data for online learning systems

Gender differences in an introductory programming course: New teaching approach, students’ learning outcomes, and perceptions

Digital game elements, user experience and learning: A conceptual framework

Editorial for EAIT Issue 6, 2018

Constraints to the use of online platform for teaching and learning technical education in developing countries

Mobile phone dependence: Secondary school pupils’ attitudes

Premium Partner