nach oben

Empirical Software Engineering

Erschienen in:

01.04.2015

Modelling the ‘hurried’ bug report reading process to summarize bug reports

verfasst von: Rafael Lotufo, Zeeshan Malik, Krzysztof Czarnecki

Erschienen in: Empirical Software Engineering | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Although bug reports are frequently consulted project assets, they are communication logs, by-products of bug resolution, and not artifacts created with the intent of being easy to follow. To facilitate bug report digestion, we propose a new, unsupervised, bug report summarization approach that estimates the attention a user would hypothetically give to different sentences in a bug report, when pressed with time. We pose three hypotheses on what makes a sentence relevant: discussing frequently discussed topics, being evaluated or assessed by other sentences, and keeping focused on the bug report’s title and description. Our results suggest that our hypotheses are valid, since the summaries have as much as 12 % improvement in standard summarization evaluation metrics compared to the previous approach. Our evaluation also asks developers to assess the quality and usefulness of the summaries created for bug reports they have worked on. Feedback from developers not only shows the summaries are useful, but also points out important requirements for this, and any bug summarization approach, and indicates directions for future work.

Vorheriger Artikel Do topics make sense to managers and developers?

Nächster Artikel Detecting and refactoring code smells in spreadsheet formulas

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#summary

Ankolekar A, Sycara K, Herbsleb J, Kraut R, Welty C (2006) Supporting online problem-solving communities with the semantic web. WWW

Anvik J, Hiew L, C Murphy G (2006) Who should fix this bug? In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on software engineering. ACM

Beineke P, Hastie T, Manning C (2004) Exploring sentiment summarization. AAAI

Bettenburg N, Just S, Schröter A, Weiss C, Premraj R, Zimmermann T (2008a) What makes a good bug report? SIGSOFT

Bettenburg N, Premraj R, Zimmermann T (2008b) Extracting structural information from bug reports. MSR

Blei DM, Ng Y, Jordan MI (2003) Latent dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res

Boehm B, Basili VR (2001) Software defect reduction top 10 list. IEEE Comput:34

Breu S, Premraj R, Sillito J, Zimmermann T (2010) Information needs in bug reports: improving cooperation between developers and users. Comput Supported Coop Work

Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. WWW

Büttcher S, Clarke C, Cormack G (2010) Information retrieval: implementing and evaluating search engines. MIT Press

Dit B, Marcus A (2008) Improving the readability of defect reports. RSSE

Edmundson HP (1969) New methods in automatic extracting. J ACM (JACM) 16(2)

Gasser L, Ripoche G (2003) Distributed collective practices and free/open-source software problem management: perspectives and methods. CITE

Go A, Bhayani R (2009) Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision. CS224N Project Report, Stanford

Haiduc S, Aponte J, Moreno L, Marcus A (2010) On the use of automated text summarization techniques for summarizing source code. In: 2010 17th working conference on reverse engineering (WCRE). IEEE

Hamou-Lhadj A, Lethbridge T (2006) Summarizing the content of large traces to facilitate the understanding of the behaviour of a software system. In: 14th IEEE international conference on program comprehension, 2006. ICPC 2006. IEEE

Hiew L (2006) Assisted detection of duplicate bug reports, Master’s thesis, The University of British Columbia

Hofmann T (1999) Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In: SIGIR. ACM

Lloret E, Palomar M (2012) Text summarisation in progress: a literature review. Artif Intell Rev 37(1)

Lotufo R, Malik Z, Czarnecki K (2012a) Modelling the ‘hurried’ bug report reading process for bug report summarization. ICSM

Lotufo R, Passos L, Czarnecki K (2012b) Towards improving bug tracking systems with game mechanisms. MSR

Mani S, Catherine R, Sinha VS, Dubey A (2012) Ausum: approach for unsupervised bug report summarization. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 20th international symposium on the foundations of software engineering. ACM

Mann WC, Thompson SA (1988) Rhetorical structure theory: toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3)

Menzies T, Marcus A (2008) Automated severity assessment of software defect reports. In: IEEE international conference on software maintenance, 2008. ICSM 2008. IEEE

Mihalcea R, Textrank PT (2004) Bringing order into texts. EMNLP

Murray G (2008) Summarizing spoken and written conversations. EMNLP

Nenkova A, Louis Ae (2008) Can you summarize this? Identifying correlates of input difficulty for generic multi-document summarization

Nenkova A, Passonneau R, McKeown K (2007) The pyramid method: Incorporating human content selection variation in summarization evaluation. ACM Trans Comput Logic

Porter MF et al (1980) An algorithm for suffix stripping

Quan X, Liu G, Lu Z, Ni X, Wenyin L (2009) Short text similarity based on probabilistic topics. Knowl Inf Syst

Radev DR (2004) Lexrank: graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. Artif Int

Rastkar S, Murphy GC, Murray G (2010) Summarizing software artifacts: a case study of bug reports. ICSE

Runeson P, AlexanderssonM, Nyholm O (2007) Detection of duplicate defect reports using natural language processing. In: Proceedings of the 29th international conference on software engineering

Sridhara G, Hill E, Muppaneni D, Pollock L, Vijay-Shanker K (2010) Towards automatically generating summary comments for java methods. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM international conference on automated software engineering. ACM

Strauss A, Corbin J (2008) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications

Sun B,Mitra P, Giles CL, Yen J, Zha H (2007) Topic segmentation with shared topic detection and alignment of multiple documents. SIGIR

Tang H, Tan S, Cheng X (2009) A survey on sentiment detection of reviews. Exp Syst Appl

Thung F, Lo D, Jiang L (2012) Automatic defect categorization. In: 2012 19th working conference on reverse engineering (WCRE). IEEE

Tian Y, Lo D, Sun C (2012) Information retrieval based nearest neighbor classification for fine-grained bug severity prediction. In: 2012 19th working conference on reverse engineering (WCRE). IEEE

Wang X, Zhang L, Xie T, Anvik J, Sun J (2008) An approach to detecting duplicate bug reports using natural language and execution information. In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on software engineering. ACM

Weiss C, Premraj R, Zimmermann T, Zeller A (2007) How long will it take to fix this bug? In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on mining software repositories. IEEE Computer Society

Titel: Modelling the ‘hurried’ bug report reading process to summarize bug reports
verfasst von: Rafael Lotufo
Zeeshan Malik
Krzysztof Czarnecki
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2015
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Empirical Software Engineering / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1382-3256
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7616
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-014-9311-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Green mining: a methodology of relating software change and configuration to power consumption

Guest editorial: special section on software maintenance and evolution

Do topics make sense to managers and developers?

Detecting and refactoring code smells in spreadsheet formulas

An empirical study on the importance of source code entities for requirements traceability

Understanding the impact of rapid releases on software quality