nach oben

Group Decision and Negotiation

Erschienen in:

07.03.2020

Alternative Generalized Metarationalities for Multiple Decision-Maker Conflicts

verfasst von: Leandro Chaves Rêgo, Giannini Italino Alves Vieira

Erschienen in: Group Decision and Negotiation | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this paper, we present an alternative definition for the generalized metarational stability concept to conflicts with n-decision makers (DMs) in the context of the graph model for conflict resolution. Our motivation to present this proposal lies on the fact that unlike the original definition of generalized metarationality for n-DMs, our definition coincides with the definition of generalized metarationality for conflicts involving only two DMs. Moreover, our definition also includes the symmetric metarational stability as a particular case. We also establish some properties satisfied by the proposed alternative definition.

Vorheriger Artikel Take the Right Turn: The Role of Social Signals and Action–Reaction Sequences in Enacting Turning Points in Negotiations

Nächster Artikel The Best of Both Worlds? Negotiations Between Cooperators and Individualists Provide High Economic and Relational Outcomes

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

As pointed out in Rêgo and Vieira (2018), the fact that DM i must be the first to move is not explicit in Zeng et al. (2007). However, without such assumption, every state would trivially satisfy the definition, since if DM j, \(j\ne i\), moves at s, the sequence will terminate at s.

The stability analysis made in Garcia et al. (2017) fixed one policy for each opponent of the focal DM and also the order in which DMs move. However, according to Definitions 11 and 12, it should be verified the existence of some policies and some order of moves leading the conflict to a non-preferable state for the focal DM. Here, we followed the original generalized metarational definitions.

Fang L, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM (1993) Interactive decision making: the graph model for conflict resolution. Wiley, New York

Fraser NM, Hipel KW (1979) Solving complex conflicts. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(12):805–816CrossRef

Garcia A, Hipel K, Obeidi A (2017) Water pricing conflict in British Columbia. Hydrol Res Lett 11(4):194–200CrossRef

Holding DH, Pfau HD (1985) Thinking ahead in chess. Am J Psychol 98(2):271–282CrossRef

Howard N (1971) Paradoxes of rationality: theory of metagames and political behavior, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge

Kilgour D, Hipel K (2005) The graph model for conflict resolution: past, present, and future. Group Decis Negot 14(6):441–460CrossRef

Kilgour DM, Hipel KW, Fang L (1987) The graph model for conflicts. Automatica 23(1):41–55CrossRef

Kreps D (1988) Notes on the theory of choice. Westview Press, Boulder

Myerson R (1991) Game theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Nash JF (1950) Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 36(1):48–49CrossRef

Osborne M, Rubinstein A (1994) A course in game theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge

Rêgo LC, Vieira GIA (2017) Symmetric sequential stability in the graph model for conflict resolution with multiple decision makers. Group Decis Negot 26:775–792CrossRef

Rêgo LC, Vieira GIA (2018) A note on policy equilibrium and generalized metarationalities for multiple decision-maker conflicts. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2018.2870375 CrossRef

Xu H, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM (2009) Matrix representation of solution concepts in multiple-decision-maker graph models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 39(1):96–108. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2007994 CrossRef

Xu H, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2011) Matrix representation of conflict resolution in multiple-decision-maker graph models with preference uncertainty. Group Decis Negot 20(6):755–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-010-9188-4 CrossRef

Xu H, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM, Fang L (2018) Conflict resolution using the graph model: strategic interactions in competition and cooperation. Springer, ChamCrossRef

Zeng DZ, Fang L, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM (2004) Policy stable states in the graph model for conflict resolution. Theory Decis 57(4):345–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-005-2459-x CrossRef

Zeng DZ, Fang L, Hipel K, Kilgour DM (2006) Generalized metarationalities in the graph model for conflict resolution. Discrete Appl Math 16:2430–2443CrossRef

Zeng DZ, Fang L, Hipel K, Kilgour DM (2007) Policy equilibrium and generalized metarationalities for multiple decision-maker conflicts. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 37(4):456–463CrossRef

Zhu Z, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2018) A new approach to coalition analysis within the graph model. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2018.2811402 CrossRef

Titel: Alternative Generalized Metarationalities for Multiple Decision-Maker Conflicts
verfasst von: Leandro Chaves Rêgo
Giannini Italino Alves Vieira
Publikationsdatum: 07.03.2020
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Group Decision and Negotiation / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0926-2644
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9907
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09665-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Does Incomplete Information Reduce Manipulability?

Take the Right Turn: The Role of Social Signals and Action–Reaction Sequences in Enacting Turning Points in Negotiations

Power Distribution in the Networks of Terrorist Groups: 2001–2018

The Best of Both Worlds? Negotiations Between Cooperators and Individualists Provide High Economic and Relational Outcomes

Coalitions’ Weights in a Dispersed System with Pawlak Conflict Model

Premium Partner