nach oben

Information Systems Frontiers

Erschienen in:

24.02.2016

Performance measurement of e-learning using student satisfaction analysis

verfasst von: Miroslava Raspopovic, Aleksandar Jankulovic

Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze e-learning system quality through the analysis of student satisfaction and the usage of learning materials. This analysis takes into consideration both online and traditional students who are using the same e-learning system. The goal of the analysis is to identify factors which influence student satisfaction and to address heterogeneous styles and needs of both groups of students, so that future pedagogical and motivational methods in teaching and learning can be appropriately selected, developed and implemented. It was of particular interest to explore student satisfaction with quality of an e-learning system and online study approach. Reasons that may influence opinions of online and traditional students are examined and presented. The results are used to give recommendations for e-learning improvements and to propose the model with 4 groups of dimensions for performance measurement each of which best represents satisfaction of both groups of students.

Vorheriger Artikel Geometry-based propagation of temporal constraints

Nächster Artikel Consumer decision support systems for novice buyers – a design science approach

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRef

Barolli, L., Koyama, A., Durresi, A., & Marco, G. (2006). A web-based e-learning system for increasing study efficiency by stimulating learner’s motivation. Information Systems Frontiers, 8(4), 297–306.CrossRef

Beer, M., Slack, F., & Armitt, G. (2005). Collaboration and teamwork: Immersion and presence in an online learning environment. Information Systems Frontiers, 7(1), 27–37.CrossRef

Bhuasiri, W., Haymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., & Rho, J. J. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58, 843–855.CrossRef

Carchiolo, V., Longheu, A., Malgeri, M., & Mangioni, G. (2007). A model for a web-based learning system. Information Systems Frontiers, 9(2–3), 267–282.CrossRef

Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing students’ perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and change in education. Educational Researcher, 31(4), 3–14.CrossRef

Costa, G. J. M. & Silva, N. S. A. (2010). Knowledge versus content in e-learning: A philosophical discussion. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(4), 399–413.CrossRef

Davis Jr, F. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.CrossRef

DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.CrossRef

Gibson, A. (2010). Measuring business student satisfaction: A review and summary of the major predictors. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(3), 251–259.CrossRef

Higher education statistics agency, UK, https://www.hesa.ac.uk/

Holsapple, C. & Lee-Post, A. (2006). Defining, Assessing, and Promoting E-Learning Success: An Information Systems Perspective. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 67–85.CrossRef

IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee. (2001). IEEE Computer Society, Draft standard for learning technology – learning technology systems architecture (LTSA). IEEE P1484.1/D9, 2001-11–30.

Jankulovic, A., & Raspopovic, M. (2013). Performance measures analysis for online and traditional studies. 7th International Quality Conference, Kragujevac, Serbia, 423–428.

Jung, I. (2012). Asian learners’ perception of quality in distance education and gender differences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 1–25.CrossRef

Kaplan, R., & Norton D. (1996). The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Harvard Business Press.

Kim, S. W. & Lee, M. G. (2008). Validation of an evaluation model for learning management systems. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(4), 284–294.CrossRef

Kim, Y., Song, S., Sambamurthy, V., & Lee, Y. (2012). Entrepreneurship, knowledge integration capability, and firm performance: An empirical study. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(5), 1047–1060.CrossRef

Levy, Y. (2008). An empirical development of critical value factors (CVF) of online learning activities: An application of activity theory and cognitive value theory. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1664–1675.CrossRef

Mai, L. (2005). A comparative study between UK and US: The student satisfaction in higher education and its influential factors. Journal of Marketing Management, 21(7–8), 859–878.CrossRef

Marsh, H. W., & Cheng, J. (2008). National student survey of teaching in UK universities: Dimensionality, multilevel structure, and differentiation at the level of university and discipline: Preliminary results. Retrieved June, 23(2010), 603–641.

Mun, Y. Y. & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 431–449.CrossRef

Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, M. (1995). Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80–116.CrossRef

Neely, A., Filippini, R., Forza, C., Vinelli, A., & Hii, J. (2001). A framework for analysing business performance, firm innovation and related contextual factors: perceptions of managers and policy makers in two European regions. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12(2), 114–124.CrossRef

Ozkan, S. & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1285–1296.CrossRef

Peinl, R. & Maier, R. (2011). SimKnowledge—Analyzing impact of knowledge management measures on team organizations with multi agent-based simulation. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(5), 621–636.CrossRef

Pituch, K. A. & Lee, Y. K. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2), 222–244.CrossRef

Ramayah, T. & Chow Lee, J. W. (2012). System Characteristics, Satisfaction and E-Learning Usage: A Structural Equation Model (SEM). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(2), 196–206.

Raspopovic, M., Jankulovic, A., Runic, J., & Lucic, V. (2014). Success factors for e-learning in a developing country: A case study of Serbia. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3), 1–23.CrossRef

Selim, H. M. (2003). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Computers & Education, 40(4), 343–360.CrossRef

Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396–413.CrossRef

Shee, D. Y. & Wang, Y.-S. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers & Education, 50(3), 894–905.CrossRef

van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95–108.CrossRef

Wu, H.-Y. & Lin, H.-Y. (2012). A hybrid approach to develop an analytical model for enhancing the service quality of e-learning. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1318–1338.CrossRef

Titel: Performance measurement of e-learning using student satisfaction analysis
verfasst von: Miroslava Raspopovic
Aleksandar Jankulovic
Publikationsdatum: 24.02.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9636-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

The acceptance of ‘intelligent trade shows’: Visitors’ evaluations of IS innovation

Consumer decision support systems for novice buyers – a design science approach

Ontology-based data mining model management for self-service knowledge discovery

A rapid maneuver path planning method with complex sensor pointing constraints in the attitude space

Conceptual foundations of a landmark personality scale based on a destination personality scale: Text mining of online reviews

A review of audio guides in the era of smart tourism

Premium Partner