Design and preparation of novel Diels–Alder crosslinking polymer and its application in NLO materials

All the chemicals were purchased from Aldrich or Beijing Lanyi Chemical co. ltd, which were used as received unless otherwise specified. All the organic solvents were distilled before use. ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectra were determined by Varian Gemini 300 400 MHz NMR spectrometer using tetramethylsilane as internal reference. FT-IR spectra were recorded on BIO-RAD FTS-165 spectrometer. MS spectra were obtained on MALDI-TOF Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization of Flight on BIFLEX BrukerInc. spectrometer. UV–Vis spectra were performed on Hitachi U2001 photo spectrometer. Thermal properties were determined by differential scanning calorimeter Q20, TA co under the protection of nitrogen.

Chromophore 1 (0.95 g, 1.0 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of THF. Aqueous solution of HCl (10 mL, 1 N) was added and the mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 2 h. Then, the solvent was removed and the crude product was purified by flashchromatography over silica gel using 20% ethyl acetate in hexane as eluent affording chromophore 1-OH (0.79 g, 1.82 mmol). The yield was about 90%. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CD₃COCD₃),δ : 8.53 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.12 (d, J = 15. 6 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.44 (s, 1H), 6.42 (s, 2H), 5. 26 (s, 2H), 3.87 (t, J = 4.8 Hz, 4H), 3.86 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 4H), 3.80 (t, J = 5.2 Hz, 4H) 1.64–1.68 (m, 2H), 1.28–1.49 (m, 16H), 0.87–0.90 (m, 12H). IR (KBr)ν: 3364, 2933, 2222, 1734, 1539, 1396, 1280, 1180 cm⁻¹. MS (MALDI-TOF) m/z: 744 (M + Na⁺) calc. for C₄₃H₅₅N₅O₅: 721.42.

Compound 1-OH (0.36 g, 0.5 mmol) and anthracen-9-ylmethoxy-4-oxobutanoic acid (0.31 g, 1.0 mmol) were dissolved in 50 mL CH₂Cl₂. DMAP (0.12 g, 1.0 mmol) and DCC (0.21 g, 1.0 mmol) were added to the mother solution. The reaction solution was stirred at room temperature for 5 h under argon. Then, the result solution was poured into 100 mL water and extract with CH₂Cl₂. The resulting compound was purified by silica gel column chromatography (V_EA:V_chloroform = 1:5) to give blue solid. Yield: 60%. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): 8.47 (s, 2H), 8.45 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 8.30 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 4H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 7.56 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.24 Hz, 4H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.03 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 6.48 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.39 (s, 1H), 6.29 (s, 2H), 6.16 (s, 4H), 5.23 (s, 2H), 4.02 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 4H), 3.81 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 4H), 3.30 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 4H), 2.61 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 2.56 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 4H), 1.67–1.70 (m, 2H), 1.31–1.49 (m, 16H), 0.87–0.90 (m, 12H). IR (KBr),ν: 3327, 2928, 2220, 1734, 1533, 1178, 733 cm⁻¹. MS (MALDI-TOF) m/z: 1324 (M + Na⁺), calc. for C₈₀H₈₂N₅O₁₁: 1302.55.

Methyl methacrylate(4 g, 40 mmol) and anthracen-9-ylmethyl methacrylate (2.76 g, 10 mmol) was dissolved in 50 ml 1,4-dioxacyclohexane. When all of the solid was dissolved, 2,2′-azobis(2,4-dimethyl)valeronitrile (0.05 g) was added to the solution. Nitrogen was introduced to the mixture for 0.5 h. Then the temperature was raised to 70 °C. And the temperature was kept for 8 h under the nitrogen atmosphere. The solution was slowly dropped into 500 mL ether and the white solid was precipitated. The solid was collected by filtration and washed for three times by methanol. Affording PMMA-AMA 6.12 g, yield: 90%. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): 8.76 (s, 1H), 8.10 (s, 4H), 7.68 (m, 4H), 4.68 (s, 24H), 3.59 (s, 12H), 2.15 (s, 10H), 1.68–1.83 (s, 15H).

The EO films were poled at a temperature of 75 °C under an electric field voltage of 10.5 kV for 15 min, at the first stage. And most of the chromophores were aligned in this stage. The polymer EO films were pre-polymerized at 80 °C for 5 min and the temperature were raised to 110 °C at the heating rate of about 5 °C/min, at the second stage. At the third stage, the EO films were kept at 110 °C for 20 min. Then, the temperature was reduced to room temperature and the electric field was removed.

The structure of the EO polymer is shown in Scheme 1. The synthesis process of this polymer can divide into the following steps: (1) the synthesis of NLO chromophore ETO, which is a complex process and will be described in the following part; (2) the synthesis of polymer PMMA-AMA, which is a normal free radical polymerization, excepting the large steric effect of anthracene; (3) NLO chromophore ETO, polymer PMMA-AMA and N, N-(methylenediphenyl)bismaleimide were dissolved in 1,1-dichloroethane with a appropriate ratio; (4) the solution was filtered and spin coated on ITO glass with thickness about 2–5 μm; (5) the EO films were poling and cross linking under direct current field and special temperatures. In the whole process, the poling process and cross linking process are combined into one step. And such process is the critical process. Thermodynamics of this process is studied in details using differential scanning calorimeter technologies and the result is discussed in the following part.

The structure and synthesized process of chromophore ETO is shown in Scheme 2. In our past article, the synthesis of chromophore 1 has been reported [24]. In this article, chromophore 1 is used as a starting material. After two chemical reaction, chromophore ETO can be prepared. In the first step, chromophore 1 ishydrolysized affording us chromophore 1-OH with two hydroxyl groups, which were the reactive active group in the following step. In the second step, chromophore 1-OH reacted with anthracen-9-ylmethoxy-4-oxobutanoicacid under the dehydrating agent of 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) and dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) affording us chromophore ETO.The esterification reaction used in this process is very successful, due to the high yield and mild reactive conditions.

The crosslinking process of the EO polymer is firstly studied by differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). The results are shown in Fig. 1. The sample is scanned for two times from low temperature to high temperature. At the first time, there is a strong heat absorption peak from 80 to 140 °C, which is attributed to the crosslink reaction process. Else, there is a small step at 65 °C, which is not very obvious comparing with the strong heat absorption peak. But this small step is very important, because it tells us the glass transition temperature of this complex system before the cross linking process. At the second time, such a heat absorption peak disappears, which indicates that the crosslinking process had been finished in the first scanning process. Else, there is no melting point and glass transition temperature found in the second scanning process. Such a result indicates that the crosslinking degree is very high. Such a high crosslinking degree can confirm the long term stability of this EO polymer effectively.

The crossling reaction speed was also studied by infrared spectroscopy. The results are shown in Fig. 2. The infrared absorption peaks between 800–1000 cm⁻¹ are attributed to the C–H out-of-plane bending vibration of the carbon carbon double bond including the carbon carbon double bond of maleimide, anthracene and other conjugated groups. Obviously, before the poling process, the absorption peaks between 800–1000 cm⁻¹ are very strong; after poling at 110 °C for 20 min, the absorption peak between 800–1000 cm⁻¹ is reduced significantly; the difference of the absorption peak between 800–1000 cm⁻¹ is not very obvious between poling for 20 and 30 min at 110 °C. Such a result indicates that the crosslinking process has been almost finished under the poling process at 110 °C for 20 min.

The UV–Vis spectra of the EO polymer films before poling and after poling are shown in Fig. 3. After the poling process, the maximum absorption peak for the EO film prepared by the EO polymer greatly decreases, which is used to characterize the poling efficiency by formula (4):

where ϕ is the poling parameter, A is the maximum absorption after poling and A ₀ is the maximum absorption before poling process.

The ϕ value is about 15.1%. According to the lectures, such a ϕ value is not very large [25]. This means that not all of the chromophore molecules are aligned in the poling process. Such a result is attributed to the fast crosslinking process. The crosslinking process can be finished in about 20 min; in such a short time, the chromophore molecules couldn’t be oriented sufficiently. So, there is still a large space for optimization of this kind of EO polymer system.

Else, the crosslinking process could also be determined by the UV–Vis spectra of the poling process. As shown in Fig. 3, before the poling process, there are three strong absorption peaks at 352, 369 and 389 nm, which are the characteristic absorption peaks of anthracene. After the poling process, these strong absorption peaks disappeared with accuracy up to 3%. Such a result indicates that the crosslinking process is sufficient. The EO efficient of poled film is determined by a simple reflection technique initially proposed by Teng and Man [26]. The r ₃₃ value is calculated via the following equation:

Here, r ₃₃ is the EO coefficient of the poled polymer, λ is the probing optical wavelength, θ is the incident angle, I _c is the output beam intensity, I _m is the amplitude of the modulation, V _m is the modulating voltage, and n is the refractive index of the polymer films. The EO coefficient usually depends on the concentration of chromophore. The highest r ₃₃ value for this EO polymer system is about 96.3 pm/V with the chromophore loading density of 24%. Comparing with the EO coefficients of chromophore 1 doped in guest–host system, the EO coefficient exhibited in this system was improved for about 50% [24]. Such a large improvement was attributed to large isolated groups (anthracen-9-ylmethoxy-4-oxobutanoic acid), which could reduce the intermolecular dipole interaction effectively and improve the poling efficiency.

The long-term stability of the EO activity is an important factor for device fabrication. In later fabrication, the poled EO polymer must resist temperatures up to 80 °C to complete the micro-nano-processing, such as: photo-etching, plating, etching, dicing treatment and so on. Most of these processes should withstand a certain temperature. To investigate the long-term NLO stability of the poled polymers, a normalized EO coefficient [r₃₃ (t)/r₃₃ (t₀)] was measured as a function of time at 80 °C.

Figure 4 shows that a fast decay was observed in the first 50 h for the EO film. This was due to the recovery of bond angles and bond lengths in the oriented chromophores. Next, the r ₃₃ value remained nearly constant in the remaining time. The initial r₃₃ value held 85% of its initial value after 250 h of heating at 80 °C.Comparing with the EO materials based on guest-host system reported before, such long term stability is improved greatly [24].

We have performed also quantum chemical calculations of the ground state dipole moments and nonlinear optical susceptibilities of ETO chromophore molecule using Gaussian W09 package [27, 28] at the DFT level [29, 30] in order to analyze the origin of the enhanced effects. Initial geometries of molecule was estimated by AM1 method and obtained model was subsequently optimized using DFT and B3LYP functional supplemented with the standard 6-31G(d,p) basis set [31, 32]. Shape of HOMO and LUMO (Fig. 5), ground state dipole moments and average hyperpolarizabilities were calculated applying DFT B3LYP/ 6-31G (d, p) method. The calculated ground state dipole moment value is equal to 16.8767D and average hyperpolarizability—about 2.1031 × 10⁻²⁹ esu. This is in agreement with principal role of ground state dipole moments [33].

Finally it should be added that the background surrounding the organic chromophore may also differently influence on the output susceptibilities [34‐36].