Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Marketing Letters 2/2008

01.06.2008

Hierarchical Bayesian conjoint models incorporating measurement uncertainty

verfasst von: John C. Liechty, Duncan K. H. Fong, Eelko K. R. E. Huizingh, Arnaud De Bruyn

Erschienen in: Marketing Letters | Ausgabe 2/2008

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The authors explore situations where consumers supplement their judgments with a measurement of uncertainty about their own preferences, either implicitly or explicitly, and develop two sets of hierarchical Bayesian conjoint models incorporating such measurements. The first set of models uses the relative location of a rating to determine the importance or weight given to the rating, in a regression setting. The second set uses interval judgment as a dependent variable in a regression setting. After specifying the models, the authors perform a theoretical comparison with a basic Bayesian regression model. They show that, under different conditions, the proposed models will yield more precise individual-level partworth estimates. Two simulated data examples and data from a conjoint study are used to illustrate the gains that could be obtained from modeling uncertainty. In the empirical application, the authors show that model fit improves when ratings for items that respondents do not like are given more weight compared to ratings for items that they do like.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
We make the assumption that essentially all of the relevant probability mass for each y ip is within a fixed interval (e.g., between 1 and 100). This assumption also holds for the scores given by the two different interval models. Clearly, there may be settings in which this assumption is not valid; in these cases, it is fairly straightforward to replace the normal density for the error term with a truncated normal density. The resulting model requires more sophisticated sampling strategies for the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. One sampling strategy that would work well for relaxing this error assumption is the slice sampler, which we discuss in the Appendix.
 
2
One limitation of our modeling approaches is that the models cannot distinguish between uncertainty in the judgment scores and uncertainty in the utilities; stated differently, the covariance matrix of β i does not depend on the uncertainty measurements. Extending the models so that Λ is a function of uncertainty could distinguish between uncertainty in preference statements and uncertainty about the utility vector, which represents a fruitful area for further research.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Allenby, G., Arora, N., & Ginter, J. (1995). Incorporating prior knowledge into the analysis of conjoint studies. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 152–162.CrossRef Allenby, G., Arora, N., & Ginter, J. (1995). Incorporating prior knowledge into the analysis of conjoint studies. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 152–162.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bassili, J. N., & Fletcher, J. F. (1991). Response-time measurement in survey research: A method for Cati and a new look at nonattitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 331–346.CrossRef Bassili, J. N., & Fletcher, J. F. (1991). Response-time measurement in survey research: A method for Cati and a new look at nonattitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 331–346.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bateson, J. E. G., Reibstein, D. J., & Boulding, W. (1987). Conjoint analysis reliability and validity: A framework for future research. In M. J. Houston (Ed.) Review of marketing (pp. 451–481). Chicago: American Marketing Association. Bateson, J. E. G., Reibstein, D. J., & Boulding, W. (1987). Conjoint analysis reliability and validity: A framework for future research. In M. J. Houston (Ed.) Review of marketing (pp. 451–481). Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Zurück zum Zitat Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1981). Applied regression analysis. New York: Wiley. Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1981). Applied regression analysis. New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Green, P. E., Krieger, A. M., & Wind, Y. (2001). Thirty years of conjoint analysis: Reflections and prospects. Interfaces, 31, S56–S73.CrossRef Green, P. E., Krieger, A. M., & Wind, Y. (2001). Thirty years of conjoint analysis: Reflections and prospects. Interfaces, 31, S56–S73.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 103–123.CrossRef Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 103–123.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haaijer, R., Kamakura, W., & Wedel, M. (2000). Response latencies in the analysis of conjoint choice experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 376–382.CrossRef Haaijer, R., Kamakura, W., & Wedel, M. (2000). Response latencies in the analysis of conjoint choice experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 376–382.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Laroche, M., Kim, C., & Zhou, L. (1996). Brand familiarity and confidence as determinants of purchase intention: An empirical test in a multiple brand context. Journal of Business Research, 37, 115–120.CrossRef Laroche, M., Kim, C., & Zhou, L. (1996). Brand familiarity and confidence as determinants of purchase intention: An empirical test in a multiple brand context. Journal of Business Research, 37, 115–120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lenk, P. J., DeSarbo, W. S., Green, P. E., & Young, M. R. (1996). Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: Recovery of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs. Marketing Science, 15, 173–191.CrossRef Lenk, P. J., DeSarbo, W. S., Green, P. E., & Young, M. R. (1996). Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: Recovery of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs. Marketing Science, 15, 173–191.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Newton, M. A., & Raftery, A. E. (1994). Approximate Bayesian inference by the weighted likelihood bootstrap (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 56, 3–48. Newton, M. A., & Raftery, A. E. (1994). Approximate Bayesian inference by the weighted likelihood bootstrap (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 56, 3–48.
Zurück zum Zitat Raden, D. (1985). Strength-related attitude dimensions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 312–330.CrossRef Raden, D. (1985). Strength-related attitude dimensions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 312–330.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Hierarchical Bayesian conjoint models incorporating measurement uncertainty
verfasst von
John C. Liechty
Duncan K. H. Fong
Eelko K. R. E. Huizingh
Arnaud De Bruyn
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2008
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Marketing Letters / Ausgabe 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0923-0645
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-059X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-007-9026-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2008

Marketing Letters 2/2008 Zur Ausgabe