Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Political Behavior
Erschienen in: Political Behavior 3/2009

01.09.2009 | Original Paper

The First Time is the Hardest? A Cross-National and Cross-Issue Comparison of First-Time Protest Participants

verfasst von: Joris Verhulst, Stefaan Walgrave

Erschienen in: Political Behavior | Ausgabe 3/2009

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The study aims to extend the existing knowledge about the dynamics of first-time participation in protest events. To tackle that puzzle we rely on extensive and innovative protest survey evidence covering 18 separate demonstrations in eight countries across nine different issues. On the individual level, age, motivation, and non-organizational mobilization appear to be consistent and robust predictors of first-timership. On the aggregate level, demonstrations staged just after or during a protest wave, large demonstrations, and demonstrations of old or new emotional movements are attended by a relatively larger share of first-timers. We conclude that it is thus the interplay of individual- and aggregate-level determinants that produces first-time participation.
Vorheriger Artikel Elements of Negativity: Volume and Proportion in Exposure to Negative Advertising

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
IPPS covered one demonstration in all participating nations, except for the US and the UK where respectively three (Seattle, Washington, San Francisco) and two (London and Glasgow) marches were covered. Since there were no significant differences between the respondents of these different locations, we aggregated the evidence on the country level.
 
2
By way of illustration; one of our interviewers at a certain moment was beleaguered by sans papiers, since they thought he was handing out official residence permits.
 
Literatur
Aminzade, R., & McAdam, D. (2001). Emotions and contentious politics. In R. R. Aminzade, J. A. Goldstone, D. McAdam, E. J. Perry, W. H. Sewell, S. Tarrow, & C. Tilly (Eds.), Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics (pp. 14–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bernstein, M. (2002). Identities and politics: Toward a historical understanding of the lesbian and gay movement. Social Science History, 26(3), 531–581.CrossRef
Dalton, R. J., & Wattenberg, M. (Eds.). (2001). Parties without partisans. New York: Oxford University Press.
della Porta, D., & Rucht, D. (1991). Left-libertarian movements in context: A comparison of Italy and West Germany, 1965–1990. Unpublished Manuscript, Wissenschaftzentrum Berlin.
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys. The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Downton, J., & Wehr, P. (1997). The persistent activist: How peace commitment develops and survives. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Etzioni, A. (1970). Demonstration democracy. New York: Gordon and Breach.
Freeman, J. (1975). The politics of women’s liberation. New York: Longman.
Gamson, W. A. (1990). The strategy of social protest. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (2001). Passionate politics. Emotions and social movements. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Goss, K. A. (2001). The smoking gun: How focusing events transform politics. Cambridge: Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49, 583–600. doi:10.​2307/​2095417.CrossRef
Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Blackwell.
Klandermans, B. (2004). The demand and supply of participation: Social psychological correlates of participation in social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 360–379). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRef
Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52, 519–531. doi:10.​2307/​2095297.CrossRef
Klandermans, B., & Tarrow, S. (1988). Mobilization into social movements: Synthesizing European and American approaches. In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), From structure to action: Comparing social movement research across cultures. Greenwich/London: JAI Press.
Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J.-W., & Giugni, M. (Eds.). (1995). New social movements in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Mair, P., Müller, W. C., & Plasser, F. (Eds.). (2004). Political parties and electoral change party responses to electoral markets. London: Sage.
Martinez, L. M. (2008). The individual and contextual determinants of protest among latinos. Mobilization, 13, 180–204.
Marwell, G., Aiken, M. T., & Demerath, N. J, I. I. I. (1987). The persistense of political attitudes of among 1960s civil rights activists. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(3), 359–375. doi:10.​1086/​269041.CrossRef
McAdam, D. (1988). Micromobilization contexts and the recruitment to activism. In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), From structure to action (pp. 125–154). Greenwich: JAI-Press.
Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present. Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Meyer, D. S., & Tarrow, S. (1998). A movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. In D. S. Meyer & S. Tarrow (Eds.), The social movement society (pp. 1–28). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Morris, A. D., & Braine, N. (2001). Social movements and oppositional consciousness. In J. Mansbridge & A. Morris (Eds.), Oppositional consciousness: The subjective roots of social protest (pp. 20–37). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morris, A. D., & Staggenborg, S. (2004). Leadership in social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell.
Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P., Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2005). Who demonstrates? Anti-state rebels or conventional participants? Or everyone? Comparative Politics, 2, 251–275.
Oegema, D., & Klandermans, B. (1994). Why social movement sympathizers don’t participate: Erosion and nonconversion of support. American Sociological Review, 59, 703–722. doi:10.​2307/​2096444.CrossRef
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Passy, F. (2002). Social networks matter, but how? In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.), Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pharr, S. J. (2000). Officials’ misconduct and public distrust: Japan and the trilateral countries. In S. J. Pharr & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected democracies. What is troubling the trilateral countries?. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pharr, S. J., & Putnam, R. D. (Eds.). (2000). Disaffected Democracies. What is troubling the trilateral countries?. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
Tarrow, S. (1991). Struggle, politics, and reform: Collective action, social movements and cycles of protest. Ithaca, NY: Center for International Studies, Cornell University.
Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1987 [1993]). Collective behavior (pp. 1–14, 16). New Jersey: Prentice Hall. reprinted in Curtis, R. L., & Aguirre, B. E. (1993). Collective behavior and social movements (pp. 5–20). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2001). Who is that (wo)man in the street? From the normalisation of protest to the normalisation of the protester. European Journal of Political Research, 39, 461–486. doi:10.​1111/​1475-6765.​00582.CrossRef
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Verhulst, J. (2009). February 15: The World says no to war. In S. Walgrave & D. Rucht (Eds.), Protest politics antiwar mobilization in advanced industrial democracies. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Verhulst, J., & Van Laer, J. (2009). Demonstration Diehards and Passer-by Protesters. Predicting protest sustainment using comparative paneled protest survey evidence (under review).
Walgrave, S., & Klandermans, B. (2009). Patterns of mobilization. In S. Walgrave & D. Rucht (Eds.), Protest politics antiwar mobilization in advanced industrial democracies. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Walgrave, S., & Manssens, J. (2000). The making of the white march: The mass media as a mobilizing alternative to movement organisations. Mobilization, 5, 217–239.
Walgrave, S., & Rucht, D. (Eds.). (2009). Protest politics antiwar mobilization in advanced industrial democracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Walgrave, S., & Verhulst, J. (2009a). Government stance and internal diversity of protest. A comparative study of anti-Iraqi-war protest. Social Forces, 87.
Walgrave, S., & Verhulst, J. (2009b). Protest surveying. Testing the feasibility and reliability of an innovative methodological approach to political protest (under review).
Walgrave, S., & Wagemann, C. (2009). Protest surveys in eight countries. In S. Walgrave & D. Rucht (Eds.), Protest politics. Antiwar mobilizations in advanced industrial democracies. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Whittier, N. (1997). Political generations, micro-cohorts, and the transformation of social movements. American Sociological Review, 62, 760–778. doi:10.​2307/​2657359.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The First Time is the Hardest? A Cross-National and Cross-Issue Comparison of First-Time Protest Participants
verfasst von
Joris Verhulst
Stefaan Walgrave
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2009
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Political Behavior / Ausgabe 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6687
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9083-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2009

Political Behavior 3/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Efficacy, Emotions and the Habit of Participation

Original Paper

Direct Democracy and Political Efficacy Reconsidered

Original Paper

‘Just Thinking:’ Attitude Development, Public Opinion, and Political Representation

Original Paper

The Effect of Information Signals on Strategic Voting in Mock Mayoral Elections

Original Paper

Bridging the Ideological Divide: Trust and Support for Social Security Privatization

Original Paper

Elements of Negativity: Volume and Proportion in Exposure to Negative Advertising

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise