nach oben

Public Organization Review

Erschienen in:

27.07.2018

Metabolism of Public Research Organizations: How Do Laboratories Consume State Subsidies?

verfasst von: Mario Coccia

Erschienen in: Public Organization Review | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The goal of this study is to suggest a new approach, called metabolism of research organizations, which analyzes how labs consume public funding to manage their structures. A case study of one of the biggest European public research organizations reveals that public funding for research is mainly used for the cost of personnel, which has a growth rate higher than revenue (state subsidy and public contracts over time). This imbalance of growth rates within public research body under study seems to be a source of organizational inefficiencies. This new approach can support best practices of R&D management.

Vorheriger Artikel Change Communication in Public Sector Cutback Management

Nächster Artikel Nepalese Budgetary Dynamics: Following Incrementalism or Punctuated Equilibrium?

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Boden et al. 2004; Coccia et al. 2015; cf., Barseghyan and Battaglini 2016.

Data are available to download, reuse, reproduce analyses and/or view at Coccia (2018).

Barles, S. (2010). Society, energy and materials: The contribution of urban metabolism studies to sustainable urban development issues. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53(4), 439–455.

Barseghyan, L., & Battaglini, M. (2016). Political economy of debt and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 82, 36–51.

Belle, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2015). Monetary incentives, motivation, and job effort in the public sector an experimental study with Italian government executives. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X13520460.CrossRef

Benati I., Coccia M. (2017). General trends and causes of high compensation of government managers in the OECD countries. International Journal of Public Administration (ISSN: 1532-4265). https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1318399.

Benati I., Coccia M. (2018). Rewards in bureaucracy and politics. Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance –section bureaucracy (edited by Ali Farazmand). ID: 3417, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3417-1, Springer International Publishing AG.

Boden, R., Cox, D., Nedeva, M., & Barker, K. (2004). Scrutinising science: The changing UK government of science. Houndmills-New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Bozeman B. (2000). Bureaucracy and red tape, Prentice Hall.

Bozeman, B., & Crow, M. (1990). The environments of US R&D laboratories: political and market influences. Policy Sciences, 23(1), 25–56.

Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7–8), 716–740.

Brown, M. G., & Svenson, R. A. (1998). Measuring R&D productivity. Research Technology Management, 41(6), 30–35.

Callon, M. (1994). Is science a public good? Fifth mullins lecture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute. Science, Technology and Human Values, 19, 395–424.

Central Management of Human Resource of the CNR (2017). http://www.dcp.cnr.it/ (Accessed February 2017).

Coccia, M. (2001). A basic model for evaluating R&D performance: Theory and application in Italy. R&D Management, 31(4), 453–464.

Coccia, M. (2001a). Satisfaction, work involvement and R&D performance. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 1(2/3/4), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2001.001010.CrossRef

Coccia, M. (2004). New models for measuring the R&D performance and identifying the productivity of public research institutes. R&D Management, 34(3), 267–280.

Coccia, M. (2005). A taxonomy of public research bodies: A systemic approach. Prometheus, 23(1), 63–82.

Coccia, M. (2005a). A Scientometric model for the assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes. Scientometrics, 65(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0276-1.CrossRef

Coccia, M. (2008a). New organizational behaviour of public research institutions: Lessons learned from Italian case study. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 2(4), 402–419.

Coccia, M. (2008b). Measuring scientific performance of public research units for strategic change. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 183–194.

Coccia, M. (2009). Bureaucratization in public research institutions. Minerva, A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 47(1), 31–50.

Coccia, M. (2009a). Research performance and bureaucratization within public research labs. Scientometrics, 79(1), 93–107.

Coccia, M. (2010). The asymmetric path of economic long waves. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(5), 730–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.02.003.CrossRef

Coccia, M. (2011). The interaction between public and private R&D expenditure and national productivity. Prometheus-Critical Studies in Innovation, 29(2), 121–130.

Coccia M. (2012). Organization and strategic change of public research institutions. In: L. Greenfeld (Ed.), The ideals of Joseph Ben-David (Ch. 5, pp. 73–96). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers. ISBN 13: 978-1-4128-4293-8 (hbk).

Coccia, M. (2012a). Political economy of R&D to support the modern competitiveness of nations and determinants of economic optimization and inertia. Technovation, 32(6), 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.005.CrossRef

Coccia, M. (2013). What are the likely interactions among innovation, government debt, and employment? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(4), 456–471.

Coccia, M. (2014). Converging scientific fields and new technological paradigms as main drivers of the division of scientific labour in drug discovery process: The effects on strategic management of the R&D corporate change. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(7), 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.882501.CrossRef

Coccia, M. (2014a). Structure and organisational behaviour of public research institutions under unstable growth of human resources. International Journal of Services, Technology and Management, 20(4/5/6), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTM.2014.068857.CrossRef

Coccia, M. (2016). Radical innovations as drivers of breakthroughs: Characteristics and properties of the management of technology leading to superior organizational performance in the discovery process of R&D labs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(4), 381–395.

Coccia, M. (2016a). The relation between price setting in markets and asymmetries of systems of measurement of goods. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 14(part B), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2016.06.001.CrossRef

Coccia, M. (2017). Asymmetric paths of public debts and of general government deficits across countries within and outside the European monetary unification and economic policy of debt dissolution. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 15, 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2016.10.003.CrossRef

Coccia M. (2018). Scientific data annual balance sheets of the National Research Council of Italy (CNR), 1997-2015, Mendeley data, v1 https://doi.org/10.17632/kt6mhn36yw.1 (under embargo 2019-02-16).

Coccia, M., & Bozeman, B. (2016). Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1065–1084.

Coccia, M., & Cadario, E. (2014). Organisational (un)learning of public research labs in turbulent context. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 15(2), 115–129.

Coccia, M., & Rolfo, S. (2002). Technology transfer analysis in the Italian national research council. Technovation, 22(5), 291–299.

Coccia, M., & Rolfo, S. (2007). How research policy changes can affect the organization and productivity of public research institutes. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, Research and Practice, 9(3), 215–233.

Coccia, M., & Rolfo, S. (2008). Strategic change of public research units in their scientific activity. Technovation, 28(8), 485–494.

Coccia, M., & Rolfo, S. (2009). Project management in public research organization: Strategic change in complex scenarios. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 1, 235–252.

Coccia, M., & Rolfo, S. (2010). New entrepreneurial behavior of public research organizations: Opportunities and threats of technological services supply. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 13, 134–151.

Coccia, M., & Rolfo, S. (2013). Human resource management and organizational behavior of public research institutions. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(4), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.756889.CrossRef

Coccia, M., Falavigna, G., & Manello, A. (2015). The impact of hybrid public and market-oriented financing mechanisms on scientific portfolio and performances of public research labs: A scientometric analysis. Scientometrics, 102(1), 151–168.

Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche. (2016). Conto Consuntivo dell’Esercizio Finanziario 1997–2016. Roma: CNR.

Crewson, P. E. (1997). Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(4), 499–518.

Crow, M., & Bozeman, B. (1998). Limited by design: R&D Laboratories in the U.S. National Innovation System. New York: Columbia University Press.

Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz- Menéndez, L. (2016). The effects of the economic crisis on public research: Spanish budgetary policies and research organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (Part B), 113, 157–167.

Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2018). Autonomy and Authority in Public Research Organisations: Structure and funding factors. Minerva, 56(2), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9349-1.CrossRef

Ehrenberg, R. G., Rizzo, M., & Jakubson, G. (2003). Who bears the growing cost of science at universities? NBER Working Paper, 9627.

Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Hüttler, W. (1999). Society’s metabolism. The intellectual history of material flow analysis, part II, 1970-1998. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(4), 107–136.

Frank, S. A., & Lewis, G. (2004). Government employees—Working hard or hardly working? American Review of Public Administration, 34, 36–51.

Jacoby, W. G. (1994). Public attitudes toward government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 336–361.

Keller, R. T. (2017). A longitudinal study of the individual characteristics of effective R&D project team leaders. R&D Management, 47(5), 741–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12272.CrossRef

Kennedy, C., Cuddihy, J., & Engel-Yan, J. (2007). The changing metabolism of cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(2), 43–59.

Marx, K. (1976). (1867). Capital, vol (p. 1). New York: Vintage.

Marx, K. (1978). (1865–70). Capital, vol (p. 2). New York: Vintage.

Marx, K. (1981). (1863–65). Capital, vol (p. 3). New York: Vintage.

National Science Board. (2006). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington: National Science Foundation.

Niza, S., Rosado, L., & Ferrao, P. (2009). Urban Metabolism. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(3), 384–405.

Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–36.

O’Reilly, C., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516.

OECD 2016. Main science and technology indicators: Volume 2016/1 - OECD.

OECD (2016a). Table 10. Total R&D personnel in full-time equivalent per thousand total employment, in Main Science and Technology Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/msti-v2016-1-table10-en CrossRef

OECD 2017. Gross domestic spending on R&D (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/d8b068b4-en (Accessed on 04 January 2017).

Opschoor J. B. (1997). Industrial metabolism, economic growth and institutional change (pp. 274–86). In International Handbook of Environmental Sociology, edited by Michael Redclift and Graham Woodgate. Edward Elgar, Northampton, Mass.

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage, free press. New York: MacMillan Inc..

Rapoport, E. (2011). Interdisciplinary perspectives on urban metabolism. In A review of literature, UCL environmental institute paper. London: UCL.

Readman, J., Bessant, J., Neely, A., & Twigg, D. (2018). Positioning UK research and technology organizations as outward-facing technology-bases. R&D Management, 48(1), 109–120.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.

Sanz-Menéndez L., Van Ryzin G.G. 2015. Economic crisis and public attitudes toward science: A study of regional differences in Spain. Public Understanding of Science, 24 (2): 167–182.

Stephan P. E. (2010). The economics of science, in handbook of economics of technical change, Bronwyn H. Hall and Nathan Rosenberg, editors, North Holland.

Stephan, P. E. (2012). How economics shapes science. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Weibel, A., Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2010). Pay for performance in the public sector–benefits and (hidden) costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 387–412.

Wolman, A. (1965). The metabolism of cities. Scientific American, 213(3), 179–190.

Wright, B. E. (2007). Public service and motivation: Does mission matter? Public Administration Review, 67(1), 54–64.

Titel: Metabolism of Public Research Organizations: How Do Laboratories Consume State Subsidies?
verfasst von: Mario Coccia
Publikationsdatum: 27.07.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Public Organization Review / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1566-7170
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7098
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-018-0421-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

The Fiscal Disparity and Achievement Gap between Extremely Wealthy and Poor School Districts in Illinois

Challenges of Forest Governance: the Case of Forest Rehabilitation in Vietnam

Change Communication in Public Sector Cutback Management

New Frontline Actors Emerging from Cross-Sector Collaboration: Examples from the Fire and Rescue Service Sector

Nepalese Budgetary Dynamics: Following Incrementalism or Punctuated Equilibrium?

Premium Partner