Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Quality of Life Research
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 4/2008

01.05.2008

Identifying response shift statistically at the individual level

verfasst von: Nancy E. Mayo, Susan C. Scott, Nandini Dendukuri, Sara Ahmed, Sharon Wood-Dauphinee

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 4/2008

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to explore whether a longitudinal comparison between reported and predicted health could be used as a method of identifying subjects who potentially experienced response shift.

Methods

A response-shift model was developed using data from a longitudinal study of stroke in which measures of stroke impact were made at study entry and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post stroke. Residuals from a random effects model were centered and used to create trajectories. This model was tested against a data set from a study in which the then-test had been administered. Twenty simulated data sets were also generated to examine how much of response shift could be attributed to random error.

Results

Group-based trajectory analysis identified seven trajectory groups. The majority (67%) of the 387 persons showed no response shift over time, whereas 15% lowered and 13% raised their health over time, disproportionally to that predicted.

Conclusion

Results of the validation studies were supportive that this methodology identifies response shift, but further research is required to compare results with other methodologies and other predictive models.
Vorheriger Artikel The development of the pediatric cardiac quality of life inventory: a quality of life measure for children and adolescents with heart disease
Nächster Artikel Individual quality of life: adaptive conjoint analysis as an alternative for direct weighting?

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Schwartz, C. E., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2000).Adaptation to changing health response shift in quality-of-life research(1st ed). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2.
Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1507–1515.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Oort, F. J. (2005). Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change. Quality of Life Research, 14(3), 587–598.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Teaching coping skills enhances quality of life more than peer support: Results of a randomized trial with multiple sclerosis patients. Health Psychology, 18(3), 211–220.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Scott, J., & Rantz, M. (1997). Managing chronically ill older people in the midst of the health care revolution. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 21, 55–64.PubMed
6.
Visser, M. R., Smets, E. M., Sprangers, M. A., & De Haes, H. J. (2000). How response shift may affect the measurement of change in fatigue. Journal of Pain Symptom Manage, 20(1), 12–18.CrossRef
7.
Ruta, D. A., Garratt, A. M., Leng, M., Russell, I. T., & MacDonald, L. M. (1994). A new approach to the measurement of quality of life. The Patient-Generated Index. Medical Care, 32(11), 1109–1126.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Howard, G. S. (1979). Response-shift bias: A source of contamination of self-report measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(2), 144–150.CrossRef
9.
Ahmed, S., Mayo, N. E., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Hanley, J. A., & Cohen, S. R. (2004). Response shift influenced estimates of change in health-related quality of life poststroke. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57(6), 561–570.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Ahmed, S., Mayo, N. E., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Hanley, J. A., & Cohen, S. R. (2005). The structural equation modeling technique did not show a response shift, contrary to the results of the then test and the individualized approaches. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(11), 1125–1133.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Ahmed, S., Mayo, N. E., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Hanley, J. A., & Cohen, S. R. (2005). Using the Patient Generated Index to evaluate response shift post-stroke. Quality of Life Research, 14(10), 2247–2257.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Mayo, N. E., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Cote, R., Durcan, L., & Carlton, J. (2002). Activity, participation, and quality of life six months post-stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 1035–1042.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Oort, F. J., Visser, M. R. M., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2005). An application of structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change in quality of life data from cancer patients undergoing invasive surgery. Quality of Life Research, 14, 599–609.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Ahmed, S., Mayo, N. E., Corbiere, M., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Hanley, J., & Cohen, R. (2005). Change in quality of life of people with stroke over time: True change or response shift? Quality of Life Research, 14(3), 611–627.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Brossart, D. F., Clay, D. L., & Willson, V. L. (2002). Methodological and statistical considerations for threats to internal validity in pediatric outcome data: Response shift in self-report outcomes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27(1), 97–107.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Mayo, N. E., Nadeau, L., Ahmed, S., White, C., Grad, R., & Huang, A., et al. (2007). Bridging the gap: The effectiveness of teaming a stroke coordinator with patient’s personal physician on the outcome of stroke. Age and Ageing, 37(1), 32–38.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Schwartz, C., Bode, R., Repucci, N., Becker, J., Sprangers, M., & Fayers, P. (2006). The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: A meta-analysis of response shift. Quality of Life Research, 15(9), 1533–1550.PubMedCrossRef
18.
EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy, 16(3), 199–208.CrossRef
19.
20.
Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(1), 59–65.PubMedCrossRef
21.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (2nd revision ed.). Geneva.
22.
Poissant, L., Mayo, N. E., Wood-Dauphinee, S., & Clarke, A. E. (2003). The development and preliminary validation of a Preference-Based Stroke Index (PBSI). Health Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(1), 43.CrossRef
23.
Roccaforte, W. H., Burke, W. J., Bayer, B. L., & Wengel, S. P. (1992). Validation of a telephone version of the mini-mental state examination. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40(7), 697–702.PubMed
24.
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Ware, J. E., Jr., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1994). SF-36 physical & mental scales: A user’s manual. Boston, Massachusetts: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
26.
Ware, J. E., Jr. (2000). SF-36 health survey update. Spine, 25(24), 3130–3139.
27.
Ware, J.E., Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–481.
28.
Duncan, P. W., Wallace, D., Lai, S. M., Johnson, D., Embretson, S., & Laster, L. J. (1999). The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke, 30(10), 2131–2140.PubMed
29.
Duncan, P. W., Bode, R. K., Lai, S. M., & Perera, S. (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The stroke impact scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(7), 950–963.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Duncan, P. W., Lai, S. M., Tyler, D., Perera, S., Reker, D. M., & Studenski, S. (2002). Evaluation of proxy responses to the stroke impact scale. Stroke, 33(11), 2593–2599.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Côté, R., Battista, R. N., Wolfson, C., Boucher, J., Adam, J., & Hachinski, V. (1989). The Canadian Neurological Scale: validation and reliability assessment. Neurology, 39(5), 638–643.PubMed
32.
Côté, R., Hachinski, V. C., Shurvell, B. L., Norris, J. W., & Wolfson, C. (1986). The Canadian Neurological Scale: a preliminary study in acute stroke. Stroke, 17, 731–737.PubMed
33.
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40, 373–383.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Farivar, S. S., Cunningham, W. E., & Hays, R. D. (2007). Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 Health Survey, V.I. Health Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 54.CrossRef
35.
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Shaw, J. W., Johnston, J. A., & Coons, S. J. (2005). US evaluation of the EQ-5D health states: Development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Medical Care, 43, 203–220.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Jones, B. L., Nagin, D. S., & Roeder, K. (2001). A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods Research, 29(3), 374–393.CrossRef
38.
Nagin, D. S., & Tremblay, R. E. (2001). Analyzing developmental trajectories of distinct but related behaviors: A group-based method. Psychological Methods, 6(1), 18–34.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Howard, G. S. (1979). Internal invalidity in pretest-posttest self-report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pretests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3(1), 1–23.CrossRef
40.
Sprangers, M. A., Tempelaar, R., van den Heuvel, W. J., & de Haes, H. C. (2002). Explaining quality of life with crisis theory. Psycho-oncology, 11(5), 419–426.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Norman, G. (2003). Hi! How are you? Response shift, implicit theories and differing epistemologies. Quality of Life Research, 12, 239–249.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Identifying response shift statistically at the individual level
verfasst von
Nancy E. Mayo
Susan C. Scott
Nandini Dendukuri
Sara Ahmed
Sharon Wood-Dauphinee
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2008
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 4/2008
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9329-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2008

Quality of Life Research 4/2008 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Health-related quality of life following blind rehabilitation

OriginalPaper

Individual quality of life: adaptive conjoint analysis as an alternative for direct weighting?

OriginalPaper

Health-related quality of life among adults with serious psychological distress and chronic medical conditions

OriginalPaper

Rasch analysis of the short form 8-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8)

OriginalPaper

Patterns of pain and mobility limitation in older people: cross-sectional findings from a population survey of 18,497 adults aged 50 years and over

OriginalPaper

The factorial structure of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ)

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise