Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Social Indicators Research
Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research 2/2018

08.11.2017

Twenty Years of Research on the Relationship Between Economic and Social Performance: A Meta-analysis Approach

verfasst von: Francisco J. López-Arceiz, Ana J. Bellostas, Pilar Rivera

Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between economic and social performance in an organizational context. We perform a meta-analysis to test this relationship and to examine the influence of the measurement criteria and organizational characteristics, such as activity, social orientation, technology and cultural environment. We find 678 effect sizes in 83 papers. Our results reveal a positive relationship between economic and social performance, although differences in the sign are detected depending on the measurement instrument and the type of organization.
Nächster Artikel Measurement Invariance in Multilingual Survey Research: The Role of the Language of the Questionnaire

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
We included studies of environmental management and financial performance in the meta-analysis. First, some studies, especially earlier ones, use environmental management as a proxy for social performance. Second, we found stakeholders related to environmental aims (Starik 1995). Finally, the business community tends to regard social responsibility as including both social and environmental performance (for example, BusinessWeek 1999).
 
2
We started the research process using this sequence of Boolean operators: (Social performance OR Corporate social responsibility OR Social value) AND (Economic performance OR Profitability OR Financial performance OR Economic value). We obtained 167,132 papers in SCOPUS and 452 in Web of Science. After this process, we added three elements: type of organization (socially responsible business, social enterprise and nonprofit), relationship and correlation. Web of Science offered 16 articles, and SCOPUS offered 83 papers. Those papers from Web of Science were included in SCOPUS.
 
3
A meta-analysis takes into account individual studies, but also previous meta-analyses that are introduced with a mean correlation and a SD. Consequently, this technique provides a complete set of information about the studied item.
 
4
According to Hofmann et al. (2005), there are three advantages related to the use of the correlation coefficient. First, the accumulation of findings across studies allows for a proper estimation of the mean population correlation being controlled variability. Second, the variance of population can be estimated. Finally, we can model the variability among population through the effect of potential moderators.
 
5
To evaluate the publication bias, we use Egger's test for small-study effects. The obtained results do not enable us to reject the null hypothesis (p value > 0.10). Thus, there is a little evidence of this type of bias in the studied sample.
 
6
We include in this category indicators with a frequency lower than one: financial sustainability, economic efficiency, economic efficacy, self-values, utilitarian identity, quality of service, organizational satisfaction, organizational success, and volunteer-worker relationship.
 
7
We include in this category indicators with a frequency lower than one: promotion of cultural development, existence of pension plans, promotion of research and development, definition of organization values, normative identity, knowledge update, creation of shared value, commitment to stakeholders, community development, and promotion of trust.
 
Literatur
Abiodun, Y. (2012). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firms’ profitability in Nigeria. European Journal of Economics, Finance, and Administrative Sciences, 45(1), 39–50.
Alsaid, L. (2016). Do consistent CSR activities matter for firm value? Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(1–2), 340–350.
Auamnoy, T., & Areepium, N. (2011). Could corporate social responsibility predict pharmaceutical corporate financial performance? Value in Health, 14(7), 422.
Augustine, D., Wheat, C. O., Jones, K. S., Baraldi, M., & Malgwi, C. A. (2016). Gender diversity within the workforce in the microfinance industry in Africa: Economic performance and sustainability. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 33(3), 227–241.
Aupperle, K. E. (1984). An empirical measure of corporate social orientation. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 6, 27–54.
Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446–463.
Bai, G. (2013). How do board size and occupational background of directors influence social performance in for-profit and non-profit organizations? Evidence from California hospitals. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 171–187.
Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320.
Bellostas, A. J., López-Arceiz, F. J., & Mateos, L. (2016). Social value and economic value in social enterprises: Value creation model of Spanish sheltered workshops. Voluntas, 27(1), 367–391.
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506.
Blois, K. J. (1999). Trust in business to business relationships: An evaluation of its status. Journal of Management Studies, 36(2), 197–215.
Boesso, G., Kumar, K., & Michelon, G. (2013). Descriptive, instrumental and strategic approaches to corporate social responsibility: Do they drive the financial performance of companies differently? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 26(3), 399–422.
Borzaga, C., & Fazzi, L. (2000). Azione volontaria e processi di trasformazione del settore nonprofit. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Bouckaert, L., & Vandenhove, J. (1998). Business ethics and the management of non-profit institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9–10), 1073–1081.
Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325–1343.
Brouthers, K. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 203–221.
Brown, B., & Perry, S. (1994). Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune’s “most admired” companies. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1347–1359.
Brown, B., & Perry, S. (1995). Halo-removed residuals of fortune’s responsibility to the community and environment—A decade of data. Business and Society, 34(2), 199–216.
BusinessWeek. (1999). Social responsibility and shareholder value. 3 May: 85.
Callan, S. J., & Thomas, J. M. (2009). Corporate financial performance and corporate social performance: An update and reinvestigation. CSR and Environmental Management, 16(2), 61–78.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.
Chaves, R., & Monzón, J. L. (2012). Beyond the crisis: The social economy, prop of a new model of sustainable economic development. Service Business, 6(1), 5–26.
Chen, L., Feldmann, A., & Tang, O. (2015). The relationship between disclosures of corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidences from GRI reports in manufacturing industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 170, 445–456.
Choi, J. S., Kwak, Y. M., & Choe, C. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea. Australian Journal of Management, 35(3), 291–311.
Conine, T. E., & Madden, G. P. (1986). Corporate social responsibility and investment value: The expectational relationship. Handbook of Business Strategy, 1987, 1–18.
Coombes, S. M., Morris, M. H., Allen, J. A., & Webb, J. W. (2011). Behavioural orientations of non-profit boards as a factor in entrepreneurial performance: Does governance matter? Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 829–856.
Costa, E., Andreaus, M., Carini, C., & Carpita, M. (2012). Exploring the efficiency of Italian social cooperatives by descriptive and principal component analysis. Service Business, 6(1), 117–136.
Costa, E., & Carini, C. (2016). Northern and southern Italian social cooperatives during the economic crisis: A multiple factor analysis. Service Business, 10(2), 369–392.
Deegan, C., & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 187–199.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2008). Social enterprise in Europe: Recent trends and developments. Social Enterprise Journal, 4(3), 202–228.
Di Zhang, D., & Swanson, L. A. (2013). Social entrepreneurship in nonprofit organizations: An empirical investigation of the synergy between social and business objectives. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 25(1), 105–125.
Dobre, E., Stanila, G. O., & Brad, L. (2015). The influence of environmental and social performance on financial performance: Evidence from Romania’s listed entities. Sustainability, 7(3), 2513–2553.
Farneti, F., & Guthrie, J. (2009). Sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organisations: Why they report? Accounting Forum, 33(2), 89–98.
Felício, J. A., Gonçalves, H. M., & da Conceição, V. (2013). Social value and organizational performance in non-profit social organizations: Social entrepreneurship, leadership, and socioeconomic context effects. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2139–2146.
Ferrero, I., Fernández, M. A., & Muñoz, M. J. (2016). The effect of environmental, social and governance consistency on economic results. Sustainability, 8(10), 1005.
Fontaine, C., Haarman, A., & Schmid, S. (2006). The stakeholder theory. Martolo: Edlays Education.
Freedman, M., & Stagliano, A. J. (1991). Differences in social cost disclosures: A market test of investor reactions. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 4(1), 68–83.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Gao, S., & Zhang, J. (2001). A comparative study of stakeholder engagement approaches in social auditing. In J. Andriof & M. McIntosh (Eds.), Perspectives on corporate citizenship (pp. 239–255). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
Gao, S., & Zhang, J. (2006). Stakeholder engagement, social auditing and corporate sustainability. Business Process Management Journal, 12(6), 722–740.
García-Ayuso, M., & Larrinaga, C. (2003). Environmental disclosure in Spain: Corporate characteristics and media exposure. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 32(115), 184–214.
Garcia-Castro, R., Ariño, M. A., & Canela, M. A. (2010). Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 107–126.
Garcia-Sanchez, I. M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Frias-Aceituno, J. V. (2016). Impact of the institutional macro context on the voluntary disclosure of CSR information. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 15–35.
Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 87–98.
Goyal, P., Rahman, Z., & Kazmi, A. A. (2013). Corporate sustainability performance and firm performance research: Literature review and future research agenda. Management Decision, 51(2), 361–379.
Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (2000). Beyond built to last… Stakeholder relations in “built to last” companies. Business and Society, 105(4), 393–418.
Guadamillas, F. J., Donate, M., & Škerlavaj, M. (2010). The integration of corporate social responsibility into the strategy of technology-intensive firms: A case study. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci, 28(1), 9–34.
Guo, C., & Brown, W. A. (2006). Community foundation performance: Bridging community resources and needs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(2), 267–287.
Hahn, T., & Figge, F. (2011). Beyond the bounded instrumentality in current corporate sustainability research: Toward an inclusive notion of profitability. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 325–345.
Hamid, K., Akash, R. S. I., Asghar, M., & Ahmad, S. (2011). Corporate social performance, financial performance and market value behavior: An information asymmetry perspective. African Journal of Business Management, 5(15), 6342–6349.
Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327, 557–560.
Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369–1385.
Hulgård, L. (2010). Discourses of social entrepreneurship—Variations of the same theme? Working Paper, European Research Network, Denmark.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Dichotomization of continuous variables: The implications for meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 334.
Inoue, Y., & Lee, S. (2011). Effects of different dimensions of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance in tourism-related industries. Tourism Management, 32(4), 790–804.
Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). CSR in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 371–394.
Johansen, T., & Nielsen, A. (2012). CSR in corporate self-storying-legitimacy as a question of differentiation and conformity. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(4), 434–448.
Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206–221.
Jung, K., Jang, H. S., & Seo, I. (2016). Government-driven social enterprises in South Korea: Lessons from the social enterprise promotion program in the Seoul metropolitan government. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(3), 598–616.
Kerlin, J. A. (2006). Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and learning from the differences. Voluntas, 17(3), 246–262.
Kinnell, M., & McDougall, J. (1997). Marketing in the not-for-profit sector. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Kristoffersen, I., Gerrans, P., & Clark-Murphy, M. (2008). Corporate social performance and financial performance. Accounting, Accountability and Performance, 14(2), 45–90.
Lebovics, M., Hermes, N., & Hudon, M. (2015). Are financial and social efficiency mutually exclusive? A case study of Vietnamese microfinance institutions. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 87(1), 55–77.
Lee, D. D., Faff, R. W., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2009). Revisiting the vexing question: Does superior corporate social performance lead to improved financial performance? Australian Journal of Management, 34(1), 21–49.
Leipnitz, S. (2014). Stakeholder performance measurement in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25(2), 165–181.
Li, N., Puumalainen, K., & Toppinen, A. (2014). Managerial perceptions of corporate social and financial performance in the global forest industry. International Forestry Review, 16(3), 319–338.
Lioui, A., & Sharma, Z. (2012). Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Disentangling direct and indirect effects. Ecological Economics, 78, 100–111.
Liu, G., Eng, T. Y., & Takeda, S. (2013). An investigation of marketing capabilities and social enterprise performance in the UK and Japan. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 267–298.
Liu, G., Takeda, S., & Ko, W. W. (2012). Strategic orientation and social enterprise performance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(3), 480–501.
López-Arceiz, F. J., Bellostas, A., & Rivera, M. P. (2016). The effects of resources on social activity and economic performance in social economy organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 26(4), 499–511.
Lu, W., Chau, K. W., Wang, H., & Pan, W. (2014). A decade’s debate on the nexus between corporate social and corporate financial performance: A critical review of empirical studies 2002–2011. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 195–206.
Makni, R., Francoeur, C., & Bellavance, F. (2009). Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from Canadian firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(3), 409–422.
Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J. J., Dahlgaard-Park, S. M., & Gomišček, B. (2016). Effect of sustainability-oriented innovation practices on the overall organizational performance: An empirical examination. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(9–10), 1171–1190.
Mallin, C., Farag, H., & Ow-Yong, K. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Islamic banks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 103, 21–38.
Mano, R. S. (2014). Networking modes and performance in Israel’s nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 24(4), 429–444.
Mano, R. S. (2015). Funding allocations in Israel: An empirical assessment of the new philanthropy approach. Voluntas, 26(5), 2130–2145.
Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Ann Arbor, 1001, 48109-1234.
Matei, L., & Matei, A. (2012). The social enterprise and the social entrepreneurship—Instruments of local development. A comparative study for Romania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1066–1071.
McKay, S., Moro, D., Teasdale, S., & Clifford, D. (2011). The marketisation of charities in England and Wales. Voluntas, 26(1), 336–354.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). CSR and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Teoh, S. H. (1999). Issues in the use of the event study methodology: A critical analysis of corporate social responsibility studies. Organizational Research Methods, 2(4), 340–365.
Mendoza-Abarca, K. I., Anokhin, S., & Zamudio, C. (2015). Uncovering the influence of social venture creation on commercial venture creation: A population ecology perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(6), 793–807.
Michelon, G., Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2013). Examining the link between strategic corporate social responsibility and company performance: An analysis of the best corporate citizens. CSR and Environmental Management, 20(2), 81–94.
Mickiewicz, T., Sauka, A., & Stephan, U. (2014). On the compatibility of benevolence and self-interest: Philanthropy and entrepreneurial orientation. International Small Business Journal, 34(3), 303–328.
Miles, M. P., Verreynne, M. L., & Luke, B. (2014). Social enterprises and the performance advantages of a Vincentian marketing orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(4), 549–556.
Millar, R., & Hall, K. (2013). Social return on investment (SROI) and performance measurement: The opportunities and barriers for social enterprises in health and social care. Public Management Review, 15(6), 923–941.
Miras, M. D. M., Carrasco, A., & Escobar, B. (2014). Responsabilidad social corporativa y rendimiento financiero: Un meta-análisis. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 43(2), 193–215.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Moneva, J. M., & Ortas, E. (2010). Corporate environmental and financial performance: A multivariate approach. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 110(2), 193–210.
Moore, G. (2001). Corporate social and financial performance: An investigation in the UK supermarket industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3–4), 299–315.
Morfit, S. (2014). What does corporate social responsibility mean for the technology sector? Standford Social Innovation Review, 1–3.
Nishimura, A. (2007). Conceptual analysis of value-based management and accounting: With reference to Japanese practices. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 2(1), 71–88.
Ntim, C. G. (2016). Corporate governance, corporate health accounting, and firm value: The case of HIV/AIDS disclosures in Sub-Saharan Africa. The International Journal of Accounting, 51(2), 155–216.
Oh, W., & Park, S. (2015). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in Korea. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(3), 85–94.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.
Pava, M. L., & Krausz, J. (1995). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 321–357.
Payne, A., Holt, S., & Frow, P. (2000). Integrating employee, customer and shareholder value through an enterprise performance model: An opportunity for financial services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18(6), 258–273.
Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1518–1541.
Petrie, A., Bulman, J. S., & Osborn, J. F. (2003). Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. British Dental Journal, 194(2), 73–78.
Post, L. E. (1991). Research in corporate social performance and policy. Greenwich: JAI Press.
Preston, L. E. (1978). Analyzing corporate social performance—Methods and results. Journal of Contemporary Business, 7(1), 135–150.
Preston, L. E., & O’bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship. Business and Society, 36(4), 419–429.
Quintão, C. (2007). Empresas de inserción y empresas sociales en Europa. CIRIEC-España, revista de economía pública, social y cooperativa, 59, 33–59.
Rahim, H. L., Mohtar, S., & Ramli, A. (2015). The effect of social entrepreneurial behaviour towards organizational performance: A study on Bumiputera entrepreneurs in Malaysia. International Academic Research Journal of Business and Technology, 1(2), 117–125.
Ramayah, T., Lee, J. W. C., & In, J. B. C. (2011). Network collaboration and performance in the tourism sector. Service Business, 5(4), 411–428.
Reimann, B. C. (1975). Organizational effectiveness and management’s public values: A canonical analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 18(2), 224–241.
Rhodes, J., Lok, P., Yu-Yuan, R., & Fang, S. C. (2008). An integrative model of organizational learning and social capital on effective knowledge transfer and perceived organizational performance. Journal of Workplace Learning, 20(4), 245–258.
Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2002). Meta-analysis. Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley.
Rotheroe, N., & Richards, A. (2007). Social return on investment and social enterprise: Transparent accountability for sustainable development. Social Enterprise Journal, 3(1), 31–48.
Sacchetti, S., Tortia, E., & López-Arceiz, F. J. (2016). Human resource management practices and organizational performance. The mediator role of immaterial satisfaction in Italian social cooperatives (Vol. 2, pp. 1–30). Spain: WP Zaragoza University.
Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341–350.
Sahin, K., Basfirinci, C. S., & Ozsalih, A. (2011). The impact of board composition on corporate financial and social responsibility performance: Evidence from public-listed companies in Turkey. African Journal of Business Management, 5(7), 2959–2978.
Sanchis, J. R., Campos, V., & Mohedano, A. (2013). Management in social enterprises: The influence of the use of strategic tools in business performance. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(4), 541–555.
Santos, J. B., & Brito, L. A. L. (2012). Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 9(SPE), 95–117.
Sanzo, M. J., Álvarez, L. I., Rey, M., & García, N. (2015). Business–nonprofit partnerships: A new form of collaboration in a corporate responsibility and social innovation context. Service Business, 9(4), 611–636.
Sargeant, A. (1999). Marketing management for nonprofit organizations. Oxford: University Press Oxford.
Scarlata, M., Zacharakis, A., & Walske, J. (2016). The effect of founder experience on the performance of philanthropic venture capital firms. International Small Business Journal, 34(5), 618–636.
Schaltegger, S., & Synnestvedt, T. (2002). The link between ‘green’ and economic success: Environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 65(4), 339–346.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(5), 529.
Shiva, M. M., & Suar, D. (2012). Transformational leadership, organizational culture, organizational effectiveness, and programme outcomes in non-governmental organizations. Voluntas, 23(3), 684–710.
Siciliano, J. I. (1996). The relationship between formal planning and performance in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7(4), 387–403.
Simpson, W. G., & Kohers, T. (2002). The link between corporate social and financial performance: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2), 97–109.
Singh, P. J., Sethuraman, K., & Lam, J. Y. (2017). Impact of corporate social responsibility dimensions on firm value: Some evidence from Hong Kong and China. Sustainability, 9(9), 1532.
Škare, M., & Golja, T. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance—Is there a link? Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1, 215–242.
Soana, M. G. (2011). The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance in the banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 133–148.
Starik, M. (1995). Research on organizations and the natural environment: Some paths we have traveled, the “field” ahead. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 1, 1–41.
Stevens, R., Moray, N., & Bruneel, J. (2014a). The social and economic mission of social enterprises: Dimensions, measurement, validation, and relation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(5), 1051–1082.
Stevens, R., Moray, N., Bruneel, J., & Clarysse, B. (2014b). Attention allocation to multiple goals: The case of for-profit social enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7), 1006–1016.
Suárez, D. F., & Hwang, H. (2013). Resource constraints or cultural conformity? Nonprofit relationships with businesses. Voluntas, 24(3), 581–605.
Tan, W. L., & Yoo, S. J. (2015). Social entrepreneurship intentions of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 103–125.
Tang, Z., Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2012). How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR–financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1274–1303.
Testi, E., & Bellucci, M. (2011). Measuring an organisation’s social and economic performance for public tenders. In ECPR Conference, Rejkiavik.
Valenzuela, L., Jara-Bertin, M., & Villegas, F. (2015). Social responsability practices, corporate reputation and financial performance. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55(3), 329–344.
Van de Velde, E., Vermeir, W., & Corten, F. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(3), 129–138.
Van der Laan, G., Van Ees, H., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2008). Corporate social and financial performance: An extended stakeholder theory, and empirical test with accounting measures. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 299–310.
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.
Wang, H., & Choi, J. (2013). A new look at the corporate social–financial performance relationship the moderating roles of temporal and interdomain consistency in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 39(2), 416–441.
Wang, Q., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business and Society, 55(8), 1083–1121.
Weisbrod, B. A. (2009). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.
Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3), 229–267.
Wu, M. (2006). Corporate social performance, corporate financial performance, and firm size: A meta-analysis. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(1), 163–171.
Wu, M. W., & Shen, C. H. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3529–3547.
Xiong, B., Lu, W., Skitmore, M., Chau, K. W., & Ye, M. (2016). Virtuous nexus between corporate social performance and financial performance: A study of construction enterprises in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 223–233.
Yang, C. L., Huang, R. H., & Lee, Y. C. (2014). Building a performance assessment model for social enterprises-views on social value creation. Science Journal of Business and Management, 2(1), 1–9.
Yang, F. J., Lin, C. W., & Chang, Y. N. (2010). The linkage between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance. African Journal of Business Management, 4(4), 406–413.
Metadaten
Titel
Twenty Years of Research on the Relationship Between Economic and Social Performance: A Meta-analysis Approach
verfasst von
Francisco J. López-Arceiz
Ana J. Bellostas
Pilar Rivera
Publikationsdatum
08.11.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Social Indicators Research / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1791-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Social Indicators Research 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Correction

Correction to: The Standard of Living of the Workers in a Spanish Industrial Town: Wages, Nutrition, Life Expentancy and Heigth in Alcoy (1870–1930)

OriginalPaper

Community-Based Determinants of Community Engagement: A Meta-Analysis Research

OriginalPaper

The Development and Validation of Stakeholder-Based Scale for Measuring University Social Responsibility (USR)

OriginalPaper

The Correlates of Self-Assessed Community Belonging in Canada: Social Capital, Neighbourhood Characteristics, and Rootedness

OriginalPaper

A Dignified Standard of Living in Mexico: Results of a Pilot Study of the Minimum Income Standard Approach

OriginalPaper

A Theory of Life Satisfaction Dynamics: Stability, Change and Volatility in 25-Year Life Trajectories in Germany