nach oben

Mind & Society

Erschienen in:

01.06.2015

Fearing fear: gender and economic discourse

verfasst von: Julie A. Nelson

Erschienen in: Mind & Society | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Economic discourse—or the lack of it—about fear is gendered on at least three fronts. First, while masculine-associated notions of reason and mind have historically been prioritized in mainstream economics, fear—along with other emotions and embodiment—has tended to be culturally associated with femininity. Research on cognitive “gender schema,” then, may at least partly explain the near absence of discussions of fear within economic research. Second, in the extremely rare cases where fear and emotion are alluded to within the contemporary economics literature on risk aversion, there is a tendency to (overly-)strongly associate them with women. Finally, historians and philosophers of science have suggested that the failure to consider the full range of human emotions and experience may be itself rooted in fear: a fear of the feminine. This aversion to discussing fear—especially fear as experienced by men—contributes to serious problems, especially in regard to financial market instability and ecological threats.

Vorheriger Artikel Attention deficit hyperactivity disorders, panic attacks, epileptic fits, depressions and dementias from missing out on appropriate fears and hopes

Nächster Artikel There is nothing to fear but the amygdala: applying advances in the neuropsychiatry of fear to public policy

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Gender associations are, obviously, culturally variable. Table 1 describes associations that were influential in the Enlightenment and early development of science in Europe (see Fee 1983; Keller 1985; Harding 1986). Cognitive schema may take shape differently in other contexts and time periods, and may also be formed around other binaries—for example, spiritual/material, cultured/barbarian, Western/Eastern, European/African, and so on—some of which may overlap with, or add nuance to, gendered understandings.

Perhaps this discomfort explains why Camerer's question appears as the title of a link in a Google search, but the link now goes to a paper with a different and less provocative title (working paper version of Camerer 2005).

Pope (1985, 2001) proposes a formal solution involving epistemic periodization.

Sen, for example, emphasizes that knowledge claims by an individual are dependent on a personal position that should be acknowledged (rather than denied); these claims form the foundation for stronger forms of ("trans-positional") objectivity arrived at through "discriminating aggregation" of positional views (Sen 1992, 4).

This neglect has recently been powerfully pointed out by Taleb (2010).

Arano K, Parker C et al (2010) Gender-based risk aversion and retirement asset allocation. Econ Inq 48(1):147–155CrossRef

Baron-Cohen S (2003) The essential difference: the truth about the male and female brain. Basic Books, NY

Bem SL (1981) Gender schema theory: a cognitive account of sex typing. Psychol Rev 88(4):354–364CrossRef

Bernasek A, Shwiff S (2001) Gender, risk, and retirement. J Econ Issues 35(2):345–356

Booth AL, Nolen P (2012) Gender differences in risk behaviour: does nurture matter? Econ J 122(558):F56–F78CrossRef

Bordo S (1986) The Cartesian masculinization of thought. Signs J Women Cult Soc 11(3):439–456CrossRef

Bordo S (1987) The flight to objectivity. State University of New York Press, Albany

Borghans L, Golsteyn BHH et al (2009) Gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. J Eur Econ Assoc 7(2–3):649–658CrossRef

Bruhin A, Fehr-Duda H et al (2010) Risk and rationality: uncovering heterogeneity in probability distortion. Econometrica 78(4):1375–1412CrossRef

Camerer C (2005) Three cheers—psychological, theoretical, empirical—for loss aversion. J Mark Res 42(2):129–133CrossRef

Carr PB, Steele CM (2010) Stereotype threat affects financial decision making. Psychol Sci 21:1411–1416CrossRef

Charness G, Gneezy U (2012) Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. J Econ Behav Organ 83(1):50–58CrossRef

Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J Econ Lit 47(2):448–474CrossRef

Damasio AR (1994) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Putnam’s Sons, New York

Easlea B (1980) Witch hunting, magic and the new philosophy: an introduction to debates of the scientific revolution, 1450-1750. Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands

Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2002) Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evol Hum Behav 23:281–295CrossRef

Eriksson K, Simpson B (2010) Emotional reactions to losing explain gender differences in entering a risky lottery. Judgm Decis Mak 5(3):159–163

Fee E (1983) Women’s nature and scientific objectivity. In: Lowe M, Hubbard R (eds) Women’s nature: rationalizations of inequality. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 9–27

Fehr-Duda H, De Gennaro M et al (2006) Gender, financial risk, and probability weights. Theory Dec 60:283–313CrossRef

Fine C (2010) Delusions of gender: how our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. W. W Norton, NY

Friedman M, Savage LJ (1948) The utility analysis of choices involving risk. J Polit Econ 56(4):279–304CrossRef

Google (2013) Google search for “Camerer risk aversion.” Retrieved Sept. 6, 2013

Hammond PJ (1988) Consequentialist foundations for expected utility. Theory Dec 25(1):25–78CrossRef

Harding S (1986) The science question in feminism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

Harding S (1995) Can feminist thought make economics more objective? Fem Econ 1(1):7–32CrossRef

Hartog J, Ferrer-i-Carbonell A et al (2002) Linking measured risk aversion to individual characteristics. Kyklos 55(1):3–26CrossRef

Hyde JS (2005) The gender similarities hypothesis. Am Psychol 60(6):581–592CrossRef

Jennings AL (1993) Public or private? Institutional economics and feminism. In: Ferber MA, Nelson JA (eds) Beyond economic man. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 111–129

Johnson KL, McKay L et al (2011) Why “he throws like a girl” (but only when he’s sad): emotion affects sex-decoding of biological motion displays. Cognition 119:265–280CrossRef

Jordan-Young RM (2010) Brain storm: the flaws in the science of sex differences. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Kahan DM, Braman D et al (2007) Culture and identity-protective cognition: explaining the white-male effect in risk perception. J Empirical Legal Stud 4(3):465–505CrossRef

Keller EF (1985) Reflections on gender and science. Yale University Press, New Haven

Kitcher P (2011) Science in a democratic society. Prometheus Books, New York

Knutson KM, Mah L et al (2007) Neural correlates of automatic beliefs about gender and race. Hum Brain Mapp 28:915–930CrossRef

Lindquist GS, Säve-Söderbergh J (2011) “Girls will be girls”, especially among boys: risk-taking in the “daily double” on Jeopardy. Econ Lett 112(2):158–160CrossRef

Longino H (1990) Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Lopes LL (1987) Between hope and fear: the psychology of risk. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Adv Exp Soc Psychol. Academic Press, New York. 20:255–295

Marschak J (1950) Rational behavior, uncertain prospects, and measurable utility. Econometrica 18(2):111–141CrossRef

McCloskey DN (1985) The rhetoric of economics. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

Meagher G, Nelson JA (2004) Survey article: feminism in the dismal science. J Polit Philos 12(1):102–126CrossRef

Most SB, Sorber AV et al (2007) Auditory Stroop reveals implicit gender associations in adults and children. J Exp Soc Psychol 43(2):287–294CrossRef

Nelson JA (1992) Gender, metaphor, and the definition of economics. Econ Philos 8:103–125CrossRef

Nelson JA (1996) Feminism, objectivity and economics. Routledge, London

Nelson JA (2012) Is dismissing the precautionary principle the manly thing to do? Gender and the economics of climate change. INET Research Note

Nelson JA (2013) Would women leaders have prevented the global financial crisis?’ teaching critical thinking by questioning a question. Int J Plur Econ Ed 4(2):192–209CrossRef

Nelson JA (2014) Are women really more risk-averse than men? A re-analysis of the literature using expanded methods. J Econ Surv, doi:10.1111/joes.12069

Nelson JA (Forthcoming) The power of stereotyping and confirmation bias to overwhelm accurate assessment: the case of economics, gender, and risk aversion. J Econ Methodol

Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2(2):175–220CrossRef

Nosek B, Banaji M et al. (2007). Gender-science IAT. https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/

Novemsky N, Kahneman D (2005) The boundaries of loss aversion. J Mark Res 42(2):119–128CrossRef

Olsen RA, Cox CM (2001) The influence of gender on the perception and response to investment risk: the case of professional investors. J Psychol Financ Mark 2(1):29–36CrossRef

O’Neil JM (2008) Summarizing 25 years of research on men’s gender role conflict using the gender role conflict scale: new research paradigms and clinical implications. Couns Psychol 36:358–445CrossRef

Plant EA, Hyde JS et al (2000) The gender stereotyping of emotions. Psychol Women Q 24(1):81–92CrossRef

Plumwood V (1993) Feminism and the mastery of nature. Routledge, London

Pope R (1985) Timing contradictions in Von Neumann and Morenstern’s axioms and in Savage’s ‘sure thing’ proof. Theory Dec 18(3):229–261CrossRef

Pope RE (2001) Debates on the utility of risk: a look back to move forward. In: Götschl J (ed) Evolution and progress in democracies: towards a new foundation of a knowledge society. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 273–315CrossRef

Ronay R, Kim DY (2006) Gender differences in explicit and implicit risk attitudes: a socially facilitated phenomenon. Brit J Soc Psychol 45(2):397–419CrossRef

Sen A (1992) Objectivity and position, The Lindley Lecture. University of Kansas, Kansas

Sokol-Hessner P, Camerer CF et al (2013) Emotion regulation reduces loss aversion and decreases amygdala responses to losses. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 8:341–350CrossRef

Taleb NN (2010) The Black Swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Random House, NY

Uhlmann EL, Cohen GL (2007) “I think it, therefore it’s true’’: effects of self-perceived objectivity on hiring discrimination. Organ Behav Hum Dec 104:207–223CrossRef

Titel: Fearing fear: gender and economic discourse
verfasst von: Julie A. Nelson
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Mind & Society / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1593-7879
Elektronische ISSN: 1860-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-014-0148-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

The natural frequency hypothesis and evolutionary arguments

Excellence examined

Conscious belief as constructed memory: an empirical challenge to dispositionalism

On both sides of the fence: perceptions of collective narratives and identity strategies among Palestinians in Israel and in the West Bank

There is nothing to fear but the amygdala: applying advances in the neuropsychiatry of fear to public policy

An explanatory coherence model of decision making in ill-structured problems