Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11/2015

01.11.2015 | SOCIETAL LCA

Social organizational LCA (SOLCA)—a new approach for implementing social LCA

verfasst von: Julia Martínez-Blanco, Annekatrin Lehmann, Ya-Ju Chang, Matthias Finkbeiner

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 11/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Current product social life cycle assessment (SLCA) addresses social aspects from a life cycle perspective, but it is not yet broadly implemented in practice. We propose a new organizational perspective to boost SLCA—the social organizational LCA (SOLCA). The paper answers four guiding questions: Why do we need SOLCA? How can we apply it? How can its implementation benefit from existing experience? Which are the foreseen limitations?

Methods

First, challenges of SLCA which may be overcome by an organizational perspective are identified, and potential solutions are described. An analysis of the indicators proposed by SLCA is conducted. Second, first ideas for a conceptual framework for SOLCA are developed. The two underlying methodologies: the guidelines for SLCA of products and the guidance on organizational LCA (OLCA)—which adapts product LCA to the organizational perspective—were reviewed, compared and adapted to a social organizational perspective. Third, different implementation pathways were identified, showing how SOLCA could be applied in practice by considering different levels of organizations’ experiences with social and environmental assessments.

Results and discussion

Existing SLCA case studies do not really evaluate the social performance of products. From the 189 indicators proposed in SLCA, only eight refer to the product level, while 127 and 69 refer to the organizational and country level, respectively—including overlaps and according to the methodological sheets. This fact clearly favors an organizational approach to social LCA. SOLCA may streamline allocation, data collection, and application in practice. The conceptual framework for SOLCA is focused on scope and inventory, which were found to differ most from SLCA and OLCA; all relevant steps like definition of unit of analysis or multi-functionality are addressed. Three SOLCA implementation pathways are proposed. Existing experience of organizations in social organizational approaches —like Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) or product SLCA— and environmental approaches —like environmental management systems (EMS) or OLCA— can be used as starting points as they can provide useful information on the organization´s structure, value chain, etc.

Conclusions

SOLCA helps to overcome some major challenges of SLCA and thus is a promising approach for putting it into practice. The frameworks of SLCA and OLCA can be integrated into SOLCA, and existing experience from organizations can be used for implementing it. However, new challenges arise. This includes potential difficulties for primary data collection in complex organizations with many different sites or the difficulty to distribute or aggregate social aspects within the organization. Further development and testing of SOLCA is recommended.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
The two publications “Guidelines for product social life cycle assessment” (UNEP/SETAC 2009) and “Guidance on organizational life cycle assessment” (UNEP 2015) use the acronym “S-LCA” and “O-LCA”, respectively. However, according to the International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment editorial policy, the acronym used by ISO/TS 14072, without hyphen, should be used here for “OLCA” and the same policy is used for “SLCA” and “SOLCA.”
 
2
Indicators (e.g., number of working hours) are used to measure social impacts (e.g., health and safety). Usually, several different indicators are used to assess one impact category.
 
3
The eight indicators which can refer to the product level are as follows: “number of consumer complaints,” “total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations and voluntary codes concerning health and safety impacts of products and services and type of outcomes,” “quality of or number of information/signs on product health and safety refer to the product level,” “quality of labels of health and safety requirements,” “consumer complaints regarding transparency,” “certification/label the organization obtained for the product/site,” “disputed products (labelling, etc.),” and “contribution of the product/service/ organization to economic progress."
 
4
This is the approach to be selected by the organization for setting the reporting organization. It represents the structure of the organization and its relationships with other organizations. Note: three distinct approaches can be used, the operational control, financial control, or the equity share (UNEP 2015).
 
5
Twelve indicators of the G3 and/or G4 of the GRI were already identified as transferable to SLCA in UNEP/SETAC (2013), and we consider that this applies for SOLCA as well, for example “total numbers of incidents of discrimination and actions taken,” “benefits provided to fulltime employees that are not provided to temporary or part-time employees,” “education, training, counselling, prevention and risk control programs in place to assist workforce members, their families, or community members regarding serious diseases,” etc. (GRI 2013; UNEP/SETAC (2013).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Benoît Norris C, Norris GA, Aulisio D (2014) Efficient assessment of social hotspots in the supply chains of 100 product categories using the social hotspots database. Sustainability 6:6973–6984CrossRef Benoît Norris C, Norris GA, Aulisio D (2014) Efficient assessment of social hotspots in the supply chains of 100 product categories using the social hotspots database. Sustainability 6:6973–6984CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berger M, Finkbeiner M (2013) Methodological challenges in volumetric and impact-oriented water footprints. J Ind Ecol 17:79–89CrossRef Berger M, Finkbeiner M (2013) Methodological challenges in volumetric and impact-oriented water footprints. J Ind Ecol 17:79–89CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dreyer L, Hauschild M (2006) Scoping must be done in accordance with the goal definition, also in social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:87–87CrossRef Dreyer L, Hauschild M (2006) Scoping must be done in accordance with the goal definition, also in social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:87–87CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:127–143CrossRef Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:127–143CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat EU (2013) Commission Recommendation of 9 April 2013 on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (2013/179/ EU). Official Journal of the European Union EU (2013) Commission Recommendation of 9 April 2013 on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (2013/179/ EU). Official Journal of the European Union
Zurück zum Zitat Finkbeiner M, König P (2013) Carbon footprint and life cycle assessment of organizations. J Environ Account Manag 1:55–63CrossRef Finkbeiner M, König P (2013) Carbon footprint and life cycle assessment of organizations. J Environ Account Manag 1:55–63CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2:3309–3322CrossRef Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2:3309–3322CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Franze J, Ciroth A (2011) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:366–379CrossRef Franze J, Ciroth A (2011) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:366–379CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Göbbels M, Jonker J (2003) AA1000 and SA8000 compared: a systematic comparison of contemporary accountability standards. Manag Audit J 18:54–58CrossRef Göbbels M, Jonker J (2003) AA1000 and SA8000 compared: a systematic comparison of contemporary accountability standards. Manag Audit J 18:54–58CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hosseinijou S, Mansour S, Shirazi M (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:620–645CrossRef Hosseinijou S, Mansour S, Shirazi M (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:620–645CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:371–382 (12 pp)CrossRef Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:371–382 (12 pp)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ISO (2006a) ISO 14044: environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland ISO (2006a) ISO 14044: environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
Zurück zum Zitat ISO (2006b) ISO 14040: environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland ISO (2006b) ISO 14040: environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
Zurück zum Zitat ISO (2014) ISO/TS 14072: environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines for organizational life cycle assessment. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland ISO (2014) ISO/TS 14072: environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines for organizational life cycle assessment. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen A (2013) Social LCA—a way ahead? Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:296–299CrossRef Jørgensen A (2013) Social LCA—a way ahead? Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:296–299CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild MZ (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:96–103CrossRef Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild MZ (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:96–103CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann A, Russi D, Bala A, Finkbeiner M, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2011) Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking. Sustainability 3:562–577CrossRef Lehmann A, Russi D, Bala A, Finkbeiner M, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2011) Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking. Sustainability 3:562–577CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Schebek L (2013) Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1581–1592CrossRef Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Schebek L (2013) Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1581–1592CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, Antón A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, Finkbeiner M (2014) Application challenges for the social LCA of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48CrossRef Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, Antón A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, Finkbeiner M (2014) Application challenges for the social LCA of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Martínez-Blanco J, Inaba A, Finkbeiner M (2015a) Scoping organizational LCA—challenges and solutions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:829–841CrossRef Martínez-Blanco J, Inaba A, Finkbeiner M (2015a) Scoping organizational LCA—challenges and solutions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:829–841CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Martínez-Blanco J, Inaba A, Finkbeiner M (2015b) Life cycle assessment of organizations. In: Finkbeiner M (ed) Encyclopedia of life cycle assessment, vol. 7. Spec. Forms LCA. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, (under publication) Martínez-Blanco J, Inaba A, Finkbeiner M (2015b) Life cycle assessment of organizations. In: Finkbeiner M (ed) Encyclopedia of life cycle assessment, vol. 7. Spec. Forms LCA. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, (under publication)
Zurück zum Zitat Muttel CL (2012) Framework and tools for regionalization in life cycle assessment. PhD dissertation. ETH Zurich Muttel CL (2012) Framework and tools for regionalization in life cycle assessment. PhD dissertation. ETH Zurich
Zurück zum Zitat Neugebauer S, Traverso M, Scheumann R, Chang Y-J, Wolf K, Finkbeiner M (2014) Impact pathways to address social well-being and social justice in SLCA—fair wage and level of education. Sustainability 6:4839–4857CrossRef Neugebauer S, Traverso M, Scheumann R, Chang Y-J, Wolf K, Finkbeiner M (2014) Impact pathways to address social well-being and social justice in SLCA—fair wage and level of education. Sustainability 6:4839–4857CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret JP (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:164–171CrossRef Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret JP (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:164–171CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Petti L, Ugaya CML, Cesare S Di (2014) Systematic review of social-life cycle assessment (SLCA) case studies. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) Soc. LCA progress. Pre-Proceedings 4th Int. Semin. Soc. LCA. Montpellier, France, pp 19–21 Petti L, Ugaya CML, Cesare S Di (2014) Systematic review of social-life cycle assessment (SLCA) case studies. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) Soc. LCA progress. Pre-Proceedings 4th Int. Semin. Soc. LCA. Montpellier, France, pp 19–21
Zurück zum Zitat Wu R, Yang D, Chen J (2014) Social life cycle assessment revisited. Sustainability 6:4200–4226CrossRef Wu R, Yang D, Chen J (2014) Social life cycle assessment revisited. Sustainability 6:4200–4226CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Social organizational LCA (SOLCA)—a new approach for implementing social LCA
verfasst von
Julia Martínez-Blanco
Annekatrin Lehmann
Ya-Ju Chang
Matthias Finkbeiner
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0960-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2015

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11/2015 Zur Ausgabe